
Swainvs Lee Sin
Swain vs Lee Sin is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Lee Sin wins with a 62.5% win rate (+25.0%) over Swain based on 8 games. Swain wins the early laning phase while Lee Sin scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Swain build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Swain vs Lee Sin matchup.
Swain Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Swain performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Swain vs Lee Sin Matchup?

Swain vs Lee Sin Matchup Summary
The Swain vs Lee Sin matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 8 recent matches analyzed, Lee Sin wins with a 62.5% win rate compared to Swain's 37.5%, giving Lee Sin a 25.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Swain controls the early laning stage, but Lee Sin outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Swain needs to press advantages before Lee Sin reaches their power spikes, while Lee Sin should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Swain leads by 0.8s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Lee Sin has a strong advantage in this matchup. Swain players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Lee Sin overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Swain vs Lee Sin Laning Phase Breakdown
Lee Sin is favored during the laning phase against Swain, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Lee Sin holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Swain Build Against Lee Sin
Immortal Path is the optimal boots choice against Lee Sin, providing the mobility and stats Swain needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Swain against Lee Sin are Zhonya's Hourglass, Rylai's Crystal Scepter and Blackfire Torch. This combination gives Swain an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Swain vs Lee Sin matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Swain dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 60.0% win rate — a 20.0 percentage point lead over Lee Sin. This lopsided early game means Swain can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Lee Sin is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Swain. Extended games heavily favor Lee Sin, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Swain must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Lee Sin reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Lee Sin survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Swain Runes Against Lee Sin
The Precision and Resolve rune setup gives Swain the best tools to compete against Lee Sin in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Swain matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Swain's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Swain build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.51% | 332 | 2.5 | 681 | 10,325 | 48.8% | 53.2% | |
| 49.49% | 293 | 2.1 | 671 | 9,737 | 50.0% | 49.1% | |
| 43.56% | 225 | 2.2 | 692 | 9,717 | 39.8% | 47.0% | |
| 46.23% | 199 | 2.8 | 709 | 10,472 | 46.0% | 46.4% | |
| 56.48% | 193 | 1.8 | 766 | 9,747 | 53.4% | 59.0% | |
| 46.24% | 186 | 1.8 | 643 | 9,708 | 46.8% | 45.9% | |
| 44.32% | 176 | 1.8 | 754 | 10,263 | 43.7% | 44.8% | |
| 49.38% | 160 | 1.7 | 666 | 9,725 | 50.8% | 48.4% | |
| 50.00% | 158 | 6.0 | 995 | 12,476 | 51.5% | 48.9% | |
| 57.05% | 156 | 1.8 | 821 | 9,798 | 54.5% | 59.5% | |
| 59.87% | 152 | 5.8 | 896 | 12,477 | 68.3% | 54.4% | |
| 56.08% | 148 | 5.6 | 913 | 12,524 | 58.6% | 53.9% | |
| 54.78% | 115 | 5.2 | 867 | 11,969 | 63.6% | 49.3% | |
| 51.82% | 110 | 2.6 | 891 | 9,537 | 57.9% | 45.3% | |
| 43.64% | 110 | 1.9 | 720 | 9,939 | 40.8% | 45.9% | |
| 48.15% | 108 | 5.9 | 900 | 11,967 | 48.0% | 48.3% | |
| 48.54% | 103 | 1.7 | 665 | 9,655 | 59.0% | 42.2% | |
| 62.38% | 101 | 2.5 | 688 | 10,234 | 62.8% | 62.1% | |
| 39.60% | 101 | 3.2 | 711 | 10,294 | 28.9% | 46.0% | |
| 52.08% | 96 | 1.7 | 720 | 9,586 | 54.4% | 50.0% | |
| 52.17% | 92 | 1.8 | 809 | 10,281 | 45.5% | 55.9% | |
| 38.89% | 90 | 1.6 | 694 | 9,120 | 35.7% | 41.7% | |
| 60.67% | 89 | 5.8 | 888 | 11,515 | 59.6% | 62.2% | |
| 59.55% | 89 | 5.7 | 952 | 12,459 | 63.9% | 56.6% | |
| 47.67% | 86 | 2.0 | 653 | 10,404 | 59.3% | 42.4% | |
| 47.67% | 86 | 5.9 | 868 | 10,794 | 47.6% | 47.7% | |
| 55.81% | 86 | 2.6 | 749 | 9,832 | 64.4% | 46.3% | |
| 58.82% | 85 | 3.2 | 716 | 10,237 | 58.8% | 58.8% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 1.7 | 787 | 9,701 | 57.8% | 43.6% | |
| 47.44% | 78 | 5.9 | 853 | 9,946 | 58.5% | 35.1% | |
| 49.33% | 75 | 6.0 | 909 | 12,050 | 43.9% | 55.9% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 4.8 | 844 | 11,084 | 51.9% | 44.7% | |
| 51.35% | 74 | 1.7 | 662 | 9,443 | 46.9% | 54.8% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 5.8 | 908 | 10,794 | 51.6% | 44.2% | |
| 45.07% | 71 | 1.8 | 716 | 9,690 | 43.3% | 46.3% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 1.8 | 649 | 9,335 | 50.0% | 36.1% | |
| 53.03% | 66 | 5.2 | 804 | 10,428 | 63.6% | 42.4% | |
| 34.43% | 61 | 1.7 | 543 | 9,196 | 33.3% | 35.1% | |
| 54.10% | 61 | 5.9 | 940 | 11,156 | 42.9% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 60 | 5.8 | 857 | 10,480 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 57 | 2.0 | 763 | 10,272 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 32.73% | 55 | 5.0 | 857 | 11,692 | 42.9% | 26.5% | |
