Swainvs Cassiopeia
Swain vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Cassiopeia wins with a 81.8% win rate (+63.6%) over Swain based on 11 games. Cassiopeia holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Swain build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Swain Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Swain performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Cassiopeia(18.2%)Who Wins the Swain vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Swain vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 11 recent matches analyzed, Cassiopeia wins with a 81.8% win rate compared to Swain's 18.2%, giving Cassiopeia a 63.6 percentage point advantage. Cassiopeia dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Swain players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Swain leads by 426 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Cassiopeia has a strong advantage in this matchup. Swain players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Cassiopeia overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Swain vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Cassiopeia is favored during the laning phase against Swain, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Cassiopeia holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Swain Build Against Cassiopeia
Mercury's Treads is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Swain needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Swain against Cassiopeia are Your Cut, Zhonya's Hourglass and Rylai's Crystal Scepter. This combination gives Swain an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Swain28.6%Cassiopeia71.4%Swain0.0%Cassiopeia100.0%Cassiopeia dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 71.4% win rate — a 42.9 percentage point lead over Swain. This lopsided early game means Cassiopeia can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Cassiopeia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Swain. Extended games heavily favor Cassiopeia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Cassiopeia holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Swain players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Swain Runes Against Cassiopeia
Precision
Sorcery
The Precision and Sorcery rune setup gives Swain the best tools to compete against Cassiopeia in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Swain matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Swain's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Swain build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.46% | 164 | 2.4 | 666 | 10,149 | 41.9% | 41.2% | |
| 50.00% | 148 | 1.7 | 717 | 9,723 | 46.6% | 53.3% | |
| 44.06% | 143 | 1.8 | 643 | 9,297 | 45.7% | 42.5% | |
| 49.25% | 134 | 1.7 | 721 | 9,988 | 52.9% | 45.3% | |
| 51.28% | 117 | 1.9 | 738 | 10,785 | 56.8% | 48.8% | |
| 54.05% | 111 | 2.0 | 641 | 9,692 | 51.0% | 56.5% | |
| 51.38% | 109 | 2.4 | 787 | 10,529 | 63.4% | 44.1% | |
| 41.35% | 104 | 1.7 | 749 | 10,275 | 38.1% | 43.5% | |
| 41.75% | 103 | 2.6 | 724 | 10,126 | 32.5% | 47.6% | |
| 41.49% | 94 | 6.0 | 849 | 12,533 | 46.1% | 38.2% | |
| 46.15% | 91 | 3.8 | 724 | 10,857 | 38.5% | 51.9% | |
| 46.59% | 88 | 1.8 | 692 | 9,610 | 38.1% | 54.4% | |
| 40.51% | 79 | 1.8 | 618 | 9,242 | 41.7% | 39.5% | |
| 65.82% | 79 | 6.1 | 886 | 11,304 | 61.1% | 69.8% | |
| 47.44% | 78 | 2.5 | 989 | 10,316 | 45.5% | 48.9% | |
| 41.56% | 77 | 3.1 | 701 | 10,352 | 20.0% | 51.9% | |
| 46.75% | 77 | 1.8 | 760 | 9,982 | 56.4% | 36.8% | |
| 37.84% | 74 | 5.3 | 948 | 12,093 | 41.9% | 34.9% | |
| 41.67% | 72 | 4.9 | 795 | 11,905 | 39.4% | 43.6% | |
| 47.89% | 71 | 1.8 | 679 | 9,692 | 42.9% | 52.8% | |
| 46.27% | 67 | 1.9 | 777 | 10,361 | 46.7% | 46.0% | |
| 53.03% | 66 | 6.0 | 857 | 10,942 | 58.1% | 48.6% | |
| 43.94% | 66 | 2.3 | 687 | 10,225 | 40.7% | 46.1% | |
| 53.97% | 63 | 6.3 | 921 | 12,040 | 42.4% | 66.7% | |
| 60.66% | 61 | 6.5 | 885 | 12,437 | 72.2% | 44.0% | |
| 46.67% | 60 | 2.2 | 661 | 10,256 | 46.1% | 47.1% | |
| 47.46% | 59 | 1.7 | 664 | 9,953 | 56.3% | 37.0% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 4.9 | 867 | 11,551 | 54.5% | 54.3% | |
| 50.00% | 56 | 6.3 | 895 | 12,270 | 48.0% | 51.6% | |
| 50.00% | 56 | 2.3 | 771 | 10,843 | 43.5% | 54.5% | |
| 55.56% | 54 | 1.6 | 650 | 10,283 | 61.9% | 51.5% | |
| 41.18% | 51 | 6.0 | 961 | 11,452 | 50.0% | 35.5% | |
| 47.06% | 51 | 1.6 | 682 | 9,357 | 43.3% | 52.4% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 6.0 | 1,009 | 12,622 | 56.0% | 32.0% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 6.3 | 910 | 11,603 | 46.4% | 55.0% | |
| 39.58% | 48 | 6.3 | 891 | 12,258 | 45.5% | 34.6% | |
| 60.42% | 48 | 1.9 | 851 | 10,014 | 60.9% | 60.0% | |
| 56.82% | 44 | 1.9 | 588 | 9,073 | 60.0% | 52.6% | |
| 56.82% | 44 | 4.9 | 843 | 10,770 | 60.9% | 52.4% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 6.0 | 853 | 10,899 | 45.0% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 1.9 | 754 | 10,447 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 3.5 | 806 | 11,030 | 75.0% | 39.1% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 6.0 | 945 | 10,705 | 66.7% | 47.6% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 5.7 | 884 | 12,010 | 58.8% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 36 | 5.8 | 1,048 | 11,233 | 55.6% | 33.3% | |
| 72.22% | 36 | 2.9 | 786 | 9,845 | 81.8% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 35 | 6.2 | 842 | 10,617 | 35.3% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 2.2 | 735 | 10,498 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 1.9 | 814 | 10,264 | 53.9% | 35.0% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 1.6 | 620 | 9,527 | 46.7% | 52.9% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 6.0 | 750 | 10,369 | 58.8% | 35.7% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 4.0 | 706 | 10,115 | 46.1% | 44.4% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 5.5 | 969 | 12,087 | 61.5% | 47.1% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 4.8 | 1,010 | 11,496 | 61.5% | 29.4% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 2.0 | 730 | 10,812 | 57.1% | 36.4% | |
