McGinnis
Win Rate
48.2%
Matches
1,783
KDA
3.05

McGinnis vs Abrams vs Abrams

Skill Level
All Skill Levels
Matches
14,963
Version
6860
Last Updated
Nov 6, 2026 UTC
Methodology
Data Methodology

McGinnis faces a challenging 48.2% win rate against Abrams in this Deadlock matchup. Data from 1,783 games shows McGinnis averages -1.0 more deaths. Focus on safe farming, team coordination, and avoiding 1v1 confrontations.

McGinnis Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how McGinnis performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
McGinnis - 48.2% win rate in this matchup
McGinnis
48.2% WR
VS
Abrams vs McGinnis matchup - 51.8% win rate
Abrams
51.8% WR

Who Wins the McGinnis vs Abrams Matchup?

Abrams wins the McGinnis vs Abrams matchup
Winner
Abrams
Matches: 1,783
48.2%
Win Rate
51.8%
3.4
Avg Kills
5.1
4.4
Avg Deaths
5.4
10.0
Avg Assists
9.3
34,772
Avg Net Worth
35,508
28,352
Player DMG
23,493
4,027
Objective DMG
3,666
62.1
Last Hits
45.4

McGinnis vs Abrams Matchup Summary

The McGinnis vs Abrams matchup in Deadlock is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 1,783 recent matches analyzed, Abrams wins with a 51.8% win rate compared to McGinnis's 48.2%, giving Abrams a 3.5 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where McGinnis consistently outperforms. Abrams holds a meaningful advantage in this matchup. McGinnis players should play more cautiously, prioritize safe farming, and look for team fight opportunities where positioning and coordination matter more than 1v1 statistics.

McGinnis vs Abrams Combat Analysis

McGinnis wins combat stats against Abrams in Deadlock

McGinnis claims 4 out of 5 combat metrics in the McGinnis vs Abrams matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, damage output. Our analysis of 1,783 ranked games reveals McGinnis consistently outperforms Abrams in direct combat scenarios. While Abrams manages to win one metric, the overall picture favors McGinnis in fights. Abrams players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where McGinnis dominates.

KDA Ratio
3.05McGinnis
2.67Abrams
McGinnis holds a moderate KDA edge in this matchup, recording 3.05 compared to Abrams's 2.67. While this 0.37 point difference indicates McGinnis tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Abrams players can overcome it through superior positioning, ability timing, or simply winning crucial duels. Abrams should focus on burst trade patterns and disengage before extended fights favor McGinnis's superior sustain.
Avg Kills
3.4McGinnis
5.1Abrams
Abrams substantially outfrags McGinnis in this matchup, averaging 5.1 kills compared to 3.4 — a difference of nearly 1.7 eliminations per match. When Abrams faces McGinnis, the data clearly shows Abrams finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. McGinnis players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Abrams in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
4.4McGinnis
5.4Abrams
McGinnis survives longer in this matchup, dying 4.4 times per game compared to Abrams's 5.4 deaths. This 1.0 death difference per match means McGinnis is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. Abrams players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests McGinnis's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
Player DMG
28,352McGinnis
23,493Abrams
McGinnis significantly outdamages Abrams in head-to-head encounters, posting 28,352 average damage versus 23,493. This 4,859 damage advantage means McGinnis consistently wins the damage exchange in fights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Abrams players should avoid prolonged fights with McGinnis — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate.
Objective DMG
4,027McGinnis
3,666Abrams
Objective damage contribution is similar between McGinnis (4,027) and Abrams (3,666). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

McGinnis vs Abrams Economy Analysis

Net Worth
34,772McGinnis
35,508Abrams
Last Hits
62.1McGinnis
45.4Abrams

Abrams generates approximately 736 more souls than McGinnis on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving Abrams a mid-game advantage. McGinnis secures more last hits (62.1 vs 45.4), while McGinnis leads in denies (3.3 vs 1.5). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

Recommended Items for McGinnis vs Abrams

McGinnis build for Abrams matchup

McGinnis Build vs Abrams

This optimized build for McGinnis against Abrams is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 51.8% win rate disadvantage against Abrams, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. Frostbite Charm, Haunting Shot, Monster Rounds, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 43,597 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

Abrams build for McGinnis matchup

Abrams Build vs McGinnis

Abrams's recommended build against McGinnis leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring Abrams, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. Mystic Burst, Mystic Conduit, Juggernaut, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 39,599 souls Understanding Abrams's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

These item builds are optimized for the McGinnis vs Abrams matchup based on win rate data from 1,783 competitive matches. Item choices in Deadlock significantly impact matchup outcomes — the right build can help overcome statistical disadvantages or extend existing advantages. Remember to adapt your build based on game state, team compositions, enemy itemization, and whether you're ahead or behind in souls.

