Brandvs Miss Fortune
Brand vs Miss Fortune is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Brand wins with a 59.2% win rate (+18.4%) over Miss Fortune based on 201 games. Brand holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Brand vs Miss Fortune matchup.
Brand Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Brand performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Miss Fortune(59.2%)Who Wins the Brand vs Miss Fortune Matchup?
Brand vs Miss Fortune Matchup Summary
The Brand vs Miss Fortune matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 201 recent matches analyzed, Brand wins with a 59.2% win rate compared to Miss Fortune's 40.8%, giving Brand a 18.4 percentage point advantage. Brand dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Miss Fortune players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Brand leads by 1.1s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Brand players can confidently pick into Miss Fortune and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Miss Fortune away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Brand vs Miss Fortune Laning Phase Breakdown
Miss Fortune is favored during the laning phase against Brand, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Miss Fortune holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Brand Build Against Miss Fortune
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Miss Fortune, providing the mobility and stats Brand needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Brand against Miss Fortune are Liandry's Torment, Rylai's Crystal Scepter and Blackfire Torch. This combination gives Brand an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Miss Fortune. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Brand vs Miss Fortune matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand62.2%Miss Fortune37.8%Brand57.5%Miss Fortune42.5%Brand dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 62.2% win rate — a 24.3 percentage point lead over Miss Fortune. This lopsided early game means Brand can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Brand is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 57.5% win rate — 15.0 points above Miss Fortune. Extended games heavily favor Brand, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Brand holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Miss Fortune players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Brand Runes Against Miss Fortune
Domination
Sorcery
Running Domination primary with Sorcery secondary allows Brand to press their advantage against Miss Fortune, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Brand matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Brand's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.67% | 407 | 2.7 | 786 | 10,924 | 40.3% | 52.4% | |
| 47.76% | 380 | 1.7 | 804 | 9,693 | 50.6% | 45.7% | |
| 55.33% | 301 | 1.8 | 829 | 10,280 | 63.7% | 49.4% | |
| 57.69% | 263 | 6.4 | 1,018 | 13,060 | 56.1% | 58.8% | |
| 53.33% | 258 | 1.8 | 852 | 10,220 | 55.5% | 52.0% | |
| 53.66% | 246 | 2.1 | 816 | 10,373 | 54.6% | 53.1% | |
| 46.44% | 239 | 2.2 | 808 | 10,604 | 49.4% | 44.8% | |
| 48.68% | 230 | 1.7 | 850 | 10,183 | 48.9% | 48.5% | |
| 47.00% | 221 | 1.7 | 821 | 10,045 | 55.4% | 41.8% | |
| 54.59% | 207 | 3.1 | 995 | 11,518 | 61.4% | 51.1% | |
| 47.32% | 205 | 2.3 | 854 | 10,385 | 47.6% | 47.1% | |
| 59.20% | 201 | 5.9 | 1,010 | 13,263 | 62.2% | 57.5% | |
| 56.82% | 177 | 1.9 | 761 | 10,593 | 56.3% | 57.1% | |
| 52.35% | 172 | 5.7 | 958 | 11,558 | 47.1% | 56.0% | |
| 47.65% | 172 | 6.1 | 1,000 | 11,157 | 52.0% | 44.2% | |
| 49.10% | 168 | 5.4 | 978 | 11,845 | 37.5% | 56.3% | |
| 49.70% | 165 | 4.0 | 861 | 11,146 | 49.1% | 50.0% | |
| 56.36% | 165 | 6.5 | 1,027 | 13,389 | 63.3% | 52.4% | |
| 49.69% | 163 | 6.2 | 970 | 12,581 | 51.5% | 48.4% | |
| 49.68% | 156 | 1.7 | 800 | 9,847 | 48.4% | 50.5% | |
| 52.05% | 146 | 3.3 | 791 | 10,610 | 46.4% | 55.6% | |
| 46.15% | 144 | 2.7 | 825 | 10,639 | 40.7% | 49.4% | |
