Fizzvs Brand
Fizz vs Brand is a moderate matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Brand wins with a 52.0% win rate (+4.0%) over Fizz based on 76 games. Fizz wins the early laning phase while Brand scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Brand matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Brand(48.0%)Who Wins the Fizz vs Brand Matchup?
Fizz vs Brand Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Brand matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 76 recent matches analyzed, Brand wins with a 52.0% win rate compared to Fizz's 48.0%, giving Brand a 4.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Fizz controls the early laning stage, but Brand outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Fizz needs to press advantages before Brand reaches their power spikes, while Brand should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Brand leads by 0.7s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Brand is slightly favored, Fizz can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Brand's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Brand Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Brand, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Brand
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Brand, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Brand are Zhonya's Hourglass, Lich Bane and Rabadon's Deathcap. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 80.0% win rate across 5 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Brand. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Brand matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz51.4%Brand48.6%Fizz44.7%Brand55.3%During the early laning phase (first 15 minutes), Fizz has a meaningful 51.4% win rate, outperforming Brand by 2.7 percentage points. Fizz players should look to press this advantage through aggressive trades, wave priority, and early jungle coordination.
Brand is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 55.3% win rate — 10.5 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Brand, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Fizz has the edge early, but Brand gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Fizz Runes Against Brand
Domination
Precision
The Domination and Precision rune setup gives Fizz the best tools to compete against Brand in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.61% | 328 | 6.1 | 829 | 12,622 | 49.0% | 51.9% | |
| 50.54% | 279 | 6.0 | 826 | 12,184 | 46.8% | 54.4% | |
| 49.11% | 224 | 6.2 | 850 | 12,917 | 55.7% | 44.1% | |
| 54.95% | 202 | 6.4 | 810 | 12,995 | 51.7% | 57.5% | |
| 58.48% | 171 | 5.9 | 912 | 12,534 | 57.7% | 59.1% | |
| 51.83% | 166 | 5.6 | 795 | 12,319 | 52.9% | 51.1% | |
| 45.68% | 163 | 5.7 | 784 | 13,004 | 48.7% | 43.0% | |
| 52.87% | 157 | 4.5 | 756 | 12,173 | 45.1% | 59.3% | |
| 58.50% | 149 | 4.5 | 854 | 13,081 | 59.7% | 57.5% | |
| 57.64% | 144 | 6.0 | 859 | 13,167 | 54.4% | 60.5% | |
| 58.27% | 128 | 6.0 | 807 | 13,044 | 50.0% | 64.4% | |
| 53.54% | 127 | 5.8 | 860 | 12,796 | 49.2% | 57.6% | |
| 53.54% | 127 | 5.8 | 756 | 12,707 | 59.6% | 50.0% | |
| 60.33% | 121 | 6.5 | 814 | 13,231 | 66.1% | 55.4% | |
| 52.99% | 118 | 6.1 | 746 | 12,103 | 57.9% | 48.3% | |
| 42.48% | 114 | 1.3 | 709 | 13,088 | 38.5% | 45.9% | |
| 50.00% | 110 | 4.8 | 840 | 12,455 | 56.6% | 43.9% | |
| 49.54% | 109 | 6.1 | 719 | 11,661 | 50.9% | 48.1% | |
| 55.56% | 109 | 4.3 | 818 | 13,680 | 54.0% | 56.9% | |
| 58.65% | 104 | 5.9 | 828 | 12,533 | 56.8% | 60.0% | |
| 54.00% | 100 | 6.4 | 932 | 13,140 | 67.5% | 45.0% | |
| 49.46% | 93 | 6.2 | 828 | 12,762 | 50.0% | 49.1% | |
| 41.18% | 86 | 1.5 | 718 | 13,444 | 36.4% | 44.2% | |
| 49.41% | 85 | 6.6 | 866 | 13,179 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 48.24% | 85 | 6.1 | 753 | 12,275 | 51.1% | 45.0% | |
| 59.04% | 83 | 6.1 | 854 | 12,204 | 60.5% | 57.5% | |
| 35.90% | 78 | 1.0 | 660 | 12,846 | 31.4% | 39.5% | |
| 50.00% | 78 | 6.0 | 797 | 12,105 | 56.4% | 43.6% | |
| 50.00% | 77 | 1.3 | 672 | 12,871 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 48.00% | 76 | 5.2 | 852 | 12,768 | 51.4% | 44.7% | |
| 50.68% | 73 | 6.2 | 778 | 12,223 | 50.0% | 51.3% | |
| 47.95% | 73 | 6.4 | 843 | 12,339 | 41.2% | 53.9% | |
| 47.22% | 72 | 5.8 | 791 | 12,256 | 42.1% | 52.9% | |
| 52.78% | 72 | 1.6 | 793 | 14,037 | 52.9% | 52.6% | |
| 57.58% | 67 | 1.1 | 778 | 13,969 | 60.0% | 56.1% | |
| 45.45% | 66 | 5.7 | 756 | 12,337 | 47.6% | 44.4% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 6.3 | 892 | 12,036 | 44.4% | 55.3% | |
