Pocket
Win Rate
46.6%
Matches
1,000
KDA
2.65

Pocket vs McGinnis vs McGinnis

Skill Level
All Skill Levels
Matches
21,583
Version
6860
Last Updated
Nov 6, 2026 UTC
Methodology
Data Methodology

Pocket faces a challenging 46.6% win rate against McGinnis in this Deadlock matchup. Data from 1,000 games shows Pocket averages 0.6 more deaths. Focus on safe farming, team coordination, and avoiding 1v1 confrontations.

Pocket Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Pocket performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
Pocket - 46.6% win rate in this matchup
Pocket
46.6% WR
VS
McGinnis vs Pocket matchup - 53.4% win rate
McGinnis
53.4% WR

Who Wins the Pocket vs McGinnis Matchup?

McGinnis wins the Pocket vs McGinnis matchup
Winner
McGinnis
Matches: 1,000
46.6%
Win Rate
53.4%
4.1
Avg Kills
3.5
5.0
Avg Deaths
4.4
9.1
Avg Assists
10.4
36,852
Avg Net Worth
36,139
27,720
Player DMG
27,641
3,675
Objective DMG
4,476
58.7
Last Hits
66.2

Pocket vs McGinnis Matchup Summary

The Pocket vs McGinnis matchup in Deadlock is a significant statistical advantage. Based on 1,000 recent matches analyzed, McGinnis wins with a 53.4% win rate compared to Pocket's 46.6%, giving McGinnis a 6.8 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where McGinnis consistently outperforms. McGinnis dominates this matchup statistically. McGinnis can play aggressively and look for solo kills, while Pocket should focus on minimizing losses, farming safely, and relying on teammates to even the odds.

Pocket vs McGinnis Combat Analysis

McGinnis wins combat stats against Pocket in Deadlock

McGinnis edges out Pocket in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 1,000 matches analyzed, this Pocket vs McGinnis matchup remains contestable for both sides. Pocket shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Pocket's favor.

KDA Ratio
2.65Pocket
3.20McGinnis
McGinnis demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Pocket, maintaining a 3.20 KDA versus 2.65. This 0.54 point gap reflects McGinnis's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Pocket players facing McGinnis should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate ability usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where McGinnis's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
4.1Pocket
3.5McGinnis
Pocket secures approximately 0.6 more kills per match than McGinnis in this head-to-head (4.1 vs 3.5). Over the course of a typical match, this translates to Pocket contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Pocket's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though McGinnis can compensate through superior objective focus, team fight positioning, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
5.0Pocket
4.4McGinnis
McGinnis survives longer in this matchup, dying 4.4 times per game compared to Pocket's 5.0 deaths. This 0.6 death difference per match means McGinnis is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. Pocket players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests McGinnis's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
Player DMG
27,720Pocket
27,641McGinnis
Player damage output is remarkably close in the Pocket vs McGinnis matchup. Pocket deals 27,720 average damage while McGinnis deals 27,641. This parity indicates both heroes apply similar pressure in fights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these heroes face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing encounters — instead, the deciding factors become ability timing, positioning, and coordination with teammates.
Objective DMG
3,675Pocket
4,476McGinnis
Objective damage contribution is similar between Pocket (3,675) and McGinnis (4,476). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

Pocket vs McGinnis Economy Analysis

Net Worth
36,852Pocket
36,139McGinnis
Last Hits
58.7Pocket
66.2McGinnis

Pocket generates approximately 713 more souls than McGinnis on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving Pocket a mid-game advantage. McGinnis secures more last hits (66.2 vs 58.7), while McGinnis leads in denies (3.3 vs 1.3). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

Recommended Items for Pocket vs McGinnis

Pocket build for McGinnis matchup

Pocket Build vs McGinnis

This optimized build for Pocket against McGinnis is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 53.4% win rate disadvantage against McGinnis, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. Arcane Surge, Cloak of Opportunity, Echo Shard, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 22,799 souls The build emphasizes early power spikes with cost-efficient items, allowing you to stay relevant even when McGinnis has an inherent advantage.