MetaBot Desktop

Build the best team around McGinnis

Comp Lab scores every pair on your team by real win rate across hundreds of thousands of matches, checks your picks against the enemy roster, and loads proven high-win-rate comps.

  • Six-hero team board
  • Pair synergy win rates
  • Proven high-win comps
Deadlock Comp Lab in MetaBot Desktop

McGinnis has favorable matchups against 27 heroes and unfavorable matchups against 16 heroes in Deadlock. McGinnis's strongest matchup is against Sinclair with a 63.4% win rate. The hardest matchup is Paige at 39.2% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and build recommendations.

McGinnis matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6860)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
41.76%3,4482.963.44.526,76034,653
39.61%2,9162.802.94.323,93234,165
42.05%2,5732.833.14.426,04434,319
48.25%2,4543.033.14.228,16034,047
50.11%2,2132.973.64.628,07035,386
52.81%2,1533.103.34.326,63234,724
54.82%2,1363.023.44.628,07134,913
50.19%2,0603.143.44.427,18434,957
39.24%2,0162.772.94.323,34134,362
47.51%1,9642.863.74.929,15034,924
55.18%1,8433.263.44.126,56934,987
44.33%1,8163.043.34.426,28835,344
50.92%1,7933.053.54.426,71434,643
48.23%1,7833.053.44.428,35234,772
51.15%1,6953.123.64.428,55635,163
53.47%1,6703.083.34.425,84734,518
45.96%1,6692.993.44.527,88434,936
50.63%1,6613.123.34.327,67234,849
53.40%1,6203.053.44.527,34035,023
53.68%1,6173.163.64.527,85235,051
57.27%1,6103.313.54.327,93635,197
49.00%1,5472.733.14.625,21134,425
48.90%1,4952.943.34.428,37534,863
53.25%1,4933.143.44.326,95834,537
50.19%1,3453.003.54.628,00734,242
46.98%1,3262.993.24.427,41035,316
54.79%1,3253.153.84.628,60534,728
55.53%1,2753.233.44.326,66735,529
48.28%1,1933.083.24.227,19434,806
57.62%1,0503.223.44.227,37435,614
52.17%1,0142.983.34.527,46535,291
45.90%1,0133.032.94.024,61334,534
53.40%1,0003.203.54.427,64136,139
55.76%9903.003.34.325,96234,610
57.68%8983.443.74.229,45635,481
58.04%8893.503.74.028,54235,187
44.36%8863.003.14.225,22633,809
57.53%8763.553.64.025,84534,678
49.29%8463.033.44.429,04534,959
57.39%8053.493.54.027,71435,435
58.48%7783.263.54.328,77935,664
53.15%7623.063.74.728,44035,120
63.38%5983.933.53.625,97635,462
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

McGinnis Matchups - FAQ

What is McGinnis's best matchup in Deadlock?

McGinnis's best matchup is against Sinclair, achieving a 63.4% win rate. McGinnis excels in this matchup through superior combat stats and favorable ability interactions.

What is McGinnis's hardest matchup?

McGinnis's hardest matchup is against Paige, with only a 39.2% win rate. Against this opponent, McGinnis should focus on team coordination and itemizing defensively.

How many favorable matchups does McGinnis have?

McGinnis has 27 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 16 unfavorable matchups in Deadlock. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better hero picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play McGinnis in difficult matchups?

When playing McGinnis in difficult matchups, prioritize safe farming, positioning, and team coordination. Adjust your item build to compensate for the matchup disadvantage, and look for opportunities to impact fights through abilities rather than direct confrontation.

What stats should I focus on in McGinnis's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in McGinnis's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average player damage, and net worth difference. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more defensively and relying on team support.