
Tahm KenchMatchupy
Dane matchupów Tahm Kench dla League of Legends patch 26.10. Win rate, statystyki wydajności i najlepsze buildy dla każdego matchupu Tahm Kench. Dowiedz się kogo Tahm Kench pokonuje i komu przegrywa na linii.
Analiza matchupu Tahm Kench
Użyj menu rozwijanego, aby wybrać przeciwnika i zobaczyć szczegółową analizę, jak Tahm Kench radzi sobie przeciwko niemu. Otrzymasz wskaźniki wygranych bezpośrednich, statystyki linii, najlepszy build i runy do matchupu oraz analizę wczesnej vs późnej gry — wszystko oparte na prawdziwych danych z rankingu.

Dane matchupow Tahm Kench dla patcha 26.10 League of Legends. Ponizszatabela pokazuje wskaznik wygranych Tahm Kench, roznice w zlocie i statystyki wydajnosci przeciwko kazdemu czempionowi w aktualnej mecie. Kliknij nazwe czempiona, aby zobaczyc szczegolowy rozklad, w tym najlepszy build Tahm Kench, runy, statystyki liniowe i analize wczesnej vs poznej gry dla tego konkretnego matchupu.
Przeciwnik | Winrate | Mecze | CS/min | OBR/min | Zloto/mecz | Wczesne WR | Pozne WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.81% | 259 | 1.4 | 598 | 9,402 | 49.5% | 50.0% | |
| 47.56% | 225 | 1.3 | 577 | 9,078 | 47.5% | 47.6% | |
| 47.87% | 211 | 1.4 | 543 | 8,976 | 41.4% | 53.6% | |
| 43.65% | 197 | 1.4 | 614 | 9,250 | 45.6% | 42.1% | |
| 49.74% | 195 | 1.3 | 608 | 9,408 | 48.4% | 51.0% | |
| 42.71% | 192 | 1.3 | 574 | 9,373 | 47.7% | 38.7% | |
| 51.37% | 183 | 5.7 | 890 | 11,063 | 48.2% | 54.0% | |
| 48.52% | 169 | 1.3 | 599 | 9,767 | 53.2% | 44.4% | |
| 48.81% | 168 | 4.8 | 728 | 11,761 | 54.2% | 46.7% | |
| 46.36% | 151 | 1.4 | 560 | 9,434 | 43.3% | 48.8% | |
| 47.97% | 148 | 5.1 | 851 | 10,712 | 58.6% | 41.1% | |
| 46.15% | 143 | 1.6 | 602 | 9,722 | 49.2% | 43.6% | |
| 47.29% | 129 | 1.2 | 610 | 9,545 | 50.9% | 44.4% | |
| 54.70% | 117 | 5.3 | 851 | 10,936 | 55.6% | 54.2% | |
| 53.04% | 115 | 5.3 | 866 | 11,878 | 52.3% | 53.5% | |
| 48.18% | 110 | 2.1 | 709 | 9,183 | 42.1% | 54.7% | |
| 49.51% | 103 | 2.1 | 640 | 9,927 | 50.0% | 49.0% | |
| 44.00% | 100 | 1.2 | 577 | 9,284 | 41.3% | 46.3% | |
| 43.75% | 96 | 1.3 | 588 | 9,331 | 44.0% | 43.5% | |
| 48.96% | 96 | 1.2 | 551 | 9,091 | 62.5% | 35.4% | |
| 45.65% | 92 | 1.3 | 547 | 9,232 | 51.4% | 42.1% | |
| 56.67% | 90 | 1.2 | 550 | 9,414 | 57.8% | 55.6% | |
| 37.78% | 90 | 5.2 | 884 | 10,524 | 33.3% | 41.2% | |
| 44.94% | 89 | 5.4 | 877 | 10,645 | 38.6% | 51.1% | |
| 48.84% | 86 | 1.2 | 596 | 8,974 | 54.4% | 42.5% | |
| 45.88% | 85 | 5.2 | 805 | 10,279 | 47.5% | 44.4% | |
| 51.95% | 77 | 5.0 | 977 | 11,338 | 53.9% | 51.0% | |
| 50.00% | 76 | 1.3 | 643 | 9,370 | 51.4% | 48.7% | |
| 43.42% | 76 | 5.2 | 802 | 12,016 | 32.1% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 72 | 5.0 | 713 | 10,771 | 42.9% | 56.8% | |
| 30.99% | 71 | 1.4 | 549 | 9,277 | 31.3% | 30.8% | |
| 62.86% | 70 | 1.3 | 564 | 9,784 | 50.0% | 72.5% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 1.5 | 570 | 9,500 | 43.3% | 42.5% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 4.8 | 790 | 9,652 | 41.2% | 44.4% | |
| 41.43% | 70 | 1.3 | 571 | 9,396 | 48.3% | 36.6% | |
| 40.00% | 70 | 4.2 | 709 | 10,391 | 48.0% | 35.6% | |
| 47.62% | 63 | 5.3 | 903 | 10,880 | 46.7% | 48.5% | |
| 30.65% | 62 | 5.0 | 573 | 8,228 | 31.6% | 29.2% | |
| 54.84% | 62 | 3.9 | 738 | 11,993 | 58.3% | 52.6% | |
| 58.06% | 62 | 5.5 | 943 | 11,215 | 66.7% | 52.6% | |
| 45.00% | 60 | 5.8 | 835 | 11,633 | 36.0% | 51.4% | |
| 55.00% | 60 | 5.0 | 769 | 11,939 | 53.9% | 55.9% | |
| 52.54% | 59 | 5.4 | 1,148 | 10,671 | 55.2% | 50.0% | |
| 49.12% | 57 | 1.6 | 650 | 9,662 | 57.1% | 41.4% | |
| 57.89% | 57 | 5.0 | 825 | 11,082 | 47.6% | 63.9% | |
| 41.82% | 55 | 5.2 | 864 | 10,848 | 55.6% | 28.6% | |
| 43.40% | 53 | 5.0 | 688 | 10,163 | 54.5% | 35.5% | |
| 50.94% | 53 | 5.4 | 881 | 11,591 | 52.4% | 50.0% | |
| 45.28% | 53 | 5.7 | 864 | 11,669 | 70.8% | 24.1% | |
| 48.08% | 52 | 1.3 | 646 | 9,977 | 31.8% | 60.0% | |
| 46.15% | 52 | 5.5 | 794 | 10,425 | 50.0% | 42.3% | |
| 42.31% | 52 | 5.2 | 796 | 10,543 | 23.5% | 51.4% | |
| 52.94% | 51 | 4.7 | 856 | 10,238 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 50.98% | 51 | 1.7 | 653 | 9,784 | 62.5% | 45.7% | |
| 52.00% | 50 | 5.3 | 839 | 10,594 | 59.1% | 46.4% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 1.9 | 681 | 10,040 | 42.9% | 48.3% | |
