Brandvs Aphelios
Brand vs Aphelios is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Aphelios wins with a 66.7% win rate (+33.3%) over Brand based on 6 games. Brand wins the early laning phase while Aphelios scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Brand vs Aphelios matchup.
Brand Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Brand performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Brand vs Aphelios Matchup?
Brand vs Aphelios Matchup Summary
The Brand vs Aphelios matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, Aphelios wins with a 66.7% win rate compared to Brand's 33.3%, giving Aphelios a 33.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Brand controls the early laning stage, but Aphelios outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Brand needs to press advantages before Aphelios reaches their power spikes, while Aphelios should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Brand leads by 0.6s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Aphelios has a strong advantage in this matchup. Brand players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Aphelios overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Brand vs Aphelios Laning Phase Breakdown
Aphelios is favored during the laning phase against Brand, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Aphelios holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand0.0%
Aphelios0.0%Brand33.3%Aphelios66.7%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Brand and Aphelios, with Brand holding a razor-thin 0.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Aphelios is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Brand. Extended games heavily favor Aphelios, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Brand has the edge early, but Aphelios gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Brand Runes Against Aphelios
Sorcery
Precision
The Sorcery and Precision rune setup gives Brand the best tools to compete against Aphelios in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Brand matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Brand's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.11% | 76 | 2.2 | 769 | 8,739 | 32.4% | 51.3% | |
| 50.68% | 73 | 2.2 | 684 | 9,459 | 48.0% | 52.1% | |
| 50.00% | 58 | 2.9 | 852 | 9,826 | 57.1% | 46.0% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 6.2 | 1,047 | 12,997 | 64.7% | 57.1% | |
| 47.06% | 51 | 1.9 | 900 | 10,085 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 60.87% | 46 | 2.0 | 810 | 9,988 | 63.2% | 59.3% | |
| 45.65% | 46 | 2.0 | 872 | 9,936 | 50.0% | 43.3% | |
| 42.22% | 45 | 5.8 | 1,045 | 12,011 | 20.0% | 53.3% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 2.6 | 937 | 10,911 | 57.1% | 55.2% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 1.9 | 918 | 10,508 | 46.7% | 53.6% | |
| 58.33% | 36 | 2.0 | 882 | 9,694 | 53.9% | 60.9% | |
| 38.89% | 36 | 1.9 | 729 | 8,213 | 30.0% | 50.0% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 4.9 | 969 | 12,263 | 63.6% | 57.1% | |
| 36.67% | 30 | 3.0 | 794 | 9,688 | 33.3% | 38.1% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 6.0 | 1,149 | 13,765 | 50.0% | 52.6% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 2.0 | 853 | 10,025 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 2.0 | 784 | 8,710 | 54.5% | 46.7% | |
| 69.23% | 26 | 5.5 | 904 | 11,450 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 2.1 | 797 | 8,802 | 46.1% | 50.0% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 2.6 | 780 | 9,231 | 37.5% | 58.8% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 3.9 | 874 | 9,705 | 28.6% | 61.1% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 5.3 | 943 | 11,232 | 37.5% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 4.8 | 950 | 9,411 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.4 | 1,059 | 11,707 | 70.0% | 45.5% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.7 | 984 | 11,097 | 50.0% | 42.1% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 2.5 | 1,050 | 11,636 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 5.0 | 1,002 | 11,710 | 83.3% | 30.8% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 5.3 | 993 | 11,264 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 1.6 | 608 | 7,472 | 80.0% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.9 | 818 | 9,077 | 62.5% | 40.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 2.3 | 818 | 10,043 | 57.1% | 63.6% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 5.2 | 827 | 10,560 | 20.0% | 45.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.8 | 774 | 9,325 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 2.3 | 800 | 10,181 | 25.0% | 54.5% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 1.9 | 913 | 9,388 | 28.6% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 5.8 | 985 | 11,738 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 5.7 | 1,139 | 11,531 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.8 | 881 | 11,021 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 5.1 | 838 | 10,965 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 6.3 | 984 | 13,132 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.7 | 846 | 9,987 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.0 | 1,067 | 10,907 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.0 | 1,127 | 10,298 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 904 | 11,934 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 4.0 | 770 | 9,513 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 2.2 | 883 | 12,113 | 0.0% | 30.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.1 | 1,002 | 14,456 | 100.0% | 44.4% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 2.0 | 705 | 8,509 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.1 | 845 | 9,093 | 25.0% | 85.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 827 | 9,989 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 850 | 13,140 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.1 | 854 | 10,944 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.4 | 963 | 11,976 | 100.0% | 55.6% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 2.3 | 852 | 10,752 | 0.0% | 22.2% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.9 | 1,048 | 11,394 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.9 | 1,060 | 13,729 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.6 | 743 | 10,043 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 4.8 | 771 | 10,590 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.6 | 990 | 12,007 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.6 | 1,010 | 13,918 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.5 | 871 | 9,673 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.8 | 1,338 | 10,727 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.5 | 734 | 5,917 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.4 | 1,047 | 11,177 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.4 | 1,085 | 13,201 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.0 | 994 | 10,534 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 6.2 | 986 | 7,378 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.0 | 1,197 | 13,387 | 0.0% | 83.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.3 | 1,110 | 11,843 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.0 | 1,137 | 11,612 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.5 | 1,012 | 11,869 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.2 | 1,001 | 12,507 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.2 | 1,013 | 10,549 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.8 | 954 | 13,000 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.9 | 989 | 12,838 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.4 | 1,447 | 11,815 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.5 | 969 | 11,018 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 7.0 | 993 | 10,153 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.5 | 765 | 9,260 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.8 | 927 | 11,263 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.6 | 1,018 | 15,168 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 1,570 | 13,199 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 872 | 10,707 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 865 | 15,519 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 1,172 | 14,105 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.7 | 1,064 | 13,572 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 954 | 10,213 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.7 | 1,249 | 13,599 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 884 | 8,379 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Brand vs Aphelios - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Brand do against Aphelios in League of Legends?
Aphelios wins the Brand vs Aphelios matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to Brand's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Brand do against Aphelios in the early game?
In the early game, Brand has the advantage against Aphelios with a 0.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Brand players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Brand do against Aphelios in the late game?
In the late game, Aphelios takes over the Brand vs Aphelios matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Aphelios scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Brand vs Aphelios matchup?
Aphelios wins the matchup against Brand with a 66.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 33.3 percentage point advantage means Aphelios is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
What is the best Brand build against Aphelios?
The best Brand build against Aphelios includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Brand runes against Aphelios?
The best Brand runes against Aphelios use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 0.0% win rate in the Brand vs Aphelios matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Brand counter Aphelios?
No, Brand struggles against Aphelios with only a 33.3% win rate. Aphelios has the advantage in this matchup. Brand players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Aphelios's lead.
How do I play Brand against Aphelios?
When playing Brand against Aphelios, play cautiously and avoid Aphelios's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Aphelios has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.