Swainvs Cassiopeia
Swain vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Swain wins with a 54.5% win rate (+9.1%) over Cassiopeia based on 11 games. Swain holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Swain build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Swain Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Swain performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Swain vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Swain vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 11 recent matches analyzed, Swain wins with a 54.5% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 45.5%, giving Swain a 9.1 percentage point advantage. Swain dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Cassiopeia players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Swain leads by 816 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Swain players can confidently pick into Cassiopeia and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Cassiopeia away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Swain vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Swain is favored during the laning phase against Cassiopeia, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Swain holds advantages in damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Swain Build Against Cassiopeia
Immortal Path is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Swain needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Swain against Cassiopeia are Riftmaker, Malignance and Frozen Heart. This combination gives Swain an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Cassiopeia. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Swain50.0%
Cassiopeia50.0%Swain57.1%Cassiopeia42.9%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Swain and Cassiopeia, with Swain holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Swain is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 57.1% win rate — 14.3 points above Cassiopeia. Extended games heavily favor Swain, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Swain holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Cassiopeia players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Swain Runes Against Cassiopeia
Domination
Precision
Running Domination primary with Precision secondary allows Swain to press their advantage against Cassiopeia, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Swain matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Swain's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Swain build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.15% | 237 | 2.0 | 657 | 9,786 | 45.2% | 45.1% | |
| 49.12% | 228 | 2.3 | 676 | 10,006 | 46.4% | 51.7% | |
| 60.84% | 166 | 1.8 | 770 | 9,842 | 70.4% | 51.8% | |
| 54.66% | 161 | 1.7 | 745 | 9,169 | 57.9% | 51.8% | |
| 63.13% | 160 | 1.9 | 824 | 10,248 | 62.5% | 63.8% | |
| 48.34% | 151 | 2.1 | 674 | 9,575 | 50.8% | 46.7% | |
| 45.77% | 142 | 3.0 | 750 | 10,946 | 43.4% | 47.2% | |
| 44.63% | 121 | 2.3 | 750 | 10,358 | 47.2% | 42.6% | |
| 52.38% | 105 | 1.8 | 674 | 9,159 | 45.6% | 60.4% | |
| 44.33% | 97 | 2.3 | 670 | 9,848 | 43.8% | 44.9% | |
| 50.00% | 96 | 5.9 | 857 | 12,381 | 47.5% | 51.8% | |
| 44.09% | 93 | 1.8 | 640 | 8,647 | 40.8% | 47.7% | |
| 58.70% | 92 | 5.1 | 875 | 12,107 | 60.4% | 56.8% | |
| 55.95% | 84 | 2.5 | 805 | 10,795 | 58.1% | 54.7% | |
| 53.66% | 82 | 6.0 | 1,048 | 13,238 | 63.0% | 49.1% | |
| 55.56% | 81 | 1.9 | 884 | 9,301 | 53.9% | 57.1% | |
| 59.74% | 77 | 6.0 | 929 | 12,205 | 74.3% | 47.6% | |
| 51.35% | 74 | 5.9 | 912 | 11,782 | 58.8% | 45.0% | |
| 54.05% | 74 | 1.8 | 781 | 9,663 | 59.0% | 48.6% | |
| 54.79% | 73 | 3.0 | 692 | 10,424 | 61.3% | 50.0% | |
| 54.79% | 73 | 5.5 | 896 | 12,700 | 62.1% | 50.0% | |
| 54.17% | 72 | 3.1 | 784 | 10,619 | 58.6% | 51.2% | |
| 33.33% | 72 | 1.7 | 630 | 9,578 | 44.4% | 26.7% | |
| 46.15% | 65 | 1.7 | 729 | 9,202 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 46.88% | 64 | 1.8 | 716 | 10,191 | 30.4% | 56.1% | |
| 59.68% | 62 | 5.4 | 881 | 11,666 | 67.9% | 52.9% | |
| 56.45% | 62 | 1.8 | 851 | 10,103 | 77.4% | 35.5% | |
| 52.46% | 61 | 1.8 | 742 | 11,198 | 40.0% | 61.1% | |
| 47.54% | 61 | 1.6 | 687 | 9,137 | 37.5% | 58.6% | |
| 60.00% | 60 | 5.0 | 792 | 11,352 | 56.5% | 62.2% | |
| 51.67% | 60 | 1.7 | 664 | 10,177 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 47.37% | 57 | 1.9 | 643 | 10,211 | 52.6% | 44.7% | |
| 51.79% | 56 | 5.8 | 912 | 11,210 | 60.0% | 45.2% | |
| 47.27% | 55 | 6.2 | 1,009 | 11,852 | 45.8% | 48.4% | |
| 46.30% | 54 | 4.7 | 954 | 10,129 | 43.3% | 50.0% | |
| 46.30% | 54 | 2.5 | 837 | 11,216 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 53.85% | 52 | 1.9 | 616 | 10,562 | 52.4% | 54.8% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 1.8 | 856 | 9,637 | 54.2% | 35.7% | |
