Brandvs Fizz
Brand vs Fizz is a very close matchup in LoL patch 26.13. Brand wins with a 50.0% win rate (+0.0%) over Fizz based on 12 games. Brand holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Brand vs Fizz matchup.
Brand Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Brand performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Brand vs Fizz Matchup?
Brand vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Brand vs Fizz matchup is essentially a coin-flip matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 12 recent matches analyzed, Brand wins with a 50.0% win rate compared to Fizz's 50.0%, giving Brand a 0.0 percentage point advantage. Brand holds a slight edge in both the early and late game, but the margins are thin enough that individual skill and jungle attention will often determine the outcome. Fizz can still find windows through outplays and team coordination. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Brand leads by 0.8s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Brand has a statistical edge, but the margin is close enough that respecting Fizz's strengths is important. Trade when cooldowns are favorable, track the enemy jungler, and build toward your strongest item spikes to convert the slight advantage into a decisive lead. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Brand vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Brand, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Brand Build Against Fizz
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Brand needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Brand against Fizz are Liandry's Torment, Shadowflame and Rylai's Crystal Scepter. This combination gives Brand an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 2 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Brand vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand50.0%
Fizz50.0%Brand50.0%Fizz50.0%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Brand and Fizz, with Brand holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Late game (25+ minutes) is equally balanced, with Brand at 50.0% win rate — only 0.0 points ahead of Fizz. Team fight execution and macro play determine the winner at this stage, not champion matchup advantage.
This matchup is remarkably even at every stage of the game. Neither Brand nor Fizz has a phase-specific advantage, making this a pure skill matchup where individual mechanics, decision-making, and team coordination determine the outcome.
Best Brand Runes Against Fizz
Sorcery
Precision
The Sorcery primary with Precision secondary combination helps Brand maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Fizz.
Brand matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.13. The table below shows Brand's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.41% | 121 | 2.5 | 783 | 10,591 | 42.1% | 54.2% | |
| 50.00% | 110 | 2.3 | 815 | 10,035 | 55.6% | 46.1% | |
| 55.95% | 84 | 3.5 | 941 | 11,374 | 58.8% | 54.0% | |
| 70.37% | 81 | 6.2 | 1,027 | 13,590 | 66.7% | 72.2% | |
| 44.12% | 68 | 5.7 | 1,008 | 12,498 | 41.7% | 45.5% | |
| 46.97% | 66 | 1.9 | 836 | 9,783 | 46.7% | 47.2% | |
| 59.38% | 64 | 1.8 | 866 | 9,780 | 66.7% | 54.0% | |
| 47.62% | 63 | 2.1 | 788 | 10,247 | 44.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.11% | 57 | 5.5 | 1,028 | 10,755 | 45.8% | 39.4% | |
| 43.64% | 55 | 1.9 | 816 | 10,163 | 41.4% | 46.1% | |
| 51.85% | 54 | 4.8 | 979 | 10,700 | 59.3% | 44.4% | |
| 52.00% | 50 | 6.1 | 967 | 11,990 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 2.3 | 945 | 9,683 | 33.3% | 64.3% | |
| 48.98% | 49 | 2.0 | 777 | 10,435 | 57.9% | 43.3% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 5.9 | 939 | 11,678 | 40.9% | 51.9% | |
| 42.55% | 47 | 2.0 | 829 | 9,570 | 39.1% | 45.8% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 2.5 | 830 | 10,248 | 62.5% | 46.4% | |
| 52.38% | 42 | 3.4 | 903 | 11,816 | 47.1% | 56.0% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 6.4 | 976 | 12,990 | 46.7% | 62.5% | |
| 65.79% | 38 | 1.9 | 872 | 10,424 | 57.1% | 67.7% | |
| 64.86% | 37 | 2.3 | 928 | 9,599 | 73.7% | 55.6% | |
| 58.33% | 36 | 2.7 | 805 | 10,770 | 72.7% | 52.0% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 6.2 | 1,032 | 13,169 | 22.2% | 57.7% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 5.8 | 1,023 | 11,498 | 46.7% | 55.0% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 1.8 | 751 | 10,273 | 42.9% | 44.0% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 2.0 | 957 | 10,294 | 66.7% | 35.0% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 1.9 | 771 | 10,358 | 30.0% | 42.9% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 1.7 | 842 | 9,858 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 4.0 | 941 | 10,957 | 40.0% | 65.0% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 1.9 | 926 | 10,152 | 35.7% | 53.3% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 6.0 | 895 | 10,069 | 53.3% | 75.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 5.8 | 1,030 | 11,818 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 5.8 | 1,026 | 10,457 | 54.5% | 53.3% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 5.6 | 937 | 11,983 | 73.3% | 50.0% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 6.3 | 1,133 | 13,370 | 72.7% | 58.3% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.0 | 963 | 12,024 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 1.7 | 844 | 9,565 | 62.5% | 23.1% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 2.2 | 870 | 10,738 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 1.7 | 622 | 9,003 | 63.6% | 60.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.7 | 726 | 10,322 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.8 | 808 | 9,371 | 55.6% | 54.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.2 | 1,038 | 12,504 | 80.0% | 30.0% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 5.9 | 925 | 9,539 | 36.4% | 22.2% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 4.6 | 1,070 | 13,172 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 5.8 | 1,124 | 12,928 | 71.4% | 45.5% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.2 | 1,055 | 12,735 | 71.4% | 60.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 1.8 | 897 | 10,574 | 66.7% | 54.5% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.1 | 1,222 | 13,842 | 75.0% | 53.9% | |