| 50.35% | 144 | 5.3 | 965 | 12,581 | 48.1% | 51.6% | |
| 50.70% | 143 | 1.6 | 896 | 10,652 | 51.9% | 50.0% | |
| 45.32% | 139 | 1.7 | 786 | 9,878 | 50.0% | 42.5% | |
| 53.03% | 135 | 1.6 | 658 | 9,379 | 57.1% | 49.3% | |
| 53.73% | 134 | 1.6 | 716 | 9,411 | 63.4% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 134 | 1.7 | 889 | 10,127 | 48.3% | 51.3% | |
| 51.94% | 130 | 1.8 | 730 | 9,981 | 49.0% | 53.8% | |
| 49.61% | 130 | 1.8 | 784 | 10,276 | 54.9% | 46.1% | |
| 57.14% | 126 | 6.3 | 971 | 12,730 | 55.3% | 58.2% | |
| 50.40% | 126 | 6.0 | 963 | 12,146 | 44.7% | 53.9% | |
| 53.28% | 123 | 6.5 | 1,039 | 12,936 | 63.3% | 43.5% | |
| 61.34% | 121 | 2.1 | 1,009 | 10,705 | 63.8% | 59.7% | |
| 58.47% | 119 | 2.4 | 864 | 11,317 | 53.3% | 61.6% | |
| 44.07% | 119 | 1.8 | 815 | 9,991 | 42.2% | 45.2% | |
| 48.25% | 114 | 5.9 | 1,044 | 11,237 | 44.7% | 50.8% | |
| 55.75% | 113 | 5.8 | 924 | 12,094 | 66.7% | 45.8% | |
| 49.53% | 108 | 6.5 | 1,023 | 13,419 | 45.0% | 52.2% | |
| 38.38% | 100 | 1.7 | 828 | 9,929 | 43.9% | 34.5% | |
| 51.02% | 98 | 4.9 | 848 | 10,583 | 50.0% | 52.0% | |
| 60.87% | 93 | 4.3 | 959 | 11,910 | 63.4% | 58.8% | |
| 48.39% | 93 | 5.6 | 999 | 11,295 | 45.2% | 51.0% | |
| 54.35% | 92 | 6.4 | 1,052 | 13,508 | 56.4% | 52.8% | |
| 51.69% | 90 | 1.7 | 875 | 9,848 | 57.1% | 46.8% | |
| 57.47% | 87 | 2.3 | 912 | 11,215 | 54.8% | 58.9% | |
| 40.48% | 84 | 1.9 | 840 | 10,135 | 48.4% | 35.9% | |
| 41.46% | 82 | 4.8 | 839 | 11,062 | 41.4% | 41.5% | |
| 51.85% | 81 | 6.6 | 990 | 13,548 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 51.25% | 81 | 6.1 | 927 | 11,807 | 51.4% | 51.1% | |
| 47.50% | 80 | 1.9 | 863 | 10,571 | 56.3% | 41.7% | |
| 50.63% | 80 | 4.9 | 873 | 11,167 | 46.1% | 55.0% | |
| 50.63% | 79 | 5.5 | 967 | 11,937 | 57.6% | 45.6% | |
| 56.76% | 74 | 1.7 | 771 | 9,851 | 58.8% | 55.0% | |
| 50.70% | 72 | 4.1 | 987 | 12,029 | 56.3% | 46.1% | |
| 52.17% | 70 | 6.0 | 1,022 | 11,834 | 34.6% | 62.8% | |
| 46.38% | 69 | 3.3 | 868 | 11,837 | 48.1% | 45.2% | |
| 55.88% | 68 | 6.4 | 1,029 | 13,254 | 66.7% | 48.8% | |
| 61.19% | 67 | 1.6 | 960 | 13,525 | 48.4% | 72.2% | |
| 56.72% | 67 | 6.4 | 926 | 12,896 | 58.3% | 55.8% | |
| 54.55% | 67 | 5.5 | 1,036 | 11,772 | 48.0% | 58.5% | |
| 58.21% | 67 | 6.3 | 1,045 | 12,935 | 64.7% | 51.5% | |
| 50.75% | 67 | 6.4 | 1,073 | 13,372 | 50.0% | 51.2% | |
| 43.94% | 66 | 6.3 | 965 | 12,240 | 48.5% | 39.4% | |
| 48.48% | 66 | 1.3 | 814 | 12,719 | 39.3% | 55.3% | |
| 54.55% | 66 | 6.6 | 1,081 | 13,235 | 68.8% | 41.2% | |
| 39.34% | 61 | 4.7 | 908 | 10,613 | 38.7% | 40.0% | |
| 61.67% | 60 | 3.0 | 963 | 12,139 | 65.0% | 60.0% | |
| 49.15% | 60 | 5.6 | 924 | 12,007 | 52.4% | 47.4% | |
| 62.50% | 58 | 4.4 | 987 | 11,654 | 53.3% | 73.1% | |
| 46.43% | 56 | 6.0 | 965 | 12,109 | 55.0% | 41.7% | |
| 55.77% | 53 | 4.5 | 1,010 | 11,521 | 52.2% | 58.6% | |
| 49.06% | 53 | 4.2 | 918 | 10,789 | 56.5% | 43.3% | |
| 37.25% | 52 | 1.9 | 911 | 12,265 | 60.0% | 27.8% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 1.4 | 792 | 12,122 | 53.6% | 66.7% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 4.9 | 803 | 11,016 | 33.3% | 53.6% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 3.0 | 899 | 10,854 | 47.8% | 41.4% | |
| 41.18% | 51 | 1.3 | 885 | 11,920 | 40.9% | 41.4% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 2.1 | 1,145 | 12,596 | 47.8% | 44.4% | |
| 55.10% | 50 | 6.3 | 936 | 11,863 | 52.4% | 57.1% | |
| 61.22% | 49 | 5.6 | 971 | 12,323 | 50.0% | 65.7% | |
| 42.86% | 49 | 1.6 | 851 | 9,954 | 63.2% | 30.0% | |
| 35.42% | 48 | 1.9 | 842 | 10,164 | 38.1% | 33.3% | |
| 56.52% | 46 | 5.7 | 951 | 12,101 | 56.3% | 56.7% | |
| 52.17% | 46 | 1.7 | 966 | 11,318 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 43.48% | 46 | 5.4 | 1,023 | 11,670 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 35.56% | 45 | 4.8 | 1,079 | 10,908 | 36.8% | 34.6% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 6.4 | 1,119 | 11,674 | 53.3% | 48.3% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 6.2 | 942 | 13,325 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 59.09% | 44 | 6.5 | 1,007 | 10,591 | 53.6% | 68.8% | |
