Abrams
Win Rate
53.7%
Matches
2,321
KDA
2.58

Abrams vs Mo & Krill vs Mo & Krill

Skill Level
All Skill Levels
Matches
42,218
Version
6860
Last Updated
Nov 7, 2026 UTC
Methodology
Data Methodology

Abrams holds a 53.7% win rate advantage over Mo & Krill based on 2,321 Deadlock matches. Abrams averages -851 more net worth, translating to earlier item power spikes. Play around your economic advantage to maximize this matchup.

Abrams Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Abrams performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
Abrams - 53.7% win rate in this matchup
Abrams
53.7% WR
VS
Mo & Krill vs Abrams matchup - 46.3% win rate
Mo & Krill
46.3% WR

Who Wins the Abrams vs Mo & Krill Matchup?

Abrams wins the Abrams vs Mo & Krill matchup
Winner
Abrams
Matches: 2,321
53.7%
Win Rate
46.3%
5.4
Avg Kills
4.2
6.0
Avg Deaths
5.5
10.1
Avg Assists
11.2
34,372
Avg Net Worth
35,223
24,814
Player DMG
22,719
4,361
Objective DMG
3,423
54.0
Last Hits
54.4

Abrams vs Mo & Krill Matchup Summary

The Abrams vs Mo & Krill matchup in Deadlock is a significant statistical advantage. Based on 2,321 recent matches analyzed, Abrams wins with a 53.7% win rate compared to Mo & Krill's 46.3%, giving Abrams a 7.4 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where Abrams consistently outperforms. Abrams dominates this matchup statistically. Abrams can play aggressively and look for solo kills, while Mo & Krill should focus on minimizing losses, farming safely, and relying on teammates to even the odds.

Abrams vs Mo & Krill Combat Analysis

Abrams wins combat stats against Mo & Krill in Deadlock

Abrams edges out Mo & Krill in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 2,321 matches analyzed, this Abrams vs Mo & Krill matchup remains contestable for both sides. Mo & Krill shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Mo & Krill's favor.

KDA Ratio
2.58Abrams
2.81Mo & Krill
Mo & Krill holds a moderate KDA edge in this matchup, recording 2.81 compared to Abrams's 2.58. While this 0.23 point difference indicates Mo & Krill tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Abrams players can overcome it through superior positioning, ability timing, or simply winning crucial duels. Abrams should focus on burst trade patterns and disengage before extended fights favor Mo & Krill's superior sustain.
Avg Kills
5.4Abrams
4.2Mo & Krill
Abrams secures approximately 1.3 more kills per match than Mo & Krill in this head-to-head (5.4 vs 4.2). Over the course of a typical match, this translates to Abrams contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Abrams's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Mo & Krill can compensate through superior objective focus, team fight positioning, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
6.0Abrams
5.5Mo & Krill
Mo & Krill survives longer in this matchup, dying 5.5 times per game compared to Abrams's 6.0 deaths. This 0.5 death difference per match means Mo & Krill is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. Abrams players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Mo & Krill's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
Player DMG
24,814Abrams
22,719Mo & Krill
Abrams applies 2,095 more damage per game than Mo & Krill in this matchup (24,814 vs 22,719). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Abrams contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Mo & Krill can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
Objective DMG
4,361Abrams
3,423Mo & Krill
Objective damage contribution is similar between Abrams (4,361) and Mo & Krill (3,423). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

Abrams vs Mo & Krill Economy Analysis

Net Worth
34,372Abrams
35,223Mo & Krill
Last Hits
54.0Abrams
54.4Mo & Krill

Mo & Krill generates approximately 851 more souls than Abrams on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving Mo & Krill a mid-game advantage. Both heroes farm at comparable rates, so lane control will depend on harassment patterns and jungle support rather than inherent farming advantages.

