Fizzvs Smolder
Fizz vs Smolder is a moderate matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Smolder wins with a 51.2% win rate (+2.4%) over Fizz based on 41 games. Fizz wins the early laning phase while Smolder scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Smolder matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Smolder(48.8%)Who Wins the Fizz vs Smolder Matchup?
Fizz vs Smolder Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Smolder matchup is a very close matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 41 recent matches analyzed, Smolder wins with a 51.2% win rate compared to Fizz's 48.8%, giving Smolder a 2.4 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Fizz controls the early laning stage, but Smolder outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Fizz needs to press advantages before Smolder reaches their power spikes, while Smolder should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Fizz leads by 0.1s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Smolder is slightly favored, Fizz can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Smolder's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Smolder Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Smolder, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Smolder
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Smolder, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Smolder are Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass and Lich Bane. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build has a 42.9% win rate across 7 games. While the overall matchup may be difficult, this item path gives Fizz the best chance to compete against Smolder. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Smolder matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz50.0%Smolder50.0%Fizz48.1%Smolder51.9%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Fizz and Smolder, with Fizz holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
In the late game (25+ minutes), Smolder takes over with a 51.9% win rate, leading Fizz by 3.7 percentage points. Smolder scales more effectively into team fights and objective contests.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Fizz has the edge early, but Smolder gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Fizz Runes Against Smolder
Domination
Sorcery
The Domination primary with Sorcery secondary combination helps Fizz maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Smolder.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.74% | 396 | 6.0 | 796 | 12,105 | 47.9% | 49.3% | |
| 53.00% | 317 | 6.2 | 828 | 12,684 | 54.8% | 51.6% | |
| 52.94% | 289 | 6.0 | 892 | 12,431 | 51.5% | 54.1% | |
| 54.55% | 264 | 5.9 | 825 | 12,318 | 52.2% | 56.3% | |
| 51.15% | 262 | 6.0 | 882 | 12,673 | 49.1% | 52.6% | |
| 54.82% | 228 | 5.8 | 868 | 12,334 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 59.03% | 227 | 6.0 | 952 | 12,408 | 63.2% | 55.4% | |
| 53.52% | 213 | 6.0 | 906 | 12,474 | 49.5% | 57.3% | |
| 48.34% | 211 | 5.7 | 838 | 11,336 | 48.6% | 48.1% | |
| 50.95% | 210 | 5.7 | 844 | 12,999 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 55.44% | 193 | 5.4 | 869 | 13,342 | 57.1% | 54.3% | |
| 52.91% | 189 | 5.8 | 792 | 13,035 | 53.6% | 52.5% | |
| 54.84% | 186 | 5.8 | 756 | 11,977 | 55.3% | 54.5% | |
| 47.16% | 176 | 5.8 | 806 | 12,280 | 47.7% | 46.9% | |
| 42.35% | 170 | 5.8 | 805 | 12,294 | 50.7% | 35.8% | |
| 53.05% | 164 | 5.8 | 863 | 12,768 | 46.5% | 58.1% | |
| 49.66% | 149 | 5.5 | 783 | 12,454 | 44.8% | 52.8% | |
| 48.97% | 145 | 5.9 | 919 | 11,818 | 49.2% | 48.8% | |
| 47.06% | 136 | 5.4 | 858 | 12,418 | 40.7% | 51.2% | |
| 59.32% | 118 | 5.7 | 784 | 12,290 | 57.7% | 60.6% | |
| 54.31% | 116 | 5.8 | 811 | 11,872 | 45.5% | 62.3% | |
| 58.41% | 113 | 6.3 | 855 | 12,693 | 57.7% | 59.0% | |
| 58.42% | 101 | 6.3 | 853 | 12,788 | 56.5% | 60.0% | |
| 48.51% | 101 | 6.0 | 879 | 13,602 | 42.9% | 50.7% | |
| 62.24% | 98 | 5.6 | 845 | 13,252 | 72.2% | 56.5% | |
| 46.39% | 97 | 5.3 | 830 | 12,751 | 31.7% | 57.1% | |
| 54.35% | 92 | 6.0 | 846 | 12,446 | 56.5% | 52.2% | |
| 49.44% | 89 | 6.0 | 887 | 12,231 | 63.4% | 37.5% | |
| 53.41% | 88 | 5.8 | 816 | 12,353 | 61.0% | 46.8% | |
| 54.65% | 86 | 5.1 | 845 | 12,799 | 55.6% | 54.0% | |
| 49.38% | 81 | 6.0 | 816 | 11,700 | 52.4% | 46.1% | |
| 55.00% | 80 | 5.9 | 838 | 12,932 | 57.1% | 53.9% | |
| 41.77% | 79 | 5.9 | 841 | 12,267 | 48.6% | 35.7% | |
| 44.30% | 79 | 5.5 | 852 | 12,346 | 54.5% | 37.0% | |
| 55.70% | 79 | 5.9 | 942 | 13,008 | 53.1% | 57.5% | |
| 48.68% | 76 | 5.0 | 784 | 12,679 | 42.4% | 53.5% | |