| 39.53% | 43 | 2.5 | 1,029 | 12,791 | 47.1% | 34.6% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 2.1 | 879 | 12,831 | 53.9% | 43.3% | |
| 56.10% | 42 | 5.6 | 1,064 | 11,788 | 43.8% | 64.0% | |
| 59.52% | 42 | 1.1 | 834 | 12,997 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 39.02% | 41 | 5.7 | 943 | 11,993 | 40.0% | 38.1% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 1.7 | 875 | 12,691 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 1.9 | 972 | 12,467 | 46.7% | 60.9% | |
| 51.35% | 38 | 3.9 | 1,037 | 12,389 | 50.0% | 52.2% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 2.1 | 826 | 11,969 | 53.9% | 48.0% | |
| 52.63% | 38 | 1.5 | 957 | 12,029 | 66.7% | 43.5% | |
| 41.67% | 37 | 6.5 | 1,043 | 11,585 | 50.0% | 35.0% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 1.2 | 847 | 11,649 | 41.2% | 50.0% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 3.8 | 1,121 | 11,708 | 33.3% | 56.5% | |
| 40.00% | 35 | 5.0 | 784 | 10,330 | 23.5% | 55.6% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 1.4 | 869 | 12,903 | 30.8% | 57.1% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 1.8 | 858 | 12,329 | 36.4% | 52.4% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 1.4 | 886 | 13,391 | 10.0% | 63.6% | |
| 62.50% | 32 | 5.7 | 953 | 12,847 | 55.6% | 65.2% | |
| 61.29% | 31 | 1.6 | 828 | 9,665 | 70.6% | 50.0% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 5.5 | 1,004 | 12,105 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 5.9 | 1,018 | 13,625 | 36.4% | 68.4% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 1.0 | 880 | 11,960 | 56.3% | 35.7% | |
| 63.33% | 30 | 3.5 | 932 | 11,572 | 64.7% | 61.5% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 5.8 | 1,006 | 11,242 | 66.7% | 41.2% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 6.2 | 1,204 | 13,601 | 69.2% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 4.9 | 1,123 | 12,779 | 63.6% | 52.9% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 5.9 | 916 | 12,132 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 2.0 | 869 | 12,382 | 38.5% | 71.4% | |
| 52.00% | 26 | 1.1 | 808 | 11,666 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 3.9 | 1,030 | 11,778 | 44.4% | 52.9% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 1.5 | 915 | 13,109 | 37.5% | 27.8% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 1.9 | 965 | 12,483 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 4.3 | 834 | 10,520 | 53.9% | 53.9% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 1.4 | 888 | 12,285 | 87.5% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.8 | 860 | 11,661 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 2.6 | 895 | 11,321 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 56.52% | 24 | 3.0 | 998 | 15,059 | 66.7% | 55.0% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 4.1 | 1,011 | 10,545 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 23 | 6.5 | 977 | 11,609 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 2.7 | 929 | 11,707 | 25.0% | 54.5% | |
| 69.57% | 23 | 6.3 | 1,094 | 13,572 | 72.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 2.4 | 1,097 | 13,163 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 3.7 | 843 | 13,604 | 66.7% | 43.8% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 5.6 | 1,018 | 13,390 | 28.6% | 42.9% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 3.1 | 932 | 12,800 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.2 | 977 | 12,160 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 4.3 | 896 | 12,055 | 54.5% | 70.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.7 | 793 | 11,230 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 1.8 | 733 | 11,058 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 5.7 | 823 | 9,493 | 36.4% | 55.6% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.6 | 1,072 | 13,456 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 0.9 | 843 | 11,565 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 29.41% | 17 | 1.5 | 910 | 10,905 | 44.4% | 12.5% | |
