Brandvs Lulu
Brand vs Lulu is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Brand wins with a 58.6% win rate (+17.2%) over Lulu based on 87 games. Brand wins the early laning phase while Lulu scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Brand vs Lulu matchup.
Brand Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Brand performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Brand vs Lulu Matchup?
Brand vs Lulu Matchup Summary
The Brand vs Lulu matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 87 recent matches analyzed, Brand wins with a 58.6% win rate compared to Lulu's 41.4%, giving Brand a 17.2 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Brand controls the early laning stage, but Lulu outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Brand needs to press advantages before Lulu reaches their power spikes, while Lulu should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where Brand leads by 610 DMG/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Brand players can confidently pick into Lulu and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Lulu away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Brand vs Lulu Laning Phase Breakdown
Brand is favored during the laning phase against Lulu, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Brand holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Brand Build Against Lulu
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Lulu, providing the mobility and stats Brand needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Brand against Lulu are Liandry's Torment, Morellonomicon and Rylai's Crystal Scepter. This combination gives Brand an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Lulu. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Brand vs Lulu matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand73.2%
Lulu26.8%Brand45.6%Lulu54.4%Brand dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 73.2% win rate — a 46.3 percentage point lead over Lulu. This lopsided early game means Brand can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Lulu is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 54.4% win rate — 8.7 points above Brand. Extended games heavily favor Lulu, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Brand must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Lulu reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Lulu survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Brand Runes Against Lulu
Sorcery
Precision
Running Sorcery primary with Precision secondary allows Brand to press their advantage against Lulu, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Brand matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Brand's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.65% | 364 | 2.8 | 768 | 10,365 | 55.9% | 48.9% | |
| 49.09% | 330 | 2.2 | 819 | 10,075 | 46.6% | 50.8% | |
| 53.67% | 300 | 6.3 | 1,035 | 12,494 | 58.6% | 50.0% | |
| 54.34% | 265 | 5.9 | 1,041 | 13,019 | 60.6% | 50.3% | |
| 49.79% | 237 | 3.0 | 902 | 10,867 | 54.7% | 46.5% | |
| 52.89% | 225 | 6.2 | 983 | 12,441 | 60.0% | 48.1% | |
| 52.47% | 223 | 6.0 | 1,057 | 12,764 | 58.8% | 49.0% | |
| 50.23% | 219 | 1.9 | 861 | 9,923 | 56.1% | 45.5% | |
| 48.37% | 215 | 1.9 | 868 | 9,878 | 51.6% | 46.0% | |
| 50.00% | 210 | 6.2 | 1,019 | 11,746 | 60.6% | 41.4% | |
| 53.62% | 207 | 1.8 | 877 | 10,263 | 60.2% | 49.2% | |
| 53.20% | 203 | 1.8 | 846 | 9,950 | 56.4% | 51.2% | |
| 44.55% | 202 | 6.2 | 1,105 | 13,032 | 57.0% | 36.6% | |
| 43.98% | 191 | 2.1 | 825 | 10,043 | 49.3% | 41.1% | |
| 54.60% | 163 | 6.3 | 1,006 | 12,695 | 55.6% | 54.0% | |
| 51.90% | 158 | 3.0 | 845 | 11,223 | 48.1% | 53.8% | |
| 54.23% | 142 | 3.1 | 1,005 | 11,300 | 56.6% | 52.8% | |
| 40.29% | 139 | 3.6 | 787 | 10,244 | 42.1% | 39.0% | |
| 51.09% | 137 | 6.1 | 1,024 | 12,423 | 54.8% | 49.5% | |
| 51.91% | 131 | 3.7 | 871 | 10,816 | 40.9% | 57.5% | |
| 48.03% | 127 | 2.1 | 830 | 10,515 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 50.41% | 121 | 1.8 | 784 | 9,904 | 51.2% | 50.0% | |
| 59.83% | 117 | 6.3 | 1,067 | 13,102 | 61.2% | 58.8% | |
| 58.62% | 116 | 2.0 | 864 | 11,278 | 66.7% | 55.4% | |
| 51.35% | 111 | 1.8 | 842 | 9,601 | 61.2% | 43.5% | |
| 47.75% | 111 | 5.3 | 1,024 | 11,488 | 46.5% | 48.5% | |
| 60.55% | 109 | 5.6 | 1,047 | 11,359 | 55.6% | 64.1% | |
| 42.99% | 107 | 1.9 | 910 | 10,199 | 51.2% | 37.9% | |
| 49.48% | 97 | 2.1 | 1,033 | 10,488 | 46.1% | 51.7% | |
| 55.21% | 96 | 5.9 | 989 | 11,633 | 55.6% | 55.0% | |
| 54.17% | 96 | 5.9 | 1,075 | 12,844 | 55.6% | 53.3% | |
| 43.16% | 95 | 6.4 | 1,042 | 12,833 | 53.3% | 38.5% | |
| 58.51% | 94 | 2.4 | 846 | 10,284 | 58.3% | 58.6% | |
| 45.74% | 94 | 1.9 | 807 | 10,063 | 55.6% | 39.7% | |
| 59.14% | 93 | 5.8 | 962 | 13,109 | 74.2% | 51.6% | |
| 58.62% | 87 | 1.8 | 834 | 9,673 | 73.2% | 45.6% | |
| 55.29% | 85 | 6.0 | 1,058 | 12,867 | 51.4% | 58.0% | |
| 50.60% | 83 | 1.7 | 671 | 9,264 | 51.2% | 50.0% | |
| 53.09% | 81 | 6.3 | 1,078 | 12,052 | 51.3% | 54.8% | |
| 59.74% | 77 | 2.0 | 907 | 10,473 | 59.4% | 60.0% | |
| 57.97% | 69 | 5.8 | 1,063 | 13,172 | 61.1% | 56.9% | |
| 60.29% | 68 | 1.8 | 875 | 10,679 | 44.4% | 66.0% | |
| 57.58% | 66 | 1.9 | 831 | 10,195 | 56.0% | 58.5% | |
