Brandvs Fizz
Brand vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.3. Fizz wins with a 58.2% win rate (+16.4%) over Brand based on 55 games. Fizz wins the early laning phase while Brand scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Brand vs Fizz matchup.
Brand Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Brand performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Fizz(41.8%)Who Wins the Brand vs Fizz Matchup?
Brand vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Brand vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 55 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 58.2% win rate compared to Brand's 41.8%, giving Fizz a 16.4 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Fizz controls the early laning stage, but Brand outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Fizz needs to press advantages before Brand reaches their power spikes, while Brand should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Brand leads by 0.8s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz has a strong advantage in this matchup. Brand players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Fizz overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Brand vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Brand, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Brand Build Against Fizz
Chainlaced Crushers is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Brand needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Brand against Fizz are Liandry's Torment, Shadowflame and Rylai's Crystal Scepter. This combination gives Brand an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 6 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Brand vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand22.2%Fizz77.8%Brand60.7%Fizz39.3%Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 77.8% win rate — a 55.6 percentage point lead over Brand. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Brand is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 60.7% win rate — 21.4 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Brand, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Fizz must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Brand reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Brand survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Brand Runes Against Fizz
Domination
Sorcery
The Domination and Sorcery rune setup gives Brand the best tools to compete against Fizz in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Brand matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.3. The table below shows Brand's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.10% | 387 | 2.8 | 805 | 10,889 | 45.7% | 51.3% | |
| 57.92% | 259 | 2.1 | 853 | 10,664 | 59.8% | 56.8% | |
| 49.01% | 253 | 1.8 | 800 | 9,739 | 50.4% | 47.8% | |
| 51.05% | 237 | 6.2 | 1,025 | 12,897 | 53.6% | 49.3% | |
| 45.58% | 226 | 1.8 | 841 | 10,437 | 41.9% | 48.1% | |
| 56.94% | 216 | 2.1 | 822 | 10,404 | 53.8% | 59.4% | |
| 49.75% | 199 | 6.1 | 1,021 | 12,495 | 53.5% | 46.0% | |
| 53.72% | 188 | 3.2 | 1,031 | 11,252 | 52.2% | 54.6% | |
| 49.71% | 175 | 1.8 | 851 | 10,335 | 44.1% | 53.3% | |
| 53.05% | 164 | 1.8 | 879 | 10,504 | 52.0% | 53.9% | |
| 66.45% | 152 | 5.8 | 1,018 | 13,049 | 71.4% | 62.9% | |
| 55.33% | 150 | 5.9 | 958 | 12,708 | 53.3% | 56.7% | |
| 45.21% | 146 | 1.8 | 794 | 9,382 | 47.8% | 43.0% | |
| 47.95% | 146 | 5.8 | 1,025 | 11,801 | 52.2% | 44.2% | |
| 42.86% | 140 | 1.7 | 932 | 10,519 | 50.0% | 38.4% | |
| 52.86% | 140 | 1.6 | 786 | 9,216 | 52.8% | 52.9% | |
| 56.39% | 133 | 5.6 | 1,009 | 11,990 | 60.7% | 53.3% | |
| 47.29% | 129 | 5.9 | 1,010 | 12,280 | 45.1% | 48.7% | |
| 57.94% | 126 | 6.0 | 984 | 11,941 | 59.6% | 56.8% | |
| 52.00% | 125 | 1.8 | 786 | 10,624 | 54.9% | 50.0% | |
| 46.77% | 124 | 2.2 | 850 | 9,935 | 54.2% | 40.0% | |
| 48.39% | 124 | 3.2 | 760 | 9,979 | 47.1% | 49.3% | |
| 56.91% | 123 | 2.0 | 781 | 10,935 | 57.1% | 56.8% | |
| 61.34% | 119 | 5.0 | 913 | 11,703 | 62.1% | 60.7% | |
| 51.28% | 117 | 1.9 | 751 | 10,323 | 63.3% | 42.6% | |
| 58.12% | 117 | 2.4 | 800 | 10,691 | 55.8% | 59.5% | |
| 61.95% | 113 | 3.4 | 864 | 11,206 | 51.1% | 69.7% | |
| 51.38% | 109 | 1.7 | 761 | 9,744 | 54.9% | 48.3% | |
| 54.90% | 102 | 6.1 | 1,031 | 13,164 | 47.6% | 60.0% | |
| 49.02% | 102 | 6.3 | 1,072 | 12,902 | 54.3% | 46.3% | |
| 60.40% | 101 | 1.8 | 819 | 10,173 | 58.8% | 62.0% | |
| 61.22% | 98 | 1.8 | 643 | 9,682 | 78.0% | 43.8% | |
| 51.58% | 95 | 2.1 | 1,003 | 9,890 | 60.9% | 42.9% | |
| 51.11% | 90 | 5.8 | 1,005 | 11,695 | 54.3% | 49.1% | |
| 53.33% | 90 | 6.3 | 984 | 12,412 | 62.2% | 47.2% | |
| 52.22% | 90 | 5.9 | 1,009 | 12,821 | 59.0% | 47.1% | |
| 58.33% | 84 | 2.6 | 916 | 11,122 | 53.3% | 61.1% | |
| 40.48% | 84 | 1.6 | 875 | 10,320 | 48.6% | 34.7% | |
| 53.66% | 82 | 1.8 | 797 | 10,401 | 52.9% | 54.2% | |
| 56.16% | 73 | 4.5 | 865 | 9,957 | 63.2% | 48.6% | |
| 57.14% | 70 | 6.0 | 997 | 11,807 | 68.0% | 51.1% | |
| 52.17% | 69 | 2.7 | 844 | 10,590 | 51.6% | 52.6% | |
| 48.48% | 66 | 1.7 | 797 | 9,796 | 47.8% | 48.8% | |
