Raze vs Iso matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
55.6%
Matches
9
KDA
1.65
ADR
182

Raze vs IsoMatchups

Duelist
Patch12.09
Matches433,552
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedMay 19, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Raze vs Iso matchup breakdown: Raze dominates with a 55.6% win rate across 9 matches. Superior fragging (1.65 KDA) gives Raze a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.

Raze Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Iso - 55.6% win rateIso(55.6%)
Raze - 55.6% win rate in this matchup
Raze
55.6% WR
VS
Iso vs Raze matchup - 44.4% win rate
Iso
44.4% WR

Who Wins the Raze vs Iso Matchup?

Raze wins the Raze vs Iso matchup
Winner
Raze
Matches: 9
55.6%
Win Rate
44.4%
1.65
Avg KDA
1.17
21.1
Avg Kills
15.9
15.4
Avg Deaths
17.9
182.3
DMG/Round
144.5
24.5%
HS %
29.4%
270
Combat Score
209
50.0%
Attack WR
48.6%
51.4%
Defense WR
50.0%

Raze vs Iso Performance Breakdown

Raze vs Iso matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

In the Raze vs Iso matchup, Raze demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 9 analyzed matches, Raze outperforms Iso in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Raze the statistically favored pick when facing Iso in ranked Valorant matches.

Fragging Power
1.65Raze
1.17Iso
Raze maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.65 KDA versus Iso's 1.17. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Raze players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
182.3Raze
144.5Iso
Raze delivers substantially higher damage per round (182.3 ADR) compared to Iso's 144.5 ADR. This 37.8 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Raze a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
50.0%Raze
48.6%Iso
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Raze at 50.0% and Iso at 48.6% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
51.4%Raze
50.0%Iso
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Raze posting a 51.4% win rate and Iso at 50.0%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.

Raze vs Iso Matchup Summary

The Raze vs Iso matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 9 competitive matches analyzed, Raze wins 55.6% of the time compared to Iso's 44.4%, a 11.1 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Raze consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Raze has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Iso should never take isolated fights against Raze and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Raze vs Iso Fragging Analysis

Raze wins fragging stats against Iso in Valorant

Raze claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Raze vs Iso matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 9 ranked games reveals Raze consistently outperforms Iso in direct combat scenarios. While Iso manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Raze in gunfights. Iso players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Raze dominates.

Avg KDA
1.65Raze
1.17Iso
Raze demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Iso, maintaining a 1.65 KDA versus 1.17. This 0.49 point gap reflects Raze's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Iso players facing Raze should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Raze's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
21.1Raze
15.9Iso
The kill differential between Raze and Iso is dramatic: 21.1 versus 15.9, representing 5.2 additional kills per game for Raze. This massive gap shows Raze consistently dominates the kill feed when these agents meet. For Iso players, this data suggests a fundamental mismatch in direct combat scenarios. Success against Raze requires reimagining your role — become the setup player, the information gatherer, the utility specialist — rather than trying to match Raze's fragging output head-to-head.
Avg Deaths
15.4Raze
17.9Iso
The death disparity between Raze and Iso is stark: 15.4 versus 17.9 deaths per game. Iso dies 2.4 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Iso either takes unfavorable fights against Raze or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Iso players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Raze.
DMG/Round
182.3Raze
144.5Iso
The damage differential between Raze and Iso is exceptional: 182.3 ADR compared to just 144.5. Raze deals 37.8 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Raze's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Iso struggles to even trade effectively. Iso players should treat Raze as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
24.5%Raze
29.4%Iso
Iso demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Raze: 29.4% versus 24.5%. This 4.9 percentage point gap in precision means Iso ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Raze faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).

Raze vs Iso Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Raze
Raze50.0%
Iso48.6%
Defense Side
Raze
Raze51.4%
Iso50.0%

Attack Side Breakdown

Raze demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Iso in this matchup, converting 50.0% of attacking rounds versus 48.6%. While this 1.4 point edge gives Raze slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Iso players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.

The data from 9 competitive games suggests Raze's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Iso teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.4% gap.

When taking entry duels, Raze holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Iso players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Raze can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

In post-plant situations, Raze's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Iso should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.4 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.

Defense Side Breakdown

Raze shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Iso, winning 51.4% of defense rounds compared to 50.0%. This 1.4 percentage point edge suggests Raze's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Iso players to overcome.

When deciding site assignments, Raze can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.4% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Iso should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.

Raze demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Raze converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Iso should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Raze when you can wait for teammates. Raze can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.4% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Iso should be more conservative with eco aggression against Raze and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Raze can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.

Overall Side Analysis

Raze maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 50.0% attack win rate and 51.4% defense win rate. While Raze is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Iso remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.

Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Raze vs Iso specific factors. The slight Raze advantage doesn't change based on external factors.

For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Raze and Iso are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.

Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Raze has a slight statistical edge, but Iso is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Iso, don't switch to Raze just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.

Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics

Both Raze and Iso fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Raze is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.

In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Raze's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.

Raze has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Astra with a 80.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Breach at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Raze matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.09)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
53.48%2301.28156.220.4%46.4%54.7%
51.05%1431.30156.520.8%47.2%53.7%
50.00%1221.30154.320.8%47.5%52.4%
47.11%1211.29156.621.2%46.1%52.9%
51.82%1101.35159.420.9%48.0%53.5%
54.05%741.33158.121.6%49.1%52.8%
50.70%711.29157.521.8%46.1%53.9%
43.48%691.24151.620.7%43.4%52.7%
40.82%491.24149.220.8%42.7%53.0%
48.78%411.33161.020.6%49.7%51.6%
71.79%391.41170.620.6%53.5%57.9%
46.67%301.37159.617.6%51.7%49.3%
53.33%301.31151.018.7%49.4%51.4%
66.67%241.35161.421.5%47.9%58.6%
52.17%231.27158.017.3%47.2%53.3%
60.87%231.28144.820.7%47.0%59.6%
61.11%181.18141.721.5%50.3%50.3%
64.29%141.27145.315.7%55.9%52.9%
38.46%131.15125.519.7%44.2%54.5%
38.46%131.17155.722.1%43.6%49.5%
66.67%91.46179.125.1%47.6%59.8%
55.56%91.65182.324.5%50.0%51.4%
42.86%71.18130.718.4%38.0%48.3%
33.33%61.19146.720.4%43.5%50.0%
80.00%51.59168.418.1%50.9%66.0%

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Raze's best matchup in Valorant?

Raze's best matchup is against Astra, achieving a 80.0% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Raze's hardest matchup?

Raze's hardest matchup is against Breach, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Raze have?

Raze has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?

When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Duelists