- Win Rate
- 48.6%
- Matches
- 1,809
- KDA
- 2.47
Abrams vs Kelvin vs Kelvin
- Skill Level
- All Skill Levels
- Matches
- 42,218
- Version
- 6860
- Last Updated
- Nov 7, 2026 UTC
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
Abrams faces a challenging 48.6% win rate against Kelvin in this Deadlock matchup. Data from 1,809 games shows Abrams averages 1.4 more deaths. Focus on safe farming, team coordination, and avoiding 1v1 confrontations.
Abrams Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Abrams performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.
Who Wins the Abrams vs Kelvin Matchup?
Abrams vs Kelvin Matchup Summary
The Abrams vs Kelvin matchup in Deadlock is a relatively balanced matchup with a slight edge. Based on 1,809 recent matches analyzed, Kelvin wins with a 51.4% win rate compared to Abrams's 48.6%, giving Kelvin a 2.7 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in fragging power, where Kelvin consistently outperforms. Kelvin has a small statistical advantage, but Abrams can absolutely win through smart play. The margin is thin enough that jungle rotations, team coordination, and mechanical outplays will often determine the outcome more than champion select.
Abrams vs Kelvin Combat Analysis
Abrams edges out Kelvin in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 1,809 matches analyzed, this Abrams vs Kelvin matchup remains contestable for both sides. Kelvin shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Kelvin's favor.
Abrams vs Kelvin Economy Analysis
Kelvin generates approximately 812 more souls than Abrams on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving Kelvin a mid-game advantage. Both heroes farm at comparable rates, so lane control will depend on harassment patterns and jungle support rather than inherent farming advantages.
Recommended Items for Abrams vs Kelvin
Abrams Build vs Kelvin
This optimized build for Abrams against Kelvin is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 51.4% win rate disadvantage against Kelvin, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. Celestial Blessing, Rusted Barrel, Focus Lens, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 33,999 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.
Kelvin Build vs Abrams
Kelvin's recommended build against Abrams leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring Kelvin, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. Spirit Burn, Mystic Reverb, Escalating Exposure, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 40,399 souls Understanding Kelvin's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.
These item builds are optimized for the Abrams vs Kelvin matchup based on win rate data from 1,809 competitive matches. Item choices in Deadlock significantly impact matchup outcomes — the right build can help overcome statistical disadvantages or extend existing advantages. Remember to adapt your build based on game state, team compositions, enemy itemization, and whether you're ahead or behind in souls.
Build the best team around Abrams
Comp Lab scores every pair on your team by real win rate across hundreds of thousands of matches, checks your picks against the enemy roster, and loads proven high-win-rate comps.
- Six-hero team board
- Pair synergy win rates
- Proven high-win comps
Abrams has favorable matchups against 32 heroes and unfavorable matchups against 11 heroes in Deadlock. Abrams's strongest matchup is against The Doorman with a 59.6% win rate. The hardest matchup is Graves at 42.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and build recommendations.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | Kills | Deaths | Player DMG | Net Worth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.66% | 6,636 | 2.55 | 5.0 | 5.7 | 22,870 | 35,016 | |
| 54.81% | 5,430 | 2.58 | 5.2 | 5.9 | 24,523 | 34,908 | |
| 46.02% | 4,954 | 2.31 | 4.6 | 5.8 | 22,241 | 34,587 | |
| 55.91% | 4,831 | 2.62 | 5.2 | 5.7 | 23,546 | 34,842 | |
| 42.30% | 4,712 | 2.46 | 5.2 | 6.0 | 23,008 | 34,884 | |
| 53.70% | 4,562 | 2.49 | 5.0 | 5.8 | 22,444 | 34,621 | |
| 50.88% | 4,552 | 2.58 | 5.6 | 6.0 | 24,561 | 34,978 | |