McGinnis build for Pocket matchup

McGinnis Build vs Pocket

McGinnis's recommended build against Pocket leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring McGinnis, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. Haunting Shot, Magic Carpet, Compress Cooldown, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 27,599 souls Understanding McGinnis's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

These item builds are optimized for the Pocket vs McGinnis matchup based on win rate data from 1,000 competitive matches. Item choices in Deadlock significantly impact matchup outcomes — the right build can help overcome statistical disadvantages or extend existing advantages. Remember to adapt your build based on game state, team compositions, enemy itemization, and whether you're ahead or behind in souls.

MetaBot Desktop

Build the best team around Pocket

Comp Lab scores every pair on your team by real win rate across hundreds of thousands of matches, checks your picks against the enemy roster, and loads proven high-win-rate comps.

  • Six-hero team board
  • Pair synergy win rates
  • Proven high-win comps
Deadlock Comp Lab in MetaBot Desktop

Pocket has favorable matchups against 11 heroes and unfavorable matchups against 32 heroes in Deadlock. Pocket's strongest matchup is against Mirage with a 55.3% win rate. The hardest matchup is Graves at 37.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and build recommendations.

Pocket matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6860)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
39.15%3,1422.554.25.227,50935,903
40.27%2,9872.444.25.427,54636,083
45.17%2,8252.694.45.231,13635,980
44.62%2,8152.634.75.529,48836,542
49.57%2,7702.694.55.329,03136,327
49.43%2,6972.644.75.530,19936,382
37.13%2,5532.514.55.628,58436,522
45.56%2,4432.484.75.929,50336,109
46.49%2,4052.624.55.528,55836,339
46.04%2,2202.624.65.329,62236,088
48.18%2,2022.664.75.328,68536,751
49.47%2,1632.614.65.528,32136,583
45.04%2,0982.704.75.328,99936,502
38.48%2,0842.444.25.426,94736,650
48.23%2,0632.644.55.329,02336,631
43.50%2,0552.584.45.428,89035,526
50.66%1,9562.684.55.428,21836,496
42.23%1,9182.624.55.428,80336,785
49.42%1,8982.684.65.530,16637,205
42.43%1,8502.534.55.529,21636,252
44.08%1,8062.364.35.626,04435,672
50.76%1,7202.734.75.529,15836,843
50.41%1,7102.734.75.430,26737,172
52.41%1,6412.844.85.329,04937,010
49.62%1,5802.684.95.629,90536,743
47.47%1,5782.644.75.629,82236,445
44.73%1,5272.504.25.429,53536,183
41.61%1,4542.524.65.730,74737,455
43.73%1,4202.694.45.028,50835,510
50.86%1,3982.614.65.529,38336,919
51.49%1,2062.654.75.428,24736,683
44.34%1,1142.514.05.126,90535,553
48.56%1,0752.634.75.530,38136,268
51.06%1,0382.934.64.928,06036,173
45.47%1,0382.604.35.328,80236,288
46.60%1,0002.654.15.027,72036,852
43.57%9962.564.25.428,77735,453
43.60%9682.464.35.529,43236,031
49.53%9612.644.85.630,35437,244
50.47%9592.744.45.128,56636,239
51.21%9532.724.75.429,42536,918
55.29%9352.804.35.028,49636,742
54.53%7172.864.55.127,54236,758
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Pocket Matchups - FAQ

What is Pocket's best matchup in Deadlock?

Pocket's best matchup is against Mirage, achieving a 55.3% win rate. Pocket excels in this matchup through superior combat stats and favorable ability interactions.

What is Pocket's hardest matchup?

Pocket's hardest matchup is against Graves, with only a 37.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Pocket should focus on team coordination and itemizing defensively.

How many favorable matchups does Pocket have?

Pocket has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 32 unfavorable matchups in Deadlock. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better hero picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Pocket in difficult matchups?

When playing Pocket in difficult matchups, prioritize safe farming, positioning, and team coordination. Adjust your item build to compensate for the matchup disadvantage, and look for opportunities to impact fights through abilities rather than direct confrontation.

What stats should I focus on in Pocket's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Pocket's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average player damage, and net worth difference. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more defensively and relying on team support.