Pocket
Win Rate
52.4%
Matches
1,641
KDA
2.84

Pocket vs Paradox vs Paradox

Skill Level
All Skill Levels
Matches
21,583
Version
6860
Last Updated
Nov 6, 2026 UTC
Methodology
Data Methodology

Pocket holds a 52.4% win rate advantage over Paradox based on 1,641 Deadlock matches. Pocket averages 496 more net worth, translating to earlier item power spikes. Play around your economic advantage to maximize this matchup.

Pocket Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Pocket performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
Pocket - 52.4% win rate in this matchup
Pocket
52.4% WR
VS
Paradox vs Pocket matchup - 47.6% win rate
Paradox
47.6% WR

Who Wins the Pocket vs Paradox Matchup?

Pocket wins the Pocket vs Paradox matchup
Winner
Pocket
Matches: 1,641
52.4%
Win Rate
47.6%
4.8
Avg Kills
4.7
5.3
Avg Deaths
5.1
10.2
Avg Assists
10.5
37,010
Avg Net Worth
36,514
29,049
Player DMG
28,956
4,601
Objective DMG
4,145
70.1
Last Hits
66.6

Pocket vs Paradox Matchup Summary

The Pocket vs Paradox matchup in Deadlock is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 1,641 recent matches analyzed, Pocket wins with a 52.4% win rate compared to Paradox's 47.6%, giving Pocket a 4.8 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where Pocket consistently outperforms. Pocket holds a meaningful advantage in this matchup. Paradox players should play more cautiously, prioritize safe farming, and look for team fight opportunities where positioning and coordination matter more than 1v1 statistics.

Pocket vs Paradox Combat Analysis

Pocket wins combat stats against Paradox in Deadlock

Pocket edges out Paradox in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 1,641 matches analyzed, this Pocket vs Paradox matchup remains contestable for both sides. Paradox shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Paradox's favor.

KDA Ratio
2.84Pocket
2.96Paradox
The KDA comparison between Pocket and Paradox reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Pocket averaging 2.84 and Paradox posting 2.96. This razor-thin margin demonstrates that neither hero has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, ability timing, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent hero kit advantage.
Avg Kills
4.8Pocket
4.7Paradox
Kill production between Pocket and Paradox is virtually identical, with Pocket averaging 4.8 kills per game and Paradox securing 4.7. This parity suggests both heroes are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, ability usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — lane denials, objective fights, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
5.3Pocket
5.1Paradox
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Pocket (5.3 deaths/game) and Paradox (5.1 deaths/game). Neither hero demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any hero-based survival advantage.
Player DMG
29,049Pocket
28,956Paradox
Player damage output is remarkably close in the Pocket vs Paradox matchup. Pocket deals 29,049 average damage while Paradox deals 28,956. This parity indicates both heroes apply similar pressure in fights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these heroes face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing encounters — instead, the deciding factors become ability timing, positioning, and coordination with teammates.
Objective DMG
4,601Pocket
4,145Paradox
Objective damage contribution is similar between Pocket (4,601) and Paradox (4,145). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

Pocket vs Paradox Economy Analysis

Net Worth
37,010Pocket
36,514Paradox
Last Hits
70.1Pocket
66.6Paradox

Pocket and Paradox have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. Both heroes farm at comparable rates, so lane control will depend on harassment patterns and jungle support rather than inherent farming advantages.

Recommended Items for Pocket vs Paradox

Pocket build for Paradox matchup

Pocket Build vs Paradox

This winning build for Pocket against Paradox focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 52.4% win rate against Paradox, these 7 items help Pocket press the advantage and close out games efficiently. Shadow Weave, Refresher, Ethereal Shift, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 36,800 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

Paradox build for Pocket matchup

Paradox Build vs Pocket

Paradox's counter-build against Pocket attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, Paradox players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. Mystic Reverb, Opening Rounds, Glass Cannon, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 25,600 souls Knowing Paradox's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

These item builds are optimized for the Pocket vs Paradox matchup based on win rate data from 1,641 competitive matches. Item choices in Deadlock significantly impact matchup outcomes — the right build can help overcome statistical disadvantages or extend existing advantages. Remember to adapt your build based on game state, team compositions, enemy itemization, and whether you're ahead or behind in souls.