| 73.33% | 16 | 5.8 | 1,005 | 10,955 | 66.7% | 77.8% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.0 | 1,053 | 11,588 | 75.0% | 37.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.5 | 744 | 10,371 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 80.00% | 15 | 1.9 | 922 | 10,798 | 62.5% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 1.4 | 841 | 11,211 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 1.0 | 791 | 11,166 | 44.4% | 40.0% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 1.3 | 981 | 14,201 | 66.7% | 87.5% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.5 | 820 | 11,657 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.2 | 1,082 | 10,583 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 61.54% | 14 | 3.8 | 1,017 | 11,040 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.7 | 950 | 14,075 | 33.3% | 70.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 4.7 | 892 | 11,626 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 8.33% | 12 | 3.9 | 938 | 12,297 | 0.0% | 12.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 4.3 | 1,025 | 12,367 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.3 | 949 | 8,008 | 44.4% | 33.3% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.2 | 899 | 12,347 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 3.3 | 787 | 9,849 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 927 | 10,638 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.6 | 676 | 10,179 | 16.7% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.9 | 988 | 13,008 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.1 | 943 | 11,191 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.7 | 979 | 11,710 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 881 | 11,851 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.2 | 1,011 | 11,464 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 1,068 | 11,518 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 754 | 9,963 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.2 | 949 | 10,426 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Brand vs Miss Fortune - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Brand do against Miss Fortune in League of Legends?
Brand wins the Brand vs Miss Fortune matchup with a 59.2% win rate compared to Miss Fortune's 40.8%, a 18.4 percentage point difference. This data is based on 201 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Brand do against Miss Fortune in the early game?
In the early game, Brand has the advantage against Miss Fortune with a 62.2% win rate versus 37.8%. Brand players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Brand do against Miss Fortune in the late game?
In the late game, Brand takes over the Brand vs Miss Fortune matchup with a 57.5% win rate compared to 42.5%. Brand scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Brand vs Miss Fortune matchup?
Brand wins the matchup against Miss Fortune with a 59.2% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 18.4 percentage point advantage means Brand is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 201 games analyzed.
What is the best Brand build against Miss Fortune?
The best Brand build against Miss Fortune includes Liandry's Torment, Rylai's Crystal Scepter, Blackfire Torch with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Brand runes against Miss Fortune?
The best Brand runes against Miss Fortune use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 66.7% win rate in the Brand vs Miss Fortune matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Brand counter Miss Fortune?
Yes, Brand has a favorable matchup against Miss Fortune with a 59.2% win rate. Brand strongly counters Miss Fortune in lane based on current patch 26.4 data.
How do I play Brand against Miss Fortune?
When playing Brand against Miss Fortune, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.