Sparring GlovesTFT Team Comps
Team compositions using Sparring Gloves in TFT Set 16.12. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Sparring Gloves as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 63 viable team comps currently building Sparring Gloves, with an average win rate of 47.48% across all compositions. The highest performing Sparring Gloves comp achieves a 92.56% win rate, primarily featuring Party Animal, Eradicator, Sniper traits with Blitzcrank as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Sparring Gloves is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
2.29 | 92.56% | 39.12% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.09 | 77.72% | 23.58% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.43 | 77.60% | 10.39% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.23 | 76.91% | 17.27% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.46 | 75.64% | 9.52% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.28 | 75.60% | 16.76% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.28 | 74.89% | 22.80% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.45 | 74.28% | 12.22% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.57 | 70.15% | 12.69% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.52 | 69.90% | 16.68% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.58 | 69.64% | 12.87% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.70 | 69.39% | 10.03% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.63 | 67.83% | 19.33% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.74 | 67.18% | 11.45% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.90 | 66.58% | 8.22% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.71 | 66.22% | 13.78% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.91 | 65.48% | 7.80% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.80 | 64.22% | 13.04% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.71 | 63.71% | 17.37% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.85 | 63.39% | 8.46% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.11 | 60.98% | 7.93% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.23 | 59.56% | 6.01% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.22 | 58.29% | 8.06% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.07 | 58.17% | 9.17% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.12 | 58.16% | 9.18% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.99 | 57.73% | 14.09% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.44 | 55.49% | 3.30% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.13 | 55.47% | 9.67% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.51 | 53.52% | 8.92% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.35 | 52.56% | 9.92% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.62 | 49.23% | 6.15% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.51 | 49.12% | 3.85% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.78 | 45.90% | 7.10% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.90 | 40.96% | 4.69% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.87 | 40.20% | 3.02% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.03 | 38.32% | 9.01% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.11 | 36.70% | 2.75% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.38 | 36.28% | 0.93% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.15 | 35.79% | 4.30% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.32 | 34.62% | 3.57% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.07 | 34.35% | 4.67% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.09 | 34.04% | 3.95% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.23 | 33.93% | 1.79% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.07 | 33.74% | 3.91% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.23 | 32.19% | 2.40% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.48 | 31.01% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.41 | 29.70% | 2.26% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.58 | 28.33% | 1.71% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.59 | 28.08% | 2.56% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.58 | 27.48% | 1.91% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.50 | 27.27% | 0.48% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.65 | 26.67% | 4.29% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.62 | 26.13% | 2.81% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.90 | 22.16% | 2.10% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.91 | 21.57% | 2.30% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.93 | 21.12% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.88 | 20.91% | 1.82% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.87 | 20.77% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.82 | 20.53% | 3.16% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.99 | 19.64% | 1.16% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.80 | 18.70% | 1.25% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.43 | 14.51% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.37 | 12.24% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Sparring Gloves Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Sparring Gloves in TFT Set 17?
The best team comp featuring Sparring Gloves in TFT Set 17 achieves a 92.56% win rate with a 0.10% pick rate. This composition uses Party Animal, Eradicator, and Sniper traits and is picked in 0.10% of games featuring Sparring Gloves.
How many team comps use Sparring Gloves in TFT?
There are 63 viable team compositions that commonly build Sparring Gloves in TFT Set 17. Sparring Gloves appears in comps with an average win rate of 47.48% across 52,593 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Sparring Gloves most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Sparring Gloves in TFT Set 17 uses the Replicator, N.O.V.A., and Fateweaver traits with a 1.55% pick rate. This composition achieves a 74.89% win rate and average placement of 3.28.
What traits work well with Sparring Gloves in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Sparring Gloves in TFT Set 17 are Party Animal, Eradicator, Sniper, Vanguard, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Sparring Gloves team compositions.