Fizzvs Brand
Fizz vs Brand is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Fizz wins with a 54.5% win rate (+9.1%) over Brand based on 99 games. Fizz wins the early laning phase while Brand scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Brand matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Fizz vs Brand Matchup?
Fizz vs Brand Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Brand matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 99 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 54.5% win rate compared to Brand's 45.5%, giving Fizz a 9.1 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Fizz controls the early laning stage, but Brand outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Fizz needs to press advantages before Brand reaches their power spikes, while Brand should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Brand leads by 0.5s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz players can confidently pick into Brand and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Brand away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Brand Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Brand, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Brand
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Brand, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Brand are Zhonya's Hourglass, Lich Bane and Rabadon's Deathcap. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 83.3% win rate across 6 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Brand. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Brand matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz68.2%
Brand31.8%Fizz43.6%Brand56.4%Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 68.2% win rate — a 36.4 percentage point lead over Brand. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Brand is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 56.4% win rate — 12.7 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Brand, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Fizz must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Brand reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Brand survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Fizz Runes Against Brand
Domination
Precision
Running Domination primary with Precision secondary allows Fizz to press their advantage against Brand, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.74% | 354 | 6.2 | 872 | 13,287 | 59.3% | 39.7% | |
| 54.60% | 348 | 5.9 | 838 | 12,613 | 60.6% | 49.5% | |
| 52.37% | 317 | 5.9 | 842 | 11,865 | 45.9% | 58.8% | |
| 54.98% | 271 | 5.8 | 865 | 12,715 | 57.3% | 53.4% | |
| 48.75% | 240 | 5.7 | 866 | 12,596 | 42.3% | 53.1% | |
| 51.48% | 237 | 5.8 | 869 | 12,743 | 55.9% | 48.1% | |
| 53.24% | 216 | 5.8 | 826 | 13,109 | 54.8% | 52.3% | |
| 54.50% | 200 | 6.2 | 876 | 12,270 | 57.5% | 50.6% | |
| 47.00% | 200 | 5.9 | 884 | 12,230 | 56.2% | 39.6% | |
| 45.03% | 191 | 5.9 | 728 | 11,611 | 43.0% | 46.9% | |
| 46.70% | 182 | 5.5 | 827 | 12,305 | 41.3% | 50.5% | |
| 53.93% | 178 | 6.0 | 828 | 12,665 | 61.1% | 49.1% | |
| 47.95% | 171 | 5.2 | 759 | 12,055 | 31.6% | 61.0% | |
| 53.25% | 169 | 5.2 | 825 | 12,330 | 51.9% | 54.4% | |
| 48.50% | 167 | 5.6 | 891 | 12,379 | 44.8% | 51.0% | |
| 46.71% | 167 | 5.9 | 798 | 12,378 | 50.7% | 43.6% | |
| 49.32% | 148 | 5.6 | 819 | 12,730 | 53.6% | 46.7% | |
| 53.74% | 147 | 5.5 | 829 | 12,759 | 58.5% | 50.0% | |
| 46.21% | 145 | 5.6 | 841 | 11,686 | 50.0% | 43.0% | |
| 52.76% | 127 | 6.2 | 938 | 13,186 | 58.5% | 48.6% | |
| 57.80% | 109 | 5.8 | 845 | 12,538 | 51.1% | 62.9% | |
| 48.60% | 107 | 6.0 | 922 | 12,424 | 57.8% | 41.9% | |
| 51.46% | 103 | 6.0 | 830 | 13,325 | 60.0% | 44.8% | |
| 46.00% | 100 | 5.9 | 823 | 12,977 | 46.9% | 45.6% | |
| 54.55% | 99 | 5.8 | 886 | 13,059 | 68.4% | 45.9% | |
| 54.55% | 99 | 5.5 | 904 | 12,525 | 68.2% | 43.6% | |
| 55.10% | 98 | 6.1 | 944 | 13,881 | 68.3% | 45.6% | |
| 47.92% | 96 | 5.1 | 770 | 11,753 | 40.0% | 56.5% | |
| 51.58% | 95 | 5.6 | 785 | 11,500 | 54.0% | 48.9% | |
| 51.58% | 95 | 6.0 | 797 | 12,284 | 57.8% | 46.0% | |
| 52.22% | 90 | 5.9 | 916 | 12,834 | 54.8% | 50.0% | |
| 59.30% | 86 | 5.8 | 891 | 12,652 | 50.0% | 65.4% | |
| 47.06% | 85 | 4.6 | 779 | 11,454 | 53.1% | 38.9% | |
| 46.43% | 84 | 5.7 | 799 | 12,111 | 41.0% | 51.1% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 5.9 | 855 | 11,914 | 43.8% | 50.0% | |
| 58.90% | 73 | 4.9 | 882 | 13,332 | 56.7% | 60.5% | |
| 48.61% | 72 | 6.0 | 872 | 12,201 | 47.1% | 50.0% | |
| 48.28% | 58 | 6.0 | 842 | 12,569 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 59.26% | 54 | 1.4 | 750 | 13,673 | 66.7% | 54.5% | |
| 54.17% | 48 | 6.0 | 831 | 12,529 | 50.0% | 56.3% | |
| 53.19% | 47 | 6.0 | 831 | 13,353 | 53.3% | 53.1% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 5.8 | 1,028 | 13,097 | 64.7% | 50.0% | |
| 58.14% | 43 | 2.3 | 824 | 13,552 | 65.0% | 52.2% | |
| 48.84% | 43 | 5.7 | 896 | 13,117 | 55.6% | 44.0% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 5.3 | 820 | 11,402 | 57.1% | 51.9% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 6.2 | 862 | 13,791 | 56.3% | 45.8% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 5.8 | 850 | 13,231 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 65.00% | 40 | 5.9 | 830 | 13,651 | 81.8% | 58.6% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 1.8 | 727 | 12,896 | 57.9% | 36.8% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 1.0 | 711 | 13,709 | 50.0% | 47.8% | |
| 63.89% | 36 | 2.4 | 901 | 14,237 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 6.3 | 815 | 12,855 | 50.0% | 35.0% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 5.7 | 873 | 12,352 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 1.6 | 714 | 11,086 | 52.6% | 64.3% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 5.9 | 820 | 13,011 | 38.5% | 63.2% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 1.2 | 890 | 14,941 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 5.3 | 823 | 12,241 | 38.5% | 52.6% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 5.3 | 858 | 13,232 | 33.3% | 63.2% | |
