
- Win Rate
- 44.5%
- Matches
- 2,855
- KDA
- 2.65
Pocket vs Haze vs Haze
- Skill Level
- All Skill Levels
- Matches
- 24,780
- Version
- 6860
- Last Updated
- Nov 7, 2026 UTC
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
Haze hard counters Pocket with only 44.5% win rate across 2,855 matches. Haze secures 2.6 more kills on average. When facing this counter, prioritize defensive items, team play, and avoid extended trades.
Pocket Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Pocket performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.
Who Wins the Pocket vs Haze Matchup?

Pocket vs Haze Matchup Summary
The Pocket vs Haze matchup in Deadlock is a decisive one-sided matchup. Based on 2,855 recent matches analyzed, Haze wins with a 55.5% win rate compared to Pocket's 44.5%, giving Haze a 11.1 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where Haze consistently outperforms. Haze has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. Pocket should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.
Pocket vs Haze Combat Analysis
Haze claims 4 out of 5 combat metrics in the Pocket vs Haze matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 2,855 ranked games reveals Haze consistently outperforms Pocket in direct combat scenarios. While Pocket manages to win one metric, the overall picture favors Haze in fights. Pocket players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Haze dominates.
Pocket vs Haze Economy Analysis
Haze vastly out-earns Pocket by 2,062 souls on average. This substantial economic gap means Haze will consistently hit item breakpoints earlier, creating a snowballing advantage throughout the game. Both heroes farm at comparable rates, so lane control will depend on harassment patterns and jungle support rather than inherent farming advantages.
Recommended Items for Pocket vs Haze
Pocket Build vs Haze







This optimized build for Pocket against Haze is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 55.5% win rate disadvantage against Haze, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. Spirit Lifesteal, Extended Magazine, Torment Pulse, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 20,000 souls The build emphasizes early power spikes with cost-efficient items, allowing you to stay relevant even when Haze has an inherent advantage.
Haze Build vs Pocket







Haze's recommended build against Pocket leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring Haze, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. Lucky Shot, Silencer, Vampiric Burst, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 44,800 souls Understanding Haze's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.
These item builds are optimized for the Pocket vs Haze matchup based on win rate data from 2,855 competitive matches. Item choices in Deadlock significantly impact matchup outcomes — the right build can help overcome statistical disadvantages or extend existing advantages. Remember to adapt your build based on game state, team compositions, enemy itemization, and whether you're ahead or behind in souls.
Build the best team around Pocket
Comp Lab scores every pair on your team by real win rate across hundreds of thousands of matches, checks your picks against the enemy roster, and loads proven high-win-rate comps.
- Six-hero team board
- Pair synergy win rates
- Proven high-win comps

