Cassiopeiavs Naafiri
Cassiopeia vs Naafiri is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Cassiopeia wins with a 57.9% win rate (+15.8%) over Naafiri based on 38 games. Cassiopeia holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Cassiopeia vs Naafiri matchup.
Cassiopeia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Cassiopeia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Naafiri(57.9%)Who Wins the Cassiopeia vs Naafiri Matchup?
Cassiopeia vs Naafiri Matchup Summary
The Cassiopeia vs Naafiri matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 38 recent matches analyzed, Cassiopeia wins with a 57.9% win rate compared to Naafiri's 42.1%, giving Cassiopeia a 15.8 percentage point advantage. Cassiopeia dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Naafiri players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Cassiopeia leads by 1.0s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Cassiopeia players can confidently pick into Naafiri and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Naafiri away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Cassiopeia vs Naafiri Laning Phase Breakdown
Naafiri is favored during the laning phase against Cassiopeia, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Naafiri holds advantages in damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Cassiopeia Build Against Naafiri
Swiftmarch is the optimal boots choice against Naafiri, providing the mobility and stats Cassiopeia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Cassiopeia against Naafiri are Rod of Ages, Rylai's Crystal Scepter and Seraph's Embrace. This combination gives Cassiopeia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Naafiri. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Cassiopeia vs Naafiri matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Cassiopeia52.4%Naafiri47.6%Cassiopeia64.7%Naafiri35.3%During the early laning phase (first 15 minutes), Cassiopeia has a meaningful 52.4% win rate, outperforming Naafiri by 4.8 percentage points. Cassiopeia players should look to press this advantage through aggressive trades, wave priority, and early jungle coordination.
Cassiopeia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 64.7% win rate — 29.4 points above Naafiri. Extended games heavily favor Cassiopeia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Cassiopeia holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Naafiri players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Cassiopeia Runes Against Naafiri
Sorcery
Precision
Running Sorcery primary with Precision secondary allows Cassiopeia to press their advantage against Naafiri, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Cassiopeia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Cassiopeia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.07% | 59 | 6.5 | 810 | 10,866 | 36.7% | 51.7% | |
| 44.64% | 56 | 6.7 | 877 | 11,670 | 58.3% | 34.4% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 6.7 | 924 | 11,384 | 39.1% | 62.5% | |
| 42.55% | 47 | 6.3 | 776 | 12,324 | 73.3% | 28.1% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 6.6 | 832 | 12,735 | 61.5% | 51.7% | |
| 57.89% | 38 | 6.1 | 761 | 10,133 | 52.4% | 64.7% | |
| 36.11% | 36 | 6.5 | 785 | 12,199 | 21.4% | 45.5% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 6.9 | 766 | 11,592 | 46.7% | 33.3% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 6.7 | 1,038 | 12,028 | 42.9% | 52.6% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 6.4 | 754 | 10,778 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 6.8 | 1,002 | 11,393 | 35.3% | 61.5% | |
| 36.67% | 30 | 6.2 | 821 | 11,816 | 35.7% | 37.5% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 6.5 | 791 | 12,064 | 37.5% | 42.9% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 6.8 | 837 | 11,930 | 80.0% | 47.4% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 6.4 | 873 | 11,401 | 43.8% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.3 | 774 | 11,548 | 33.3% | 53.3% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 6.6 | 927 | 13,226 | 42.9% | 57.9% | |
| 36.00% | 25 | 5.8 | 790 | 11,284 | 18.2% | 50.0% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.2 | 901 | 12,620 | 28.6% | 55.6% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 6.7 | 902 | 12,216 | 45.5% | 30.8% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 6.7 | 769 | 10,761 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 5.6 | 866 | 12,014 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 5.6 | 949 | 11,595 | 30.0% | 57.1% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 6.4 | 893 | 12,929 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.9 | 747 | 11,241 | 44.4% | 46.1% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 6.1 | 787 | 11,511 | 44.4% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 5.9 | 813 | 10,670 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 6.8 | 812 | 11,505 | 55.6% | 25.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 6.8 | 903 | 12,814 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 23.81% | 21 | 5.5 | 807 | 11,529 | 40.0% | 18.8% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 7.2 | 870 | 11,162 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 6.0 | 651 | 12,136 | 14.3% | 45.5% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.4 | 880 | 11,398 | 60.0% | 53.9% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 6.1 | 872 | 13,556 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 5.9 | 651 | 10,672 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.8 | 919 | 12,158 | 75.0% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 6.7 | 1,078 | 11,022 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.7 | 763 | 12,024 | 0.0% | 54.