McGinnis
Win Rate
52.4%
Matches
1,948
KDA
2.91
Player DMG
37,917

McGinnis vs Paradoxvs Paradox

Skill LevelAll Skill Levels
Matches4,958
Version6484
Last UpdatedMay 5, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

McGinnis holds a 52.4% win rate advantage over Paradox based on 1,948 Deadlock matches. McGinnis averages -37 more net worth, translating to earlier item power spikes. Play around your economic advantage to maximize this matchup.

McGinnis Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how McGinnis performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
Paradox - 52.4% win rateParadox(52.4%)
McGinnis - 52.4% win rate in this matchup
McGinnis
52.4% WR
VS
Paradox vs McGinnis matchup - 47.0% win rate
Paradox
47.0% WR

Who Wins the McGinnis vs Paradox Matchup?

McGinnis wins the McGinnis vs Paradox matchup
Winner
McGinnis
Matches: 1,948
52.4%
Win Rate
47.0%
4.8
Avg Kills
4.8
5.7
Avg Deaths
5.9
11.8
Avg Assists
11.7
39,687
Avg Net Worth
39,724
37,917
Player DMG
32,267
6,271
Objective DMG
5,062
102.9
Last Hits
93.8

McGinnis vs Paradox Matchup Summary

The McGinnis vs Paradox matchup in Deadlock is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 1,948 recent matches analyzed, McGinnis wins with a 52.4% win rate compared to Paradox's 47.0%, giving McGinnis a 5.4 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where McGinnis consistently outperforms. McGinnis holds a meaningful advantage in this matchup. Paradox players should play more cautiously, prioritize safe farming, and look for team fight opportunities where positioning and coordination matter more than 1v1 statistics.

McGinnis vs Paradox Combat Analysis

McGinnis wins combat stats against Paradox in Deadlock

McGinnis claims 4 out of 5 combat metrics in the McGinnis vs Paradox matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, damage output. Our analysis of 1,948 ranked games reveals McGinnis consistently outperforms Paradox in direct combat scenarios. While Paradox manages to win one metric, the overall picture favors McGinnis in fights. Paradox players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where McGinnis dominates.

KDA Ratio
2.91McGinnis
2.78Paradox
The KDA comparison between McGinnis and Paradox reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with McGinnis averaging 2.91 and Paradox posting 2.78. This razor-thin margin demonstrates that neither hero has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, ability timing, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent hero kit advantage.
Avg Kills
4.8McGinnis
4.8Paradox
Kill production between McGinnis and Paradox is virtually identical, with McGinnis averaging 4.8 kills per game and Paradox securing 4.8. This parity suggests both heroes are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, ability usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — lane denials, objective fights, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
5.7McGinnis
5.9Paradox
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between McGinnis (5.7 deaths/game) and Paradox (5.9 deaths/game). Neither hero demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any hero-based survival advantage.
Player DMG
37,917McGinnis
32,267Paradox
The damage differential between McGinnis and Paradox is exceptional: 37,917 compared to just 32,267. McGinnis deals 5,650 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests McGinnis's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Paradox struggles to even trade effectively. Paradox players should treat McGinnis as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.
Objective DMG
6,271McGinnis
5,062Paradox
McGinnis contributes 1,209 more objective damage than Paradox on average, making them more valuable for split pushing, securing guardian kills, and accelerating tower takes. Teams with McGinnis may want to prioritize objective-focused strategies. Paradox should focus on creating picks while McGinnis pushes objectives.