| 52.83% | 53 | 4.7 | 956 | 10,705 | 61.5% | 44.4% | |
| 56.60% | 53 | 5.8 | 949 | 13,299 | 57.9% | 55.9% | |
| 49.02% | 51 | 2.1 | 725 | 9,528 | 38.1% | 56.7% | |
| 62.75% | 51 | 4.5 | 903 | 11,085 | 64.7% | 61.8% | |
| 52.94% | 51 | 1.7 | 674 | 9,337 | 59.3% | 45.8% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 1.9 | 835 | 10,100 | 40.0% | 46.1% | |
| 60.87% | 46 | 1.6 | 829 | 9,946 | 77.3% | 45.8% | |
| 40.00% | 45 | 5.9 | 754 | 9,852 | 31.6% | 46.1% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 6.1 | 927 | 12,367 | 61.9% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 42 | 5.4 | 890 | 11,975 | 37.5% | 30.8% | |
| 47.62% | 42 | 1.6 | 687 | 9,183 | 33.3% | 61.9% | |
| 52.38% | 42 | 4.6 | 1,060 | 11,038 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 3.6 | 870 | 10,301 | 56.3% | 44.0% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 6.4 | 932 | 11,989 | 41.2% | 43.5% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 6.1 | 872 | 10,456 | 47.4% | 61.9% | |
| 61.54% | 39 | 6.1 | 958 | 11,678 | 73.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.89% | 38 | 2.2 | 822 | 11,234 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 4.5 | 667 | 9,359 | 38.1% | 47.1% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 5.6 | 881 | 11,036 | 47.1% | 47.6% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 6.2 | 977 | 12,240 | 52.4% | 68.8% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 5.5 | 770 | 10,635 | 43.8% | 55.0% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 5.0 | 910 | 10,947 | 60.0% | 47.6% | |
| 65.71% | 35 | 5.0 | 887 | 11,837 | 76.5% | 55.6% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 5.6 | 830 | 10,738 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 5.8 | 932 | 11,586 | 41.7% | 55.0% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 1.8 | 740 | 9,095 | 84.6% | 42.1% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 5.8 | 834 | 10,536 | 61.1% | 38.5% | |
| 64.52% | 31 | 5.4 | 939 | 11,827 | 71.4% | 62.5% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 6.5 | 805 | 11,893 | 53.3% | 26.7% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.9 | 873 | 10,736 | 53.9% | 43.8% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 6.0 | 988 | 13,591 | 61.5% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 6.5 | 1,037 | 11,176 | 54.5% | 35.3% | |
| 25.93% | 27 | 3.7 | 880 | 10,230 | 18.2% | 31.3% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 6.3 | 858 | 11,571 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 6.0 | 823 | 11,264 | 41.7% | 64.3% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.8 | 700 | 10,036 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 6.4 | 793 | 10,500 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 5.5 | 850 | 11,369 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 5.9 | 946 | 10,851 | 30.0% | 57.1% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 4.9 | 737 | 10,230 | 66.7% | 54.5% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 5.5 | 921 | 10,919 | 40.0% | 61.5% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 5.2 | 961 | 9,652 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 6.2 | 860 | 11,412 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 6.8 | 994 | 13,521 | 100.0% | 41.2% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 5.9 | 925 | 10,918 | 54.5% | 36.4% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 2.1 | 689 | 8,911 | 28.6% | 42.9% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 3.7 | 708 | 9,768 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.1 | 860 | 9,888 | 70.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 5.7 | 834 | 10,956 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 90.00% | 20 | 1.8 | 692 | 10,699 | 90.9% | 88.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.7 | 1,037 | 10,925 | 58.3% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 4.2 | 865 | 11,476 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 837 | 10,644 | 36.4% | 44.4% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.1 | 918 | 12,714 | 80.0% | 30.0% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 1,086 | 12,043 | 100.0% | 58.8% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 1,325 | 11,731 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 5.5 | 898 | 10,345 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.2 | 986 | 10,393 | 37.5% | 80.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.2 | 875 | 12,937 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 4.2 | 791 | 10,947 | 87.5% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.0 | 1,022 | 10,764 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 5.7 | 1,089 | 13,676 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 23.53% | 17 | 5.1 | 761 | 11,412 | 28.6% | 20.0% | |