| 45.31% | 64 | 1.8 | 813 | 9,728 | 44.0% | 46.1% | |
| 55.56% | 63 | 6.4 | 979 | 12,275 | 57.7% | 54.0% | |
| 58.06% | 62 | 5.9 | 926 | 13,155 | 81.0% | 46.3% | |
| 51.61% | 62 | 4.5 | 995 | 12,078 | 44.0% | 56.8% | |
| 56.67% | 60 | 5.8 | 1,016 | 11,266 | 55.0% | 57.5% | |
| 39.66% | 58 | 5.6 | 1,001 | 11,902 | 17.6% | 48.8% | |
| 55.17% | 58 | 6.6 | 979 | 11,618 | 52.0% | 57.6% | |
| 48.28% | 58 | 1.9 | 947 | 10,228 | 66.7% | 37.8% | |
| 49.12% | 57 | 4.0 | 1,035 | 11,343 | 42.1% | 52.6% | |
| 60.71% | 56 | 1.8 | 774 | 10,244 | 76.5% | 53.9% | |
| 46.43% | 56 | 4.5 | 930 | 11,385 | 45.8% | 46.9% | |
| 51.79% | 56 | 6.7 | 1,035 | 13,504 | 52.2% | 51.5% | |
| 56.36% | 55 | 6.2 | 1,011 | 12,990 | 60.9% | 53.1% | |
| 56.60% | 53 | 4.9 | 911 | 10,576 | 60.9% | 53.3% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 5.1 | 1,054 | 10,623 | 40.7% | 45.8% | |
| 56.00% | 50 | 5.8 | 948 | 11,616 | 52.6% | 58.1% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 5.2 | 838 | 10,509 | 56.5% | 46.1% | |
| 44.90% | 49 | 4.5 | 944 | 9,811 | 37.0% | 54.5% | |
| 41.67% | 48 | 6.7 | 1,015 | 10,975 | 52.0% | 30.4% | |
| 61.70% | 47 | 2.3 | 891 | 10,964 | 62.5% | 61.3% | |
| 54.35% | 46 | 5.1 | 897 | 9,991 | 47.4% | 59.3% | |
| 65.22% | 46 | 2.2 | 890 | 10,258 | 70.0% | 61.5% | |
| 42.22% | 45 | 1.9 | 877 | 9,931 | 45.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.22% | 45 | 6.0 | 902 | 10,941 | 50.0% | 36.0% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 1.8 | 771 | 9,745 | 63.2% | 44.0% | |
| 38.64% | 44 | 5.2 | 932 | 11,418 | 37.5% | 39.3% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 3.0 | 917 | 11,389 | 38.9% | 52.0% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 4.2 | 1,064 | 11,448 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 5.3 | 1,029 | 11,740 | 27.3% | 48.3% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 5.0 | 904 | 11,208 | 50.0% | 56.5% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 2.1 | 895 | 12,338 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 64.86% | 37 | 6.5 | 964 | 12,800 | 76.5% | 55.0% | |
| 41.67% | 36 | 5.8 | 946 | 11,197 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 5.7 | 798 | 10,158 | 52.6% | 60.0% | |
| 64.71% | 34 | 4.5 | 927 | 11,172 | 66.7% | 63.6% | |
| 40.63% | 32 | 5.6 | 911 | 11,230 | 41.7% | 40.0% | |
| 81.25% | 32 | 6.2 | 1,047 | 13,786 | 81.8% | 81.0% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 1.9 | 861 | 9,789 | 53.9% | 44.4% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 3.6 | 1,011 | 10,414 | 61.5% | 55.6% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 3.1 | 967 | 9,736 | 64.3% | 50.0% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 1.6 | 773 | 9,918 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 5.8 | 969 | 12,224 | 60.0% | 58.8% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 4.5 | 1,278 | 12,100 | 37.5% | 55.6% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 5.8 | 1,012 | 12,186 | 57.1% | 63.2% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 5.3 | 959 | 10,596 | 41.7% | 21.4% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 4.5 | 913 | 11,416 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 28.00% | 25 | 6.2 | 1,081 | 12,638 | 30.8% | 25.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 1.6 | 795 | 11,400 | 45.5% | 46.1% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 5.6 | 969 | 11,795 | 57.1% | 52.9% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 4.7 | 875 | 10,599 | 50.0% | 23.1% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 6.0 | 1,058 | 12,902 | 44.4% | 61.5% | |
| 68.18% | 22 | 6.4 | 1,040 | 12,183 | 77.8% | 61.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.2 | 952 | 13,411 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 1.4 | 760 | 10,103 | 37.5% | 38.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.9 | 793 | 8,474 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 5.0 | 1,081 | 11,246 | 66.7% | 63.6% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 1.5 | 901 | 11,628 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 4.3 | 858 | 10,799 | 37.5% | 45.5% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 3.7 | 1,024 | 12,966 | 50.0% | 72.7% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 1.9 | 929 | 12,423 | 80.0% | 57.1% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 2.4 | 873 | 12,452 | 85.7% | 58.3% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 4.4 | 1,021 | 11,009 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 6.2 | 1,202 | 13,906 | 80.0% | 71.4% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.8 | 862 | 9,915 | 37.5% | 72.7% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.4 | 1,131 | 10,412 | 77.8% | 55.6% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 5.0 | 934 | 10,238 | 40.0% | 12.5% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 5.8 | 1,158 | 12,625 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 2.0 | 853 | 12,695 | 57.1% | 36.4% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 2.6 | 944 | 13,498 | 75.0% | 64.3% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.7 | 1,210 | 12,529 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 18.75% | 16 | 2.1 | 870 | 12,247 | 0.0% | 27.3% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.3 | 991 | 10,982 | 55.6% | 57.1% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.6 | 974 | 11,952 | 57.1% | 55.6% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 1.3 | 989 | 12,275 | 25.0% | 54.5% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 4.7 | 1,201 | 11,837 | 100.0% | 30.