Best TFT Comps by Placement
This table ranks TFT Set 17 team compositions by their average placement finish, showing which comps consistently achieve top placements. Top 9-champion Set 17 compositions: Rogue (95.8% WR, 1.9 avg), Rogue (94.8% WR, 2.0 avg), Rogue (96.4% WR, 2.1 avg). Rogue/N.O.V.A. leads with 95.83% win rate and 1.93 average placement. Rogue follows at 94.82% win rate. Analyzing 80 9-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.93 | 95.83% | 47.92% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
1.99 | 94.82% | 42.42% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.06 | 96.39% | 39.25% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.08 | 95.88% | 37.05% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
2.14 | 94.75% | 37.37% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.17 | 95.67% | 34.66% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
2.20 | 94.07% | 37.29% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.25 | 97.42% | 31.61% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.32 | 89.49% | 39.95% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.36 | 92.29% | 30.35% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.40 | 87.58% | 40.35% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.41 | 91.99% | 30.04% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.43 | 92.56% | 29.35% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.44 | 87.13% | 39.82% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.47 | 88.33% | 28.02% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.55 | 89.66% | 26.17% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.71 | 85.26% | 30.52% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.73 | 86.01% | 27.97% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.77 | 87.78% | 13.33% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.79 | 80.00% | 27.50% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.82 | 80.15% | 37.13% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
2.83 | 82.72% | 32.10% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.84 | 83.06% | 28.72% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
2.91 | 78.77% | 29.16% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.93 | 86.67% | 6.67% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.97 | 83.85% | 25.77% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.00 | 86.67% | 6.67% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.01 | 77.15% | 25.22% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.03 | 79.64% | 23.68% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.03 | 81.98% | 16.47% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.05 | 79.45% | 25.12% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.05 | 77.94% | 26.83% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.06 | 85.31% | 13.29% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.10 | 78.42% | 21.98% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.10 | 77.78% | 27.53% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.11 | 81.06% | 17.41% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.13 | 80.00% | 40.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.13 | 79.36% | 18.53% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.14 | 80.24% | 18.76% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.16 | 78.50% | 20.56% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.23 | 74.27% | 23.03% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.23 | 75.51% | 19.05% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.30 | 74.25% | 19.77% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.31 | 65.57% | 22.95% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.33 | 75.00% | 32.69% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.33 | 63.64% | 30.30% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.37 | 75.92% | 16.97% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.39 | 74.82% | 19.56% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.42 | 73.13% | 17.50% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.45 | 68.14% | 23.67% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.46 | 73.21% | 23.21% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.49 | 71.84% | 16.65% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.50 | 69.83% | 19.63% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.55 | 67.92% | 20.82% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.56 | 70.89% | 14.41% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.66 | 67.38% | 17.91% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.66 | 67.14% | 16.30% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.70 | 66.30% | 20.65% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.73 | 69.09% | 16.36% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.74 | 66.70% | 11.92% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.74 | 64.80% | 17.51% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.83 | 66.60% | 16.19% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.90 | 59.24% | 20.93% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.93 | 65.47% | 7.82% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.95 | 63.45% | 6.99% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.04 | 62.37% | 9.68% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.07 | 59.35% | 7.61% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.11 | 60.00% | 4.71% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
4.26 | 56.43% | 4.97% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.29 | 52.94% | 0.00% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.32 | 56.96% | 6.03% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.32 | 55.03% | 8.52% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
4.43 | 54.22% | 3.21% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
4.43 | 51.97% | 5.34% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.43 | 49.82% | 5.78% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.49 | 53.21% | 9.62% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
4.60 | 49.74% | 3.95% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.85 | 42.51% | 7.58% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.86 | 43.02% | 3.49% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
4.97 | 41.14% | 6.69% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Set 17 Comps FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 17?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 17 is Challenger/Rogue with Kai'Sa as the primary carry, achieving a 97.4% win rate and 2.25 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Challenger/Rogue comp?
To play Challenger/Rogue, focus on building around Kai'Sa as your main carry. Look for Kai'Sa and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 17?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 17, Rogue/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.93. Other reliable options include Rogue/N.O.V.A. (1.99 avg) and Rogue/N.O.V.A. (2.06 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Challenger/Rogue is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 97.4% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 17?
In TFT Set 17, Replicator/Dark Star has a 1.4% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Challenger/Rogue. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
What is the most consistent TFT comp in TFT Set 17?
Rogue/N.O.V.A. has the best average placement at 1.93, making it the most consistent comp for climbing. Rogue/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.99, and Rogue/N.O.V.A. at 2.06. Lower average placement means fewer bottom 4 finishes.
Is average placement better than win rate for climbing?
For consistent LP gains, average placement is often more reliable than pure win rate. A comp like Rogue/N.O.V.A. with 1.93 average placement minimizes big LP losses from bottom 4 finishes. High variance comps might win more lobbies but also 8th more often. For climbing, consistency usually beats coinflip strategies.