| 23.53% | 17 | 5.8 | 929 | 12,300 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 75.00% | 16 | 6.0 | 930 | 12,274 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 2.5 | 854 | 11,273 | 100.0% | 58.3% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 5.3 | 946 | 11,530 | 40.0% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.1 | 1,063 | 9,215 | 72.7% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.5 | 852 | 12,043 | 20.0% | 55.6% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 6.6 | 923 | 13,452 | 70.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 5.8 | 1,120 | 12,915 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 5.6 | 927 | 10,294 | 33.3% | 71.4% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.6 | 854 | 11,319 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.8 | 858 | 9,768 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 5.9 | 942 | 12,725 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.9 | 844 | 11,682 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.8 | 957 | 11,208 | 55.6% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 4.4 | 783 | 12,315 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.2 | 857 | 11,919 | 0.0% | 44.4% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.1 | 796 | 11,354 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 4.7 | 997 | 10,733 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.0 | 765 | 11,089 | 75.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.4 | 776 | 10,287 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.7 | 919 | 10,411 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 2.1 | 659 | 8,971 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.6 | 1,001 | 13,736 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.5 | 780 | 10,829 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.3 | 976 | 11,533 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.0 | 965 | 10,665 | 25.0% | 20.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.8 | 792 | 9,183 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 817 | 10,800 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.8 | 1,086 | 14,455 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.6 | 794 | 10,940 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 7.0 | 692 | 8,984 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.6 | 714 | 9,702 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.7 | 634 | 11,963 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.4 | 860 | 11,635 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 1.9 | 709 | 10,462 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.2 | 694 | 7,952 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.6 | 771 | 11,084 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.2 | 828 | 11,119 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.6 | 895 | 10,655 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.2 | 702 | 8,230 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.1 | 648 | 11,166 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 701 | 10,335 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 4.5 | 899 | 11,393 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 732 | 8,524 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 2.3 | 723 | 11,562 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 938 | 9,977 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.0 | 1,012 | 13,330 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 725 | 12,468 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 804 | 11,424 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 666 | 10,930 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Swain vs Lee Sin - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Swain do against Lee Sin in League of Legends?
Lee Sin wins the Swain vs Lee Sin matchup with a 62.5% win rate compared to Swain's 37.5%, a 25.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 8 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Swain do against Lee Sin in the early game?
In the early game, Swain has the advantage against Lee Sin with a 60.0% win rate versus 40.0%. Swain players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Swain do against Lee Sin in the late game?
In the late game, Lee Sin takes over the Swain vs Lee Sin matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Lee Sin scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Swain vs Lee Sin matchup?
Lee Sin wins the matchup against Swain with a 62.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 25.0 percentage point advantage means Lee Sin is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 8 games analyzed.
What is the best Swain build against Lee Sin?
The best Swain build against Lee Sin includes Zhonya's Hourglass, Rylai's Crystal Scepter, Blackfire Torch with Immortal Path. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Swain runes against Lee Sin?
The best Swain runes against Lee Sin use the Precision primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Swain vs Lee Sin matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Swain counter Lee Sin?
No, Swain struggles against Lee Sin with only a 37.5% win rate. Lee Sin has the advantage in this matchup. Swain players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Lee Sin's lead.
How do I play Swain against Lee Sin?
When playing Swain against Lee Sin, play cautiously and avoid Lee Sin's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Lee Sin has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.