| 49.23% | 65 | 1.8 | 802 | 13,006 | 48.1% | 50.0% | |
| 47.62% | 63 | 1.6 | 757 | 12,915 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 58.62% | 60 | 3.6 | 767 | 12,214 | 61.3% | 55.6% | |
| 57.63% | 59 | 6.2 | 885 | 12,366 | 65.4% | 51.5% | |
| 42.86% | 57 | 5.9 | 866 | 12,563 | 44.8% | 40.7% | |
| 53.57% | 56 | 4.2 | 791 | 12,383 | 65.5% | 40.7% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 1.2 | 813 | 13,336 | 47.8% | 51.7% | |
| 50.00% | 51 | 5.8 | 838 | 13,072 | 56.3% | 47.1% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 5.5 | 849 | 13,744 | 61.9% | 35.7% | |
| 56.52% | 47 | 1.0 | 724 | 13,372 | 35.0% | 73.1% | |
| 57.78% | 46 | 6.4 | 784 | 12,142 | 70.0% | 48.0% | |
| 48.84% | 44 | 1.1 | 850 | 13,338 | 56.3% | 44.4% | |
| 30.23% | 44 | 1.2 | 721 | 12,313 | 31.8% | 28.6% | |
| 38.64% | 44 | 1.4 | 844 | 13,938 | 38.1% | 39.1% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 1.1 | 731 | 12,752 | 55.0% | 41.7% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 2.0 | 806 | 13,914 | 40.9% | 61.9% | |
| 35.71% | 43 | 1.2 | 731 | 13,642 | 42.9% | 32.1% | |
| 40.48% | 42 | 1.8 | 652 | 12,035 | 36.8% | 43.5% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 6.3 | 826 | 13,821 | 46.7% | 63.0% | |
| 50.00% | 41 | 6.0 | 879 | 13,540 | 61.1% | 40.9% | |
| 45.00% | 40 | 5.3 | 853 | 13,372 | 58.8% | 34.8% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 1.3 | 731 | 12,108 | 44.0% | 38.5% | |
| 62.16% | 37 | 1.0 | 779 | 15,158 | 75.0% | 56.0% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 5.9 | 848 | 12,709 | 50.0% | 56.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 1.4 | 793 | 13,730 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 2.9 | 816 | 14,467 | 63.6% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 1.6 | 769 | 13,270 | 64.7% | 50.0% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 4.5 | 808 | 12,628 | 62.5% | 47.4% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 6.2 | 827 | 11,927 | 66.7% | 38.5% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 2.7 | 765 | 13,795 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 60.61% | 33 | 5.8 | 767 | 11,636 | 68.8% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 3.9 | 704 | 13,299 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 5.7 | 954 | 13,809 | 50.0% | 55.0% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 1.1 | 704 | 12,725 | 58.3% | 55.6% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 4.4 | 749 | 12,972 | 61.5% | 35.3% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 4.1 | 826 | 11,676 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 64.29% | 29 | 5.1 | 771 | 12,785 | 58.3% | 68.8% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 5.9 | 894 | 13,642 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 1.6 | 781 | 14,385 | 66.7% | 44.4% | |
| 69.23% | 26 | 4.7 | 768 | 12,427 | 90.9% | 53.3% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 1.1 | 776 | 13,045 | 53.9% | 30.8% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 2.0 | 818 | 13,468 | 30.0% | 37.5% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 5.7 | 783 | 11,261 | 40.0% | 53.3% | |
| 36.00% | 25 | 2.3 | 802 | 12,962 | 38.5% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 2.2 | 816 | 14,253 | 55.6% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 23 | 2.2 | 788 | 13,192 | 45.5% | 54.5% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 1.5 | 806 | 13,703 | 55.6% | 71.4% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 1.2 | 697 | 14,058 | 50.0% | 30.8% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 1.1 | 796 | 16,057 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 2.1 | 713 | 12,757 | 57.1% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.5 | 813 | 13,495 | 55.6% | 46.1% | |
| 61.11% | 19 | 4.5 | 703 | 11,246 | 63.6% | 57.1% | |
| 44.44% | 19 | 0.9 | 631 | 12,149 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 0.9 | 790 | 11,797 | 53.3% | 75.0% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 2.7 | 790 | 13,243 | 66.7% | 70.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 1.7 | 778 | 13,193 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 1.1 | 824 | 13,178 | 55.6% | 77.8% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.2 | 785 | 13,730 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 41.18% | 18 | 1.6 | 603 | 12,948 | 25.0% | 80.0% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.2 | 792 | 14,342 | 44.4% | 33.3% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.8 | 786 | 12,156 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.3 | 876 | 11,808 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.5 | 757 | 13,351 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 5.4 | 793 | 11,852 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.1 | 942 | 13,370 | 87.5% | 42.9% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 5.9 | 963 | 11,828 | 28.6% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 15 | 5.6 | 866 | 13,710 | 66.7% | 36.