| 55.77% | 52 | 1.8 | 732 | 9,467 | 42.1% | 63.6% | |
| 32.00% | 50 | 5.9 | 842 | 10,853 | 16.7% | 40.6% | |
| 42.86% | 49 | 5.9 | 883 | 12,597 | 38.9% | 45.2% | |
| 54.17% | 48 | 5.9 | 807 | 10,932 | 59.1% | 50.0% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 2.0 | 816 | 9,579 | 54.5% | 38.5% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 2.0 | 719 | 9,490 | 72.7% | 32.0% | |
| 50.00% | 46 | 6.2 | 881 | 12,760 | 52.6% | 48.1% | |
| 58.14% | 43 | 5.3 | 866 | 11,035 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 53.49% | 43 | 5.7 | 794 | 10,307 | 54.5% | 52.4% | |
| 47.62% | 42 | 5.0 | 828 | 10,902 | 38.9% | 54.2% | |
| 60.00% | 40 | 5.7 | 993 | 11,838 | 44.4% | 72.7% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 6.5 | 836 | 11,192 | 44.4% | 64.7% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 1.8 | 646 | 9,594 | 69.2% | 31.8% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 4.6 | 919 | 11,034 | 60.0% | 30.4% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 5.9 | 997 | 12,173 | 52.4% | 36.4% | |
| 29.03% | 31 | 1.7 | 800 | 8,923 | 26.7% | 31.3% | |
| 33.33% | 30 | 5.8 | 762 | 11,517 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 5.7 | 969 | 12,296 | 42.9% | 60.9% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 5.5 | 978 | 11,137 | 50.0% | 61.1% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 2.1 | 763 | 9,568 | 50.0% | 61.1% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 5.7 | 971 | 12,429 | 70.0% | 42.1% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 6.3 | 760 | 10,435 | 35.7% | 71.4% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 4.7 | 910 | 11,817 | 62.5% | 41.7% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 5.3 | 1,046 | 11,933 | 36.4% | 52.9% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 5.7 | 891 | 12,452 | 33.3% | 35.7% | |
| 72.00% | 25 | 6.0 | 946 | 11,973 | 69.2% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 5.5 | 759 | 9,163 | 53.9% | 66.7% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 6.1 | 950 | 13,153 | 44.4% | 62.5% | |
| 33.33% | 24 | 6.0 | 968 | 11,947 | 37.5% | 31.3% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 2.1 | 733 | 11,523 | 55.6% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 24 | 6.5 | 806 | 9,749 | 30.8% | 36.4% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 5.6 | 870 | 9,034 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 6.6 | 884 | 12,858 | 76.9% | 40.0% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 5.6 | 886 | 9,684 | 57.1% | 55.6% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 4.1 | 1,057 | 10,124 | 40.0% | 30.8% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 4.6 | 943 | 11,045 | 60.0% | 42.9% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 5.6 | 792 | 11,489 | 83.3% | 43.8% | |
| 77.27% | 22 | 2.0 | 777 | 10,115 | 75.0% | 78.6% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 4.2 | 807 | 11,666 | 50.0% | 64.3% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.0 | 896 | 13,025 | 55.6% | 41.7% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 3.6 | 687 | 9,781 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.1 | 1,200 | 11,161 | 58.3% | 33.3% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 4.2 | 824 | 9,501 | 41.7% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 5.6 | 972 | 11,396 | 72.7% | 60.0% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 918 | 10,373 | 70.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 6.1 | 803 | 13,000 | 57.1% | 58.3% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 4.9 | 904 | 10,867 | 50.0% | 23.1% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.5 | 1,102 | 14,560 | 75.0% | 46.1% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 5.6 | 656 | 10,742 | 55.6% | 12.5% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 6.6 | 968 | 11,303 | 75.0% | 62.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.6 | 825 | 12,639 | 71.4% | 62.5% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 5.3 | 907 | 11,206 | 57.1% | 62.5% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 1.8 | 665 | 9,056 | 50.0% | 11.1% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 5.0 | 1,007 | 10,962 | 100.0% | 63.6% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 4.9 | 842 | 10,936 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.1 | 835 | 10,996 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.4 | 942 | 11,361 | 85.7% | 50.