McGinnis
Win Rate
54.0%
Matches
3,363
KDA
3.00
Player DMG
41,503

McGinnis vs Venatorvs Venator

Skill LevelAll Skill Levels
Matches5,394
Version6446
Last UpdatedApr 22, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

McGinnis holds a 54.0% win rate advantage over Venator based on 3,363 Deadlock matches. McGinnis averages -1,535 more net worth, translating to earlier item power spikes. Play around your economic advantage to maximize this matchup.

McGinnis Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how McGinnis performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
Venator - 54.0% win rateVenator(54.0%)
McGinnis - 54.0% win rate in this matchup
McGinnis
54.0% WR
VS
Venator vs McGinnis matchup - 46.2% win rate
Venator
46.2% WR

Who Wins the McGinnis vs Venator Matchup?

McGinnis wins the McGinnis vs Venator matchup
Winner
McGinnis
Matches: 3,363
54.0%
Win Rate
46.2%
5.2
Avg Kills
7.1
5.9
Avg Deaths
7.2
12.5
Avg Assists
10.3
41,109
Avg Net Worth
42,644
41,503
Player DMG
38,594
6,615
Objective DMG
7,973
110.0
Last Hits
102.3

McGinnis vs Venator Matchup Summary

The McGinnis vs Venator matchup in Deadlock is a significant statistical advantage. Based on 3,363 recent matches analyzed, McGinnis wins with a 54.0% win rate compared to Venator's 46.2%, giving McGinnis a 7.8 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in fragging power, where McGinnis consistently outperforms. McGinnis dominates this matchup statistically. McGinnis can play aggressively and look for solo kills, while Venator should focus on minimizing losses, farming safely, and relying on teammates to even the odds.

McGinnis vs Venator Combat Analysis

McGinnis wins combat stats against Venator in Deadlock

McGinnis edges out Venator in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 3,363 matches analyzed, this McGinnis vs Venator matchup remains contestable for both sides. Venator shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Venator's favor.

KDA Ratio
3.00McGinnis
2.41Venator
McGinnis demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Venator, maintaining a 3.00 KDA versus 2.41. This 0.59 point gap reflects McGinnis's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Venator players facing McGinnis should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate ability usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where McGinnis's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
5.2McGinnis
7.1Venator
Venator substantially outfrags McGinnis in this matchup, averaging 7.1 kills compared to 5.2 — a difference of nearly 1.9 eliminations per match. When Venator faces McGinnis, the data clearly shows Venator finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. McGinnis players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Venator in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
5.9McGinnis
7.2Venator
McGinnis demonstrates markedly better survivability against Venator, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives McGinnis significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. Venator players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
Player DMG
41,503McGinnis
38,594Venator
McGinnis significantly outdamages Venator in head-to-head encounters, posting 41,503 average damage versus 38,594. This 2,909 damage advantage means McGinnis consistently wins the damage exchange in fights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Venator players should avoid prolonged fights with McGinnis — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate.
Objective DMG
6,615McGinnis
7,973Venator
Venator contributes 1,358 more objective damage than McGinnis on average, making them more valuable for split pushing, securing guardian kills, and accelerating tower takes. Teams with Venator may want to prioritize objective-focused strategies. McGinnis should focus on creating picks while Venator pushes objectives.

McGinnis vs Venator Economy Analysis

Net Worth
41,109McGinnis
42,644Venator
Last Hits
110.0McGinnis
102.3Venator

Venator generates approximately 1,535 more souls than McGinnis on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving Venator a mid-game advantage. McGinnis secures more last hits (110.0 vs 102.3), while McGinnis leads in denies (7.7 vs 3.7). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

Recommended Items for McGinnis vs Venator

McGinnis build for Venator matchup

McGinnis Build vs Venator

This winning build for McGinnis against Venator focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 54.0% win rate against Venator, these 7 items help McGinnis press the advantage and close out games efficiently. Ethereal Shift, Majestic Leap, Colossus, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 25,600 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

Venator build for McGinnis matchup

Venator Build vs McGinnis

Venator's counter-build against McGinnis attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, Venator players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. Refresher, Spirit Rend, Rescue Beam, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 35,200 souls Knowing Venator's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

These item builds are optimized for the McGinnis vs Venator matchup based on win rate data from 3,363 competitive matches. Item choices in Deadlock significantly impact matchup outcomes — the right build can help overcome statistical disadvantages or extend existing advantages. Remember to adapt your build based on game state, team compositions, enemy itemization, and whether you're ahead or behind in souls.

McGinnis has favorable matchups against 20 heroes and unfavorable matchups against 17 heroes in Deadlock. McGinnis's strongest matchup is against Holliday with a 57.2% win rate. The hardest matchup is Seven at 45.5% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and build recommendations.

McGinnis matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6446)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
51.26%4,9913.025.35.941,58141,086
53.64%4,5892.935.26.041,32040,621
46.71%4,2712.785.06.141,69440,355
46.92%3,9782.765.06.140,44440,427
48.26%3,8302.785.06.139,73840,000
45.49%3,6862.835.06.040,02840,434
52.64%3,6642.845.06.140,89240,772
54.00%3,3633.005.25.941,50341,109
48.74%3,1792.805.16.139,37740,518
49.95%3,1602.845.26.241,33240,617
51.49%2,9942.755.06.241,30140,987
54.61%2,8362.865.26.240,89840,422
49.92%2,8352.685.06.241,40640,773
51.43%2,6802.875.26.141,42240,786
53.10%2,6392.945.46.141,27140,522
49.49%2,5892.905.05.839,28239,620
49.83%2,5812.755.26.341,57640,866
48.32%2,4782.795.06.141,22740,918
54.30%2,3672.865.36.241,33740,989
49.33%2,2642.965.15.841,39740,605
50.59%2,2412.865.05.939,32140,128
53.87%2,2182.995.15.841,78641,560
52.45%2,1592.865.36.141,43440,759
49.65%2,1452.935.25.941,91940,506
49.33%2,1372.825.06.042,24940,908
54.14%2,0852.835.16.140,08040,505
49.50%2,0712.954.95.741,02639,991
50.93%1,9662.895.16.040,83040,359
47.96%1,9222.764.96.241,24040,543
54.20%1,9083.035.35.942,14541,283
52.96%1,8322.925.16.040,58241,064
49.58%1,7382.945.36.040,38640,476
57.19%1,4602.835.16.140,86841,027
53.95%1,3382.945.15.840,73841,014
54.82%1,3102.794.75.940,08240,797
48.55%1,2652.745.16.341,31140,812
55.22%1,1273.225.55.641,48941,086

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

McGinnis Matchups - FAQ

What is McGinnis's best matchup in Deadlock?

McGinnis's best matchup is against Holliday, achieving a 57.2% win rate. McGinnis excels in this matchup through superior combat stats and favorable ability interactions.

What is McGinnis's hardest matchup?

McGinnis's hardest matchup is against Seven, with only a 45.5% win rate. Against this opponent, McGinnis should focus on team coordination and itemizing defensively.

How many favorable matchups does McGinnis have?

McGinnis has 20 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 17 unfavorable matchups in Deadlock. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better hero picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play McGinnis in difficult matchups?

When playing McGinnis in difficult matchups, prioritize safe farming, positioning, and team coordination. Adjust your item build to compensate for the matchup disadvantage, and look for opportunities to impact fights through abilities rather than direct confrontation.

What stats should I focus on in McGinnis's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in McGinnis's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average player damage, and net worth difference. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more defensively and relying on team support.