Most Popular TFT Comps by Pick Rate
This table displays the most commonly played TFT Set 17 team compositions based on pick rate, showing current meta trends and popular strategies. Top 9-champion Set 17 compositions: Rogue (74.3% WR, 3.3 avg), Rogue (55.0% WR, 4.3 avg), Dark Star (71.8% WR, 3.5 avg). Rogue/Dark Star leads with 74.25% win rate and 3.30 average placement. Rogue follows at 55.03% win rate. Analyzing 80 9-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.30 | 74.25% | 19.77% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
4.32 | 55.03% | 8.52% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.49 | 71.84% | 16.65% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.74 | 64.80% | 17.51% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.56 | 70.89% | 14.41% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.50 | 69.83% | 19.63% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
4.49 | 53.21% | 9.62% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.91 | 78.77% | 29.16% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.77 | 87.78% | 13.33% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.55 | 67.92% | 20.82% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.42 | 73.13% | 17.50% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
4.86 | 43.02% | 3.49% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.41 | 91.99% | 30.04% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.47 | 88.33% | 28.02% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.20 | 94.07% | 37.29% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.36 | 92.29% | 30.35% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
4.85 | 42.51% | 7.58% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.45 | 68.14% | 23.67% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.33 | 63.64% | 30.30% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.04 | 62.37% | 9.68% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.23 | 74.27% | 23.03% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.43 | 92.56% | 29.35% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.10 | 78.42% | 21.98% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.79 | 80.00% | 27.50% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.71 | 85.26% | 30.52% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.93 | 86.67% | 6.67% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.32 | 89.49% | 39.95% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.55 | 89.66% | 26.17% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.00 | 86.67% | 6.67% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.25 | 97.42% | 31.61% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.29 | 52.94% | 0.00% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.14 | 80.24% | 18.76% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.32 | 56.96% | 6.03% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.13 | 79.36% | 18.53% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.60 | 49.74% | 3.95% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.73 | 86.01% | 27.97% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.06 | 85.31% | 13.29% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.83 | 82.72% | 32.10% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.66 | 67.38% | 17.91% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.26 | 56.43% | 4.97% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.31 | 65.57% | 22.95% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.01 | 77.15% | 25.22% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.74 | 66.70% | 11.92% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.11 | 81.06% | 17.41% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.40 | 87.58% | 40.35% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.93 | 65.47% | 7.82% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.03 | 79.64% | 23.68% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.43 | 49.82% | 5.78% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.97 | 83.85% | 25.77% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.44 | 87.13% | 39.82% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.14 | 94.75% | 37.37% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.05 | 77.94% | 26.83% | High Contested Risk | ||||
1.99 | 94.82% | 42.42% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.39 | 74.82% | 19.56% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.43 | 51.97% | 5.34% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.07 | 59.35% | 7.61% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.03 | 81.98% | 16.47% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.23 | 75.51% | 19.05% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.95 | 63.45% | 6.99% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.10 | 77.78% | 27.53% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.37 | 75.92% | 16.97% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.06 | 96.39% | 39.25% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.16 | 78.50% | 20.56% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
2.84 | 83.06% | 28.72% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
4.43 | 54.22% | 3.21% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
2.17 | 95.67% | 34.66% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
2.08 | 95.88% | 37.05% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.46 | 73.21% | 23.21% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
1.93 | 95.83% | 47.92% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.66 | 67.14% | 16.30% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.73 | 69.09% | 16.36% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.05 | 79.45% | 25.12% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
4.97 | 41.14% | 6.69% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.90 | 59.24% | 20.93% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
4.11 | 60.00% | 4.71% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
2.82 | 80.15% | 37.13% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.33 | 75.00% | 32.69% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.83 | 66.60% | 16.19% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.70 | 66.30% | 20.65% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.13 | 80.00% | 40.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Set 17 Comps FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 17?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 17 is Challenger/Rogue with Kai'Sa as the primary carry, achieving a 97.4% win rate and 2.25 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Challenger/Rogue comp?
To play Challenger/Rogue, focus on building around Kai'Sa as your main carry. Look for Kai'Sa and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 17?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 17, Rogue/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.93. Other reliable options include Rogue/N.O.V.A. (1.99 avg) and Rogue/N.O.V.A. (2.06 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Challenger/Rogue is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 97.4% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 17?
In TFT Set 17, Replicator/Dark Star has a 1.4% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Challenger/Rogue. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
What is the current TFT meta in TFT Set 17?
The TFT Set 17 meta is dominated by Replicator/Dark Star with 1.4% pick rate, followed by Arbiter/Replicator at 1.1%. High pick rate comps define the meta but are often contested. For uncontested games, consider less popular alternatives like Replicator/Dark Star (0.1% pick rate).
Should I avoid playing popular comps in TFT?
Not necessarily. Popular comps like Replicator/Dark Star (1.4% pick rate) are popular for a reason—they're strong. However, when multiple players contest the same comp, everyone's placement suffers. Scout your lobby early. If 2+ players are forcing the same comp, pivot to alternatives to avoid fighting for units.