| 45.71% | 70 | 6.0 | 873 | 12,566 | 62.1% | 34.1% | |
| 48.33% | 60 | 6.2 | 912 | 12,266 | 46.4% | 50.0% | |
| 54.72% | 53 | 5.3 | 911 | 11,595 | 52.0% | 57.1% | |
| 49.02% | 51 | 6.2 | 819 | 12,063 | 48.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.82% | 49 | 5.6 | 845 | 11,383 | 38.9% | 41.9% | |
| 70.21% | 47 | 1.6 | 773 | 12,963 | 81.0% | 61.5% | |
| 63.04% | 46 | 5.5 | 942 | 13,901 | 68.4% | 59.3% | |
| 56.52% | 46 | 5.6 | 896 | 13,759 | 46.7% | 61.3% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 1.8 | 693 | 12,879 | 45.5% | 57.1% | |
| 53.49% | 43 | 5.7 | 848 | 11,764 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 6.1 | 953 | 13,579 | 50.0% | 48.1% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 5.3 | 700 | 12,734 | 58.3% | 48.1% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 6.1 | 897 | 14,171 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 60.53% | 38 | 1.4 | 643 | 12,575 | 61.1% | 60.0% | |
| 60.53% | 38 | 1.9 | 661 | 11,590 | 76.2% | 41.2% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 2.4 | 689 | 11,590 | 55.6% | 55.0% | |
| 63.89% | 36 | 6.4 | 875 | 13,574 | 54.5% | 68.0% | |
| 58.33% | 36 | 5.7 | 893 | 13,399 | 63.6% | 56.0% | |
| 54.55% | 33 | 5.6 | 928 | 12,573 | 64.7% | 43.8% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 2.3 | 724 | 14,261 | 16.7% | 61.5% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 5.8 | 799 | 11,046 | 43.8% | 46.7% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 1.5 | 840 | 13,583 | 64.3% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 5.8 | 852 | 11,991 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 72.41% | 29 | 4.5 | 857 | 11,945 | 70.0% | 77.8% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 5.6 | 895 | 11,930 | 27.3% | 46.7% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 2.0 | 709 | 12,407 | 41.7% | 46.1% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 1.3 | 678 | 12,874 | 36.4% | 38.5% | |
| 70.83% | 24 | 5.8 | 760 | 13,757 | 80.0% | 68.4% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 1.7 | 655 | 14,437 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 5.9 | 932 | 13,411 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 2.5 | 816 | 13,376 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 3.2 | 839 | 14,402 | 40.0% | 46.7% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 6.0 | 706 | 10,216 | 58.3% | 25.0% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 6.0 | 893 | 13,905 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.0 | 742 | 10,652 | 58.3% | 37.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.5 | 745 | 13,219 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 3.9 | 768 | 11,762 | 60.0% | 55.6% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 5.9 | 871 | 11,305 | 45.5% | 85.7% | |
| 22.22% | 18 | 2.5 | 833 | 15,148 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 4.2 | 759 | 11,943 | 20.0% | 58.3% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.9 | 900 | 12,447 | 80.0% | 28.6% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 5.0 | 823 | 11,116 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 5.6 | 966 | 12,972 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 4.6 | 816 | 12,250 | 28.6% | 88.9% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 2.2 | 910 | 13,629 | 33.3% | 70.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 5.5 | 902 | 12,760 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.8 | 657 | 12,260 | 71.4% | 44.4% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 5.3 | 684 | 10,689 | 44.4% | 28.6% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.2 | 894 | 12,497 | 62.5% | 71.4% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 2.1 | 676 | 12,847 | 22.2% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.8 | 740 | 11,498 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 0.9 | 678 | 12,270 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 1.7 | 841 | 14,312 | 83.3% | 75.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.1 | 893 | 13,733 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 6.1 | 835 | 12,362 | 25.0% | 44.4% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 2.6 | 559 | 11,331 | 80.0% | 25.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.3 | 627 | 10,814 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.8 | 843 | 13,980 | 60.