Most Popular TFT Comps by Pick Rate
This table displays the most commonly played TFT Set 15 team compositions based on pick rate, showing current meta trends and popular strategies. Top 9-champion Set 15 compositions: Bastion (92.3% WR, 2.1 avg), Bastion (72.4% WR, 3.4 avg), Duelist (80.7% WR, 3.1 avg). Bastion/Rogue Captain leads with 92.29% win rate and 2.12 average placement. Bastion follows at 72.45% win rate. Analyzing 51 9-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avg Place 2.12 | Top 4 92.29% | First Place 47.64% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.45 | Top 4 72.45% | First Place 15.31% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.07 | Top 4 80.74% | First Place 22.59% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.58 | Top 4 70.45% | First Place 14.94% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.48 | Top 4 86.83% | First Place 35.80% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.94 | Top 4 62.71% | First Place 10.69% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.67 | Top 4 87.06% | First Place 30.35% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.10 | Top 4 57.60% | First Place 9.06% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.40 | Top 4 89.36% | First Place 36.88% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.15 | Top 4 75.49% | First Place 26.47% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.06 | Top 4 57.18% | First Place 18.00% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.52 | Top 4 72.51% | First Place 14.69% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.02 | Top 4 56.32% | First Place 12.07% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.21 | Top 4 71.43% | First Place 19.78% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.68 | Top 4 84.08% | First Place 27.39% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.22 | Top 4 51.11% | First Place 14.44% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.43 | Top 4 72.88% | First Place 18.33% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.97 | Top 4 81.27% | First Place 23.81% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.43 | Top 4 72.25% | First Place 14.98% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.83 | Top 4 22.92% | First Place 3.13% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.77 | Top 4 82.24% | First Place 35.05% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.64 | Top 4 84.88% | First Place 30.73% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.24 | Top 4 33.07% | First Place 5.18% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.46 | Top 4 71.01% | First Place 17.92% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.92 | Top 4 22.83% | First Place 1.63% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.78 | Top 4 43.69% | First Place 7.66% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.79 | Top 4 63.91% | First Place 9.47% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.49 | Top 4 86.27% | First Place 38.24% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.78 | Top 4 62.26% | First Place 23.69% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.06 | Top 4 36.56% | First Place 5.38% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.25 | Top 4 53.49% | First Place 14.73% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.28 | Top 4 55.69% | First Place 11.38% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.53 | Top 4 68.14% | First Place 20.00% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.17 | Top 4 53.07% | First Place 10.06% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.21 | Top 4 77.17% | First Place 17.81% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.32 | Top 4 74.47% | First Place 17.02% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.56 | Top 4 86.99% | First Place 30.08% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.48 | Top 4 50.91% | First Place 7.27% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.94 | Top 4 56.76% | First Place 18.92% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.02 | Top 4 62.60% | First Place 16.26% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.24 | Top 4 75.80% | First Place 19.77% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.83 | Top 4 67.51% | First Place 9.64% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.29 | Top 4 52.78% | First Place 8.33% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.13 | Top 4 55.56% | First Place 14.21% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.34 | Top 4 75.31% | First Place 16.16% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.51 | Top 4 73.23% | First Place 14.96% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.71 | Top 4 69.61% | First Place 9.80% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.73 | Top 4 63.92% | First Place 18.21% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.01 | Top 4 37.27% | First Place 10.91% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.49 | Top 4 71.29% | First Place 18.81% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.54 | Top 4 70.66% | First Place 16.96% | Low Contested Risk | |||
The Best Comps, Right in Your Game
The Recommended Comps overlay shows the strongest meta comps matched to the traits and units you're already running — with win rate, average placement, and 1st-place odds — without ever leaving TFT.
- Meta comps without alt-tabbing
- Matched to your current traits
- Win rate, avg place & 1st odds

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Set 15 Comps FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 15?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 15 is Bastion/Rogue Captain, achieving a 92.3% win rate and 2.12 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Bastion/Rogue Captain comp?
Focus on finding your core units and items early, then stabilize and push levels for your final composition.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 15?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 15, Bastion/Rogue Captain offers the best average placement at 2.12. Other reliable options include Bastion/Rogue Captain (2.40 avg) and Duelist/Wraith (2.48 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Bastion/Rogue Captain is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 92.3% win rate but only 0.5% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 15?
In TFT Set 15, Bastion/Battle Academia has a 0.8% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Bastion/Rogue Captain. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
What is the current TFT meta in TFT Set 15?
The TFT Set 15 meta is dominated by Bastion/Battle Academia with 0.8% pick rate, followed by Edgelord/Juggernaut at 0.7%. High pick rate comps define the meta but are often contested. For uncontested games, consider less popular alternatives like Bastion/Rogue Captain (0.1% pick rate).
Should I avoid playing popular comps in TFT?
Not necessarily. Popular comps like Bastion/Battle Academia (0.8% pick rate) are popular for a reason—they're strong. However, when multiple players contest the same comp, everyone's placement suffers. Scout your lobby early. If 2+ players are forcing the same comp, pivot to alternatives to avoid fighting for units.