Brandvs Qiyana
Brand vs Qiyana is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Qiyana wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Brand based on 5 games. Qiyana wins the early laning phase while Brand scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Brand vs Qiyana matchup.
Brand Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Brand performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Brand vs Qiyana Matchup?
Brand vs Qiyana Matchup Summary
The Brand vs Qiyana matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Qiyana wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Brand's 40.0%, giving Qiyana a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Qiyana controls the early laning stage, but Brand outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Qiyana needs to press advantages before Brand reaches their power spikes, while Brand should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Qiyana leads by 274 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Qiyana has a strong advantage in this matchup. Brand players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Qiyana overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Brand vs Qiyana Laning Phase Breakdown
Qiyana is favored during the laning phase against Brand, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Qiyana holds advantages in damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Brand Build Against Qiyana
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Qiyana, providing the mobility and stats Brand needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Brand against Qiyana are Liandry's Torment, Shadowflame and Zhonya's Hourglass. This combination gives Brand an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Brand vs Qiyana matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand0.0%
Qiyana100.0%Brand66.7%Qiyana33.3%Qiyana dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Brand. This lopsided early game means Qiyana can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Brand is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Qiyana. Extended games heavily favor Brand, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Qiyana must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Brand reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Brand survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Brand Runes Against Qiyana
Sorcery
Precision
The Sorcery and Precision rune setup gives Brand the best tools to compete against Qiyana in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Brand matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Brand's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.15% | 186 | 2.5 | 722 | 9,707 | 53.6% | 51.3% | |
| 49.15% | 177 | 2.3 | 800 | 9,625 | 46.4% | 50.9% | |
| 53.21% | 109 | 2.0 | 908 | 10,428 | 50.0% | 55.1% | |
| 56.48% | 108 | 1.9 | 808 | 10,198 | 61.1% | 54.2% | |
| 53.40% | 103 | 2.6 | 842 | 10,150 | 62.5% | 47.6% | |
| 52.00% | 100 | 1.9 | 872 | 10,124 | 55.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.87% | 94 | 5.6 | 978 | 12,069 | 40.7% | 50.8% | |
| 48.91% | 92 | 1.9 | 849 | 10,143 | 53.6% | 46.9% | |
| 46.15% | 91 | 2.7 | 966 | 10,347 | 53.1% | 42.4% | |
| 56.32% | 87 | 6.2 | 1,036 | 13,133 | 55.6% | 56.7% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 1.9 | 812 | 9,183 | 44.8% | 48.9% | |
| 50.75% | 67 | 2.3 | 792 | 9,924 | 38.1% | 56.5% | |
| 43.28% | 67 | 1.9 | 774 | 9,200 | 32.4% | 54.5% | |
| 42.62% | 61 | 3.0 | 793 | 10,374 | 37.5% | 44.4% | |
| 55.93% | 59 | 4.8 | 993 | 11,984 | 64.7% | 52.4% | |
| 57.63% | 59 | 5.9 | 1,057 | 12,634 | 50.0% | 61.5% | |
| 55.36% | 56 | 4.0 | 897 | 10,099 | 60.0% | 52.8% | |
| 41.07% | 56 | 2.2 | 887 | 10,289 | 40.0% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 54 | 1.9 | 776 | 10,027 | 56.3% | 47.4% | |
| 71.15% | 52 | 4.9 | 870 | 12,069 | 100.0% | 55.9% | |
| 50.00% | 50 | 1.9 | 830 | 9,377 | 57.1% | 44.8% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 2.0 | 779 | 8,846 | 54.5% | 40.7% | |
| 47.92% | 48 | 5.3 | 894 | 9,640 | 55.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.32% | 47 | 2.6 | 878 | 8,916 | 54.2% | 56.5% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 6.4 | 977 | 11,697 | 55.0% | 48.0% | |
| 40.91% | 44 | 6.0 | 900 | 10,703 | 47.4% | 36.0% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 2.1 | 987 | 10,042 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.19% | 43 | 1.9 | 766 | 9,823 | 30.8% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 42 | 5.5 | 966 | 11,565 | 42.9% | 53.6% | |
| 52.38% | 42 | 1.6 | 627 | 8,251 | 68.2% | 35.0% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 1.9 | 1,026 | 10,910 | 62.5% | 45.2% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 1.7 | 734 | 8,730 | 52.6% | 36.8% | |
| 57.89% | 38 | 4.9 | 949 | 9,944 | 70.6% | 47.6% | |
| 66.67% | 36 | 2.4 | 865 | 10,327 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 37.14% | 35 | 1.8 | 750 | 9,132 | 46.7% | 30.0% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 4.3 | 904 | 11,221 | 83.3% | 40.9% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 4.8 | 918 | 11,583 | 61.5% | 57.1% | |
| 60.61% | 33 | 6.0 | 964 | 12,604 | 33.3% | 76.2% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 6.1 | 1,087 | 11,978 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 5.6 | 1,078 | 11,959 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 5.6 | 1,032 | 12,195 | 83.3% | 26.3% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 4.5 | 1,024 | 11,132 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 1.5 | 776 | 9,010 | 42.9% | 62.5% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 2.1 | 983 | 10,218 | 54.5% | 38.9% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 5.8 | 990 | 11,398 | 63.6% | 52.9% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 2.3 | 823 | 9,299 | 45.5% | 80.0% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 1.8 | 922 | 11,033 | 42.9% | 42.1% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 2.0 | 913 | 9,661 | 40.0% | 46.7% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 3.9 | 850 | 12,120 | 50.0% | 52.6% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 5.9 | 1,049 | 14,278 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 2.2 | 809 | 11,340 | 50.0% | 41.2% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 2.0 | 831 | 10,470 | 28.6% | 46.7% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 4.8 | 1,118 | 10,155 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.5 | 1,040 | 12,035 | 57.1% | 46.1% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 5.7 | 1,007 | 13,409 | 40.0% | 26.7% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 3.9 | 793 | 9,984 | 62.5% | 41.7% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.2 | 1,079 | 11,132 | 20.0% | 57.1% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 5.4 | 904 | 10,159 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 5.7 | 909 | 11,813 | 20.0% | 35.7% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 3.2 | 886 | 10,697 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.7 | 875 | 11,738 | 60.0% | 46.1% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 4.9 | 843 | 10,734 | 25.0% | 71.4% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.7 | 1,009 | 11,331 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.2 | 878 | 12,160 | 75.0% | 30.8% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 4.8 | 915 | 11,973 | 66.7% | 35.