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.1 | 669 | 9,152 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.9 | 1,056 | 12,331 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 5.8 | 899 | 10,571 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 5.4 | 732 | 10,219 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.6 | 925 | 12,286 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.3 | 756 | 9,810 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 84.62% | 13 | 5.7 | 1,111 | 10,308 | 100.0% | 71.4% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 6.0 | 977 | 12,689 | 40.0% | 12.5% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.7 | 855 | 7,143 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.8 | 796 | 11,258 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.8 | 803 | 11,675 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.7 | 1,036 | 11,304 | 100.0% | 37.5% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.6 | 919 | 8,999 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 6.1 | 1,004 | 12,665 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.7 | 1,008 | 12,544 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.5 | 882 | 10,298 | 83.3% | 20.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 5.0 | 865 | 10,399 | 50.0% | 14.3% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 4.9 | 930 | 12,519 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.0 | 879 | 10,082 | 20.0% | 80.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 3.8 | 654 | 9,889 | 20.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 990 | 12,037 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.2 | 787 | 10,266 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 2.5 | 912 | 10,807 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 1,125 | 12,227 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.1 | 895 | 9,897 | 57.1% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 707 | 10,047 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 5.8 | 876 | 10,491 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.9 | 873 | 10,865 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.4 | 1,089 | 13,619 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.7 | 731 | 11,944 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 1.8 | 661 | 8,244 | 25.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.6 | 928 | 11,608 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.9 | 1,252 | 9,586 | 20.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.4 | 822 | 11,683 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.6 | 798 | 9,870 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.9 | 853 | 11,833 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.7 | 778 | 9,831 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.9 | 1,134 | 11,590 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.9 | 641 | 10,907 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.5 | 911 | 12,990 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.5 | 853 | 10,946 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.8 | 770 | 9,475 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 814 | 9,823 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 776 | 13,000 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 856 | 10,501 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 833 | 12,008 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Swain vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Swain do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Swain wins the Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 54.5% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 45.5%, a 9.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 11 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Swain do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Swain has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Swain players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Swain do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Swain takes over the Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 57.1% win rate compared to 42.9%. Swain scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Swain wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 54.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 9.1 percentage point advantage means Swain is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 11 games analyzed.
What is the best Swain build against Cassiopeia?
The best Swain build against Cassiopeia includes Riftmaker, Malignance, Frozen Heart with Immortal Path. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Swain runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Swain runes against Cassiopeia use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Swain vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Swain counter Cassiopeia?
Yes, Swain has a favorable matchup against Cassiopeia with a 54.5% win rate. Swain strongly counters Cassiopeia in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Swain against Cassiopeia?
When playing Swain against Cassiopeia, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.