- Win Rate
- 49.2%
- Pick Rate
- 4.8%
Taste of Blood vs Sudden Impact vs Cheap Shot
- Patch
- 26.19
- Games with rune
- 21,669
- Lane
- All Lanes
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Last Updated
- Oct 7, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Healing: 16-40 (+0.1 bonus AD, +0.05 AP) health (based on level)
Cooldown: 20s
- Rune tree
- Domination · Row 1
- Cooldown
- 20s
- Win Rate
- 49.2%−0.1 vs row avg
- Pick Rate
- 4.8%
- Best champion
- Zyra · 52.6%
- Most played by
- Ahri
Taste of Blood vs alternatives
Patch 26.19 · All ranksYou can take only one rune per row. Here is Taste of Blood against its 2 row alternatives, on the same champions and overall.
Taste of Blood49.2%4.8% PR · 21,669 games
Sudden Impact49.2%15.6% PR · 70,885 gamesOn the same champions, Sudden Impact wins 2.5 points more often than Taste of Blood across 46 champion-lane pairs. Taste of Blood and Sudden Impact share a row, so it is a straight either-or choice.
Taste of Blood vs Sudden Impact on the same champions
| Champion | Taste of Blood | Sudden Impact | Δ WR |
|---|---|---|---|
 Zed · Mid | 46.7% 1,524 | 46.0% 1,507 | +0.7 |
 Aurora · Mid | 48.6% 978 | 51.1% 1,345 | −2.5 |
 Samira · ADC | 47.8% 2,490 | 51.3% 626 | −3.5 |
 Zoe · Mid | 48.1% 553 | 48.9% 1,506 | −0.8 |
 Ahri · Mid | 51.0% 7,695 | 51.4% 393 | −0.4 |
 Vayne · ADC | 45.4% 736 | 49.8% 402 | −4.4 |
 Tristana · ADC | 49.7% 3,889 | 54.0% 265 | −4.3 |
 Kai'Sa · ADC | 44.6% 1,198 | 48.8% 172 | −4.3 |
 Master Yi · Jungle | 41.7% 151 | 50.9% 5,401 | −9.1 |
 Aatrox · Top | 50.2% 654 | 50.6% 174 | −0.4 |
 Quinn · Jungle | 48.4% 128 | 50.9% 1,009 | −2.5 |
 Warwick · Jungle | 49.0% 206 | 52.6% 251 | −3.6 |
By lane
| Lane | Taste of Blood | Sudden Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Top | 48.9% 2,064 | 48.5% 5,703 |
| Jungle | 47.5% 762 | 49.0% 33,226 |
| Mid | 49.5% 9,208 | 49.8% 23,753 |
| ADC | 48.7% 6,967 | 49.3% 3,720 |
| Support | 50.3% 2,657 | 49.0% 4,453 |
By game length
Per-minute stats
| Stat | Taste of Blood | Sudden Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Damage to champions | 826 | 806 |
| Healing | 194 | 321 |
| Damage mitigated | 469 | 709 |
| Objective damage | 349 | 586 |
| Kills | 0.240 | 0.287 |
| Deaths | 0.222 | 0.226 |
Taste of Blood49.2%4.8% PR · 21,669 games
Cheap Shot49.4%9.8% PR · 44,463 gamesHead to head on shared champions it is close: Taste of Blood and Cheap Shot are 0.2 points apart over 69 champion-lanes. Taste of Blood and Cheap Shot share a row, so it is a straight either-or choice.
Taste of Blood vs Cheap Shot on the same champions
| Champion | Taste of Blood | Cheap Shot | Δ WR |
|---|---|---|---|
 Veigar · Mid | 50.2% 906 | 48.8% 2,414 | +1.4 |
 Zyra · Support | 52.6% 1,539 | 51.1% 1,063 | +1.5 |
 Jhin · ADC | 50.0% 3,541 | 45.9% 429 | +4.1 |
 Janna · Support | 50.0% 668 | 53.0% 551 | −3.0 |
 Vex · Mid | 51.6% 3,506 | 54.0% 326 | −2.4 |
 Neeko · Support | 48.0% 348 | 50.8% 799 | −2.8 |
| Ahri · Mid | 51.0% 7,695 | 51.4% 249 | −0.5 |
 Teemo · Top | 48.3% 290 | 50.5% 1,356 | −2.2 |
| Veigar · ADC | 48.6% 276 | 51.7% 810 | −3.2 |
 Brand · Support | 52.3% 803 | 43.3% 270 | +9.0 |
 Miss Fortune · ADC | 50.4% 357 | 48.9% 442 | +1.6 |
| Veigar · Support | 45.1% 184 | 45.8% 613 | −0.7 |
By lane
| Lane | Taste of Blood | Cheap Shot |
|---|---|---|
| Top | 48.9% 2,064 | 51.0% 3,895 |
| Jungle | 47.5% 762 | 49.5% 9,869 |
| Mid | 49.5% 9,208 | 49.3% 9,090 |
| ADC | 48.7% 6,967 | 47.6% 2,815 |
| Support | 50.3% 2,657 | 49.4% 18,777 |
By game length
Per-minute stats
| Stat | Taste of Blood | Cheap Shot |
|---|---|---|
| Damage to champions | 826 | 728 |
| Healing | 194 | 203 |
| Damage mitigated | 469 | 648 |
| Objective damage | 349 | 374 |
| Kills | 0.240 | 0.189 |
| Deaths | 0.222 | 0.223 |
Same-champion difference: for every champion and lane with 30+ games on both runes, the win-rate gap, weighted by the smaller sample. This removes the bias of each rune's champion mix.
Taste of Blood and its alternatives
All candidates at a glance. The same-champion column shows how each alternative does against Taste of Blood on the champions that take both.
| Rune | Win Rate | Pick Rate | vs this rune (same champions) | Shared champions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taste of Blood This rune | 49.2% | 4.8% | — | — |
| Sudden Impact | 49.2% | 15.6% | +2.5 | 46 |
| Cheap Shot | 49.4% | 9.8% | −0.2 | 69 |
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Taste of Blood vs other runes – Patch 26.19
Taste of Blood vs Sudden Impact: which is better?
On the same champions, Sudden Impact wins 2.5 points more often than Taste of Blood across 46 champion-lane pairs. Across all games: Taste of Blood 49.2%, Sudden Impact 49.2%. Taste of Blood and Sudden Impact share a row, so it is a straight either-or choice.
Taste of Blood vs Cheap Shot: which is better?
On the same champions, Taste of Blood and Cheap Shot are within 0.2 points of each other (69 shared champion-lanes), so pick by playstyle. Across all games: Taste of Blood 49.2%, Cheap Shot 49.4%. Taste of Blood and Cheap Shot share a row, so it is a straight either-or choice.