Gambler's Blade TFT item icon
Avg Place
4.29
1st Place
13.59%
Top 4 Rate
53.50%
Pick Rate
1.08%

Gambler's BladeTFT Team Comps

Set 17
SetSet 17
Matches140,428
TierAll Tiers
RankAll Ranks
Last UpdatedJul 18, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Team compositions using Gambler's Blade in TFT Set 16.14. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.

Metabot Logo
MetaBot Desktop
Live In-Game Overlays
Join Our Discord
Bug reports, feature requests & developer chat
Join Discord

Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Gambler's Blade as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 29 viable team comps currently building Gambler's Blade, with an average win rate of 52.18% across all compositions. The highest performing Gambler's Blade comp achieves a 78.40% win rate, primarily featuring Party Animal, Bastion, Bulwark traits with Gwen as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Gambler's Blade is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.

3.01
78.40%
21.92%
Low Contested Risk
3.24
76.38%
16.74%
Low Contested Risk
3.24
75.83%
19.66%
Low Contested Risk
2.93
75.22%
24.77%
Low Contested Risk
3.43
72.39%
11.08%
Low Contested Risk
3.58
71.07%
10.09%
Low Contested Risk
3.70
69.55%
9.33%
Low Contested Risk
3.53
69.01%
17.79%
Low Contested Risk
3.57
67.96%
16.56%
Low Contested Risk
3.48
67.28%
19.00%
Low Contested Risk
3.87
63.56%
13.30%
Low Contested Risk
4.01
61.62%
14.82%
Low Contested Risk
4.25
57.17%
9.03%
Low Contested Risk
4.50
52.72%
6.02%
Low Contested Risk
4.37
51.97%
11.55%
Low Contested Risk
4.77
48.97%
9.77%
Low Contested Risk
4.79
46.22%
5.53%
Low Contested Risk
4.88
45.45%
9.78%
Low Contested Risk
5.05
41.57%
5.09%
Low Contested Risk
5.14
40.69%
9.31%
Low Contested Risk
5.11
39.23%
3.60%
Low Contested Risk
5.06
38.95%
6.11%
Low Contested Risk
5.07
37.91%
2.94%
Low Contested Risk
5.69
30.61%
2.98%
Low Contested Risk
5.51
29.50%
2.85%
Low Contested Risk
5.71
28.53%
4.55%
Low Contested Risk
5.56
28.11%
4.67%
Low Contested Risk
5.96
27.16%
4.29%
Low Contested Risk
5.90
20.08%
1.57%
Low Contested Risk
3.01
Avg Place
78.40%
Top 4 Rate
21.92%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.24
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
16.74%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.24
Avg Place
75.83%
Top 4 Rate
19.66%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
2.93
Avg Place
75.22%
Top 4 Rate
24.77%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.58
Avg Place
71.07%
Top 4 Rate
10.09%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.70
Avg Place
69.55%
Top 4 Rate
9.33%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.53
Avg Place
69.01%
Top 4 Rate
17.79%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.57
Avg Place
67.96%
Top 4 Rate
16.56%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.48
Avg Place
67.28%
Top 4 Rate
19.00%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.01
Avg Place
61.62%
Top 4 Rate
14.82%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.25
Avg Place
57.17%
Top 4 Rate
9.03%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.50
Avg Place
52.72%
Top 4 Rate
6.02%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.37
Avg Place
51.97%
Top 4 Rate
11.55%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.77
Avg Place
48.97%
Top 4 Rate
9.77%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.79
Avg Place
46.22%
Top 4 Rate
5.53%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.05
Avg Place
41.57%
Top 4 Rate
5.09%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.14
Avg Place
40.69%
Top 4 Rate
9.31%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.11
Avg Place
39.23%
Top 4 Rate
3.60%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.06
Avg Place
38.95%
Top 4 Rate
6.11%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.07
Avg Place
37.91%
Top 4 Rate
2.94%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.51
Avg Place
29.50%
Top 4 Rate
2.85%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.71
Avg Place
28.53%
Top 4 Rate
4.55%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.56
Avg Place
28.11%
Top 4 Rate
4.67%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.96
Avg Place
27.16%
Top 4 Rate
4.29%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.90
Avg Place
20.08%
Top 4 Rate
1.57%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Gambler's Blade Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best team comp for Gambler's Blade in TFT Set 17?

The best team comp featuring Gambler's Blade in TFT Set 17 achieves a 78.40% win rate with a 0.58% pick rate. This composition uses Party Animal, Bastion, and Bulwark traits and is picked in 0.58% of games featuring Gambler's Blade.

How many team comps use Gambler's Blade in TFT?

There are 29 viable team compositions that commonly build Gambler's Blade in TFT Set 17. Gambler's Blade appears in comps with an average win rate of 52.18% across 11,234 total matches analyzed.

Which comp uses Gambler's Blade most often in TFT?

The most popular comp for Gambler's Blade in TFT Set 17 uses the Challenger, N.O.V.A., and Brawler traits with a 2.29% pick rate. This composition achieves a 71.07% win rate and average placement of 3.58.

What comp with Gambler's Blade has the best average placement?

The Gambler's Blade comp with the best average placement achieves 2.93 with the Eradicator, Sniper, and Space Groove traits. This composition has a 75.22% win rate and 0.06% pick rate.

What traits work well with Gambler's Blade in TFT?

The best traits that synergize with Gambler's Blade in TFT Set 17 are Party Animal, Bastion, Bulwark, Vanguard, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Gambler's Blade team compositions.