- Win Rate
- 48.2%
- Matches
- 2,202
- KDA
- 2.66
Pocket vs Shiv vs Shiv
- Skill Level
- All Skill Levels
- Matches
- 21,583
- Version
- 6860
- Last Updated
- Nov 6, 2026 UTC
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
Pocket faces a challenging 48.2% win rate against Shiv in this Deadlock matchup. Data from 2,202 games shows Pocket averages -0.2 more deaths. Focus on safe farming, team coordination, and avoiding 1v1 confrontations.
Pocket Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Pocket performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.
Who Wins the Pocket vs Shiv Matchup?
Pocket vs Shiv Matchup Summary
The Pocket vs Shiv matchup in Deadlock is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 2,202 recent matches analyzed, Shiv wins with a 51.8% win rate compared to Pocket's 48.2%, giving Shiv a 3.6 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where Pocket consistently outperforms. Shiv holds a meaningful advantage in this matchup. Pocket players should play more cautiously, prioritize safe farming, and look for team fight opportunities where positioning and coordination matter more than 1v1 statistics.
Pocket vs Shiv Combat Analysis
Pocket edges out Shiv in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in survivability, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 2,202 matches analyzed, this Pocket vs Shiv matchup remains contestable for both sides. Shiv shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Shiv's favor.
Pocket vs Shiv Economy Analysis
Pocket generates approximately 650 more souls than Shiv on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving Pocket a mid-game advantage. Pocket secures more last hits (66.7 vs 50.1), while Shiv leads in denies (1.7 vs 1.7). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.
Recommended Items for Pocket vs Shiv
Pocket Build vs Shiv
This optimized build for Pocket against Shiv is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 51.8% win rate disadvantage against Shiv, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. Shadow Strike, Spirit Lifesteal, Seraphim Wings, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 39,198 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.
Shiv Build vs Pocket
Shiv's recommended build against Pocket leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring Shiv, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. Long Range, Mystic Conduit, Escalating Exposure, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 35,599 souls Understanding Shiv's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.
These item builds are optimized for the Pocket vs Shiv matchup based on win rate data from 2,202 competitive matches. Item choices in Deadlock significantly impact matchup outcomes — the right build can help overcome statistical disadvantages or extend existing advantages. Remember to adapt your build based on game state, team compositions, enemy itemization, and whether you're ahead or behind in souls.
Build the best team around Pocket
Comp Lab scores every pair on your team by real win rate across hundreds of thousands of matches, checks your picks against the enemy roster, and loads proven high-win-rate comps.
- Six-hero team board
- Pair synergy win rates
- Proven high-win comps
Pocket has favorable matchups against 11 heroes and unfavorable matchups against 32 heroes in Deadlock. Pocket's strongest matchup is against Mirage with a 55.3% win rate. The hardest matchup is Graves at 37.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and build recommendations.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | Kills | Deaths | Player DMG | Net Worth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.15% | 3,142 | 2.55 | 4.2 | 5.2 | 27,509 | 35,903 | |
| 40.27% | 2,987 | 2.44 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 27,546 | 36,083 | |
| 45.17% | 2,825 | 2.69 | 4.4 | 5.2 | 31,136 | 35,980 | |
| 44.62% | 2,815 | 2.63 | 4.7 | 5.5 | 29,488 | 36,542 | |
