Brandvs Lulu
Brand vs Lulu is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Lulu wins with a 53.1% win rate (+6.1%) over Brand based on 49 games. Brand wins the early laning phase while Lulu scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Brand vs Lulu matchup.
Brand Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Brand performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Brand vs Lulu Matchup?
Brand vs Lulu Matchup Summary
The Brand vs Lulu matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 49 recent matches analyzed, Lulu wins with a 53.1% win rate compared to Brand's 46.9%, giving Lulu a 6.1 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Brand controls the early laning stage, but Lulu outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Brand needs to press advantages before Lulu reaches their power spikes, while Lulu should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where Brand leads by 565 DMG/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Lulu has a strong advantage in this matchup. Brand players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Lulu overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Brand vs Lulu Laning Phase Breakdown
Brand is favored during the laning phase against Lulu, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Brand holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Brand Build Against Lulu
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Lulu, providing the mobility and stats Brand needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Brand against Lulu are Liandry's Torment, Zhonya's Hourglass and Rylai's Crystal Scepter. This combination gives Brand an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 4 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Lulu. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Brand vs Lulu matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand54.5%
Lulu45.5%Brand40.7%Lulu59.3%Brand dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 54.5% win rate — a 9.1 percentage point lead over Lulu. This lopsided early game means Brand can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Lulu is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 59.3% win rate — 18.5 points above Brand. Extended games heavily favor Lulu, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Brand must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Lulu reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Lulu survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Brand Runes Against Lulu
Sorcery
Precision
The Sorcery and Precision rune setup gives Brand the best tools to compete against Lulu in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Brand matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Brand's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.15% | 186 | 2.5 | 722 | 9,707 | 53.6% | 51.3% | |
| 49.15% | 177 | 2.3 | 800 | 9,625 | 46.4% | 50.9% | |
| 53.21% | 109 | 2.0 | 908 | 10,428 | 50.0% | 55.1% | |
| 56.48% | 108 | 1.9 | 808 | 10,198 | 61.1% | 54.2% | |
| 53.40% | 103 | 2.6 | 842 | 10,150 | 62.5% | 47.6% | |
| 52.00% | 100 | 1.9 | 872 | 10,124 | 55.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.87% | 94 | 5.6 | 978 | 12,069 | 40.7% | 50.8% | |
| 48.91% | 92 | 1.9 | 849 | 10,143 | 53.6% | 46.9% | |
| 46.15% | 91 | 2.7 | 966 | 10,347 | 53.1% | 42.4% | |
| 56.32% | 87 | 6.2 | 1,036 | 13,133 | 55.6% | 56.7% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 1.9 | 812 | 9,183 | 44.8% | 48.9% | |
| 50.75% | 67 | 2.3 | 792 | 9,924 | 38.1% | 56.5% | |
| 43.28% | 67 | 1.9 | 774 | 9,200 | 32.4% | 54.5% | |
| 42.62% | 61 | 3.0 | 793 | 10,374 | 37.5% | 44.4% | |
| 55.93% | 59 | 4.8 | 993 | 11,984 | 64.7% | 52.4% | |
| 57.63% | 59 | 5.9 | 1,057 | 12,634 | 50.0% | 61.5% | |
| 55.36% | 56 | 4.0 | 897 | 10,099 | 60.0% | 52.8% | |
| 41.07% | 56 | 2.2 | 887 | 10,289 | 40.0% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 54 | 1.9 | 776 | 10,027 | 56.3% | 47.4% | |
| 71.15% | 52 | 4.9 | 870 | 12,069 | 100.0% | 55.9% | |
| 50.00% | 50 | 1.9 | 830 | 9,377 | 57.1% | 44.8% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 2.0 | 779 | 8,846 | 54.5% | 40.7% | |
| 47.92% | 48 | 5.3 | 894 | 9,640 | 55.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.32% | 47 | 2.6 | 878 | 8,916 | 54.2% | 56.5% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 6.4 | 977 | 11,697 | 55.0% | 48.0% | |
| 40.91% | 44 | 6.0 | 900 | 10,703 | 47.4% | 36.0% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 2.1 | 987 | 10,042 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.19% | 43 | 1.9 | 766 | 9,823 | 30.8% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 42 | 5.5 | 966 | 11,565 | 42.9% | 53.6% | |
| 52.38% | 42 | 1.6 | 627 | 8,251 | 68.2% | 35.0% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 1.9 | 1,026 | 10,910 | 62.5% | 45.2% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 1.7 | 734 | 8,730 | 52.6% | 36.8% | |
| 57.89% | 38 | 4.9 | 949 | 9,944 | 70.6% | 47.6% | |
| 66.67% | 36 | 2.4 | 865 | 10,327 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 37.14% | 35 | 1.8 | 750 | 9,132 | 46.7% | 30.0% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 4.3 | 904 | 11,221 | 83.3% | 40.9% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 4.8 | 918 | 11,583 | 61.5% | 57.1% | |
| 60.61% | 33 | 6.0 | 964 | 12,604 | 33.3% | 76.2% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 6.1 | 1,087 | 11,978 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 5.6 | 1,078 | 11,959 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 5.6 | 1,032 | 12,195 | 83.3% | 26.3% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 4.5 | 1,024 | 11,132 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 1.5 | 776 | 9,010 | 42.9% | 62.5% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 2.1 | 983 | 10,218 | 54.5% | 38.9% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 5.8 | 990 | 11,398 | 63.6% | 52.9% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 2.3 | 823 | 9,299 | 45.5% | 80.0% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 1.8 | 922 | 11,033 | 42.9% | 42.1% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 2.0 | 913 | 9,661 | 40.0% | 46.7% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 3.9 | 850 | 12,120 | 50.0% | 52.6% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 5.9 | 1,049 | 14,278 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 2.2 | 809 | 11,340 | 50.0% | 41.2% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 2.0 | 831 | 10,470 | 28.6% | 46.7% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 4.8 | 1,118 | 10,155 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.5 | 1,040 | 12,035 | 57.1% | 46.1% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 5.7 | 1,007 | 13,409 | 40.0% | 26.7% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 3.9 | 793 | 9,984 | 62.5% | 41.7% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.2 | 1,079 | 11,132 | 20.0% | 57.1% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 5.4 | 904 | 10,159 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 5.7 | 909 | 11,813 | 20.0% | 35.7% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 3.2 | 886 | 10,697 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.7 | 875 | 11,738 | 60.0% | 46.1% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 4.9 | 843 | 10,734 | 25.0% | 71.4% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.7 | 1,009 | 11,331 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.2 | 878 | 12,160 | 75.0% | 30.8% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 4.8 | 915 | 11,973 | 66.7% | 35.