Recommended Items for Abrams vs Mo & Krill

Abrams build for Mo & Krill matchup

Abrams Build vs Mo & Krill

This winning build for Abrams against Mo & Krill focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 53.7% win rate against Mo & Krill, these 7 items help Abrams press the advantage and close out games efficiently. Healing Tempo, Phantom Strike, Plated Armor, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 36,800 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

Mo & Krill build for Abrams matchup

Mo & Krill Build vs Abrams

Mo & Krill's counter-build against Abrams attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, Mo & Krill players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. Escalating Exposure, Scourge, Transcendent Cooldown, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 32,000 souls Knowing Mo & Krill's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

These item builds are optimized for the Abrams vs Mo & Krill matchup based on win rate data from 2,321 competitive matches. Item choices in Deadlock significantly impact matchup outcomes — the right build can help overcome statistical disadvantages or extend existing advantages. Remember to adapt your build based on game state, team compositions, enemy itemization, and whether you're ahead or behind in souls.

MetaBot Desktop

Build the best team around Abrams

Comp Lab scores every pair on your team by real win rate across hundreds of thousands of matches, checks your picks against the enemy roster, and loads proven high-win-rate comps.

  • Six-hero team board
  • Pair synergy win rates
  • Proven high-win comps
Deadlock Comp Lab in MetaBot Desktop

Abrams has favorable matchups against 32 heroes and unfavorable matchups against 11 heroes in Deadlock. Abrams's strongest matchup is against The Doorman with a 59.6% win rate. The hardest matchup is Graves at 42.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and build recommendations.

Abrams matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6860)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
45.66%6,6362.555.05.722,87035,016
54.81%5,4302.585.25.924,52334,908
46.02%4,9542.314.65.822,24134,587
55.91%4,8312.625.25.723,54634,842
42.30%4,7122.465.26.023,00834,884
53.70%4,5622.495.05.822,44434,621
50.88%4,5522.585.66.024,56134,978
50.31%4,5502.514.65.524,32633,897
53.38%4,4042.605.56.025,44535,263
51.31%4,2762.575.25.823,68235,217
53.04%4,1142.615.45.925,14635,860
51.70%4,0272.565.56.124,88135,118
48.70%3,8872.515.36.025,39835,258
44.53%3,8292.434.95.822,26135,223
54.28%3,6902.635.35.923,80134,863
52.49%3,6752.655.45.823,56834,976
57.40%3,6132.695.65.924,29235,310
55.26%3,5852.735.55.724,26835,591
52.95%3,3772.615.25.824,21934,700
47.61%3,3712.625.35.823,61035,159
57.30%3,1992.775.75.825,42734,986
56.76%3,1872.795.65.724,12435,377
49.24%3,1112.474.85.723,84035,005
49.17%3,0122.314.96.021,75834,460
56.98%3,0102.735.45.724,53035,030
51.69%2,9562.635.45.925,47035,566
50.85%2,8792.595.35.924,41735,148
57.43%2,6242.665.45.824,23534,961
48.94%2,5582.595.05.623,74334,648
53.68%2,3212.585.46.024,81434,372
51.02%2,2112.585.05.723,29134,370
54.15%2,1832.585.25.722,86535,015
56.51%2,1272.825.35.523,85435,294
51.22%2,0912.534.65.522,37634,875
48.31%1,9192.434.55.521,65833,486
52.27%1,8752.675.05.322,89135,303
58.94%1,8462.734.95.423,37934,646
59.59%1,8192.835.45.524,67835,873
48.65%1,8092.474.75.724,09134,292
57.39%1,6782.725.65.924,95435,482
59.47%1,6312.695.05.523,40735,369
53.98%1,6212.685.05.522,27734,367
57.75%1,3042.805.35.523,82935,874
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Abrams Matchups - FAQ

What is Abrams's best matchup in Deadlock?

Abrams's best matchup is against The Doorman, achieving a 59.6% win rate. Abrams excels in this matchup through superior combat stats and favorable ability interactions.

What is Abrams's hardest matchup?

Abrams's hardest matchup is against Graves, with only a 42.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Abrams should focus on team coordination and itemizing defensively.

How many favorable matchups does Abrams have?

Abrams has 32 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Deadlock. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better hero picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Abrams in difficult matchups?

When playing Abrams in difficult matchups, prioritize safe farming, positioning, and team coordination. Adjust your item build to compensate for the matchup disadvantage, and look for opportunities to impact fights through abilities rather than direct confrontation.

What stats should I focus on in Abrams's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Abrams's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average player damage, and net worth difference. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more defensively and relying on team support.