Abrams
Win Rate
56.8%
Matches
3,187
KDA
2.79

Abrams vs Paradox vs Paradox

Skill Level
All Skill Levels
Matches
42,218
Version
6860
Last Updated
Nov 7, 2026 UTC
Methodology
Data Methodology

Abrams dominates Paradox with a commanding 56.8% win rate in Deadlock. Across 3,187 games, Abrams averages 5.6 kills and -3,462 more player damage per match. This favorable matchup allows aggressive play and early fight opportunities.

Abrams Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Abrams performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
Abrams - 56.8% win rate in this matchup
Abrams
56.8% WR
VS
Paradox vs Abrams matchup - 43.2% win rate
Paradox
43.2% WR

Who Wins the Abrams vs Paradox Matchup?

Abrams wins the Abrams vs Paradox matchup
Winner
Abrams
Matches: 3,187
56.8%
Win Rate
43.2%
5.6
Avg Kills
4.3
5.7
Avg Deaths
5.1
10.3
Avg Assists
9.9
35,377
Avg Net Worth
34,888
24,124
Player DMG
27,586
4,337
Objective DMG
3,770
52.4
Last Hits
61.2

Abrams vs Paradox Matchup Summary

The Abrams vs Paradox matchup in Deadlock is a decisive one-sided matchup. Based on 3,187 recent matches analyzed, Abrams wins with a 56.8% win rate compared to Paradox's 43.2%, giving Abrams a 13.5 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where Abrams consistently outperforms. Abrams has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. Paradox should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

Abrams vs Paradox Combat Analysis

Abrams wins combat stats against Paradox in Deadlock

Abrams edges out Paradox in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 3,187 matches analyzed, this Abrams vs Paradox matchup remains contestable for both sides. Paradox shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Paradox's favor.

KDA Ratio
2.79Abrams
2.75Paradox
The KDA comparison between Abrams and Paradox reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Abrams averaging 2.79 and Paradox posting 2.75. This razor-thin margin demonstrates that neither hero has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, ability timing, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent hero kit advantage.
Avg Kills
5.6Abrams
4.3Paradox
Abrams secures approximately 1.3 more kills per match than Paradox in this head-to-head (5.6 vs 4.3). Over the course of a typical match, this translates to Abrams contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Abrams's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Paradox can compensate through superior objective focus, team fight positioning, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
5.7Abrams
5.1Paradox
Paradox survives longer in this matchup, dying 5.1 times per game compared to Abrams's 5.7 deaths. This 0.5 death difference per match means Paradox is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. Abrams players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Paradox's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
Player DMG
24,124Abrams
27,586Paradox
Paradox significantly outdamages Abrams in head-to-head encounters, posting 27,586 average damage versus 24,124. This 3,462 damage advantage means Paradox consistently wins the damage exchange in fights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Abrams players should avoid prolonged fights with Paradox — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate.
Objective DMG
4,337Abrams
3,770Paradox
Objective damage contribution is similar between Abrams (4,337) and Paradox (3,770). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

Abrams vs Paradox Economy Analysis

Net Worth
35,377Abrams
34,888Paradox
Last Hits
52.4Abrams
61.2Paradox

Abrams and Paradox have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. Paradox secures more last hits (61.2 vs 52.4), while Paradox leads in denies (2.0 vs 1.9). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

Recommended Items for Abrams vs Paradox

Abrams build for Paradox matchup

Abrams Build vs Paradox

This winning build for Abrams against Paradox focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 56.8% win rate against Paradox, these 7 items help Abrams press the advantage and close out games efficiently. Shadow Weave, Colossus, Spellbreaker, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 27,200 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

Paradox build for Abrams matchup

Paradox Build vs Abrams

Paradox's counter-build against Abrams attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, Paradox players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. Healing Booster, Escalating Exposure, Spirit Burn, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 37,999 souls Knowing Paradox's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

These item builds are optimized for the Abrams vs Paradox matchup based on win rate data from 3,187 competitive matches. Item choices in Deadlock significantly impact matchup outcomes — the right build can help overcome statistical disadvantages or extend existing advantages. Remember to adapt your build based on game state, team compositions, enemy itemization, and whether you're ahead or behind in souls.