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.6 | 749 | 9,081 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.4 | 774 | 11,624 | 57.1% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.5 | 842 | 12,012 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 6.5 | 741 | 11,027 | 0.0% | 44.4% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.1 | 968 | 12,973 | 57.1% | 28.6% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 6.6 | 805 | 11,351 | 62.5% | 80.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 4.9 | 695 | 9,754 | 28.6% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.5 | 638 | 10,094 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 6.5 | 774 | 12,695 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 7.2 | 962 | 11,832 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 7.5 | 983 | 12,861 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 802 | 10,866 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.8 | 779 | 10,111 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 862 | 9,878 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 806 | 10,688 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 849 | 11,450 | 62.5% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 5.8 | 945 | 12,848 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.1 | 698 | 9,844 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.6 | 668 | 9,949 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.9 | 1,019 | 11,214 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 7.0 | 1,172 | 12,102 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.3 | 720 | 14,006 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 6.0 | 820 | 9,227 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.4 | 842 | 13,876 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.1 | 1,020 | 11,354 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 7.3 | 1,016 | 14,878 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.2 | 909 | 12,245 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.8 | 803 | 7,083 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.6 | 897 | 11,056 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.5 | 1,113 | 12,379 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.3 | 854 | 10,957 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.7 | 909 | 14,290 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.8 | 939 | 13,148 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.4 | 725 | 9,266 | 20.0% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.5 | 792 | 11,926 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.2 | 670 | 7,523 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.2 | 947 | 13,052 | 100.0% | 16.7% | |
| 100.00% | 7 | 7.5 | 1,273 | 14,401 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.4 | 913 | 9,822 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.6 | 548 | 8,515 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.2 | 812 | 13,060 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.1 | 875 | 13,348 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.3 | 769 | 13,980 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.9 | 773 | 9,944 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 999 | 14,248 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.4 | 764 | 10,880 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.2 | 723 | 13,072 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 811 | 11,565 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 952 | 14,302 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 859 | 12,579 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 873 | 14,136 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 961 | 13,692 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 684 | 11,598 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 852 | 11,058 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 863 | 13,732 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 982 | 10,463 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 814 | 11,974 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Cassiopeia vs Naafiri - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Cassiopeia do against Naafiri in League of Legends?
Cassiopeia wins the Cassiopeia vs Naafiri matchup with a 57.9% win rate compared to Naafiri's 42.1%, a 15.8 percentage point difference. This data is based on 38 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Cassiopeia do against Naafiri in the early game?
In the early game, Cassiopeia has the advantage against Naafiri with a 52.4% win rate versus 47.6%. Cassiopeia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Cassiopeia do against Naafiri in the late game?
In the late game, Cassiopeia takes over the Cassiopeia vs Naafiri matchup with a 64.7% win rate compared to 35.3%. Cassiopeia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Cassiopeia vs Naafiri matchup?
Cassiopeia wins the matchup against Naafiri with a 57.9% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 15.8 percentage point advantage means Cassiopeia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 38 games analyzed.
What is the best Cassiopeia build against Naafiri?
The best Cassiopeia build against Naafiri includes Rod of Ages, Rylai's Crystal Scepter, Seraph's Embrace with Swiftmarch. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Cassiopeia runes against Naafiri?
The best Cassiopeia runes against Naafiri use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 66.7% win rate in the Cassiopeia vs Naafiri matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Cassiopeia counter Naafiri?
Yes, Cassiopeia has a favorable matchup against Naafiri with a 57.9% win rate. Cassiopeia strongly counters Naafiri in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Cassiopeia against Naafiri?
When playing Cassiopeia against Naafiri, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.