- Win Rate
- 49.2%
- Pick Rate
- 15.6%
Sudden Impact vs Cheap Shot vs Taste of Blood
- Patch
- 26.19
- Games with rune
- 70,885
- Lane
- All Lanes
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Last Updated
- Oct 6, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Cooldown: 10s
- Rune tree
- Domination · Row 1
- Cooldown
- 10s
- Win Rate
- 49.2%−0.1 vs row avg
- Pick Rate
- 15.6%
- Best champion
- Fizz · 52.8%
- Most played by
- Fizz
Sudden Impact vs alternatives
Patch 26.19 · All ranksYou can take only one rune per row. Here is Sudden Impact against its 2 row alternatives, on the same champions and overall.
Sudden Impact49.2%15.6% PR · 70,885 games
Cheap Shot49.4%9.8% PR · 44,463 gamesOn the same champions, Sudden Impact wins 1.8 points more often than Cheap Shot across 53 champion-lane pairs. Sudden Impact and Cheap Shot share a row, so it is a straight either-or choice.
Sudden Impact vs Cheap Shot on the same champions
| Champion | Sudden Impact | Cheap Shot | Δ WR |
|---|---|---|---|
 Pyke · Support | 48.7% 2,668 | 47.5% 2,992 | +1.2 |
 Shaco · Jungle | 47.9% 4,069 | 46.5% 840 | +1.4 |
 Pantheon · Support | 54.6% 463 | 48.5% 2,749 | +6.2 |
 Elise · Jungle | 48.3% 300 | 48.4% 1,204 | −0.1 |
| Pantheon · Mid | 50.5% 402 | 54.5% 440 | −4.0 |
 Fiddlesticks · Jungle | 55.0% 218 | 49.7% 2,197 | +5.4 |
| Shaco · Support | 45.9% 366 | 50.6% 326 | −4.7 |
 Nocturne · Jungle | 49.5% 3,166 | 48.3% 178 | +1.2 |
 Zoe · Mid | 48.9% 1,506 | 45.9% 172 | +2.9 |
 Ahri · Mid | 51.4% 393 | 51.4% 249 | ±0.0 |
 Teemo · Top | 52.1% 167 | 50.5% 1,356 | +1.6 |
 Malphite · Jungle | 51.6% 351 | 45.6% 215 | +6.0 |
By lane
| Lane | Sudden Impact | Cheap Shot |
|---|---|---|
| Top | 48.5% 5,703 | 51.0% 3,895 |
| Jungle | 49.0% 33,226 | 49.5% 9,869 |
| Mid | 49.8% 23,753 | 49.3% 9,090 |
| ADC | 49.3% 3,720 | 47.6% 2,815 |
| Support | 49.0% 4,453 | 49.4% 18,777 |
By game length
Per-minute stats
| Stat | Sudden Impact | Cheap Shot |
|---|---|---|
| Damage to champions | 806 | 728 |
| Healing | 321 | 203 |
| Damage mitigated | 709 | 648 |
| Objective damage | 586 | 374 |
| Kills | 0.287 | 0.189 |
| Deaths | 0.226 | 0.223 |
Sudden Impact49.2%15.6% PR · 70,885 games
Taste of Blood49.2%4.8% PR · 21,669 gamesOn the same champions, Sudden Impact wins 2.5 points more often than Taste of Blood across 46 champion-lane pairs. Sudden Impact and Taste of Blood share a row, so it is a straight either-or choice.
Sudden Impact vs Taste of Blood on the same champions
| Champion | Sudden Impact | Taste of Blood | Δ WR |
|---|---|---|---|
 Zed · Mid | 46.0% 1,507 | 46.7% 1,524 | −0.7 |
 Aurora · Mid | 51.1% 1,345 | 48.6% 978 | +2.5 |
 Samira · ADC | 51.3% 626 | 47.8% 2,490 | +3.5 |
| Zoe · Mid | 48.9% 1,506 | 48.1% 553 | +0.8 |
| Ahri · Mid | 51.4% 393 | 51.0% 7,695 | +0.4 |
 Vayne · ADC | 49.8% 402 | 45.4% 736 | +4.4 |
 Tristana · ADC | 54.0% 265 | 49.7% 3,889 | +4.3 |
 Kai'Sa · ADC | 48.8% 172 | 44.6% 1,198 | +4.3 |
 Master Yi · Jungle | 50.9% 5,401 | 41.7% 151 | +9.1 |
 Aatrox · Top | 50.6% 174 | 50.2% 654 | +0.4 |
 Quinn · Jungle | 50.9% 1,009 | 48.4% 128 | +2.5 |
 Warwick · Jungle | 52.6% 251 | 49.0% 206 | +3.6 |
By lane
| Lane | Sudden Impact | Taste of Blood |
|---|---|---|
| Top | 48.5% 5,703 | 48.9% 2,064 |
| Jungle | 49.0% 33,226 | 47.5% 762 |
| Mid | 49.8% 23,753 | 49.5% 9,208 |
| ADC | 49.3% 3,720 | 48.7% 6,967 |
| Support | 49.0% 4,453 | 50.3% 2,657 |
By game length
Per-minute stats
| Stat | Sudden Impact | Taste of Blood |
|---|---|---|
| Damage to champions | 806 | 826 |
| Healing | 321 | 194 |
| Damage mitigated | 709 | 469 |
| Objective damage | 586 | 349 |
| Kills | 0.287 | 0.240 |
| Deaths | 0.226 | 0.222 |
Same-champion difference: for every champion and lane with 30+ games on both runes, the win-rate gap, weighted by the smaller sample. This removes the bias of each rune's champion mix.
Sudden Impact and its alternatives
All candidates at a glance. The same-champion column shows how each alternative does against Sudden Impact on the champions that take both.
| Rune | Win Rate | Pick Rate | vs this rune (same champions) | Shared champions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sudden Impact This rune | 49.2% | 15.6% | — | — |
| Cheap Shot | 49.4% | 9.8% | −1.8 | 53 |
| Taste of Blood | 49.2% | 4.8% | −2.5 | 46 |
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Sudden Impact vs other runes – Patch 26.19
Sudden Impact vs Cheap Shot: which is better?
On the same champions, Sudden Impact wins 1.8 points more often than Cheap Shot across 53 champion-lane pairs. Across all games: Sudden Impact 49.2%, Cheap Shot 49.4%. Sudden Impact and Cheap Shot share a row, so it is a straight either-or choice.
Sudden Impact vs Taste of Blood: which is better?
On the same champions, Sudden Impact wins 2.5 points more often than Taste of Blood across 46 champion-lane pairs. Across all games: Sudden Impact 49.2%, Taste of Blood 49.2%. Sudden Impact and Taste of Blood share a row, so it is a straight either-or choice.