McGinnis vs Paradox Economy Analysis

Net Worth
39,687McGinnis
39,724Paradox
Last Hits
102.9McGinnis
93.8Paradox

McGinnis and Paradox have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. McGinnis secures more last hits (102.9 vs 93.8), while McGinnis leads in denies (6.8 vs 3.4). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

Recommended Items for McGinnis vs Paradox

McGinnis build for Paradox matchup

McGinnis Build vs Paradox

This winning build for McGinnis against Paradox focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 52.4% win rate against Paradox, these 7 items help McGinnis press the advantage and close out games efficiently. Seraphim Wings, Restorative Shot, Diviner's Kevlar, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 37,598 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

Paradox build for McGinnis matchup

Paradox Build vs McGinnis

Paradox's counter-build against McGinnis attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, Paradox players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. Seraphim Wings, Shadow Weave, Healing Nova, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 39,998 souls Knowing Paradox's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

These item builds are optimized for the McGinnis vs Paradox matchup based on win rate data from 1,948 competitive matches. Item choices in Deadlock significantly impact matchup outcomes — the right build can help overcome statistical disadvantages or extend existing advantages. Remember to adapt your build based on game state, team compositions, enemy itemization, and whether you're ahead or behind in souls.

McGinnis has favorable matchups against 25 heroes and unfavorable matchups against 12 heroes in Deadlock. McGinnis's strongest matchup is against Sinclair with a 56.5% win rate. The hardest matchup is Seven at 45.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and build recommendations.

McGinnis matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6484)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
50.83%4,7792.965.05.739,82840,296
51.62%4,2892.854.85.838,83839,827
46.24%4,2312.754.55.737,41739,121
46.02%4,1572.724.65.939,49439,422
51.44%3,8232.784.75.939,18839,851
45.30%3,7752.764.65.837,54639,370
51.50%3,3172.924.85.638,45539,642
55.63%3,2792.884.85.939,19739,701
49.07%3,2772.834.75.737,14539,773
48.65%3,2712.694.66.037,92839,152
52.48%3,0042.804.75.938,64139,591
51.17%2,9522.864.95.938,97039,735
51.37%2,8072.784.75.940,20640,189
48.53%2,7602.844.65.638,53939,179
50.33%2,5592.794.75.939,31039,527
49.79%2,5432.894.75.738,78039,790
51.32%2,5112.914.75.638,53939,858
53.21%2,4822.924.95.839,26139,762
53.04%2,4602.844.75.838,56739,247
46.45%2,3172.844.55.638,08338,898
50.83%2,2612.744.75.837,16539,140
49.28%2,2192.814.75.838,33538,969
47.92%2,1672.754.75.837,85039,728
51.67%2,0622.914.85.739,22039,826
53.94%2,0592.914.75.638,26039,641
48.79%2,0282.804.85.939,34240,142
51.19%1,9562.884.75.737,67739,185
49.83%1,9532.834.55.638,37338,674
52.41%1,9482.914.85.737,91739,687
53.68%1,7662.914.85.741,64841,159
51.20%1,6812.914.75.739,27439,717
54.50%1,6462.874.85.838,98740,257
53.15%1,6132.724.55.837,25739,057
54.46%1,4952.874.65.637,87540,099
54.77%1,3712.954.85.639,23140,365
51.31%1,2952.834.85.939,41640,077
56.46%1,1282.984.95.537,90139,573

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

McGinnis Matchups - FAQ

What is McGinnis's best matchup in Deadlock?

McGinnis's best matchup is against Sinclair, achieving a 56.5% win rate. McGinnis excels in this matchup through superior combat stats and favorable ability interactions.

What is McGinnis's hardest matchup?

McGinnis's hardest matchup is against Seven, with only a 45.3% win rate. Against this opponent, McGinnis should focus on team coordination and itemizing defensively.

How many favorable matchups does McGinnis have?

McGinnis has 25 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 12 unfavorable matchups in Deadlock. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better hero picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play McGinnis in difficult matchups?

When playing McGinnis in difficult matchups, prioritize safe farming, positioning, and team coordination. Adjust your item build to compensate for the matchup disadvantage, and look for opportunities to impact fights through abilities rather than direct confrontation.

What stats should I focus on in McGinnis's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in McGinnis's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average player damage, and net worth difference. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more defensively and relying on team support.