| 70.97% | 31 | 6.1 | 844 | 12,528 | 64.7% | 78.6% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 6.0 | 858 | 13,454 | 53.9% | 47.1% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 4.9 | 886 | 12,911 | 40.0% | 52.6% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 5.6 | 937 | 12,724 | 50.0% | 65.0% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 5.1 | 796 | 11,986 | 25.0% | 52.9% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 5.9 | 793 | 12,990 | 54.5% | 38.5% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.9 | 622 | 11,888 | 63.6% | 46.1% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 6.0 | 980 | 13,322 | 45.5% | 75.0% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 1.1 | 730 | 14,773 | 33.3% | 64.7% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 5.0 | 970 | 14,611 | 66.7% | 56.3% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 5.4 | 909 | 11,229 | 12.5% | 61.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.8 | 738 | 14,226 | 37.5% | 53.9% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.2 | 797 | 14,234 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 4.9 | 866 | 11,714 | 28.6% | 46.1% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.2 | 922 | 10,514 | 72.7% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 4.6 | 918 | 12,432 | 77.8% | 45.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 4.5 | 910 | 14,857 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 5.8 | 847 | 11,395 | 25.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.2 | 827 | 12,353 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 76.47% | 17 | 1.5 | 688 | 12,688 | 72.7% | 83.3% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 5.9 | 940 | 13,764 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.9 | 886 | 15,205 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 4.4 | 695 | 11,282 | 44.4% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.8 | 752 | 13,859 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 1.7 | 601 | 10,025 | 55.6% | 71.4% | |
| 87.50% | 16 | 1.5 | 759 | 15,670 | 83.3% | 90.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 1.4 | 820 | 13,501 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 5.0 | 646 | 10,777 | 25.0% | 28.6% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 4.1 | 900 | 14,001 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 3.0 | 890 | 14,451 | 80.0% | 62.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 5.3 | 943 | 13,492 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.5 | 743 | 12,734 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 3.7 | 788 | 13,277 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.1 | 885 | 15,382 | 75.0% | 62.5% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 2.8 | 747 | 10,839 | 16.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 4.9 | 695 | 10,423 | 57.1% | 80.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.0 | 870 | 13,075 | 80.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.7 | 798 | 13,895 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 3.6 | 752 | 11,341 | 42.9% | 60.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.5 | 851 | 12,236 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.3 | 750 | 12,971 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.4 | 741 | 10,902 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.1 | 810 | 11,261 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.8 | 608 | 12,434 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.1 | 572 | 10,951 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 3.6 | 1,058 | 13,880 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 746 | 10,972 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 3.9 | 899 | 14,145 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.7 | 887 | 12,571 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.0 | 871 | 12,377 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.7 | 830 | 10,243 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.3 | 702 | 11,556 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.4 | 864 | 11,984 | 60.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.8 | 804 | 11,725 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.7 | 653 | 12,218 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.0 | 887 | 14,547 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.9 | 822 | 13,465 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.0 | 830 | 16,629 | 100.0% | 71.4% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.9 | 1,038 | 14,743 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.3 | 938 | 13,296 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.4 | 789 | 10,042 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.9 | 998 | 13,452 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.3 | 741 | 11,710 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.7 | 859 | 11,150 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.8 | 843 | 9,763 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.9 | 943 | 14,119 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.7 | 872 | 13,976 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.6 | 722 | 13,093 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.4 | 1,072 | 13,384 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.1 | 766 | 9,379 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 893 | 12,869 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 5.3 | 788 | 10,522 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.1 | 745 | 9,502 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.3 | 584 | 12,333 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 764 | 9,097 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Brand - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Brand in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Fizz vs Brand matchup with a 54.5% win rate compared to Brand's 45.5%, a 9.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 99 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Fizz do against Brand in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Brand with a 68.2% win rate versus 31.8%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Brand in the late game?
In the late game, Brand takes over the Fizz vs Brand matchup with a 56.4% win rate compared to 43.6%. Brand scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Brand matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Brand with a 54.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 9.1 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 99 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Brand?
The best Fizz build against Brand includes Zhonya's Hourglass, Lich Bane, Rabadon's Deathcap with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 83.3% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Brand?
The best Fizz runes against Brand use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 58.3% win rate in the Fizz vs Brand matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Brand?
Yes, Fizz has a favorable matchup against Brand with a 54.5% win rate. Fizz strongly counters Brand in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Fizz against Brand?
When playing Fizz against Brand, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.