Thief's GlovesTFT Team Comps
Sparring GlovesSparring GlovesTeam compositions using Thief's Gloves in TFT Set 16.13. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Thief's Gloves as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 65 viable team comps currently building Thief's Gloves, with an average win rate of 49.69% across all compositions. The highest performing Thief's Gloves comp achieves a 96.62% win rate, primarily featuring Party Animal, Dark Star, Divine Duelist traits with Aurelion Sol as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Thief's Gloves is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
1.79 | 96.62% | 58.45% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.19 | 94.57% | 37.06% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.11 | 92.19% | 47.27% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.58 | 86.98% | 30.93% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.20 | 79.76% | 16.19% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.99 | 79.64% | 24.89% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.16 | 76.39% | 24.68% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.27 | 75.69% | 16.99% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.30 | 74.27% | 21.56% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.47 | 73.73% | 14.03% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.58 | 73.18% | 11.11% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.55 | 72.42% | 11.05% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.53 | 71.12% | 14.66% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.38 | 70.66% | 19.83% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.51 | 69.62% | 17.31% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.72 | 68.87% | 13.62% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.71 | 68.12% | 14.49% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.65 | 66.36% | 16.36% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.94 | 66.32% | 7.02% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.67 | 66.10% | 16.35% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.83 | 65.94% | 13.02% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.71 | 65.43% | 12.96% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.91 | 65.26% | 4.83% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.86 | 65.10% | 13.54% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.90 | 64.79% | 8.89% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.78 | 64.64% | 18.54% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.91 | 60.80% | 13.57% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.09 | 60.65% | 9.94% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.22 | 58.26% | 4.13% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.09 | 57.18% | 13.95% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.15 | 57.01% | 11.31% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.57 | 50.83% | 5.37% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.46 | 48.88% | 8.52% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.59 | 47.88% | 8.69% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.54 | 46.30% | 10.74% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.66 | 45.82% | 4.68% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.75 | 41.01% | 8.29% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.98 | 40.89% | 4.94% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.91 | 39.46% | 4.52% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.05 | 38.63% | 4.08% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.09 | 36.68% | 5.29% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.02 | 36.64% | 6.49% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.17 | 36.22% | 3.64% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.10 | 35.62% | 3.77% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.18 | 34.92% | 5.16% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.14 | 34.26% | 4.57% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.19 | 33.71% | 3.35% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.29 | 32.44% | 1.48% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.37 | 31.12% | 0.91% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.57 | 28.24% | 1.39% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.44 | 26.11% | 1.33% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.66 | 25.60% | 2.41% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.62 | 24.82% | 2.94% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.69 | 24.75% | 1.76% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.92 | 21.79% | 1.92% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.89 | 21.45% | 1.25% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.82 | 21.42% | 1.59% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.99 | 19.84% | 2.45% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.92 | 19.77% | 2.89% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.96 | 18.81% | 1.32% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.15 | 14.51% | 2.59% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.43 | 11.63% | 0.39% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.35 | 11.40% | 0.37% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.38 | 10.70% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.43 | 10.09% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Thief's Gloves Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Thief's Gloves in TFT Set 17?
The best team comp featuring Thief's Gloves in TFT Set 17 achieves a 96.62% win rate with a 0.05% pick rate. This composition uses Party Animal, Dark Star, and Divine Duelist traits and is picked in 0.05% of games featuring Thief's Gloves.
How many team comps use Thief's Gloves in TFT?
There are 65 viable team compositions that commonly build Thief's Gloves in TFT Set 17. Thief's Gloves appears in comps with an average win rate of 49.69% across 50,294 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Thief's Gloves most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Thief's Gloves in TFT Set 17 uses the Challenger, N.O.V.A., and Brawler traits with a 3.09% pick rate. This composition achieves a 72.42% win rate and average placement of 3.55.
What traits work well with Thief's Gloves in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Thief's Gloves in TFT Set 17 are Party Animal, Dark Star, Divine Duelist, Voyager, Conduit, Mecha, Dark Lady, Redeemer, Vanguard, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Thief's Gloves team compositions.