MetaBot Desktop

Build the best team around Pocket

Comp Lab scores every pair on your team by real win rate across hundreds of thousands of matches, checks your picks against the enemy roster, and loads proven high-win-rate comps.

  • Six-hero team board
  • Pair synergy win rates
  • Proven high-win comps
Deadlock Comp Lab in MetaBot Desktop

Pocket has favorable matchups against 11 heroes and unfavorable matchups against 32 heroes in Deadlock. Pocket's strongest matchup is against Mirage with a 55.3% win rate. The hardest matchup is Graves at 37.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and build recommendations.

Pocket matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6860)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
39.15%3,1422.554.25.227,50935,903
40.27%2,9872.444.25.427,54636,083
45.17%2,8252.694.45.231,13635,980
44.62%2,8152.634.75.529,48836,542
49.57%2,7702.694.55.329,03136,327
49.43%2,6972.644.75.530,19936,382
37.13%2,5532.514.55.628,58436,522
45.56%2,4432.484.75.929,50336,109
46.49%2,4052.624.55.528,55836,339
46.04%2,2202.624.65.329,62236,088
48.18%2,2022.664.75.328,68536,751
49.47%2,1632.614.65.528,32136,583
45.04%2,0982.704.75.328,99936,502
38.48%2,0842.444.25.426,94736,650
48.23%2,0632.644.55.329,02336,631
43.50%2,0552.584.45.428,89035,526
50.66%1,9562.684.55.428,21836,496
42.23%1,9182.624.55.428,80336,785
49.42%1,8982.684.65.530,16637,205
42.43%1,8502.534.55.529,21636,252
44.08%1,8062.364.35.626,04435,672
50.76%1,7202.734.75.529,15836,843
50.41%1,7102.734.75.430,26737,172
52.41%1,6412.844.85.329,04937,010
49.62%1,5802.684.95.629,90536,743
47.47%1,5782.644.75.629,82236,445
44.73%1,5272.504.25.429,53536,183
41.61%1,4542.524.65.730,74737,455
43.73%1,4202.694.45.028,50835,510
50.86%1,3982.614.65.529,38336,919
51.49%1,2062.654.75.428,24736,683
44.34%1,1142.514.05.126,90535,553
48.56%1,0752.634.75.530,38136,268
51.06%1,0382.934.64.928,06036,173
45.47%1,0382.604.35.328,80236,288
46.60%1,0002.654.15.027,72036,852
43.57%9962.564.25.428,77735,453
43.60%9682.464.35.529,43236,031
49.53%9612.644.85.630,35437,244
50.47%9592.744.45.128,56636,239
51.21%9532.724.75.429,42536,918
55.29%9352.804.35.028,49636,742
54.53%7172.864.55.127,54236,758
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Pocket Matchups - FAQ

What is Pocket's best matchup in Deadlock?

Pocket's best matchup is against Mirage, achieving a 55.3% win rate. Pocket excels in this matchup through superior combat stats and favorable ability interactions.

What is Pocket's hardest matchup?

Pocket's hardest matchup is against Graves, with only a 37.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Pocket should focus on team coordination and itemizing defensively.

How many favorable matchups does Pocket have?

Pocket has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 32 unfavorable matchups in Deadlock. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better hero picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Pocket in difficult matchups?

When playing Pocket in difficult matchups, prioritize safe farming, positioning, and team coordination. Adjust your item build to compensate for the matchup disadvantage, and look for opportunities to impact fights through abilities rather than direct confrontation.

What stats should I focus on in Pocket's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Pocket's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average player damage, and net worth difference. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more defensively and relying on team support.