| 23.53% | 17 | 5.2 | 1,047 | 11,879 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 1.8 | 896 | 9,749 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.9 | 811 | 9,407 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 3.8 | 1,066 | 12,749 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 2.3 | 860 | 11,316 | 0.0% | 63.6% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 6.0 | 875 | 11,917 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.8 | 773 | 9,489 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 6.1 | 1,087 | 14,095 | 100.0% | 70.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.9 | 816 | 10,241 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.9 | 907 | 10,868 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 4.2 | 882 | 11,439 | 66.7% | 30.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 2.1 | 732 | 9,611 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 2.1 | 812 | 11,083 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 4.8 | 974 | 11,263 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 4.1 | 945 | 9,969 | 80.0% | 42.9% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 720 | 7,706 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.3 | 934 | 14,140 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.0 | 1,039 | 10,788 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.9 | 974 | 10,350 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 3.9 | 851 | 9,383 | 57.1% | 75.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.3 | 947 | 12,053 | 60.0% | 80.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 793 | 10,643 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.4 | 779 | 10,056 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.4 | 842 | 10,990 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 3.5 | 1,082 | 13,029 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 6.0 | 1,104 | 11,699 | 66.7% | 83.3% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.2 | 859 | 8,811 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.7 | 1,077 | 11,102 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.9 | 923 | 11,683 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.1 | 1,033 | 10,518 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.3 | 1,115 | 12,462 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.0 | 1,123 | 12,075 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.2 | 773 | 13,533 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.5 | 1,016 | 11,041 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.9 | 956 | 10,647 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.2 | 1,156 | 11,630 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.6 | 1,123 | 12,844 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.6 | 1,065 | 12,785 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.1 | 674 | 10,895 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.9 | 822 | 10,519 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.1 | 980 | 12,035 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.2 | 1,184 | 9,882 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.9 | 1,045 | 14,089 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.1 | 994 | 13,244 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 2.1 | 811 | 13,110 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.8 | 829 | 9,134 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 801 | 12,306 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 840 | 14,086 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 1,468 | 17,097 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.1 | 1,128 | 13,272 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 1,185 | 12,741 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 850 | 8,656 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 778 | 10,205 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 1,212 | 10,102 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 775 | 7,295 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.9 | 863 | 10,567 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 3.7 | 724 | 10,587 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 857 | 10,274 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 1,237 | 10,494 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 798 | 9,210 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Brand vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Brand do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Brand wins the Brand vs Fizz matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to Fizz's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 12 recent ranked games in patch 26.13.
How does Brand do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Brand has the advantage against Fizz with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Brand players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Brand do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Brand takes over the Brand vs Fizz matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to 50.0%. Brand scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Brand vs Fizz matchup?
Brand wins the matchup against Fizz with a 50.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.13. The 0.0 percentage point advantage means Brand is slightly favored in this lane matchup based on 12 games analyzed.
What is the best Brand build against Fizz?
The best Brand build against Fizz includes Liandry's Torment, Shadowflame, Rylai's Crystal Scepter with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Brand runes against Fizz?
The best Brand runes against Fizz use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Brand vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Brand counter Fizz?
Yes, Brand has a favorable matchup against Fizz with a 50.0% win rate. Brand slightly edges out Fizz in lane based on current patch 26.13 data.
How do I play Brand against Fizz?
When playing Brand against Fizz, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.