This table ranks TFT Set 16 team compositions by their average placement finish, showing which comps consistently achieve top placements. Top 9-champion Set 16 compositions: Defender (96.7% WR, 2.1 avg), Defender (94.9% WR, 2.1 avg), Defender (94.5% WR, 2.2 avg). Defender/Harvester leads with 96.67% win rate and 2.07 average placement. Defender follows at 94.92% win rate. Analyzing 55 9-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.

Primary
Champions
Builds
Traits
AvgWinFirstPick
2.07
Avg Place
96.67%
Win Rate
26.67%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.07
Avg Place
94.92%
Win Rate
40.68%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.21
Avg Place
94.52%
Win Rate
23.97%
First Place
0.13%
Pick Rate
2.36
Avg Place
79.66%
Win Rate
45.76%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.40
Avg Place
90.61%
Win Rate
35.92%
First Place
0.22%
Pick Rate
2.51
Avg Place
90.51%
Win Rate
35.04%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
2.61
Avg Place
93.48%
Win Rate
22.83%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
2.61
Avg Place
82.86%
Win Rate
35.71%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
2.62
Avg Place
81.97%
Win Rate
37.70%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.65
Avg Place
88.02%
Win Rate
25.12%
First Place
0.38%
Pick Rate
2.66
Avg Place
88.06%
Win Rate
31.34%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
2.66
Avg Place
89.02%
Win Rate
39.02%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
2.73
Avg Place
85.71%
Win Rate
14.29%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
2.76
Avg Place
79.07%
Win Rate
34.01%
First Place
0.30%
Pick Rate
2.77
Avg Place
81.67%
Win Rate
33.33%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.83
Avg Place
86.54%
Win Rate
29.81%
First Place
0.09%
Pick Rate
2.85
Avg Place
81.40%
Win Rate
38.76%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
2.87
Avg Place
80.28%
Win Rate
26.76%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
2.88
Avg Place
81.66%
Win Rate
28.38%
First Place
0.20%
Pick Rate
2.93
Avg Place
80.39%
Win Rate
27.17%
First Place
1.10%
Pick Rate
2.99
Avg Place
81.40%
Win Rate
26.36%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
3.03
Avg Place
78.67%
Win Rate
30.67%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
3.03
Avg Place
80.85%
Win Rate
22.98%
First Place
0.21%
Pick Rate
3.05
Avg Place
77.14%
Win Rate
30.71%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
3.08
Avg Place
77.72%
Win Rate
19.80%
First Place
0.18%
Pick Rate
3.13
Avg Place
83.87%
Win Rate
14.52%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.20
Avg Place
75.00%
Win Rate
25.00%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.23
Avg Place
73.76%
Win Rate
29.66%
First Place
0.23%
Pick Rate
3.24
Avg Place
65.52%
Win Rate
28.74%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
3.24
Avg Place
74.69%
Win Rate
26.54%
First Place
0.36%
Pick Rate
3.28
Avg Place
70.18%
Win Rate
26.32%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.30
Avg Place
71.49%
Win Rate
23.25%
First Place
0.20%
Pick Rate
3.31
Avg Place
73.87%
Win Rate
23.42%
First Place
0.10%
Pick Rate
3.43
Avg Place
75.38%
Win Rate
6.92%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
3.45
Avg Place
76.67%
Win Rate
14.00%
First Place
0.13%
Pick Rate
3.49
Avg Place
65.38%
Win Rate
11.54%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
3.52
Avg Place
65.52%
Win Rate
15.52%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.57
Avg Place
64.29%
Win Rate
17.53%
First Place
0.14%
Pick Rate
-
3.61
Avg Place
68.90%
Win Rate
17.22%
First Place
0.18%
Pick Rate
3.61
Avg Place
65.40%
Win Rate
18.99%
First Place
0.21%
Pick Rate
3.62
Avg Place
67.90%
Win Rate
12.35%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
3.62
Avg Place
68.97%
Win Rate
17.24%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.70
Avg Place
67.42%
Win Rate
14.39%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
3.76
Avg Place
61.02%
Win Rate
11.86%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.88
Avg Place
63.79%
Win Rate
10.34%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.95
Avg Place
64.86%
Win Rate
10.87%
First Place
0.24%
Pick Rate
3.99
Avg Place
58.76%
Win Rate
10.31%
First Place
0.09%
Pick Rate
4.10
Avg Place
56.72%
Win Rate
13.43%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
4.33
Avg Place
49.80%
Win Rate
13.06%
First Place
0.22%
Pick Rate
4.36
Avg Place
51.39%
Win Rate
11.11%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
4.65
Avg Place
46.15%
Win Rate
12.09%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
4.91
Avg Place
46.08%
Win Rate
1.96%
First Place
0.09%
Pick Rate
4.96
Avg Place
43.42%
Win Rate
6.58%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
5.03
Avg Place
36.23%
Win Rate
5.80%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
5.19
Avg Place
35.94%
Win Rate
9.38%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate

TFT Set 16 Meta Analysis

This page displays 55 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 8.4K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 72.9% and average placement of 3.31 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Defender/Harvester with Zoe as the primary carry, achieving a 96.7% win rate. Following closely is Defender/Disruptor at 94.9% win rate, and Defender/Disruptor at 94.5%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Defender/Harvester (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Zoe
  • Defender/Disruptor (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Malzahar
  • Defender/Disruptor (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Leona

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Riftscourge/Juggernaut which achieves first place in 45.8% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Defender/Harvester: 96.7% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Defender/Disruptor: 94.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Defender/Disruptor: 94.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Blacksmith/Harvester with a 1.1% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 80.4% win rate despite high contestation. Bruiser/Gunslinger follows at 0.4% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Join MetaBot.GG

Create a free account to personalize your experience and track your favorite champions.

Customizable dashboardSave your favoritesFollow other playersConnect Your Gaming Profiles
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

TFT Set 16 Comps FAQ

What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 16?

The best TFT comp in TFT Set 16 is Defender/Harvester with Zoe as the primary carry, achieving a 96.7% win rate and 2.07 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.

How do I play the Defender/Harvester comp?

To play Defender/Harvester, focus on building around Zoe as your main carry. Look for Zoe and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.

What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 16?

For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 16, Defender/Harvester offers the best average placement at 2.07. Other reliable options include Defender/Disruptor (2.07 avg) and Defender/Disruptor (2.21 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.

What is the easiest TFT comp to play?

Defender/Harvester is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 96.7% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.

When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 16?

In TFT Set 16, Blacksmith/Harvester has a 1.1% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Defender/Harvester. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.

What is the most consistent TFT comp in TFT Set 16?

Defender/Harvester has the best average placement at 2.07, making it the most consistent comp for climbing. Defender/Disruptor follows at 2.07, and Defender/Disruptor at 2.21. Lower average placement means fewer bottom 4 finishes.

Is average placement better than win rate for climbing?

For consistent LP gains, average placement is often more reliable than pure win rate. A comp like Defender/Harvester with 2.07 average placement minimizes big LP losses from bottom 4 finishes. High variance comps might win more lobbies but also 8th more often. For climbing, consistency usually beats coinflip strategies.