Thief's Gloves TFT item icon
Avg Place
4.11
1st Place
16.23%
Top 4 Rate
57.20%
Pick Rate
23.19%

Thief's GlovesTFT Team Comps

Set 17
BSparring Gloves iconSparring GlovesSparring Gloves iconSparring Gloves
SetSet 17
Matches277,350
TierAll Tiers
RankAll Ranks
Last UpdatedMay 31, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Team compositions using Thief's Gloves in TFT Set 16.11. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.

MetaBot Desktop
Live In-Game Overlays
Join Our Discord
Bug reports, feature requests & developer chat
Join Discord

Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Thief's Gloves as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 55 viable team comps currently building Thief's Gloves, with an average win rate of 46.45% across all compositions. The highest performing Thief's Gloves comp achieves a 87.31% win rate, primarily featuring Challenger, N.O.V.A., Brawler traits with Urgot as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Thief's Gloves is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.

2.63
87.31%
23.13%
Low Contested Risk
2.80
83.76%
25.07%
Low Contested Risk
2.97
82.90%
20.19%
Low Contested Risk
2.86
82.32%
22.56%
Low Contested Risk
3.27
80.58%
8.27%
Low Contested Risk
3.22
79.31%
12.93%
Low Contested Risk
2.83
78.40%
31.20%
Low Contested Risk
3.33
74.03%
20.06%
Low Contested Risk
3.42
72.58%
15.44%
Low Contested Risk
3.55
71.52%
12.63%
Low Contested Risk
3.03
71.10%
32.37%
Low Contested Risk
3.62
70.22%
13.18%
Low Contested Risk
3.58
68.42%
9.57%
Low Contested Risk
3.74
68.15%
8.89%
Low Contested Risk
3.62
67.76%
14.37%
Low Contested Risk
3.78
66.80%
7.83%
Low Contested Risk
3.68
65.74%
16.98%
Low Contested Risk
3.76
64.24%
9.93%
Low Contested Risk
3.98
63.45%
6.30%
Low Contested Risk
4.33
57.89%
9.77%
Low Contested Risk
4.23
54.82%
8.77%
Low Contested Risk
4.10
54.34%
12.72%
Low Contested Risk
4.38
54.19%
4.13%
Low Contested Risk
4.38
46.37%
12.90%
Low Contested Risk
4.86
44.96%
0.78%
Low Contested Risk
4.76
44.44%
0.85%
Low Contested Risk
4.81
43.16%
5.03%
Low Contested Risk
4.86
42.75%
3.86%
Low Contested Risk
4.87
41.23%
5.26%
Low Contested Risk
4.96
41.11%
0.56%
Low Contested Risk
4.95
40.16%
5.30%
Low Contested Risk
5.03
39.64%
4.50%
Low Contested Risk
4.96
39.32%
6.84%
Low Contested Risk
5.21
33.33%
3.92%
Low Contested Risk
5.31
33.10%
5.63%
Low Contested Risk
5.18
30.52%
7.14%
Low Contested Risk
5.62
29.60%
3.14%
Low Contested Risk
5.55
29.32%
3.61%
Low Contested Risk
5.51
29.11%
2.53%
Low Contested Risk
5.24
28.68%
0.78%
Low Contested Risk
5.68
27.42%
0.81%
Low Contested Risk
5.59
26.63%
2.37%
Low Contested Risk
5.74
26.17%
0.67%
Low Contested Risk
5.59
26.05%
5.04%
Low Contested Risk
5.92
23.48%
0.76%
Low Contested Risk
5.89
22.52%
0.00%
Low Contested Risk
5.96
20.70%
0.96%
Low Contested Risk
5.94
20.69%
2.36%
Low Contested Risk
5.88
20.20%
0.00%
Low Contested Risk
5.87
19.72%
0.46%
Low Contested Risk
5.94
18.18%
0.00%
Low Contested Risk
6.11
17.33%
1.00%
Low Contested Risk
5.97
12.34%
0.65%
Low Contested Risk
6.49
10.24%
0.00%
Low Contested Risk
6.37
6.34%
0.00%
Low Contested Risk
2.97
Avg Place
82.90%
Top 4 Rate
20.19%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
2.86
Avg Place
82.32%
Top 4 Rate
22.56%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.27
Avg Place
80.58%
Top 4 Rate
8.27%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.22
Avg Place
79.31%
Top 4 Rate
12.93%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.33
Avg Place
74.03%
Top 4 Rate
20.06%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.42
Avg Place
72.58%
Top 4 Rate
15.44%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.55
Avg Place
71.52%
Top 4 Rate
12.63%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.03
Avg Place
71.10%
Top 4 Rate
32.37%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.62
Avg Place
70.22%
Top 4 Rate
13.18%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.74
Avg Place
68.15%
Top 4 Rate
8.89%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.62
Avg Place
67.76%
Top 4 Rate
14.37%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.78
Avg Place
66.80%
Top 4 Rate
7.83%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.76
Avg Place
64.24%
Top 4 Rate
9.93%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.98
Avg Place
63.45%
Top 4 Rate
6.30%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.33
Avg Place
57.89%
Top 4 Rate
9.77%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.23
Avg Place
54.82%
Top 4 Rate
8.77%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.10
Avg Place
54.34%
Top 4 Rate
12.72%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.38
Avg Place
54.19%
Top 4 Rate
4.13%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.86
Avg Place
44.96%
Top 4 Rate
0.78%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.76
Avg Place
44.44%
Top 4 Rate
0.85%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.81
Avg Place
43.16%
Top 4 Rate
5.03%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.86
Avg Place
42.75%
Top 4 Rate
3.86%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.87
Avg Place
41.23%
Top 4 Rate
5.26%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.03
Avg Place
39.64%
Top 4 Rate
4.50%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.96
Avg Place
39.32%
Top 4 Rate
6.84%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.31
Avg Place
33.10%
Top 4 Rate
5.63%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.18
Avg Place
30.52%
Top 4 Rate
7.14%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.62
Avg Place
29.60%
Top 4 Rate
3.14%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.55
Avg Place
29.32%
Top 4 Rate
3.61%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.51
Avg Place
29.11%
Top 4 Rate
2.53%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.24
Avg Place
28.68%
Top 4 Rate
0.78%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.68
Avg Place
27.42%
Top 4 Rate
0.81%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.74
Avg Place
26.17%
Top 4 Rate
0.67%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.88
Avg Place
20.20%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.87
Avg Place
19.72%
Top 4 Rate
0.46%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Thief's Gloves Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best team comp for Thief's Gloves in TFT Set 17?

The best team comp featuring Thief's Gloves in TFT Set 17 achieves a 87.31% win rate with a 0.06% pick rate. This composition uses Challenger, N.O.V.A., and Brawler traits and is picked in 0.06% of games featuring Thief's Gloves.

How many team comps use Thief's Gloves in TFT?

There are 55 viable team compositions that commonly build Thief's Gloves in TFT Set 17. Thief's Gloves appears in comps with an average win rate of 46.45% across 27,450 total matches analyzed.

Which comp uses Thief's Gloves most often in TFT?

The most popular comp for Thief's Gloves in TFT Set 17 uses the Rogue, Meeple, and Fateweaver traits with a 2.49% pick rate. This composition achieves a 43.16% win rate and average placement of 4.81.

What traits work well with Thief's Gloves in TFT?

The best traits that synergize with Thief's Gloves in TFT Set 17 are Challenger, N.O.V.A., Brawler, Marauder, Gun Goddess, Bastion, Redeemer, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Thief's Gloves team compositions.