CrownguardTFT Team Comps
Needlessly Large Rod
Chain VestTeam compositions using Crownguard in TFT Set 16.14. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Crownguard as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 63 viable team comps currently building Crownguard, with an average win rate of 50.26% across all compositions. The highest performing Crownguard comp achieves a 85.22% win rate, primarily featuring Party Animal, Dark Star, Divine Duelist traits with Mordekaiser as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Crownguard is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
2.00 | 85.22% | 43.52% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.40 | 83.82% | 36.37% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.13 | 83.54% | 34.31% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.60 | 81.92% | 28.98% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.01 | 78.40% | 21.92% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.24 | 76.38% | 16.74% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.24 | 75.83% | 19.66% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.93 | 75.22% | 24.77% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.06 | 75.14% | 24.86% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.23 | 74.97% | 17.08% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.05 | 74.72% | 17.39% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.43 | 72.39% | 11.08% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.43 | 72.02% | 15.15% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.25 | 71.30% | 10.63% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.58 | 71.07% | 10.09% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.70 | 69.55% | 9.33% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.53 | 69.01% | 17.79% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.57 | 67.96% | 16.56% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.48 | 67.28% | 19.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.73 | 65.49% | 18.18% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.66 | 64.49% | 12.39% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.87 | 63.56% | 13.30% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.76 | 63.53% | 13.13% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.01 | 61.62% | 14.82% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.10 | 59.97% | 10.76% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.25 | 57.17% | 9.03% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.03 | 56.47% | 16.02% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.32 | 55.36% | 8.95% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.50 | 52.72% | 6.02% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.37 | 51.97% | 11.55% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.72 | 50.24% | 9.22% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.77 | 48.97% | 9.77% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.79 | 46.22% | 5.53% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.88 | 45.45% | 9.78% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.05 | 41.57% | 5.09% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.14 | 40.69% | 9.31% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.11 | 39.23% | 3.60% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.02 | 39.20% | 6.11% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.06 | 38.95% | 6.11% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.35 | 38.08% | 7.86% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.07 | 37.91% | 2.94% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.53 | 36.86% | 4.24% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.36 | 36.81% | 4.77% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.09 | 36.05% | 2.15% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.27 | 33.71% | 4.34% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.40 | 31.54% | 3.40% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.69 | 30.61% | 2.98% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.82 | 30.48% | 3.86% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.80 | 30.22% | 4.77% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.69 | 29.98% | 3.67% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.51 | 29.50% | 2.85% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.80 | 28.67% | 2.65% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.71 | 28.53% | 4.55% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.56 | 28.11% | 4.67% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.96 | 27.16% | 4.29% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.09 | 26.90% | 3.76% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.91 | 26.86% | 3.13% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.77 | 26.33% | 2.94% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.87 | 23.98% | 5.54% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.40 | 22.17% | 3.44% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.90 | 20.08% | 1.57% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.49 | 18.74% | 2.91% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.33 | 18.41% | 3.66% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Crownguard Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Crownguard in TFT Set 17?
The best team comp featuring Crownguard in TFT Set 17 achieves a 85.22% win rate with a 0.06% pick rate. This composition uses Party Animal, Dark Star, and Divine Duelist traits and is picked in 0.06% of games featuring Crownguard.
How many team comps use Crownguard in TFT?
There are 63 viable team compositions that commonly build Crownguard in TFT Set 17. Crownguard appears in comps with an average win rate of 50.26% across 14,355 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Crownguard most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Crownguard in TFT Set 17 uses the Challenger, N.O.V.A., and Brawler traits with a 2.29% pick rate. This composition achieves a 71.07% win rate and average placement of 3.58.
What traits work well with Crownguard in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Crownguard in TFT Set 17 are Party Animal, Dark Star, Divine Duelist, Voyager, Conduit, Mecha, Dark Lady, Redeemer, Vanguard, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Crownguard team compositions.