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 6.4 | 948 | 11,763 | 75.0% | 20.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.6 | 951 | 12,342 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 4.9 | 1,038 | 10,423 | 14.3% | 42.9% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 5.1 | 936 | 11,994 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.4 | 1,063 | 11,660 | 40.0% | 62.5% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.6 | 766 | 9,928 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 4.4 | 1,132 | 10,651 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 6.5 | 1,034 | 12,503 | 83.3% | 57.1% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.2 | 1,104 | 11,651 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 1.5 | 988 | 12,513 | 83.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 4.6 | 925 | 11,948 | 100.0% | 55.6% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 4.3 | 857 | 11,010 | 66.7% | 83.3% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.2 | 744 | 11,173 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 2.2 | 745 | 11,893 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.9 | 1,115 | 11,893 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.4 | 650 | 9,651 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 1,063 | 11,850 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 1,125 | 15,037 | 25.0% | 83.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.9 | 1,213 | 12,818 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 1.3 | 784 | 12,658 | 50.0% | 85.7% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.1 | 909 | 9,548 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 4.9 | 1,143 | 11,548 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.7 | 812 | 8,352 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 11.11% | 9 | 6.0 | 712 | 8,530 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.2 | 1,121 | 14,042 | 66.7% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.0 | 777 | 10,223 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.8 | 916 | 11,852 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.3 | 799 | 6,425 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.2 | 871 | 12,721 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 2.3 | 780 | 11,214 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.3 | 880 | 9,414 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.2 | 1,082 | 11,813 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.3 | 1,000 | 12,924 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.4 | 680 | 10,880 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.3 | 815 | 10,984 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 797 | 10,147 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 820 | 11,105 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 1,090 | 11,446 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 854 | 8,953 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.9 | 1,036 | 10,326 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 1,055 | 10,875 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 986 | 10,887 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 1,333 | 13,011 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Brand vs Lulu - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Brand do against Lulu in League of Legends?
Brand wins the Brand vs Lulu matchup with a 58.6% win rate compared to Lulu's 41.4%, a 17.2 percentage point difference. This data is based on 87 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Brand do against Lulu in the early game?
In the early game, Brand has the advantage against Lulu with a 73.2% win rate versus 26.8%. Brand players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Brand do against Lulu in the late game?
In the late game, Lulu takes over the Brand vs Lulu matchup with a 54.4% win rate compared to 45.6%. Lulu scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Brand vs Lulu matchup?
Brand wins the matchup against Lulu with a 58.6% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 17.2 percentage point advantage means Brand is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 87 games analyzed.
What is the best Brand build against Lulu?
The best Brand build against Lulu includes Liandry's Torment, Morellonomicon, Rylai's Crystal Scepter with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Brand runes against Lulu?
The best Brand runes against Lulu use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 75.0% win rate in the Brand vs Lulu matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Brand counter Lulu?
Yes, Brand has a favorable matchup against Lulu with a 58.6% win rate. Brand strongly counters Lulu in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Brand against Lulu?
When playing Brand against Lulu, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.