Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Analysis of 3 matches reveals that KAY/O holds a clear advantage over Raze in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Raze shows strength in one category, KAY/O's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
The Raze vs KAY/O matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 3 competitive matches analyzed, KAY/O wins 66.7% of the time compared to Raze's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where KAY/O consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Initiator matchup, KAY/O has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Raze should never take isolated fights against KAY/O and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
KAY/O edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 3 matches analyzed, this Raze vs KAY/O matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.
KAY/O holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Raze vs KAY/O matchup, winning 50.0% of offensive rounds compared to 46.9% for Raze. This 3.1 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 3 matches reveals KAY/O's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, KAY/O consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Raze teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in KAY/O's favor in this matchup. When KAY/O takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Raze. For Raze players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate KAY/O's advantages. KAY/O can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Raze has favorable matchups against 10 agents and unfavorable matchups against 16 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 60.9% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 31.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.62% | 325 | 1.27 | 153.4 | 20.6% | 46.4% |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Raze's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 60.9% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
Raze's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 31.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
Raze has 10 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 16 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where KAY/O's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.1% attack-side gap suggests KAY/O excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Raze should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where KAY/O's kit advantages become decisive. For KAY/O, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
KAY/O demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Raze, holding 53.1% of rounds versus 50.0%. This 3.1 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for KAY/O's defensive advantage. KAY/O can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Raze should avoid solo anchor positions against KAY/O — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Raze's site with KAY/O on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor KAY/O in this matchup. Our 3 match analysis shows KAY/O converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Raze should never attempt solo retakes against KAY/O — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. KAY/O can confidently take 1vX retakes that Raze should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight KAY/O's defensive advantages. Raze should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing KAY/O, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. KAY/O can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Raze should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
KAY/O holds clear advantages on both attack (50.0%) and defense (53.1%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Raze vs KAY/O matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means KAY/O doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
KAY/O's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, KAY/O performs better. Raze teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Raze with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Raze's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, KAY/O is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing KAY/O provides a measurable ranked advantage. Raze players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct KAY/O confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: KAY/O wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 6.3 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Raze isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
The Duelist (Raze) vs Initiator (KAY/O) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than KAY/O's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while KAY/O's Initiator kit counters others. The KAY/O advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
| 53.6% |
| 49.03% | 206 | 1.29 | 156.6 | 20.8% | 47.9% | 52.3% |
| 46.77% | 186 | 1.34 | 160.7 | 21.4% | 47.7% | 51.1% |
| 54.39% | 171 | 1.27 | 155.6 | 21.1% | 46.4% | 55.4% |
| 52.35% | 170 | 1.29 | 155.8 | 21.4% | 48.9% | 51.8% |
| 52.21% | 113 | 1.32 | 159.1 | 21.0% | 46.0% | 55.1% |
| 47.27% | 110 | 1.31 | 156.3 | 21.3% | 46.8% | 53.0% |
| 56.70% | 97 | 1.26 | 155.8 | 21.3% | 46.5% | 56.6% |
| 35.62% | 73 | 1.18 | 147.1 | 20.5% | 44.4% | 49.1% |
| 49.23% | 65 | 1.40 | 164.9 | 20.9% | 45.3% | 53.9% |
| 46.30% | 54 | 1.30 | 154.6 | 20.1% | 48.6% | 50.6% |
| 46.15% | 52 | 1.36 | 162.9 | 20.3% | 44.3% | 54.1% |
| 58.82% | 51 | 1.35 | 165.1 | 20.8% | 49.8% | 52.7% |
| 47.06% | 34 | 1.22 | 153.4 | 19.7% | 48.2% | 50.6% |
| 54.55% | 33 | 1.25 | 152.8 | 21.7% | 43.8% | 56.3% |
| 37.50% | 24 | 1.25 | 147.8 | 21.7% | 43.8% | 53.5% |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.26 | 144.2 | 19.5% | 48.0% | 55.0% |
| 60.87% | 23 | 1.37 | 156.1 | 22.4% | 44.5% | 60.5% |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.17 | 144.7 | 18.2% | 46.8% | 48.2% |
| 31.58% | 19 | 1.27 | 163.7 | 19.8% | 39.7% | 48.6% |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.57 | 177.0 | 24.5% | 54.6% | 45.0% |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.29 | 155.3 | 24.0% | 43.6% | 53.3% |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.40 | 155.2 | 23.2% | 55.5% | 41.7% |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.45 | 189.6 | 21.7% | 46.2% | 46.2% |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.33 | 154.7 | 19.6% | 39.0% | 67.0% |
| 33.33% | 3 | 1.21 | 139.3 | 14.0% | 46.9% | 50.0% |
Raze vs KAY/O matchup guide: KAY/O leads with a 66.7% win rate, but Raze can still win. Learn how Raze's 139 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 3-match dataset into ranked wins.