Void Staff TFT item icon
Avg Place
4.06
1st Place
16.25%
Top 4 Rate
58.03%
Pick Rate
20.55%

Void StaffTFT Team Comps

Set 17
ARecurve Bow iconRecurve BowTear of the Goddess iconTear of the Goddess
SetSet 17
Matches504,936
TierAll Tiers
RankAll Ranks
Last UpdatedJun 1, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Team compositions using Void Staff in TFT Set 16.11. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.

MetaBot Desktop
Live In-Game Overlays
Join Our Discord
Bug reports, feature requests & developer chat
Join Discord

Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Void Staff as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 52 viable team comps currently building Void Staff, with an average win rate of 46.97% across all compositions. The highest performing Void Staff comp achieves a 83.59% win rate, primarily featuring Challenger, N.O.V.A., Brawler traits with Urgot as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Void Staff is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.

2.80
83.59%
24.53%
Low Contested Risk
3.26
81.92%
8.27%
Low Contested Risk
3.00
81.33%
21.44%
Low Contested Risk
2.94
79.76%
23.21%
Low Contested Risk
3.27
77.89%
10.55%
Low Contested Risk
2.93
77.46%
25.35%
Low Contested Risk
3.10
74.43%
25.90%
Low Contested Risk
3.41
73.50%
16.25%
Low Contested Risk
3.39
72.07%
19.81%
Low Contested Risk
3.56
70.31%
15.34%
Low Contested Risk
3.61
70.21%
12.39%
Low Contested Risk
3.63
69.56%
13.36%
Low Contested Risk
3.77
68.14%
8.57%
Low Contested Risk
3.55
68.02%
14.36%
Low Contested Risk
3.58
67.21%
20.23%
Low Contested Risk
3.79
66.27%
10.71%
Low Contested Risk
3.86
65.72%
8.98%
Low Contested Risk
3.76
64.29%
11.51%
Low Contested Risk
4.17
57.11%
11.97%
Low Contested Risk
-
4.05
55.87%
9.46%
Low Contested Risk
4.58
53.36%
6.73%
Low Contested Risk
4.53
51.47%
3.08%
Low Contested Risk
4.25
50.91%
13.68%
Low Contested Risk
4.79
44.00%
5.01%
Low Contested Risk
4.81
43.07%
4.15%
Low Contested Risk
4.92
42.68%
6.28%
Low Contested Risk
4.88
41.77%
2.41%
Low Contested Risk
-
4.94
41.67%
3.75%
Low Contested Risk
4.96
41.14%
1.00%
Low Contested Risk
4.95
40.02%
5.80%
Low Contested Risk
4.93
39.91%
6.42%
Low Contested Risk
4.93
38.47%
6.76%
Low Contested Risk
5.33
34.96%
4.10%
Low Contested Risk
5.40
34.48%
2.10%
Low Contested Risk
-
5.52
31.68%
2.97%
Low Contested Risk
5.51
29.62%
3.40%
Low Contested Risk
5.62
29.22%
0.97%
Low Contested Risk
5.29
28.52%
5.70%
Low Contested Risk
5.54
28.16%
2.91%
Low Contested Risk
5.73
26.48%
2.93%
Low Contested Risk
5.73
26.46%
0.45%
Low Contested Risk
5.65
24.97%
2.24%
Low Contested Risk
5.88
24.38%
0.41%
Low Contested Risk
5.79
21.85%
1.85%
Low Contested Risk
5.84
20.71%
3.24%
Low Contested Risk
5.82
20.56%
0.23%
Low Contested Risk
5.86
20.38%
1.74%
Low Contested Risk
5.99
19.84%
0.53%
Low Contested Risk
6.09
19.66%
1.71%
Low Contested Risk
6.02
19.43%
1.21%
Low Contested Risk
6.14
15.79%
1.45%
Low Contested Risk
6.26
12.23%
0.00%
Low Contested Risk
3.26
Avg Place
81.92%
Top 4 Rate
8.27%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.00
Avg Place
81.33%
Top 4 Rate
21.44%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.27
Avg Place
77.89%
Top 4 Rate
10.55%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.10
Avg Place
74.43%
Top 4 Rate
25.90%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.39
Avg Place
72.07%
Top 4 Rate
19.81%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.56
Avg Place
70.31%
Top 4 Rate
15.34%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.61
Avg Place
70.21%
Top 4 Rate
12.39%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.63
Avg Place
69.56%
Top 4 Rate
13.36%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.77
Avg Place
68.14%
Top 4 Rate
8.57%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.55
Avg Place
68.02%
Top 4 Rate
14.36%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.79
Avg Place
66.27%
Top 4 Rate
10.71%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.86
Avg Place
65.72%
Top 4 Rate
8.98%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.76
Avg Place
64.29%
Top 4 Rate
11.51%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.17
Avg Place
57.11%
Top 4 Rate
11.97%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.05
Avg Place
55.87%
Top 4 Rate
9.46%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.58
Avg Place
53.36%
Top 4 Rate
6.73%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.53
Avg Place
51.47%
Top 4 Rate
3.08%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.79
Avg Place
44.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.01%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.81
Avg Place
43.07%
Top 4 Rate
4.15%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.92
Avg Place
42.68%
Top 4 Rate
6.28%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.88
Avg Place
41.77%
Top 4 Rate
2.41%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.94
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
3.75%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.93
Avg Place
39.91%
Top 4 Rate
6.42%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.93
Avg Place
38.47%
Top 4 Rate
6.76%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.33
Avg Place
34.96%
Top 4 Rate
4.10%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.40
Avg Place
34.48%
Top 4 Rate
2.10%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.52
Avg Place
31.68%
Top 4 Rate
2.97%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.51
Avg Place
29.62%
Top 4 Rate
3.40%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.62
Avg Place
29.22%
Top 4 Rate
0.97%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.29
Avg Place
28.52%
Top 4 Rate
5.70%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.54
Avg Place
28.16%
Top 4 Rate
2.91%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.73
Avg Place
26.48%
Top 4 Rate
2.93%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.82
Avg Place
20.56%
Top 4 Rate
0.23%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.99
Avg Place
19.84%
Top 4 Rate
0.53%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Void Staff Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best team comp for Void Staff in TFT Set 17?

The best team comp featuring Void Staff in TFT Set 17 achieves a 83.59% win rate with a 0.16% pick rate. This composition uses Challenger, N.O.V.A., and Brawler traits and is picked in 0.16% of games featuring Void Staff.

How many team comps use Void Staff in TFT?

There are 52 viable team compositions that commonly build Void Staff in TFT Set 17. Void Staff appears in comps with an average win rate of 46.97% across 48,612 total matches analyzed.

Which comp uses Void Staff most often in TFT?

The most popular comp for Void Staff in TFT Set 17 uses the Rogue, Meeple, and Fateweaver traits with a 2.42% pick rate. This composition achieves a 44.00% win rate and average placement of 4.79.

What traits work well with Void Staff in TFT?

The best traits that synergize with Void Staff in TFT Set 17 are Challenger, N.O.V.A., Brawler, Marauder, Gun Goddess, Dark Lady, Bastion, Redeemer, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Void Staff team compositions.