| 66.67% | 48 | 1.4 | 634 | 9,593 | 78.3% | 56.0% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 5.0 | 832 | 11,569 | 36.8% | 58.6% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 1.4 | 533 | 8,939 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 5.5 | 765 | 10,457 | 45.8% | 66.7% | |
| 57.78% | 45 | 2.6 | 670 | 10,255 | 56.3% | 58.6% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 1.2 | 566 | 9,411 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 58.14% | 43 | 5.7 | 909 | 11,094 | 62.5% | 52.6% | |
| 40.48% | 42 | 1.3 | 545 | 9,942 | 56.3% | 30.8% | |
| 42.86% | 42 | 5.2 | 835 | 10,003 | 40.9% | 45.0% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 5.5 | 898 | 11,000 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 4.8 | 517 | 9,677 | 55.6% | 45.5% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 4.0 | 870 | 11,867 | 55.6% | 57.1% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 1.4 | 596 | 10,712 | 75.0% | 40.7% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 5.5 | 801 | 10,313 | 47.1% | 50.0% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 5.7 | 847 | 10,690 | 66.7% | 47.4% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 5.3 | 875 | 12,133 | 68.8% | 52.4% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 4.7 | 794 | 12,155 | 46.7% | 52.4% | |
| 20.00% | 35 | 1.2 | 585 | 9,232 | 21.4% | 19.1% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 5.2 | 975 | 10,864 | 30.8% | 54.5% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 4.9 | 850 | 11,018 | 53.9% | 26.3% | |
| 36.67% | 30 | 2.1 | 606 | 10,000 | 38.5% | 35.3% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 1.1 | 505 | 8,372 | 31.3% | 53.9% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 5.4 | 802 | 11,177 | 61.5% | 53.3% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 5.0 | 814 | 11,680 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 4.4 | 758 | 10,627 | 76.9% | 46.1% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 5.2 | 713 | 9,904 | 42.9% | 41.7% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 2.9 | 707 | 10,457 | 55.6% | 37.5% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 4.9 | 804 | 9,527 | 41.7% | 69.2% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 4.5 | 933 | 10,592 | 63.6% | 69.2% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 5.0 | 724 | 12,022 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 5.2 | 721 | 10,084 | 45.5% | 72.7% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 5.8 | 1,103 | 11,745 | 70.0% | 41.7% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 4.7 | 891 | 11,766 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 4.1 | 755 | 12,352 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 5.7 | 1,100 | 12,181 | 77.8% | 58.3% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 4.8 | 825 | 13,816 | 25.0% | 64.7% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 5.3 | 822 | 11,154 | 70.0% | 63.6% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 2.6 | 677 | 9,796 | 57.1% | 53.9% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.9 | 549 | 9,346 | 72.7% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 815 | 10,789 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 4.9 | 788 | 10,483 | 70.0% | 22.2% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 5.3 | 642 | 11,610 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 5.3 | 838 | 10,567 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 3.9 | 734 | 9,206 | 22.2% | 44.4% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 4.6 | 705 | 11,196 | 70.0% | 71.4% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 4.4 | 625 | 10,859 | 16.7% | 63.6% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.9 | 794 | 11,041 | 12.5% | 87.5% | |
| 80.00% | 15 | 5.7 | 772 | 9,855 | 77.8% | 83.3% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 2.6 | 532 | 8,979 | 42.9% | 37.5% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 4.1 | 689 | 11,605 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 5.1 | 867 | 13,184 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.6 | 860 | 11,782 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.3 | 538 | 9,234 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.3 | 772 | 11,526 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 5.1 | 715 | 10,168 | 25.0% | 77.8% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 4.6 | 742 | 10,317 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 4.5 | 747 | 10,807 