| 42.19% | 64 | 5.2 | 957 | 11,356 | 45.8% | 40.0% | |
| 51.61% | 62 | 1.9 | 886 | 9,814 | 57.6% | 44.8% | |
| 40.68% | 59 | 6.0 | 908 | 11,154 | 33.3% | 45.7% | |
| 37.93% | 58 | 5.8 | 1,069 | 11,555 | 30.4% | 42.9% | |
| 64.91% | 57 | 6.1 | 1,087 | 13,246 | 60.9% | 67.7% | |
| 54.55% | 55 | 4.8 | 892 | 11,610 | 52.0% | 56.7% | |
| 41.82% | 55 | 5.1 | 866 | 10,511 | 22.2% | 60.7% | |
| 48.15% | 54 | 5.0 | 946 | 11,045 | 56.0% | 41.4% | |
| 79.63% | 54 | 6.1 | 1,063 | 14,061 | 81.8% | 78.1% | |
| 50.00% | 54 | 6.0 | 1,003 | 11,672 | 42.3% | 57.1% | |
| 39.62% | 53 | 1.8 | 767 | 10,207 | 38.1% | 40.6% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 6.0 | 1,016 | 13,054 | 57.1% | 61.3% | |
| 55.77% | 52 | 6.0 | 955 | 11,748 | 60.9% | 51.7% | |
| 68.63% | 51 | 6.0 | 1,001 | 11,667 | 60.0% | 76.9% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 6.1 | 1,027 | 12,897 | 47.8% | 59.3% | |
| 55.10% | 49 | 1.7 | 835 | 9,792 | 72.0% | 37.5% | |
| 44.90% | 49 | 5.3 | 1,028 | 11,723 | 50.0% | 41.9% | |
| 59.57% | 47 | 2.0 | 972 | 10,150 | 57.1% | 61.5% | |
| 53.19% | 47 | 5.7 | 959 | 12,412 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 55.32% | 47 | 6.0 | 1,031 | 13,074 | 70.0% | 44.4% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 1.9 | 850 | 9,660 | 40.9% | 60.0% | |
| 56.52% | 46 | 5.4 | 1,017 | 12,704 | 69.2% | 51.5% | |
| 50.00% | 46 | 5.3 | 1,082 | 12,827 | 68.8% | 40.0% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 6.2 | 1,058 | 11,698 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 57.78% | 45 | 5.7 | 1,129 | 12,618 | 47.4% | 65.4% | |
| 68.18% | 44 | 5.7 | 857 | 11,494 | 71.4% | 65.2% | |
| 61.36% | 44 | 4.8 | 973 | 10,709 | 50.0% | 69.2% | |
| 53.49% | 43 | 1.7 | 934 | 11,109 | 57.1% | 51.7% | |
| 45.24% | 42 | 5.8 | 1,033 | 12,216 | 50.0% | 42.3% | |
| 63.41% | 41 | 4.0 | 849 | 10,912 | 63.2% | 63.6% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 4.8 | 893 | 10,939 | 35.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 2.1 | 844 | 10,407 | 60.0% | 44.0% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 3.4 | 1,004 | 12,620 | 53.3% | 37.5% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 3.8 | 1,018 | 12,376 | 33.3% | 64.0% | |
| 37.14% | 35 | 6.2 | 1,097 | 11,638 | 35.3% | 38.9% | |
| 60.00% | 35 | 5.5 | 1,018 | 10,988 | 50.0% | 68.4% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 5.7 | 963 | 11,481 | 53.9% | 38.1% | |
| 63.64% | 33 | 1.7 | 785 | 9,753 | 63.2% | 64.3% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 4.6 | 1,147 | 12,304 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 32 | 6.3 | 1,115 | 13,705 | 37.5% | 70.8% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 4.8 | 885 | 11,262 | 57.1% | 47.1% | |
| 64.52% | 31 | 5.4 | 916 | 11,272 | 60.0% | 68.8% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 1.7 | 876 | 10,462 | 47.1% | 30.8% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 5.4 | 917 | 11,238 | 46.1% | 68.8% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 4.8 | 901 | 9,955 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 6.1 | 1,083 | 12,180 | 30.0% | 64.7% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 2.3 | 1,052 | 13,626 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 5.2 | 1,139 | 11,888 | 70.0% | 46.7% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.6 | 872 | 12,627 | 28.6% | 55.6% | |
| 36.00% | 25 | 5.0 | 914 | 10,399 | 25.0% | 46.1% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 5.8 | 1,072 | 13,330 | 83.3% | 47.4% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 2.3 | 926 | 12,194 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 4.8 | 1,111 | 12,131 | 63.6% | 53.9% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 5.9 | 1,004 | 13,565 | 28.6% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.2 | 1,075 | 11,762 | 55.6% | 46.1% | |
| 81.82% | 22 | 3.2 | 1,084 | 12,516 | 87.5% | 78.6% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.0 | 1,120 | 12,612 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 3.4 | 1,113 | 11,796 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 6.4 | 984 | 12,671 | 83.3% | 37.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 3.1 | 1,136 | 13,622 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 4.7 | 918 | 12,708 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 1,034 | 12,825 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 2.0 | 803 | 10,561 | 66.7% | 63.6% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.1 | 985 | 12,106 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 5.4 | 987 | 12,452 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 5.1 | 990 | 12,487 | 85.7% | 50.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 5.2 | 863 | 11,336 | 55.6% | 40.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 4.9 | 933 | 10,475 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.3 | 1,068 | 10,965 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.3 | 1,140 | 11,509 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 16 | 3.4 | 893 | 9,499 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 5.3 | 1,099 | 11,632 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.7 | 619 | 9,705 | 27.3% | 60.