Cassiopeiavs Ambessa
Cassiopeia vs Ambessa is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Ambessa wins with a 80.0% win rate (+60.0%) over Cassiopeia based on 5 games. Ambessa holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Cassiopeia vs Ambessa matchup.
Cassiopeia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Cassiopeia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Ambessa(20.0%)Who Wins the Cassiopeia vs Ambessa Matchup?
Cassiopeia vs Ambessa Matchup Summary
The Cassiopeia vs Ambessa matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Ambessa wins with a 80.0% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 20.0%, giving Ambessa a 60.0 percentage point advantage. Ambessa dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Cassiopeia players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Cassiopeia leads by 0.9s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ambessa has a strong advantage in this matchup. Cassiopeia players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Ambessa overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Cassiopeia vs Ambessa Laning Phase Breakdown
Ambessa is favored during the laning phase against Cassiopeia, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Ambessa holds advantages in damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Cassiopeia Build Against Ambessa
Boots of Swiftness is the optimal boots choice against Ambessa, providing the mobility and stats Cassiopeia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Cassiopeia against Ambessa are Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment and Rylai's Crystal Scepter. This combination gives Cassiopeia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Ambessa. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Cassiopeia vs Ambessa matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Cassiopeia33.3%Ambessa66.7%Cassiopeia0.0%Ambessa100.0%Ambessa dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Cassiopeia. This lopsided early game means Ambessa can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Ambessa is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Cassiopeia. Extended games heavily favor Ambessa, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Ambessa holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Cassiopeia players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Cassiopeia Runes Against Ambessa
Precision
Sorcery
The Precision and Sorcery rune setup gives Cassiopeia the best tools to compete against Ambessa in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Cassiopeia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Cassiopeia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56.25% | 32 | 6.7 | 885 | 12,088 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 7.0 | 829 | 11,663 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.7 | 767 | 12,316 | 50.0% | 47.4% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 6.8 | 729 | 11,512 | 40.0% | 62.5% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.3 | 859 | 13,061 | 20.0% | 52.9% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.4 | 849 | 12,548 | 62.5% | 57.1% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.9 | 864 | 11,121 | 27.3% | 62.5% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.5 | 908 | 10,894 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 6.4 | 921 | 12,992 | 28.6% | 75.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.3 | 739 | 12,065 | 37.5% | 44.4% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 6.7 | 736 | 11,498 | 14.3% | 50.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 7.0 | 761 | 10,089 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.5 | 793 | 12,564 | 33.3% | 46.1% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.6 | 799 | 11,966 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.7 | 692 | 11,337 | 28.6% | 44.4% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.1 | 948 | 12,981 | 75.0% | 63.6% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 7.0 | 980 | 13,675 | 100.0% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.5 | 804 | 11,933 | 33.3% | 62.5% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.5 | 650 | 11,062 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 21.43% | 14 | 6.4 | 858 | 12,885 | 66.7% | 9.1% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.8 | 691 | 9,869 | 37.5% | 60.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 6.4 | 940 | 11,618 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.9 | 840 | 13,601 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 6.9 | 1,017 | 11,759 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 6.2 | 623 | 11,142 | 60.0% | 16.7% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 6.8 | 942 | 11,319 | 71.4% | 100.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.5 | 930 | 13,223 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 7.4 | 659 | 9,845 | 55.6% | 100.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.5 | 830 | 12,700 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.7 | 1,090 | 12,212 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 7.1 | 790 | 11,958 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 836 | 13,983 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 7.5 | 658 | 11,942 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 7.0 | 930 | 11,929 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.1 | 1,062 | 14,147 | 100.0% | 37.5% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.3 | 740 | 10,388 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.2 | 932 | 12,070 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.5 | 840 | 11,206 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 7.2 | 1,069 | 13,954 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.3 | 753 | 11,987 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 804 | 12,100 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.7 | 1,077 | 12,316 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.6 | 1,025 | 13,529 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.2 | 825 | 11,090 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.4 | 793 | 13,236 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 7.0 | 970 | 12,450 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.8 | 641 | 10,210 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.5 | 752 | 10,289 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.7 | 840 | 13,445 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.8 | 758 | 10,811 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.9 | 872 | 14,875 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 558 | 10,776 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.9 | 862 | 13,632 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.1 | 905 | 15,491 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 1,073 | 12,453 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 1,077 | 13,114 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 999 | 12,801 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 834 | 10,909 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 754 | 9,531 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 796 | 11,092 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 745 | 13,361 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 675 | 8,508 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 1,144 | 16,919 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 732 | 9,347 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 954 | 11,166 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Cassiopeia vs Ambessa - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Cassiopeia do against Ambessa in League of Legends?
Ambessa wins the Cassiopeia vs Ambessa matchup with a 80.0% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 20.0%, a 60.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Cassiopeia do against Ambessa in the early game?
In the early game, Ambessa has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Ambessa players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Cassiopeia do against Ambessa in the late game?
In the late game, Ambessa takes over the Cassiopeia vs Ambessa matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Ambessa scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Cassiopeia vs Ambessa matchup?
Ambessa wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 80.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 60.0 percentage point advantage means Ambessa is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Cassiopeia build against Ambessa?
The best Cassiopeia build against Ambessa includes Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment, Rylai's Crystal Scepter with Boots of Swiftness. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Cassiopeia runes against Ambessa?
The best Cassiopeia runes against Ambessa use the Precision primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Cassiopeia vs Ambessa matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Cassiopeia counter Ambessa?
No, Cassiopeia struggles against Ambessa with only a 20.0% win rate. Ambessa has the advantage in this matchup. Cassiopeia players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Ambessa's lead.
How do I play Cassiopeia against Ambessa?
When playing Cassiopeia against Ambessa, play cautiously and avoid Ambessa's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Ambessa has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.