Pocket has favorable matchups against 13 heroes and unfavorable matchups against 30 heroes in Deadlock. Pocket's strongest matchup is against Mirage with a 56.0% win rate. The hardest matchup is Graves at 36.5% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and build recommendations.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | Kills | Deaths | Player DMG | Net Worth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.52% | 3,057 | 2.55 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 26,396 | 35,219 | |
| 40.00% | 2,960 | 2.42 | 3.9 | 5.2 | 26,643 | 35,532 | |
| 44.45% | 2,855 | 2.65 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 28,516 | 35,896 | |
| 49.37% | 2,775 | 2.71 | 4.3 | 5.1 | 28,239 | 35,866 | |
| 49.28% | 2,709 | 2.69 | 4.6 | 5.3 | 29,593 | 36,044 | |
| 44.99% | 2,676 | 2.68 | 4.1 | 4.9 | 29,714 | 34,897 | |
| 36.52% | 2,533 | 2.50 | 4.3 | 5.4 | 27,751 | 35,990 | |
| 45.70% | 2,490 | 2.50 | 4.6 | 5.7 | 28,741 | 35,665 | |
| 46.42% | 2,441 | 2.62 | 4.4 | 5.4 | 27,932 | 35,964 | |
| 48.96% | 2,253 | 2.71 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 27,698 | 36,133 | |
| 49.88% | 2,137 | 2.64 | 4.4 | 5.3 | 27,503 | 36,006 | |
| 48.38% | 2,127 | 2.64 | 4.3 | 5.1 | 27,827 | 35,869 | |
| 43.49% | 2,127 | 2.59 | 4.3 | 5.2 | 28,480 | 35,310 | |
| 37.76% | 2,116 | 2.47 | 4.1 | 5.2 | 26,133 | 36,177 | |
| 47.99% | 2,086 | 2.71 | 4.4 | 5.0 | 28,361 | 35,419 | |
| 45.45% | 2,068 | 2.73 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 28,004 | 35,812 | |
| 48.91% | 1,969 | 2.69 | 4.5 | 5.4 | 29,551 | 36,763 | |
| 41.87% | 1,961 | 2.63 | 4.3 | 5.2 | 27,797 | 36,221 | |
| 51.11% | 1,943 | 2.74 | 4.3 | 5.1 | 27,285 | 35,958 | |
| 42.86% | 1,906 | 2.57 | 4.4 | 5.3 | 28,412 | 35,886 | |
| 44.71% | 1,823 | 2.39 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 25,193 | 35,034 | |
| 51.68% | 1,782 | 2.77 | 4.5 | 5.2 | 28,287 | 36,517 | |
| 50.82% | 1,702 | 2.80 | 4.4 | 5.1 | 29,401 | 36,639 | |
| 53.86% | 1,697 | 2.87 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 28,386 | 36,649 | |
| 47.55% | 1,594 | 2.67 | 4.6 | 5.4 | 28,933 | 35,937 | |
| 45.39% | 1,584 | 2.55 | 4.0 | 5.1 | 28,811 | 35,801 | |
| 50.00% | 1,584 | 2.69 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 29,242 | 36,286 | |
| 44.20% | 1,491 | 2.73 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 28,095 | 35,231 | |
| 41.96% | 1,442 | 2.57 | 4.4 | 5.5 | 29,626 | 36,806 | |
| 50.11% | 1,403 | 2.61 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 28,631 | 36,206 | |
| 50.94% | 1,219 | 2.63 | 4.5 | 5.2 | 27,296 | 36,174 | |
| 44.61% | 1,159 | 2.50 | 3.9 | 5.0 | 26,356 | 35,087 | |
| 45.87% | 1,090 | 2.64 | 4.2 | 5.1 | 28,134 | 35,708 | |
| 51.99% | 1,054 | 3.03 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 27,643 | 35,916 | |
| 49.33% | 1,052 | 2.68 | 4.6 | 5.2 | 29,176 | 35,623 | |
| 46.19% | 1,050 | 2.67 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 27,090 | 36,628 | |
| 43.86% | 1,001 | 2.51 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 29,327 | 36,102 | |
| 51.35% | 999 | 2.78 | 4.1 | 4.8 | 27,306 | 35,353 | |
| 43.98% | 989 | 2.56 | 4.0 | 5.2 | 27,613 | 34,872 | |
| 52.39% | 985 | 2.81 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 28,360 | 36,205 | |
| 50.56% | 983 | 2.69 | 4.7 | 5.4 | 29,521 | 36,846 | |
| 56.02% | 971 | 2.80 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 28,418 | 36,799 | |
| 55.48% | 739 | 2.91 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 27,116 | 36,554 | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Pocket Matchups - FAQ
What is Pocket's best matchup in Deadlock?
Pocket's best matchup is against Mirage, achieving a 56.0% win rate. Pocket excels in this matchup through superior combat stats and favorable ability interactions.
What is Pocket's hardest matchup?
Pocket's hardest matchup is against Graves, with only a 36.5% win rate. Against this opponent, Pocket should focus on team coordination and itemizing defensively.
How many favorable matchups does Pocket have?
Pocket has 13 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 30 unfavorable matchups in Deadlock. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better hero picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Pocket in difficult matchups?
When playing Pocket in difficult matchups, prioritize safe farming, positioning, and team coordination. Adjust your item build to compensate for the matchup disadvantage, and look for opportunities to impact fights through abilities rather than direct confrontation.
What stats should I focus on in Pocket's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Pocket's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average player damage, and net worth difference. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more defensively and relying on team support.