| 37.93% | 29 | 5.5 | 805 | 12,400 | 57.1% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 6.1 | 945 | 12,414 | 63.6% | 41.2% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 6.1 | 871 | 9,911 | 52.9% | 54.5% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 5.8 | 832 | 11,546 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.0 | 957 | 12,731 | 53.3% | 38.5% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 6.3 | 826 | 11,482 | 68.8% | 54.5% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 4.9 | 903 | 11,071 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 1.6 | 720 | 9,442 | 84.6% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 2.0 | 723 | 9,979 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 5.3 | 957 | 10,440 | 54.5% | 60.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 3.9 | 669 | 9,523 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 5.4 | 951 | 10,616 | 72.7% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 2.0 | 776 | 11,220 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 4.3 | 919 | 10,878 | 46.1% | 50.0% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 5.7 | 1,085 | 13,800 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 5.7 | 943 | 10,608 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 5.7 | 898 | 13,151 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 5.2 | 993 | 11,858 | 62.5% | 25.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 5.3 | 700 | 10,294 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.3 | 1,011 | 12,691 | 71.4% | 53.9% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 6.0 | 989 | 12,571 | 72.7% | 66.7% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 6.2 | 884 | 12,421 | 62.5% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 5.8 | 832 | 12,205 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 5.8 | 883 | 10,751 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 5.9 | 968 | 10,033 | 55.6% | 55.6% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.0 | 933 | 10,577 | 54.5% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.1 | 907 | 12,986 | 50.0% | 87.5% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.9 | 962 | 14,123 | 83.3% | 54.5% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.1 | 906 | 13,028 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 5.9 | 1,055 | 11,430 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 1.7 | 645 | 9,405 | 75.0% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.8 | 713 | 9,821 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 5.7 | 769 | 10,428 | 45.5% | 20.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 3.9 | 736 | 9,967 | 87.5% | 37.5% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 6.0 | 1,008 | 11,824 | 77.8% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.9 | 921 | 14,725 | 100.0% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.5 | 851 | 11,454 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 5.1 | 795 | 9,372 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.6 | 684 | 9,736 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 6.7 | 885 | 12,778 | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.0 | 1,025 | 11,420 | 33.3% | 85.7% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.1 | 849 | 12,486 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.1 | 865 | 12,787 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 4.4 | 856 | 11,373 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.8 | 1,250 | 11,842 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 6.0 | 1,033 | 13,203 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.2 | 813 | 10,052 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.6 | 689 | 10,054 | 42.9% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.4 | 791 | 11,575 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 6.3 | 869 | 10,463 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.3 | 967 | 10,746 | 20.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.7 | 982 | 10,422 | 28.6% | 75.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.1 | 1,018 | 11,744 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 6.2 | 796 | 10,268 | 28.6% | 0.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.5 | 1,046 | 12,561 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 768 | 10,855 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 3.3 | 809 | 10,672 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.0 | 1,047 | 12,714 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.5 | 906 | 10,587 | 83.3% | 0.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.6 | 1,140 | 11,964 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.7 | 973 | 11,298 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 6.0 | 716 | 8,188 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 3.6 | 917 | 10,459 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.9 | 864 | 12,209 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.3 | 735 | 9,319 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 4.5 | 955 | 11,473 | 100.0% | 83.3% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 6.9 | 887 | 10,175 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.6 | 681 | 9,028 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.9 | 1,044 | 9,377 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.3 | 840 | 11,266 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.9 | 709 | 8,964 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.3 | 718 | 10,677 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.3 | 970 | 14,146 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 5.0 | 867 | 12,631 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.1 | 948 | 12,368 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 563 | 9,169 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,040 | 12,293 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.5 | 729 | 10,845 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 892 | 11,601 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 876 | 11,251 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.4 | 995 | 9,952 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 1,067 | 14,751 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 3.5 | 887 | 13,310 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 2.5 | 557 | 7,406 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 1,136 | 11,589 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Swain vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Swain do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Cassiopeia wins the Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 81.8% win rate compared to Swain's 18.2%, a 63.6 percentage point difference. This data is based on 11 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Swain do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Cassiopeia has the advantage against Swain with a 71.4% win rate versus 28.6%. Cassiopeia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Swain do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Cassiopeia takes over the Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Cassiopeia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Cassiopeia wins the matchup against Swain with a 81.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 63.6 percentage point advantage means Cassiopeia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 11 games analyzed.
What is the best Swain build against Cassiopeia?
The best Swain build against Cassiopeia includes Your Cut, Zhonya's Hourglass, Rylai's Crystal Scepter with Mercury's Treads. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Swain runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Swain runes against Cassiopeia use the Precision primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Swain counter Cassiopeia?
No, Swain struggles against Cassiopeia with only a 18.2% win rate. Cassiopeia has the advantage in this matchup. Swain players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Cassiopeia's lead.
How do I play Swain against Cassiopeia?
When playing Swain against Cassiopeia, play cautiously and avoid Cassiopeia's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Cassiopeia has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.