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 5.9 | 1,000 | 11,591 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.6 | 896 | 11,331 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 3.9 | 773 | 9,411 | 14.3% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 1.5 | 833 | 13,015 | 71.4% | 55.6% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 3.9 | 1,015 | 9,795 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 2.0 | 816 | 10,928 | 100.0% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.6 | 1,176 | 12,896 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 3.0 | 997 | 10,004 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 5.4 | 1,073 | 13,697 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.9 | 977 | 13,020 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.2 | 894 | 10,035 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 1.5 | 770 | 12,256 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.9 | 952 | 11,718 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.1 | 1,098 | 13,246 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 5.8 | 1,227 | 13,694 | 100.0% | 81.8% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 4.0 | 1,012 | 10,323 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.1 | 933 | 12,101 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.8 | 1,174 | 9,303 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.6 | 938 | 13,347 | 0.0% | 55.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 3.8 | 860 | 9,155 | 75.0% | 28.6% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 3.1 | 1,165 | 10,775 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 919 | 9,422 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 1,000 | 9,795 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 775 | 10,835 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 1,111 | 12,750 | 100.0% | 77.8% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 1,032 | 11,638 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 983 | 12,135 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.2 | 1,114 | 12,343 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.7 | 1,012 | 11,080 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.3 | 1,072 | 13,868 | 100.0% | 37.5% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.4 | 948 | 11,226 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.8 | 1,131 | 12,434 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 0.7 | 799 | 9,930 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 4.8 | 1,058 | 11,295 | 50.0% | 14.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.6 | 1,063 | 11,770 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 7.0 | 1,215 | 13,471 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.2 | 893 | 11,578 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 4.8 | 796 | 9,086 | 33.3% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.3 | 792 | 11,103 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 3.4 | 936 | 9,563 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.6 | 1,080 | 12,593 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.0 | 1,059 | 12,323 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.2 | 979 | 12,437 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.3 | 1,319 | 15,236 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.2 | 1,127 | 10,131 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.4 | 994 | 12,238 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.9 | 1,206 | 12,238 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.3 | 1,234 | 14,578 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 4.8 | 937 | 12,762 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 790 | 9,024 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.2 | 938 | 12,905 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.3 | 914 | 12,066 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.3 | 762 | 12,727 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 907 | 11,866 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 802 | 9,995 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 890 | 11,639 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 1,287 | 16,309 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 969 | 9,601 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 696 | 12,875 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 934 | 15,019 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.9 | 1,067 | 12,670 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 648 | 8,848 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 899 | 12,834 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 1,016 | 11,406 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Brand vs Lulu - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Brand do against Lulu in League of Legends?
Lulu wins the Brand vs Lulu matchup with a 53.1% win rate compared to Brand's 46.9%, a 6.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 49 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Brand do against Lulu in the early game?
In the early game, Brand has the advantage against Lulu with a 54.5% win rate versus 45.5%. Brand players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Brand do against Lulu in the late game?
In the late game, Lulu takes over the Brand vs Lulu matchup with a 59.3% win rate compared to 40.7%. Lulu scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Brand vs Lulu matchup?
Lulu wins the matchup against Brand with a 53.1% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 6.1 percentage point advantage means Lulu is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 49 games analyzed.
What is the best Brand build against Lulu?
The best Brand build against Lulu includes Liandry's Torment, Zhonya's Hourglass, Rylai's Crystal Scepter with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Brand runes against Lulu?
The best Brand runes against Lulu use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 44.4% win rate in the Brand vs Lulu matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Brand counter Lulu?
No, Brand struggles against Lulu with only a 46.9% win rate. Lulu has the advantage in this matchup. Brand players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Lulu's lead.
How do I play Brand against Lulu?
When playing Brand against Lulu, play cautiously and avoid Lulu's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Lulu has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.