Abrams
Win Rate
47.5%
Matches
4,934
KDA
2.48

Abrams vs Mo & Krillvs Mo & Krill

Skill LevelAll Skill Levels
Matches16,734
Version6694
Last UpdatedSep 23, 2026 UTC
MethodologyData Methodology

Abrams faces a challenging 47.5% win rate against Mo & Krill in this Deadlock matchup. Data from 4,934 games shows Abrams averages 1.2 more deaths. Focus on safe farming, team coordination, and avoiding 1v1 confrontations.

Abrams Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Abrams performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
Abrams - 47.5% win rate in this matchup
Abrams
47.5% WR
VS
Mo & Krill vs Abrams matchup - 52.6% win rate
Mo & Krill
52.6% WR

Who Wins the Abrams vs Mo & Krill Matchup?

Mo & Krill wins the Abrams vs Mo & Krill matchup
Winner
Mo & Krill
Matches: 4,934
47.5%
Win Rate
52.6%
6.5
Avg Kills
6.7
8.0
Avg Deaths
6.7
13.3
Avg Assists
16.0
40,265
Avg Net Worth
44,386
30,878
Player DMG
36,703
5,485
Objective DMG
5,672
86.2
Last Hits
87.2

Abrams vs Mo & Krill Matchup Summary

The Abrams vs Mo & Krill matchup in Deadlock is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 4,934 recent matches analyzed, Mo & Krill wins with a 52.6% win rate compared to Abrams's 47.5%, giving Mo & Krill a 5.1 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in fragging power, where Mo & Krill consistently outperforms. Mo & Krill holds a meaningful advantage in this matchup. Abrams players should play more cautiously, prioritize safe farming, and look for team fight opportunities where positioning and coordination matter more than 1v1 statistics.

Abrams vs Mo & Krill Combat Analysis

Mo & Krill wins combat stats against Abrams in Deadlock

Mo & Krill achieves a clean sweep in the combat department, winning all five metrics against Abrams in the Abrams vs Mo & Krill matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Mo & Krill holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 4,934 competitive matches, Mo & Krill players can approach duels against Abrams with confidence, while Abrams players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on ability-based contributions, objective play, and team coordination to remain impactful.

KDA Ratio
2.48Abrams
3.37Mo & Krill
The KDA disparity between Mo & Krill and Abrams is substantial: 3.37 versus 2.48, a commanding 0.89 point difference that reveals Mo & Krill's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 4,934 games shows Mo & Krill consistently outfragging and outliving Abrams in these encounters. For Abrams players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against Mo & Krill whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize Mo & Krill's mechanical advantage.
Avg Kills
6.5Abrams
6.7Mo & Krill
Kill production between Abrams and Mo & Krill is virtually identical, with Abrams averaging 6.5 kills per game and Mo & Krill securing 6.7. This parity suggests both heroes are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, ability usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — lane denials, objective fights, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
8.0Abrams
6.7Mo & Krill
Mo & Krill demonstrates markedly better survivability against Abrams, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives Mo & Krill significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. Abrams players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
Player DMG
30,878Abrams
36,703Mo & Krill
The damage differential between Mo & Krill and Abrams is exceptional: 36,703 compared to just 30,878. Mo & Krill deals 5,825 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Mo & Krill's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Abrams struggles to even trade effectively. Abrams players should treat Mo & Krill as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.
Objective DMG
5,485Abrams
5,672Mo & Krill
Objective damage contribution is similar between Abrams (5,485) and Mo & Krill (5,672). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

Abrams vs Mo & Krill Economy Analysis

Net Worth
40,265Abrams
44,386Mo & Krill
Last Hits
86.2Abrams
87.2Mo & Krill

Mo & Krill vastly out-earns Abrams by 4,121 souls on average. This substantial economic gap means Mo & Krill will consistently hit item breakpoints earlier, creating a snowballing advantage throughout the game. Both heroes farm at comparable rates, so lane control will depend on harassment patterns and jungle support rather than inherent farming advantages.

