Brandvs Bard
Brand vs Bard is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Brand wins with a 53.3% win rate (+6.7%) over Bard based on 30 games. Bard wins the early laning phase while Brand scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Brand vs Bard matchup.
Brand Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Brand performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Brand vs Bard Matchup?
Brand vs Bard Matchup Summary
The Brand vs Bard matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 30 recent matches analyzed, Brand wins with a 53.3% win rate compared to Bard's 46.7%, giving Brand a 6.7 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Bard controls the early laning stage, but Brand outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Bard needs to press advantages before Brand reaches their power spikes, while Brand should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Bard leads by 409 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Brand players can confidently pick into Bard and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Bard away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Brand vs Bard Laning Phase Breakdown
Brand is favored during the laning phase against Bard, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Brand holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Brand Build Against Bard
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Bard, providing the mobility and stats Brand needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Brand against Bard are Liandry's Torment, Morellonomicon and Rylai's Crystal Scepter. This combination gives Brand an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Bard. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Brand vs Bard matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand42.9%
Bard57.1%Brand62.5%Bard37.5%Bard dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 57.1% win rate — a 14.3 percentage point lead over Brand. This lopsided early game means Bard can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Brand is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 62.5% win rate — 25.0 points above Bard. Extended games heavily favor Brand, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Bard must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Brand reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Brand survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Brand Runes Against Bard
Sorcery
Precision
Running Sorcery primary with Precision secondary allows Brand to press their advantage against Bard, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Brand matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Brand's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.15% | 186 | 2.5 | 722 | 9,707 | 53.6% | 51.3% | |
| 49.15% | 177 | 2.3 | 800 | 9,625 | 46.4% | 50.9% | |
| 53.21% | 109 | 2.0 | 908 | 10,428 | 50.0% | 55.1% | |
| 56.48% | 108 | 1.9 | 808 | 10,198 | 61.1% | 54.2% | |
| 53.40% | 103 | 2.6 | 842 | 10,150 | 62.5% | 47.6% | |
| 52.00% | 100 | 1.9 | 872 | 10,124 | 55.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.87% | 94 | 5.6 | 978 | 12,069 | 40.7% | 50.8% | |
| 48.91% | 92 | 1.9 | 849 | 10,143 | 53.6% | 46.9% | |
| 46.15% | 91 | 2.7 | 966 | 10,347 | 53.1% | 42.4% | |
| 56.32% | 87 | 6.2 | 1,036 | 13,133 | 55.6% | 56.7% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 1.9 | 812 | 9,183 | 44.8% | 48.9% | |
| 50.75% | 67 | 2.3 | 792 | 9,924 | 38.1% | 56.5% | |
| 43.28% | 67 | 1.9 | 774 | 9,200 | 32.4% | 54.5% | |
| 42.62% | 61 | 3.0 | 793 | 10,374 | 37.5% | 44.4% | |
| 55.93% | 59 | 4.8 | 993 | 11,984 | 64.7% | 52.4% | |
| 57.63% | 59 | 5.9 | 1,057 | 12,634 | 50.0% | 61.5% | |
| 55.36% | 56 | 4.0 | 897 | 10,099 | 60.0% | 52.8% | |
| 41.07% | 56 | 2.2 | 887 | 10,289 | 40.0% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 54 | 1.9 | 776 | 10,027 | 56.3% | 47.4% | |
| 71.15% | 52 | 4.9 | 870 | 12,069 | 100.0% | 55.9% | |
| 50.00% | 50 | 1.9 | 830 | 9,377 | 57.1% | 44.8% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 2.0 | 779 | 8,846 | 54.5% | 40.7% | |
| 47.92% | 48 | 5.3 | 894 | 9,640 | 55.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.32% | 47 | 2.6 | 878 | 8,916 | 54.2% | 56.5% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 6.4 | 977 | 11,697 | 55.0% | 48.0% | |
| 40.91% | 44 | 6.0 | 900 | 10,703 | 47.4% | 36.0% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 2.1 | 987 | 10,042 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.19% | 43 | 1.9 | 766 | 9,823 | 30.8% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 42 | 5.5 | 966 | 11,565 | 42.9% | 53.6% | |
| 52.38% | 42 | 1.6 | 627 | 8,251 | 68.2% | 35.0% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 1.9 | 1,026 | 10,910 | 62.5% | 45.2% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 1.7 | 734 | 8,730 | 52.6% | 36.8% | |
| 57.89% | 38 | 4.9 | 949 | 9,944 | 70.6% | 47.6% | |
| 66.67% | 36 | 2.4 | 865 | 10,327 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 37.14% | 35 | 1.8 | 750 | 9,132 | 46.7% | 30.0% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 4.3 | 904 | 11,221 | 83.3% | 40.9% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 4.8 | 918 | 11,583 | 61.5% | 57.1% | |
| 60.61% | 33 | 6.0 | 964 | 12,604 | 33.3% | 76.2% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 6.1 | 1,087 | 11,978 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 5.6 | 1,078 | 11,959 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 5.6 | 1,032 | 12,195 | 83.3% | 26.3% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 4.5 | 1,024 | 11,132 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 1.5 | 776 | 9,010 | 42.9% | 62.5% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 2.1 | 983 | 10,218 | 54.5% | 38.9% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 5.8 | 990 | 11,398 | 63.6% | 52.9% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 2.3 | 823 | 9,299 | 45.5% | 80.0% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 1.8 | 922 | 11,033 | 42.9% | 42.1% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 2.0 | 913 | 9,661 | 40.0% | 46.7% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 3.9 | 850 | 12,120 | 50.0% | 52.6% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 5.9 | 1,049 | 14,278 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 2.2 | 809 | 11,340 | 50.0% | 41.2% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 2.0 | 831 | 10,470 | 28.6% | 46.7% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 4.8 | 1,118 | 10,155 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.5 | 1,040 | 12,035 | 57.1% | 46.1% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 5.7 | 1,007 | 13,409 | 40.0% | 26.7% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 3.9 | 793 | 9,984 | 62.5% | 41.7% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.2 | 1,079 | 11,132 | 20.0% | 57.1% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 5.4 | 904 | 10,159 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 5.7 | 909 | 11,813 | 20.0% | 35.7% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 3.2 | 886 | 10,697 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.7 | 875 | 11,738 | 60.0% | 46.1% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 4.9 | 843 | 10,734 | 25.0% | 71.4% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.7 | 1,009 | 11,331 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.2 | 878 | 12,160 | 75.0% | 30.8% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 4.8 | 915 | 11,973 | 66.7% | 35.