
Aniviavs Quinn
Anivia vs Quinn is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Quinn wins with a 52.9% win rate (+5.9%) over Anivia based on 17 games. Anivia wins the early laning phase while Quinn scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Anivia vs Quinn matchup.
Anivia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Anivia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Anivia vs Quinn Matchup?

Anivia vs Quinn Matchup Summary
The Anivia vs Quinn matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 17 recent matches analyzed, Quinn wins with a 52.9% win rate compared to Anivia's 47.1%, giving Quinn a 5.9 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Anivia controls the early laning stage, but Quinn outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Anivia needs to press advantages before Quinn reaches their power spikes, while Quinn should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Anivia leads by 0.6s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Quinn is slightly favored, Anivia can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Quinn's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Anivia vs Quinn Laning Phase Breakdown
Anivia is favored during the laning phase against Quinn, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Anivia holds advantages in farming, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Anivia Build Against Quinn
Armored Advance is the optimal boots choice against Quinn, providing the mobility and stats Anivia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Anivia against Quinn are Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment and Zhonya's Hourglass. This combination gives Anivia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build has a 33.3% win rate across 3 games. While the overall matchup may be difficult, this item path gives Anivia the best chance to compete against Quinn. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Anivia vs Quinn matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Anivia and Quinn, with Anivia holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Quinn is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 55.6% win rate — 11.1 points above Anivia. Extended games heavily favor Quinn, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Anivia has the edge early, but Quinn gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Anivia Runes Against Quinn
The Sorcery and Precision rune setup gives Anivia the best tools to compete against Quinn in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Anivia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Anivia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.31% | 93 | 6.8 | 676 | 11,903 | 46.9% | 47.5% | |
| 46.07% | 89 | 6.5 | 713 | 11,056 | 40.5% | 51.1% | |
| 41.25% | 80 | 6.4 | 795 | 10,969 | 44.8% | 39.2% | |
| 48.61% | 72 | 6.6 | 703 | 10,946 | 57.1% | 43.2% | |
| 42.25% | 71 | 4.9 | 666 | 11,325 | 50.0% | 38.3% | |
| 47.06% | 68 | 6.5 | 653 | 10,645 | 44.1% | 50.0% | |
| 51.61% | 62 | 6.3 | 680 | 10,892 | 50.0% | 52.5% | |
| 47.37% | 57 | 6.5 | 780 | 12,350 | 55.0% | 43.2% | |
| 58.93% | 56 | 6.5 | 827 | 11,500 | 63.2% | 56.8% | |
| 55.36% | 56 | 6.7 | 723 | 11,059 | 51.9% | 58.6% | |
| 50.91% | 55 | 6.6 | 786 | 11,910 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 51.92% | 52 | 6.8 | 836 | 10,680 | 60.9% | 44.8% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 4.8 | 757 | 12,238 | 42.9% | 52.9% | |
| 45.65% | 46 | 6.5 | 780 | 11,921 | 50.0% | 43.3% | |
| 43.48% | 46 | 6.2 | 725 | 11,939 | 64.3% | 34.4% | |
| 48.84% | 43 | 2.0 | 532 | 9,733 | 47.1% | 50.0% | |
| 60.47% | 43 | 5.7 | 801 | 12,109 | 64.7% | 57.7% | |
| 46.15% | 39 | 6.5 | 737 | 10,153 | 47.6% | 44.4% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 6.5 | 717 | 10,383 | 47.4% | 44.4% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 6.2 | 716 | 10,616 | 50.0% | 42.1% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 6.5 | 768 | 11,348 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 35.29% | 34 | 6.2 | 679 | 11,362 | 25.0% | 40.9% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 2.1 | 603 | 9,967 | 40.0% | 68.4% | |
| 65.63% | 32 | 6.8 | 655 | 10,672 | 69.2% | 63.2% | |
| 35.48% | 31 | 6.5 | 711 | 11,280 | 53.9% | 22.2% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 5.5 | 643 | 10,741 | 64.3% | 43.8% | |
| 62.07% | 29 | 6.6 | 853 | 12,009 | 50.0% | 76.9% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 6.8 | 771 | 10,721 | 30.8% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 6.8 | 780 | 12,033 | 30.0% | 70.6% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.4 | 796 | 10,445 | 37.5% | 54.5% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 1.9 | 690 | 10,565 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 6.3 | 760 | 10,797 | 54.5% | 60.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 6.6 | 755 | 10,801 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 6.6 | 764 | 10,654 | 54.5% | 53.3% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 7.0 | 854 | 11,386 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 2.3 | 612 | 8,781 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.5 | 664 | 11,319 | 28.6% | 58.8% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 7.1 | 709 | 9,233 | 42.9% | 30.0% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 7.1 | 766 | 11,990 | 37.5% | 37.5% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.8 | 500 | 9,703 | 55.6% | 53.3% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 3.1 | 658 | 11,606 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 73.91% | 23 | 6.1 | 756 | 12,006 | 66.7% | 76.5% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 6.2 | 855 | 11,004 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.3 | 809 | 12,115 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 7.2 | 947 | 11,029 | 80.0% | 36.4% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 6.1 | 809 | 11,130 | 75.0% | 38.5% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.7 | 682 | 11,735 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 6.0 | 965 | 13,084 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 6.7 | 725 | 10,745 | 61.5% | 71.4% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.2 | 750 | 12,924 | 33.3% | 53.9% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.8 | 717 | 10,644 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 2.8 | 642 | 9,820 | 55.6% | 30.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 4.8 | 591 | 9,793 | 62.5% | 45.5% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 6.7 | 588 | 8,908 | 27.3% | 57.1% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.0 | 945 | 11,528 | 20.0% | 53.9% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 6.8 | 811 | 12,984 | 66.7% | 41.7% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.8 | 872 | 12,701 | 66.7% | 27.3% | |