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.1 | 1,157 | 11,767 | 45.5% | 80.0% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 1.3 | 842 | 11,278 | 20.0% | 30.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 5.5 | 935 | 11,506 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 3.4 | 1,042 | 12,681 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 2.3 | 872 | 11,421 | 62.5% | 83.3% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 1.6 | 885 | 10,917 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 5.2 | 975 | 12,636 | 20.0% | 37.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.2 | 1,093 | 10,558 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.6 | 1,026 | 12,520 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 5.1 | 1,036 | 12,944 | 66.7% | 11.1% | |
| 16.67% | 12 | 5.6 | 874 | 11,630 | 0.0% | 22.2% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 2.0 | 881 | 10,709 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 12 | 2.1 | 768 | 9,890 | 16.7% | 16.7% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.3 | 752 | 9,615 | 55.6% | 0.0% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 2.2 | 1,047 | 11,683 | 50.0% | 85.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.0 | 929 | 11,695 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.5 | 968 | 12,168 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.2 | 810 | 11,994 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 1.7 | 745 | 10,097 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 1,207 | 12,894 | 80.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 985 | 11,977 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 3.2 | 1,111 | 13,086 | 100.0% | 22.2% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.4 | 981 | 11,245 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 2.0 | 723 | 10,859 | 66.7% | 14.3% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.1 | 954 | 12,011 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.2 | 914 | 12,763 | 25.0% | 80.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 6.1 | 1,060 | 12,962 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.8 | 968 | 13,989 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 11.11% | 9 | 3.8 | 944 | 7,992 | 16.7% | 0.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.1 | 911 | 12,967 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.4 | 1,077 | 15,889 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 4.5 | 978 | 12,697 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 2.2 | 839 | 11,519 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.0 | 1,253 | 10,837 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 0.7 | 872 | 10,786 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.2 | 947 | 11,144 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.1 | 641 | 10,003 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.2 | 1,266 | 10,990 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.5 | 1,083 | 10,160 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 5.1 | 1,096 | 12,958 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.3 | 749 | 10,663 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.4 | 888 | 12,158 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 1,046 | 13,762 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Brand vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Brand do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Brand vs Fizz matchup with a 58.2% win rate compared to Brand's 41.8%, a 16.4 percentage point difference. This data is based on 55 recent ranked games in patch 26.3.
How does Brand do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Brand with a 77.8% win rate versus 22.2%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Brand do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Brand takes over the Brand vs Fizz matchup with a 60.7% win rate compared to 39.3%. Brand scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Brand vs Fizz matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Brand with a 58.2% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.3. The 16.4 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 55 games analyzed.
What is the best Brand build against Fizz?
The best Brand build against Fizz includes Liandry's Torment, Shadowflame, Rylai's Crystal Scepter with Chainlaced Crushers. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Brand runes against Fizz?
The best Brand runes against Fizz use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 55.6% win rate in the Brand vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Brand counter Fizz?
No, Brand struggles against Fizz with only a 41.8% win rate. Fizz has the advantage in this matchup. Brand players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Fizz's lead.
How do I play Brand against Fizz?
When playing Brand against Fizz, play cautiously and avoid Fizz's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Fizz in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.