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 5.1 | 878 | 13,314 | 57.1% | 62.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 0.9 | 773 | 12,183 | 85.7% | 42.9% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 3.1 | 763 | 13,252 | 83.3% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.6 | 716 | 12,874 | 40.0% | 55.6% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 1.4 | 722 | 12,003 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 717 | 12,662 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 782 | 14,479 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.0 | 795 | 11,615 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 70.00% | 11 | 5.7 | 909 | 11,504 | 80.0% | 60.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 734 | 10,226 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.3 | 843 | 13,483 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.3 | 989 | 11,560 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 781 | 12,828 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 826 | 12,839 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.7 | 744 | 13,505 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.1 | 821 | 12,920 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.4 | 850 | 13,380 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.0 | 654 | 11,213 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 755 | 15,214 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.8 | 844 | 12,489 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.5 | 719 | 13,534 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 7 | 1.2 | 721 | 12,576 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 5.6 | 902 | 14,054 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.8 | 832 | 12,700 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.6 | 639 | 11,309 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 703 | 11,999 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.4 | 653 | 10,348 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.8 | 999 | 14,053 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,069 | 14,765 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 4.4 | 1,026 | 13,675 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 825 | 12,996 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 1,025 | 14,690 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 75.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 879 | 14,052 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Brand - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Brand in League of Legends?
Brand wins the Fizz vs Brand matchup with a 52.0% win rate compared to Fizz's 48.0%, a 4.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 76 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Fizz do against Brand in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Brand with a 51.4% win rate versus 48.6%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Brand in the late game?
In the late game, Brand takes over the Fizz vs Brand matchup with a 55.3% win rate compared to 44.7%. Brand scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Brand matchup?
Brand wins the matchup against Fizz with a 52.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 4.0 percentage point advantage means Brand is moderately favored in this lane matchup based on 76 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Brand?
The best Fizz build against Brand includes Zhonya's Hourglass, Lich Bane, Rabadon's Deathcap with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 80.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Brand?
The best Fizz runes against Brand use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 66.7% win rate in the Fizz vs Brand matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Brand?
No, Fizz struggles against Brand with only a 48.0% win rate. Brand has the advantage in this matchup. Fizz players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Brand's lead.
How do I play Fizz against Brand?
When playing Fizz against Brand, play cautiously and avoid Brand's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Brand has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.