| 23.53% | 17 | 2.6 | 527 | 10,327 | 40.0% | 16.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 6.4 | 817 | 11,676 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.0 | 646 | 12,101 | 25.0% | 53.9% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.5 | 771 | 12,828 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 2.5 | 581 | 9,571 | 0.0% | 54.5% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 1.7 | 619 | 10,793 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.6 | 831 | 11,385 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 7.0 | 707 | 10,497 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.1 | 678 | 9,837 | 71.4% | 25.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 3.5 | 538 | 8,176 | 44.4% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 3.8 | 918 | 10,449 | 57.1% | 62.5% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.6 | 799 | 11,851 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 2.8 | 614 | 10,379 | 75.0% | 45.5% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.3 | 521 | 9,461 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.5 | 778 | 11,374 | 71.4% | 62.5% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 3.5 | 793 | 11,485 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.5 | 852 | 11,153 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 6.4 | 619 | 10,768 | 42.9% | 14.3% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 6.0 | 726 | 10,929 | 88.9% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.9 | 564 | 9,575 | 57.1% | 42.9% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.4 | 821 | 10,913 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 6.5 | 862 | 12,063 | 100.0% | 27.3% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 2.5 | 559 | 8,697 | 57.1% | 20.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.6 | 766 | 12,170 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.6 | 820 | 10,546 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 5.9 | 758 | 10,844 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.1 | 669 | 9,141 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 785 | 10,222 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.2 | 775 | 11,504 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 660 | 10,316 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.1 | 419 | 9,628 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 726 | 9,535 | 20.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 757 | 11,433 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 2.5 | 756 | 11,344 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.5 | 681 | 11,561 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.4 | 601 | 10,407 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.0 | 574 | 7,284 | 80.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.2 | 744 | 12,065 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.6 | 704 | 10,293 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.7 | 862 | 14,288 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 7.1 | 802 | 13,473 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.8 | 606 | 9,073 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.4 | 665 | 10,014 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 2.1 | 472 | 9,347 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.1 | 694 | 12,194 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.8 | 520 | 9,488 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.0 | 617 | 9,440 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 6.8 | 719 | 12,752 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.2 | 664 | 11,527 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.8 | 800 | 12,586 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.9 | 810 | 9,756 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 3.6 | 937 | 12,475 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.8 | 567 | 9,507 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.9 | 618 | 8,483 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 8.4 | 1,169 | 13,216 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 576 | 7,798 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.5 | 1,101 | 13,357 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.5 | 528 | 9,785 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 592 | 12,288 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 681 | 11,536 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.1 | 563 | 10,179 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.7 | 703 | 9,246 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 786 | 8,576 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 895 | 10,194 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Anivia vs Quinn - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Anivia do against Quinn in League of Legends?
Quinn wins the Anivia vs Quinn matchup with a 52.9% win rate compared to Anivia's 47.1%, a 5.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 17 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Anivia do against Quinn in the early game?
In the early game, Anivia has the advantage against Quinn with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Anivia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Anivia do against Quinn in the late game?
In the late game, Quinn takes over the Anivia vs Quinn matchup with a 55.6% win rate compared to 44.4%. Quinn scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Anivia vs Quinn matchup?
Quinn wins the matchup against Anivia with a 52.9% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 5.9 percentage point advantage means Quinn is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 17 games analyzed.
What is the best Anivia build against Quinn?
The best Anivia build against Quinn includes Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment, Zhonya's Hourglass with Armored Advance. This build achieves a 33.3% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Anivia runes against Quinn?
The best Anivia runes against Quinn use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Anivia vs Quinn matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Anivia counter Quinn?
No, Anivia struggles against Quinn with only a 47.1% win rate. Quinn has the advantage in this matchup. Anivia players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Quinn's lead.
How do I play Anivia against Quinn?
When playing Anivia against Quinn, play cautiously and avoid Quinn's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Quinn has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.