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 5.9 | 1,000 | 11,591 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.6 | 896 | 11,331 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 3.9 | 773 | 9,411 | 14.3% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 1.5 | 833 | 13,015 | 71.4% | 55.6% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 3.9 | 1,015 | 9,795 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 2.0 | 816 | 10,928 | 100.0% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.6 | 1,176 | 12,896 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 3.0 | 997 | 10,004 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 5.4 | 1,073 | 13,697 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.9 | 977 | 13,020 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.2 | 894 | 10,035 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 1.5 | 770 | 12,256 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.9 | 952 | 11,718 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.1 | 1,098 | 13,246 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 5.8 | 1,227 | 13,694 | 100.0% | 81.8% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 4.0 | 1,012 | 10,323 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.1 | 933 | 12,101 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.8 | 1,174 | 9,303 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.6 | 938 | 13,347 | 0.0% | 55.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 3.8 | 860 | 9,155 | 75.0% | 28.6% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 3.1 | 1,165 | 10,775 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 919 | 9,422 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 1,000 | 9,795 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 775 | 10,835 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 1,111 | 12,750 | 100.0% | 77.8% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 1,032 | 11,638 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 983 | 12,135 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.2 | 1,114 | 12,343 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.7 | 1,012 | 11,080 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.3 | 1,072 | 13,868 | 100.0% | 37.5% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.4 | 948 | 11,226 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.8 | 1,131 | 12,434 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 0.7 | 799 | 9,930 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 4.8 | 1,058 | 11,295 | 50.0% | 14.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.6 | 1,063 | 11,770 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 7.0 | 1,215 | 13,471 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.2 | 893 | 11,578 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 4.8 | 796 | 9,086 | 33.3% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.3 | 792 | 11,103 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 3.4 | 936 | 9,563 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.6 | 1,080 | 12,593 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.0 | 1,059 | 12,323 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.2 | 979 | 12,437 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.3 | 1,319 | 15,236 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.2 | 1,127 | 10,131 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.4 | 994 | 12,238 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.9 | 1,206 | 12,238 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.3 | 1,234 | 14,578 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 4.8 | 937 | 12,762 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 790 | 9,024 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.2 | 938 | 12,905 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.3 | 914 | 12,066 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.3 | 762 | 12,727 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 907 | 11,866 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 802 | 9,995 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 890 | 11,639 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 1,287 | 16,309 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 969 | 9,601 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 696 | 12,875 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 934 | 15,019 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.9 | 1,067 | 12,670 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 648 | 8,848 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 899 | 12,834 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 1,016 | 11,406 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Brand vs Qiyana - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Brand do against Qiyana in League of Legends?
Qiyana wins the Brand vs Qiyana matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Brand's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Brand do against Qiyana in the early game?
In the early game, Qiyana has the advantage against Brand with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Qiyana players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Brand do against Qiyana in the late game?
In the late game, Brand takes over the Brand vs Qiyana matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Brand scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Brand vs Qiyana matchup?
Qiyana wins the matchup against Brand with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Qiyana is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Brand build against Qiyana?
The best Brand build against Qiyana includes Liandry's Torment, Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass with Sorcerer's Shoes. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Brand runes against Qiyana?
The best Brand runes against Qiyana use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Brand vs Qiyana matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Brand counter Qiyana?
No, Brand struggles against Qiyana with only a 40.0% win rate. Qiyana has the advantage in this matchup. Brand players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Qiyana's lead.
How do I play Brand against Qiyana?
When playing Brand against Qiyana, play cautiously and avoid Qiyana's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Qiyana in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.