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.7 | 573 | 9,678 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.3 | 792 | 11,140 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.2 | 773 | 6,614 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.4 | 478 | 11,135 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.9 | 855 | 11,867 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 4.7 | 728 | 11,868 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.5 | 749 | 11,112 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.8 | 954 | 10,659 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 913 | 8,322 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.9 | 934 | 12,578 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 912 | 10,550 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.2 | 763 | 10,767 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 90.00% | 10 | 4.4 | 1,060 | 12,068 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 907 | 11,586 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.3 | 840 | 11,324 | 60.0% | 20.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.6 | 574 | 8,265 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.2 | 592 | 11,194 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.4 | 630 | 10,776 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.2 | 641 | 7,121 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 88.89% | 9 | 2.0 | 736 | 11,806 | 100.0% | 87.5% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.0 | 941 | 13,461 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.2 | 560 | 6,688 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 2.8 | 930 | 13,233 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.5 | 553 | 10,134 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 2.2 | 470 | 7,398 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.8 | 731 | 10,422 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.0 | 635 | 8,648 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 3.0 | 639 | 11,544 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.2 | 761 | 10,732 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.5 | 672 | 10,577 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.3 | 627 | 10,511 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.9 | 879 | 10,714 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 682 | 11,384 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 695 | 11,497 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.7 | 548 | 7,888 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 699 | 11,469 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 544 | 9,568 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Matchupy Tahm Kench - Czesto zadawane pytania
Jakie sa najlepsze matchupy Tahm Kench w League of Legends?
Najlepsze matchupy Tahm Kench w patchu 26.10 to Seraphine, Thresh, and Lux. Tahm Kench ma najwyzsze wskazniki zwyciestwa przeciwko tym czempionom i moze dominowac na linii, gdy sie z nimi mierzy. Wybierz dowolnego przeciwnika z tabeli matchupow, aby zobaczyc szczegolowe statystyki.
Jakie sa najgorsze matchupy Tahm Kench?
Najgorsze matchupy Tahm Kench to Xayah, Taric, and Azir. Ci czempioni maja korzystne wskazniki zwyciestwa przeciwko Tahm Kench i moga wykorzystac slabosci Tahm Kench na linii. Kliknij nazwe czempiona w tabeli, aby zobaczyc pelny rozklad matchupu.
Jak sprawdzic dane matchupow Tahm Kench?
Mozesz sprawdzic dane matchupow Tahm Kench wlasnie tutaj na tej stronie. Tabela matchupow pokazuje wskazniki zwyciestwa i statystyki przeciwko kazdemu czempionowi. Kliknij dowolna nazwe czempiona, aby zobaczyc szczegolowy rozklad, w tym najlepszy build, runy, statystyki linii i analize early vs late game dla tego konkretnego matchupu Tahm Kench.
Kogo kontruje Tahm Kench w League of Legends?
Tahm Kench kontruje Seraphine, Thresh, and Lux w patchu 26.10. To sa najbardziej korzystne matchupy Tahm Kench, gdzie Tahm Kench ma najwyzsze wskazniki zwyciestwa i najsilniejsza wydajnosc na linii. Uzyj selektora matchupow powyzej, aby zbadac dowolny konkretny matchup Tahm Kench w szczegolach.
Kto kontruje Tahm Kench na linii?
Xayah, Taric, and Azir kontruja Tahm Kench na linii w patchu 26.10. Ci czempioni maja najlepsze wskazniki zwyciestwa przeciwko Tahm Kench. Sprawdz zakladke kontr lub kliknij czempiona w tabeli, aby zobaczyc szczegolowe strategie matchupow i polecane buildy.