MetaBot Desktop

Build the best team around Abrams

Comp Lab scores every pair on your team by real win rate across hundreds of thousands of matches, checks your picks against the enemy roster, and loads proven high-win-rate comps.

  • Six-hero team board
  • Pair synergy win rates
  • Proven high-win comps
Deadlock Comp Lab in MetaBot Desktop

Abrams has favorable matchups against 32 heroes and unfavorable matchups against 11 heroes in Deadlock. Abrams's strongest matchup is against The Doorman with a 59.6% win rate. The hardest matchup is Graves at 42.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and build recommendations.

Abrams matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6860)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
45.66%6,6362.555.05.722,87035,016
54.81%5,4302.585.25.924,52334,908
46.02%4,9542.314.65.822,24134,587
55.91%4,8312.625.25.723,54634,842
42.30%4,7122.465.26.023,00834,884
53.70%4,5622.495.05.822,44434,621
50.88%4,5522.585.66.024,56134,978
50.31%4,5502.514.65.524,32633,897
53.38%4,4042.605.56.025,44535,263
51.31%4,2762.575.25.823,68235,217
53.04%4,1142.615.45.925,14635,860
51.70%4,0272.565.56.124,88135,118
48.70%3,8872.515.36.025,39835,258
44.53%3,8292.434.95.822,26135,223
54.28%3,6902.635.35.923,80134,863
52.49%3,6752.655.45.823,56834,976
57.40%3,6132.695.65.924,29235,310
55.26%3,5852.735.55.724,26835,591
52.95%3,3772.615.25.824,21934,700
47.61%3,3712.625.35.823,61035,159
57.30%3,1992.775.75.825,42734,986
56.76%3,1872.795.65.724,12435,377
49.24%3,1112.474.85.723,84035,005
49.17%3,0122.314.96.021,75834,460
56.98%3,0102.735.45.724,53035,030
51.69%2,9562.635.45.925,47035,566
50.85%2,8792.595.35.924,41735,148
57.43%2,6242.665.45.824,23534,961
48.94%2,5582.595.05.623,74334,648
53.68%2,3212.585.46.024,81434,372
51.02%2,2112.585.05.723,29134,370
54.15%2,1832.585.25.722,86535,015
56.51%2,1272.825.35.523,85435,294
51.22%2,0912.534.65.522,37634,875
48.31%1,9192.434.55.521,65833,486
52.27%1,8752.675.05.322,89135,303
58.94%1,8462.734.95.423,37934,646
59.59%1,8192.835.45.524,67835,873
48.65%1,8092.474.75.724,09134,292
57.39%1,6782.725.65.924,95435,482
59.47%1,6312.695.05.523,40735,369
53.98%1,6212.685.05.522,27734,367
57.75%1,3042.805.35.523,82935,874
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Abrams Matchups - FAQ

What is Abrams's best matchup in Deadlock?

Abrams's best matchup is against The Doorman, achieving a 59.6% win rate. Abrams excels in this matchup through superior combat stats and favorable ability interactions.

What is Abrams's hardest matchup?

Abrams's hardest matchup is against Graves, with only a 42.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Abrams should focus on team coordination and itemizing defensively.

How many favorable matchups does Abrams have?

Abrams has 32 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Deadlock. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better hero picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Abrams in difficult matchups?

When playing Abrams in difficult matchups, prioritize safe farming, positioning, and team coordination. Adjust your item build to compensate for the matchup disadvantage, and look for opportunities to impact fights through abilities rather than direct confrontation.

What stats should I focus on in Abrams's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Abrams's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average player damage, and net worth difference. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more defensively and relying on team support.