Blue BuffTFT Team Comps
Tear of the GoddessTear of the GoddessTeam compositions using Blue Buff in TFT Set 16.13. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Blue Buff as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 65 viable team comps currently building Blue Buff, with an average win rate of 49.69% across all compositions. The highest performing Blue Buff comp achieves a 96.62% win rate, primarily featuring Party Animal, Dark Star, Divine Duelist traits with Aurelion Sol as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Blue Buff is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
1.79 | 96.62% | 58.45% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.19 | 94.57% | 37.06% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.11 | 92.19% | 47.27% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.58 | 86.98% | 30.93% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.20 | 79.76% | 16.19% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.99 | 79.64% | 24.89% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.16 | 76.39% | 24.68% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.27 | 75.69% | 16.99% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.30 | 74.27% | 21.56% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.47 | 73.73% | 14.03% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.58 | 73.18% | 11.11% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.55 | 72.42% | 11.05% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.53 | 71.12% | 14.66% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.38 | 70.66% | 19.83% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.51 | 69.62% | 17.31% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.72 | 68.87% | 13.62% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.71 | 68.12% | 14.49% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.65 | 66.36% | 16.36% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.94 | 66.32% | 7.02% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.67 | 66.10% | 16.35% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.83 | 65.94% | 13.02% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.71 | 65.43% | 12.96% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.91 | 65.26% | 4.83% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.86 | 65.10% | 13.54% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.90 | 64.79% | 8.89% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.78 | 64.64% | 18.54% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.91 | 60.80% | 13.57% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.09 | 60.65% | 9.94% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.22 | 58.26% | 4.13% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.09 | 57.18% | 13.95% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.15 | 57.01% | 11.31% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.57 | 50.83% | 5.37% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.46 | 48.88% | 8.52% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.59 | 47.88% | 8.69% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.54 | 46.30% | 10.74% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.66 | 45.82% | 4.68% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.75 | 41.01% | 8.29% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.98 | 40.89% | 4.94% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.91 | 39.46% | 4.52% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.05 | 38.63% | 4.08% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.09 | 36.68% | 5.29% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.02 | 36.64% | 6.49% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.17 | 36.22% | 3.64% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.10 | 35.62% | 3.77% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.18 | 34.92% | 5.16% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.14 | 34.26% | 4.57% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.19 | 33.71% | 3.35% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.29 | 32.44% | 1.48% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.37 | 31.12% | 0.91% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.57 | 28.24% | 1.39% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.44 | 26.11% | 1.33% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.66 | 25.60% | 2.41% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.62 | 24.82% | 2.94% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.69 | 24.75% | 1.76% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.92 | 21.79% | 1.92% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.89 | 21.45% | 1.25% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.82 | 21.42% | 1.59% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.99 | 19.84% | 2.45% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.92 | 19.77% | 2.89% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.96 | 18.81% | 1.32% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.15 | 14.51% | 2.59% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.43 | 11.63% | 0.39% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.35 | 11.40% | 0.37% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.38 | 10.70% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.43 | 10.09% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Blue Buff Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Blue Buff in TFT Set 17?
The best team comp featuring Blue Buff in TFT Set 17 achieves a 96.62% win rate with a 0.05% pick rate. This composition uses Party Animal, Dark Star, and Divine Duelist traits and is picked in 0.05% of games featuring Blue Buff.
How many team comps use Blue Buff in TFT?
There are 65 viable team compositions that commonly build Blue Buff in TFT Set 17. Blue Buff appears in comps with an average win rate of 49.69% across 50,294 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Blue Buff most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Blue Buff in TFT Set 17 uses the Challenger, N.O.V.A., and Brawler traits with a 3.09% pick rate. This composition achieves a 72.42% win rate and average placement of 3.55.
What traits work well with Blue Buff in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Blue Buff in TFT Set 17 are Party Animal, Dark Star, Divine Duelist, Voyager, Conduit, Mecha, Dark Lady, Redeemer, Vanguard, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Blue Buff team compositions.