Best TFT Comps by Placement
This table ranks TFT Set 15 team compositions by their average placement finish, showing which comps consistently achieve top placements. Top 9-champion Set 15 compositions: Bastion/Rogue Captain (92.3% top 4, 2.12 avg place, 804 games); Bastion/Edgelord (81.3% top 4, 2.97 avg place, 630 games); Duelist/Edgelord (80.7% top 4, 3.07 avg place, 571 games). Bastion/Rogue Captain leads with a 92.3% top-4 rate and 2.12 average placement. Bastion/Edgelord follows at 81.3%. Analyzing 51 9-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avg Place 2.12 | Top 4 92.29% | First Place 47.64% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.40 | Top 4 89.36% | First Place 36.88% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.48 | Top 4 86.83% | First Place 35.80% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.49 | Top 4 86.27% | First Place 38.24% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.56 | Top 4 86.99% | First Place 30.08% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.64 | Top 4 84.88% | First Place 30.73% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.67 | Top 4 87.06% | First Place 30.35% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.68 | Top 4 84.08% | First Place 27.39% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.77 | Top 4 82.24% | First Place 35.05% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.97 | Top 4 81.27% | First Place 23.81% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.07 | Top 4 80.74% | First Place 22.59% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.15 | Top 4 75.49% | First Place 26.47% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.21 | Top 4 71.43% | First Place 19.78% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.21 | Top 4 77.17% | First Place 17.81% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.24 | Top 4 75.80% | First Place 19.77% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.32 | Top 4 74.47% | First Place 17.02% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.34 | Top 4 75.31% | First Place 16.16% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.43 | Top 4 72.25% | First Place 14.98% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.43 | Top 4 72.88% | First Place 18.33% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.45 | Top 4 72.45% | First Place 15.31% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.46 | Top 4 71.01% | First Place 17.92% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.49 | Top 4 71.29% | First Place 18.81% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.51 | Top 4 73.23% | First Place 14.96% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.52 | Top 4 72.51% | First Place 14.69% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.53 | Top 4 68.14% | First Place 20.00% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.54 | Top 4 70.66% | First Place 16.96% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.58 | Top 4 70.45% | First Place 14.94% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.71 | Top 4 69.61% | First Place 9.80% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.73 | Top 4 63.92% | First Place 18.21% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.78 | Top 4 62.26% | First Place 23.69% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.79 | Top 4 63.91% | First Place 9.47% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.83 | Top 4 67.51% | First Place 9.64% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.94 | Top 4 56.76% | First Place 18.92% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.94 | Top 4 62.71% | First Place 10.69% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.02 | Top 4 62.60% | First Place 16.26% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.02 | Top 4 56.32% | First Place 12.07% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.06 | Top 4 57.18% | First Place 18.00% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.10 | Top 4 57.60% | First Place 9.06% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.13 | Top 4 55.56% | First Place 14.21% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.17 | Top 4 53.07% | First Place 10.06% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.22 | Top 4 51.11% | First Place 14.44% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.25 | Top 4 53.49% | First Place 14.73% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.28 | Top 4 55.69% | First Place 11.38% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.29 | Top 4 52.78% | First Place 8.33% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.48 | Top 4 50.91% | First Place 7.27% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.78 | Top 4 43.69% | First Place 7.66% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.01 | Top 4 37.27% | First Place 10.91% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.06 | Top 4 36.56% | First Place 5.38% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.24 | Top 4 33.07% | First Place 5.18% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.83 | Top 4 22.92% | First Place 3.13% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.92 | Top 4 22.83% | First Place 1.63% | Low Contested Risk | |||
The Best Comps, Right in Your Game
The Recommended Comps overlay shows the strongest meta comps matched to the traits and units you're already running — with win rate, average placement, and 1st-place odds — without ever leaving TFT.
- Meta comps without alt-tabbing
- Matched to your current traits
- Win rate, avg place & 1st odds

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Set 15 Comps FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 15?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 15 is Bastion/Rogue Captain, finishing top 4 in 92.3% of games with a 2.12 average placement. That consistency is what climbs ranked.
How do I play the Bastion/Rogue Captain comp?
Focus on finding your core units and items early, then stabilize and push levels for your final composition.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 15?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 15, Bastion/Rogue Captain offers the best average placement at 2.12. Other reliable options include Bastion/Rogue Captain (2.40 avg) and Duelist/Wraith (2.48 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Bastion/Rogue Captain is a good pick for an easier climb: it finishes top 4 in 92.3% of games but only 0.5% of players pick it, so you are unlikely to be contested and can find your units without forced pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 15?
In TFT Set 15, Bastion/Battle Academia has a 0.8% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Bastion/Rogue Captain. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
What is the most consistent TFT comp in TFT Set 15?
Bastion/Rogue Captain has the best average placement at 2.12, making it the most consistent comp for climbing. Bastion/Rogue Captain follows at 2.40, and Duelist/Wraith at 2.48. Lower average placement means fewer bottom 4 finishes.
Is average placement better than win rate for climbing?
For consistent LP gains, average placement is often more reliable than pure win rate. A comp like Bastion/Rogue Captain with 2.12 average placement minimizes big LP losses from bottom 4 finishes. High variance comps might win more lobbies but also 8th more often. For climbing, consistency usually beats coinflip strategies.