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.8 | 821 | 13,001 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.1 | 726 | 13,767 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.5 | 765 | 14,835 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.1 | 891 | 13,653 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.6 | 795 | 14,024 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 4.4 | 1,046 | 11,368 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.1 | 619 | 13,461 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.1 | 902 | 15,063 | 100.0% | 37.5% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.5 | 788 | 9,322 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.0 | 719 | 10,037 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 3.7 | 703 | 13,499 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 3.8 | 734 | 12,702 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 784 | 10,303 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 905 | 14,291 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 798 | 14,984 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.3 | 1,047 | 17,775 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.7 | 786 | 10,143 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.3 | 1,018 | 13,375 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.2 | 864 | 13,757 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.3 | 773 | 12,364 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 4.5 | 694 | 12,473 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.2 | 850 | 10,888 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 2.5 | 937 | 13,889 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 4.2 | 926 | 9,642 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.4 | 862 | 12,795 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.7 | 623 | 10,313 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.5 | 722 | 13,006 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.0 | 1,019 | 12,702 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.6 | 855 | 15,835 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.6 | 818 | 14,286 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.4 | 858 | 12,964 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.1 | 663 | 11,766 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.4 | 748 | 10,851 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.0 | 861 | 12,526 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 567 | 11,840 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 893 | 12,004 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 539 | 9,135 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 961 | 14,567 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 718 | 7,244 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 839 | 16,605 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 760 | 12,236 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 649 | 11,949 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 686 | 7,605 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 620 | 12,320 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.6 | 777 | 9,384 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Smolder - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Smolder in League of Legends?
Smolder wins the Fizz vs Smolder matchup with a 51.2% win rate compared to Fizz's 48.8%, a 2.4 percentage point difference. This data is based on 41 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Fizz do against Smolder in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Smolder with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Smolder in the late game?
In the late game, Smolder takes over the Fizz vs Smolder matchup with a 51.9% win rate compared to 48.1%. Smolder scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Smolder matchup?
Smolder wins the matchup against Fizz with a 51.2% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 2.4 percentage point advantage means Smolder is moderately favored in this lane matchup based on 41 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Smolder?
The best Fizz build against Smolder includes Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass, Lich Bane with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 42.9% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Smolder?
The best Fizz runes against Smolder use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 57.1% win rate in the Fizz vs Smolder matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Smolder?
No, Fizz struggles against Smolder with only a 48.8% win rate. Smolder has the advantage in this matchup. Fizz players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Smolder's lead.
How do I play Fizz against Smolder?
When playing Fizz against Smolder, play cautiously and avoid Smolder's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Smolder has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.