Swainvs Samira
Swain vs Samira is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Samira wins with a 53.6% win rate (+7.1%) over Swain based on 28 games. Swain wins the early laning phase while Samira scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Swain build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Swain vs Samira matchup.
Swain Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Swain performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Samira(46.4%)Who Wins the Swain vs Samira Matchup?
Swain vs Samira Matchup Summary
The Swain vs Samira matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 28 recent matches analyzed, Samira wins with a 53.6% win rate compared to Swain's 46.4%, giving Samira a 7.1 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Swain controls the early laning stage, but Samira outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Swain needs to press advantages before Samira reaches their power spikes, while Samira should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Swain leads by 1.6s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Samira has a strong advantage in this matchup. Swain players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Samira overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Swain vs Samira Laning Phase Breakdown
Samira is favored during the laning phase against Swain, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Samira holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Swain53.3%Samira46.7%Swain38.5%Samira61.5%Swain dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 53.3% win rate — a 6.7 percentage point lead over Samira. This lopsided early game means Swain can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Samira is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 61.5% win rate — 23.1 points above Swain. Extended games heavily favor Samira, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Swain must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Samira reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Samira survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Swain Runes Against Samira
Sorcery
Precision
The Sorcery and Precision rune setup gives Swain the best tools to compete against Samira in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Swain matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Swain's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Swain build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.46% | 164 | 2.4 | 666 | 10,149 | 41.9% | 41.2% | |
| 50.00% | 148 | 1.7 | 717 | 9,723 | 46.6% | 53.3% | |
| 44.06% | 143 | 1.8 | 643 | 9,297 | 45.7% | 42.5% | |
| 49.25% | 134 | 1.7 | 721 | 9,988 | 52.9% | 45.3% | |
| 51.28% | 117 | 1.9 | 738 | 10,785 | 56.8% | 48.8% | |
| 54.05% | 111 | 2.0 | 641 | 9,692 | 51.0% | 56.5% | |
| 51.38% | 109 | 2.4 | 787 | 10,529 | 63.4% | 44.1% | |
| 41.35% | 104 | 1.7 | 749 | 10,275 | 38.1% | 43.5% | |
| 41.75% | 103 | 2.6 | 724 | 10,126 | 32.5% | 47.6% | |
| 41.49% | 94 | 6.0 | 849 | 12,533 | 46.1% | 38.2% | |
| 46.15% | 91 | 3.8 | 724 | 10,857 | 38.5% | 51.9% | |
| 46.59% | 88 | 1.8 | 692 | 9,610 | 38.1% | 54.4% | |
| 40.51% | 79 | 1.8 | 618 | 9,242 | 41.7% | 39.5% | |
| 65.82% | 79 | 6.1 | 886 | 11,304 | 61.1% | 69.8% | |
| 47.44% | 78 | 2.5 | 989 | 10,316 | 45.5% | 48.9% | |
| 41.56% | 77 | 3.1 | 701 | 10,352 | 20.0% | 51.9% | |
| 46.75% | 77 | 1.8 | 760 | 9,982 | 56.4% | 36.8% | |
| 37.84% | 74 | 5.3 | 948 | 12,093 | 41.9% | 34.9% | |
| 41.67% | 72 | 4.9 | 795 | 11,905 | 39.4% | 43.6% | |
| 47.89% | 71 | 1.8 | 679 | 9,692 | 42.9% | 52.8% | |
| 46.27% | 67 | 1.9 | 777 | 10,361 | 46.7% | 46.0% | |
| 53.03% | 66 | 6.0 | 857 | 10,942 | 58.1% | 48.6% | |
| 43.94% | 66 | 2.3 | 687 | 10,225 | 40.7% | 46.1% | |
| 53.97% | 63 | 6.3 | 921 | 12,040 | 42.4% | 66.7% | |
| 60.66% | 61 | 6.5 | 885 | 12,437 | 72.2% | 44.0% | |
| 46.67% | 60 | 2.2 | 661 | 10,256 | 46.1% | 47.1% | |
| 47.46% | 59 | 1.7 | 664 | 9,953 | 56.3% | 37.0% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 4.9 | 867 | 11,551 | 54.5% | 54.3% | |
| 50.00% | 56 | 6.3 | 895 | 12,270 | 48.0% | 51.6% | |
| 50.00% | 56 | 2.3 | 771 | 10,843 | 43.5% | 54.5% | |
| 55.56% | 54 | 1.6 | 650 | 10,283 | 61.9% | 51.5% | |
| 41.18% | 51 | 6.0 | 961 | 11,452 | 50.0% | 35.5% | |
| 47.06% | 51 | 1.6 | 682 | 9,357 | 43.3% | 52.4% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 6.0 | 1,009 | 12,622 | 56.0% | 32.0% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 6.3 | 910 | 11,603 | 46.4% | 55.0% | |
| 39.58% | 48 | 6.3 | 891 | 12,258 | 45.5% | 34.6% | |
| 60.42% | 48 | 1.9 | 851 | 10,014 | 60.9% | 60.0% | |
| 56.82% | 44 | 1.9 | 588 | 9,073 | 60.0% | 52.6% | |
| 56.82% | 44 | 4.9 | 843 | 10,770 | 60.9% | 52.4% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 6.0 | 853 | 10,899 | 45.0% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 1.9 | 754 | 10,447 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 3.5 | 806 | 11,030 | 75.0% | 39.1% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 6.0 | 945 | 10,705 | 66.7% | 47.6% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 5.7 | 884 | 12,010 | 58.8% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 36 | 5.8 | 1,048 | 11,233 | 55.6% | 33.3% | |
| 72.22% | 36 | 2.9 | 786 | 9,845 | 81.8% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 35 | 6.2 | 842 | 10,617 | 35.3% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 2.2 | 735 | 10,498 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 1.9 | 814 | 10,264 | 53.9% | 35.0% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 1.6 | 620 | 9,527 | 46.7% | 52.9% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 6.0 | 750 | 10,369 | 58.8% | 35.7% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 4.0 | 706 | 10,115 | 46.1% | 44.4% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 5.5 | 969 | 12,087 | 61.5% | 47.1% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 4.8 | 1,010 | 11,496 | 61.5% | 29.4% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 2.0 | 730 | 10,812 | 57.1% | 36.4% | |