| 49.57% | 2,770 | 2.69 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 29,031 | 36,327 | |
| 49.43% | 2,697 | 2.64 | 4.7 | 5.5 | 30,199 | 36,382 | |
| 37.13% | 2,553 | 2.51 | 4.5 | 5.6 | 28,584 | 36,522 | |
| 45.56% | 2,443 | 2.48 | 4.7 | 5.9 | 29,503 | 36,109 | |
| 46.49% | 2,405 | 2.62 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 28,558 | 36,339 | |
| 46.04% | 2,220 | 2.62 | 4.6 | 5.3 | 29,622 | 36,088 | |
| 48.18% | 2,202 | 2.66 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 28,685 | 36,751 | |
| 49.47% | 2,163 | 2.61 | 4.6 | 5.5 | 28,321 | 36,583 | |
| 45.04% | 2,098 | 2.70 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 28,999 | 36,502 | |
| 38.48% | 2,084 | 2.44 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 26,947 | 36,650 | |
| 48.23% | 2,063 | 2.64 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 29,023 | 36,631 | |
| 43.50% | 2,055 | 2.58 | 4.4 | 5.4 | 28,890 | 35,526 | |
| 50.66% | 1,956 | 2.68 | 4.5 | 5.4 | 28,218 | 36,496 | |
| 42.23% | 1,918 | 2.62 | 4.5 | 5.4 | 28,803 | 36,785 | |
| 49.42% | 1,898 | 2.68 | 4.6 | 5.5 | 30,166 | 37,205 | |
| 42.43% | 1,850 | 2.53 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 29,216 | 36,252 | |
| 44.08% | 1,806 | 2.36 | 4.3 | 5.6 | 26,044 | 35,672 | |
| 50.76% | 1,720 | 2.73 | 4.7 | 5.5 | 29,158 | 36,843 | |
| 50.41% | 1,710 | 2.73 | 4.7 | 5.4 | 30,267 | 37,172 | |
| 52.41% | 1,641 | 2.84 | 4.8 | 5.3 | 29,049 | 37,010 | |
| 49.62% | 1,580 | 2.68 | 4.9 | 5.6 | 29,905 | 36,743 | |
| 47.47% | 1,578 | 2.64 | 4.7 | 5.6 | 29,822 | 36,445 | |
| 44.73% | 1,527 | 2.50 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 29,535 | 36,183 | |
| 41.61% | 1,454 | 2.52 | 4.6 | 5.7 | 30,747 | 37,455 | |
| 43.73% | 1,420 | 2.69 | 4.4 | 5.0 | 28,508 | 35,510 | |
| 50.86% | 1,398 | 2.61 | 4.6 | 5.5 | 29,383 | 36,919 | |
| 51.49% | 1,206 | 2.65 | 4.7 | 5.4 | 28,247 | 36,683 | |
| 44.34% | 1,114 | 2.51 | 4.0 | 5.1 | 26,905 | 35,553 | |
| 48.56% | 1,075 | 2.63 | 4.7 | 5.5 | 30,381 | 36,268 | |
| 51.06% | 1,038 | 2.93 | 4.6 | 4.9 | 28,060 | 36,173 | |
| 45.47% | 1,038 | 2.60 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 28,802 | 36,288 | |
| 46.60% | 1,000 | 2.65 | 4.1 | 5.0 | 27,720 | 36,852 | |
| 43.57% | 996 | 2.56 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 28,777 | 35,453 | |
| 43.60% | 968 | 2.46 | 4.3 | 5.5 | 29,432 | 36,031 | |
| 49.53% | 961 | 2.64 | 4.8 | 5.6 | 30,354 | 37,244 | |
| 50.47% | 959 | 2.74 | 4.4 | 5.1 | 28,566 | 36,239 | |
| 51.21% | 953 | 2.72 | 4.7 | 5.4 | 29,425 | 36,918 | |
| 55.29% | 935 | 2.80 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 28,496 | 36,742 | |
| 54.53% | 717 | 2.86 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 27,542 | 36,758 | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Pocket Matchups - FAQ
What is Pocket's best matchup in Deadlock?
Pocket's best matchup is against Mirage, achieving a 55.3% win rate. Pocket excels in this matchup through superior combat stats and favorable ability interactions.
What is Pocket's hardest matchup?
Pocket's hardest matchup is against Graves, with only a 37.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Pocket should focus on team coordination and itemizing defensively.
How many favorable matchups does Pocket have?
Pocket has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 32 unfavorable matchups in Deadlock. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better hero picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Pocket in difficult matchups?
When playing Pocket in difficult matchups, prioritize safe farming, positioning, and team coordination. Adjust your item build to compensate for the matchup disadvantage, and look for opportunities to impact fights through abilities rather than direct confrontation.
What stats should I focus on in Pocket's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Pocket's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average player damage, and net worth difference. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more defensively and relying on team support.