Recommended Items for Abrams vs Mo & Krill

Abrams build for Mo & Krill matchup

Abrams Build vs Mo & Krill

This optimized build for Abrams against Mo & Krill is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 52.5% win rate disadvantage against Mo & Krill, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. Runed Gauntlets, Spirit Burn, Mystic Shot, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 38,799 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

Mo & Krill build for Abrams matchup

Mo & Krill Build vs Abrams

Mo & Krill's recommended build against Abrams leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring Mo & Krill, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. Rescue Beam, Escalating Exposure, Scourge, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 41,600 souls Understanding Mo & Krill's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

These item builds are optimized for the Abrams vs Mo & Krill matchup based on win rate data from 4,934 competitive matches. Item choices in Deadlock significantly impact matchup outcomes — the right build can help overcome statistical disadvantages or extend existing advantages. Remember to adapt your build based on game state, team compositions, enemy itemization, and whether you're ahead or behind in souls.

Abrams has favorable matchups against 18 heroes and unfavorable matchups against 19 heroes in Deadlock. Abrams's strongest matchup is against Venator with a 55.5% win rate. The hardest matchup is Graves at 44.4% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and build recommendations.

Abrams matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6694)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
51.81%7,1722.536.67.930,88640,526
48.41%6,2312.496.47.930,36640,310
47.07%6,2202.486.47.829,57039,993
49.94%6,0192.536.77.930,77241,225
49.78%6,0112.546.78.030,91340,691
52.68%5,6522.626.87.831,20241,387
53.99%5,5502.536.77.930,89741,195
50.27%5,3922.606.87.830,92540,690
52.86%5,1542.566.67.831,04940,677
47.95%5,0742.536.57.729,73139,949
44.43%5,0582.466.77.930,24141,296
55.54%5,0232.586.77.830,98041,291
52.07%4,9542.586.87.931,05941,159
47.54%4,9342.486.58.030,87840,265
45.97%4,8612.456.57.829,60740,778
48.26%4,8312.526.87.931,22841,224
44.76%4,8222.426.58.031,13840,602
52.20%4,7922.506.57.930,06440,505
44.82%4,5242.496.77.830,61041,147
48.03%4,3292.396.48.028,70740,411
46.72%4,1882.486.27.729,73739,765
48.31%4,1122.506.57.830,76040,396
47.77%3,6962.486.48.030,16539,855
52.48%3,5362.596.88.031,52241,966
49.48%3,3932.536.77.931,38040,727
52.72%3,3612.546.47.730,44940,726
50.30%3,2892.576.97.931,40540,833
51.48%3,1092.586.77.831,67341,532
54.80%2,9202.616.97.830,95441,435
53.58%2,8552.556.77.931,32741,821
52.50%2,7162.496.57.830,03240,520
53.85%2,6182.636.67.630,65541,073
49.90%2,5932.606.57.729,94740,442
44.88%2,5302.466.47.831,53840,290
51.29%2,3712.476.57.829,90441,376
49.98%2,3042.586.77.631,19841,729
53.35%2,1952.506.47.830,20540,928
MetaBot Desktop

Get the Winning Edge

Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.

  • In-game overlays
  • Automatic match tracking
  • Desktop-exclusive tools
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Abrams Matchups - FAQ

What is Abrams's best matchup in Deadlock?

Abrams's best matchup is against Venator, achieving a 55.5% win rate. Abrams excels in this matchup through superior combat stats and favorable ability interactions.

What is Abrams's hardest matchup?

Abrams's hardest matchup is against Graves, with only a 44.4% win rate. Against this opponent, Abrams should focus on team coordination and itemizing defensively.

How many favorable matchups does Abrams have?

Abrams has 18 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 19 unfavorable matchups in Deadlock. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better hero picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Abrams in difficult matchups?

When playing Abrams in difficult matchups, prioritize safe farming, positioning, and team coordination. Adjust your item build to compensate for the matchup disadvantage, and look for opportunities to impact fights through abilities rather than direct confrontation.

What stats should I focus on in Abrams's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Abrams's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average player damage, and net worth difference. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more defensively and relying on team support.