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 5.9 | 1,000 | 11,591 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.6 | 896 | 11,331 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 3.9 | 773 | 9,411 | 14.3% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 1.5 | 833 | 13,015 | 71.4% | 55.6% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 3.9 | 1,015 | 9,795 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 2.0 | 816 | 10,928 | 100.0% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.6 | 1,176 | 12,896 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 3.0 | 997 | 10,004 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 5.4 | 1,073 | 13,697 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.9 | 977 | 13,020 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.2 | 894 | 10,035 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 1.5 | 770 | 12,256 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.9 | 952 | 11,718 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.1 | 1,098 | 13,246 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 5.8 | 1,227 | 13,694 | 100.0% | 81.8% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 4.0 | 1,012 | 10,323 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.1 | 933 | 12,101 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.8 | 1,174 | 9,303 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.6 | 938 | 13,347 | 0.0% | 55.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 3.8 | 860 | 9,155 | 75.0% | 28.6% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 3.1 | 1,165 | 10,775 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 919 | 9,422 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 1,000 | 9,795 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 775 | 10,835 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 1,111 | 12,750 | 100.0% | 77.8% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 1,032 | 11,638 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 983 | 12,135 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.2 | 1,114 | 12,343 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.7 | 1,012 | 11,080 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.3 | 1,072 | 13,868 | 100.0% | 37.5% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.4 | 948 | 11,226 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.8 | 1,131 | 12,434 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 0.7 | 799 | 9,930 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 4.8 | 1,058 | 11,295 | 50.0% | 14.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.6 | 1,063 | 11,770 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 7.0 | 1,215 | 13,471 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.2 | 893 | 11,578 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 4.8 | 796 | 9,086 | 33.3% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.3 | 792 | 11,103 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 3.4 | 936 | 9,563 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.6 | 1,080 | 12,593 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.0 | 1,059 | 12,323 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.2 | 979 | 12,437 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.3 | 1,319 | 15,236 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.2 | 1,127 | 10,131 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.4 | 994 | 12,238 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.9 | 1,206 | 12,238 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.3 | 1,234 | 14,578 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 4.8 | 937 | 12,762 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 790 | 9,024 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.2 | 938 | 12,905 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.3 | 914 | 12,066 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.3 | 762 | 12,727 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 907 | 11,866 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 802 | 9,995 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 890 | 11,639 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 1,287 | 16,309 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 969 | 9,601 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 696 | 12,875 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 934 | 15,019 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.9 | 1,067 | 12,670 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 648 | 8,848 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 899 | 12,834 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 1,016 | 11,406 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Brand vs Bard - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Brand do against Bard in League of Legends?
Brand wins the Brand vs Bard matchup with a 53.3% win rate compared to Bard's 46.7%, a 6.7 percentage point difference. This data is based on 30 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Brand do against Bard in the early game?
In the early game, Bard has the advantage against Brand with a 57.1% win rate versus 42.9%. Bard players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Brand do against Bard in the late game?
In the late game, Brand takes over the Brand vs Bard matchup with a 62.5% win rate compared to 37.5%. Brand scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Brand vs Bard matchup?
Brand wins the matchup against Bard with a 53.3% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 6.7 percentage point advantage means Brand is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 30 games analyzed.
What is the best Brand build against Bard?
The best Brand build against Bard includes Liandry's Torment, Morellonomicon, Rylai's Crystal Scepter with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Brand runes against Bard?
The best Brand runes against Bard use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 56.3% win rate in the Brand vs Bard matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Brand counter Bard?
Yes, Brand has a favorable matchup against Bard with a 53.3% win rate. Brand strongly counters Bard in lane based on current patch 26.14 data.
How do I play Brand against Bard?
When playing Brand against Bard, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Bard. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.