| 37.93% | 29 | 5.5 | 805 | 12,400 | 57.1% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 6.1 | 945 | 12,414 | 63.6% | 41.2% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 6.1 | 871 | 9,911 | 52.9% | 54.5% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 5.8 | 832 | 11,546 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.0 | 957 | 12,731 | 53.3% | 38.5% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 6.3 | 826 | 11,482 | 68.8% | 54.5% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 4.9 | 903 | 11,071 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 1.6 | 720 | 9,442 | 84.6% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 2.0 | 723 | 9,979 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 5.3 | 957 | 10,440 | 54.5% | 60.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 3.9 | 669 | 9,523 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 5.4 | 951 | 10,616 | 72.7% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 2.0 | 776 | 11,220 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 4.3 | 919 | 10,878 | 46.1% | 50.0% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 5.7 | 1,085 | 13,800 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 5.7 | 943 | 10,608 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 5.7 | 898 | 13,151 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 5.2 | 993 | 11,858 | 62.5% | 25.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 5.3 | 700 | 10,294 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.3 | 1,011 | 12,691 | 71.4% | 53.9% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 6.0 | 989 | 12,571 | 72.7% | 66.7% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 6.2 | 884 | 12,421 | 62.5% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 5.8 | 832 | 12,205 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 5.8 | 883 | 10,751 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 5.9 | 968 | 10,033 | 55.6% | 55.6% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.0 | 933 | 10,577 | 54.5% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.1 | 907 | 12,986 | 50.0% | 87.5% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.9 | 962 | 14,123 | 83.3% | 54.5% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.1 | 906 | 13,028 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 5.9 | 1,055 | 11,430 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 1.7 | 645 | 9,405 | 75.0% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.8 | 713 | 9,821 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 5.7 | 769 | 10,428 | 45.5% | 20.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 3.9 | 736 | 9,967 | 87.5% | 37.5% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 6.0 | 1,008 | 11,824 | 77.8% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.9 | 921 | 14,725 | 100.0% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.5 | 851 | 11,454 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 5.1 | 795 | 9,372 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.6 | 684 | 9,736 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 6.7 | 885 | 12,778 | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.0 | 1,025 | 11,420 | 33.3% | 85.7% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.1 | 849 | 12,486 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.1 | 865 | 12,787 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 4.4 | 856 | 11,373 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.8 | 1,250 | 11,842 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 6.0 | 1,033 | 13,203 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.2 | 813 | 10,052 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.6 | 689 | 10,054 | 42.9% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.4 | 791 | 11,575 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 6.3 | 869 | 10,463 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.3 | 967 | 10,746 | 20.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.7 | 982 | 10,422 | 28.6% | 75.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.1 | 1,018 | 11,744 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 6.2 | 796 | 10,268 | 28.6% | 0.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.5 | 1,046 | 12,561 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 768 | 10,855 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 3.3 | 809 | 10,672 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.0 | 1,047 | 12,714 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.5 | 906 | 10,587 | 83.3% | 0.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.6 | 1,140 | 11,964 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.7 | 973 | 11,298 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 6.0 | 716 | 8,188 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 3.6 | 917 | 10,459 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.9 | 864 | 12,209 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.3 | 735 | 9,319 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 4.5 | 955 | 11,473 | 100.0% | 83.3% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 6.9 | 887 | 10,175 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.6 | 681 | 9,028 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.9 | 1,044 | 9,377 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.3 | 840 | 11,266 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.9 | 709 | 8,964 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.3 | 718 | 10,677 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.3 | 970 | 14,146 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 5.0 | 867 | 12,631 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.1 | 948 | 12,368 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 563 | 9,169 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,040 | 12,293 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.5 | 729 | 10,845 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 892 | 11,601 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 876 | 11,251 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.4 | 995 | 9,952 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 1,067 | 14,751 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 3.5 | 887 | 13,310 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 2.5 | 557 | 7,406 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 1,136 | 11,589 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Swain vs Samira - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Swain do against Samira in League of Legends?
Samira wins the Swain vs Samira matchup with a 53.6% win rate compared to Swain's 46.4%, a 7.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 28 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Swain do against Samira in the early game?
In the early game, Swain has the advantage against Samira with a 53.3% win rate versus 46.7%. Swain players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Swain do against Samira in the late game?
In the late game, Samira takes over the Swain vs Samira matchup with a 61.5% win rate compared to 38.5%. Samira scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Swain vs Samira matchup?
Samira wins the matchup against Swain with a 53.6% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 7.1 percentage point advantage means Samira is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 28 games analyzed.
What is the best Swain build against Samira?
The best Swain build against Samira includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Swain runes against Samira?
The best Swain runes against Samira use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Swain vs Samira matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Swain counter Samira?
No, Swain struggles against Samira with only a 46.4% win rate. Samira has the advantage in this matchup. Swain players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Samira's lead.
How do I play Swain against Samira?
When playing Swain against Samira, play cautiously and avoid Samira's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Samira has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.