| 50.31% | 4,550 | 2.51 | 4.6 | 5.5 | 24,326 | 33,897 | |
| 53.38% | 4,404 | 2.60 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 25,445 | 35,263 | |
| 51.31% | 4,276 | 2.57 | 5.2 | 5.8 | 23,682 | 35,217 | |
| 53.04% | 4,114 | 2.61 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 25,146 | 35,860 | |
| 51.70% | 4,027 | 2.56 | 5.5 | 6.1 | 24,881 | 35,118 | |
| 48.70% | 3,887 | 2.51 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 25,398 | 35,258 | |
| 44.53% | 3,829 | 2.43 | 4.9 | 5.8 | 22,261 | 35,223 | |
| 54.28% | 3,690 | 2.63 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 23,801 | 34,863 | |
| 52.49% | 3,675 | 2.65 | 5.4 | 5.8 | 23,568 | 34,976 | |
| 57.40% | 3,613 | 2.69 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 24,292 | 35,310 | |
| 55.26% | 3,585 | 2.73 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 24,268 | 35,591 | |
| 52.95% | 3,377 | 2.61 | 5.2 | 5.8 | 24,219 | 34,700 | |
| 47.61% | 3,371 | 2.62 | 5.3 | 5.8 | 23,610 | 35,159 | |
| 57.30% | 3,199 | 2.77 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 25,427 | 34,986 | |
| 56.76% | 3,187 | 2.79 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 24,124 | 35,377 | |
| 49.24% | 3,111 | 2.47 | 4.8 | 5.7 | 23,840 | 35,005 | |
| 49.17% | 3,012 | 2.31 | 4.9 | 6.0 | 21,758 | 34,460 | |
| 56.98% | 3,010 | 2.73 | 5.4 | 5.7 | 24,530 | 35,030 | |
| 51.69% | 2,956 | 2.63 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 25,470 | 35,566 | |
| 50.85% | 2,879 | 2.59 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 24,417 | 35,148 | |
| 57.43% | 2,624 | 2.66 | 5.4 | 5.8 | 24,235 | 34,961 | |
| 48.94% | 2,558 | 2.59 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 23,743 | 34,648 | |
| 53.68% | 2,321 | 2.58 | 5.4 | 6.0 | 24,814 | 34,372 | |
| 51.02% | 2,211 | 2.58 | 5.0 | 5.7 | 23,291 | 34,370 | |
| 54.15% | 2,183 | 2.58 | 5.2 | 5.7 | 22,865 | 35,015 | |
| 56.51% | 2,127 | 2.82 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 23,854 | 35,294 | |
| 51.22% | 2,091 | 2.53 | 4.6 | 5.5 | 22,376 | 34,875 | |
| 48.31% | 1,919 | 2.43 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 21,658 | 33,486 | |
| 52.27% | 1,875 | 2.67 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 22,891 | 35,303 | |
| 58.94% | 1,846 | 2.73 | 4.9 | 5.4 | 23,379 | 34,646 | |
| 59.59% | 1,819 | 2.83 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 24,678 | 35,873 | |
| 48.65% | 1,809 | 2.47 | 4.7 | 5.7 | 24,091 | 34,292 | |
| 57.39% | 1,678 | 2.72 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 24,954 | 35,482 | |
| 59.47% | 1,631 | 2.69 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 23,407 | 35,369 | |
| 53.98% | 1,621 | 2.68 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 22,277 | 34,367 | |
| 57.75% | 1,304 | 2.80 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 23,829 | 35,874 | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Abrams Matchups - FAQ
What is Abrams's best matchup in Deadlock?
Abrams's best matchup is against The Doorman, achieving a 59.6% win rate. Abrams excels in this matchup through superior combat stats and favorable ability interactions.
What is Abrams's hardest matchup?
Abrams's hardest matchup is against Graves, with only a 42.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Abrams should focus on team coordination and itemizing defensively.
How many favorable matchups does Abrams have?
Abrams has 32 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Deadlock. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better hero picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Abrams in difficult matchups?
When playing Abrams in difficult matchups, prioritize safe farming, positioning, and team coordination. Adjust your item build to compensate for the matchup disadvantage, and look for opportunities to impact fights through abilities rather than direct confrontation.
What stats should I focus on in Abrams's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Abrams's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average player damage, and net worth difference. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more defensively and relying on team support.