Best TFT Comps by Placement
This table ranks TFT Set 16 team compositions by their average placement finish, showing which comps consistently achieve top placements. Top 9-champion Set 16 compositions: Bruiser (90.7% WR, 2.0 avg), Defender (93.2% WR, 2.4 avg), Star Forger (86.0% WR, 2.4 avg). Bruiser/Defender leads with 90.67% win rate and 2.00 average placement. Defender follows at 93.19% win rate. Analyzing 55 9-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.00 | 90.67% | 45.33% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.37 | 93.19% | 23.47% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.43 | 86.00% | 38.51% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.43 | 89.84% | 30.90% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.54 | 91.30% | 31.88% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.54 | 89.70% | 29.09% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.55 | 82.61% | 31.88% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.56 | 91.88% | 24.35% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.73 | 81.19% | 34.02% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.80 | 80.92% | 33.06% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.87 | 83.57% | 22.91% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.90 | 78.85% | 31.07% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.92 | 78.50% | 31.06% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.97 | 79.39% | 27.43% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.98 | 77.21% | 33.46% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.00 | 77.43% | 26.57% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.01 | 76.88% | 30.40% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.01 | 78.82% | 25.12% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.01 | 80.71% | 22.55% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.01 | 77.17% | 31.08% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.04 | 77.18% | 27.51% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.05 | 86.36% | 22.73% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.10 | 78.61% | 22.08% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.12 | 73.65% | 30.39% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.15 | 74.29% | 26.33% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
- | 3.23 | 76.36% | 20.00% | Low Contested Risk | |||
3.24 | 73.67% | 27.56% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.25 | 72.32% | 24.40% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.26 | 73.06% | 23.94% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.29 | 71.79% | 18.75% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
- | 3.30 | 72.88% | 22.99% | Low Contested Risk | |||
3.33 | 75.99% | 21.11% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.35 | 71.15% | 25.52% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.36 | 71.90% | 22.77% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.37 | 71.85% | 22.52% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.39 | 78.12% | 12.46% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
- | 3.41 | 73.19% | 16.53% | Low Contested Risk | |||
3.41 | 71.15% | 15.38% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.42 | 74.27% | 19.69% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.43 | 71.58% | 20.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.45 | 72.73% | 13.64% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.51 | 71.91% | 15.30% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.52 | 72.30% | 11.95% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.59 | 68.62% | 15.99% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.96 | 59.66% | 15.87% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.03 | 62.42% | 10.09% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.12 | 58.39% | 11.19% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.36 | 50.27% | 7.47% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.49 | 45.89% | 5.70% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.51 | 50.52% | 7.22% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.63 | 48.77% | 6.13% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.65 | 45.05% | 3.07% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.95 | 36.71% | 5.70% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
- | 5.52 | 28.16% | 4.21% | Low Contested Risk | |||
5.54 | 37.50% | 4.17% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Set 16 Comps FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 16?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 16 is Defender/Disruptor with Zoe as the primary carry, achieving a 93.2% win rate and 2.37 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Defender/Disruptor comp?
To play Defender/Disruptor, focus on building around Zoe as your main carry. Look for Zoe and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 16?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 16, Bruiser/Defender offers the best average placement at 2.00. Other reliable options include Defender/Disruptor (2.37 avg) and Star Forger/Defender (2.43 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Defender/Disruptor is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 93.2% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 16?
In TFT Set 16, Blacksmith/Harvester has a 1.0% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Defender/Disruptor. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
What is the most consistent TFT comp in TFT Set 16?
Bruiser/Defender has the best average placement at 2.00, making it the most consistent comp for climbing. Defender/Disruptor follows at 2.37, and Star Forger/Defender at 2.43. Lower average placement means fewer bottom 4 finishes.
Is average placement better than win rate for climbing?
For consistent LP gains, average placement is often more reliable than pure win rate. A comp like Bruiser/Defender with 2.00 average placement minimizes big LP losses from bottom 4 finishes. High variance comps might win more lobbies but also 8th more often. For climbing, consistency usually beats coinflip strategies.