#|mp|#Rem
Winrate
50.9%
Mecze
5,139
KDA
3.25
Obrażenia graczom
24,905

#|mp|#Rem vs Paradoksvs Paradoks

Poziom umiejętnościWszystkie poziomy umiejętności
Mecze19,170
Wersja6430
Ostatnia aktualizacja10 kwi 2026

Starcie #|mp|#Rem vs Paradoks jest niezwykle bliskie z 50.9% vs 49.2% procent wygranych w 5,139 meczach. Paradoks ma niewielką przewagę w kill-death ratio. Indywidualna umiejętność i pozycjonowanie określą wynik bardziej niż wybór bohatera w tym wyrównaniu starciu.

#|mp|#Rem Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how #|mp|#Rem performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
Paradoks - 50.9% win rateParadoks(50.9%)
#|mp|#Rem - 50.9% win rate in this matchup
#|mp|#Rem
50.9% WR
VS
Paradoks vs #|mp|#Rem matchup - 49.2% win rate
Paradoks
49.2% WR

Who Wins the #|mp|#Rem vs Paradoks Matchup?

#|mp|#Rem wins the #|mp|#Rem vs Paradoks matchup
Winner
#|mp|#Rem
Matches: 5,139
50.9%
Win Rate
49.2%
3.9
Avg Kills
5.1
5.6
Avg Deaths
6.6
14.4
Avg Assists
12.7
43,614
Avg Net Worth
42,542
24,905
Player DMG
34,597
5,097
Objective DMG
5,288
89.2
Last Hits
101.9

#|mp|#Rem vs Paradoks Podsumowanie starcia

The #|mp|#Rem vs Paradoks matchup in Deadlock is relatywnie zbalansowane starcie z lekką przewagą. Based on 5,139 recent matches analyzed, #|mp|#Rem wins with a 50.9% win rate compared to Paradoks's 49.2%, giving #|mp|#Rem a 1.7 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where Paradoks consistently outperforms. #|mp|#Rem has a small statistical advantage, but Paradoks can absolutely win through smart play. The margin is thin enough that jungle rotations, team coordination, and mechanical outplays will often determine the outcome more than champion select.

#|mp|#Rem vs Paradoks Analiza walki

Paradoks wins combat stats against #|mp|#Rem in Deadlock

Paradoks edges out #|mp|#Rem in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 5,139 matches analyzed, this #|mp|#Rem vs Paradoks matchup remains contestable for both sides. #|mp|#Rem shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in #|mp|#Rem's favor.

Stosunek KDA
3.25#|mp|#Rem
2.69Paradoks
#|mp|#Rem demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Paradoks, maintaining a 3.25 KDA versus 2.69. This 0.56 point gap reflects #|mp|#Rem's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Paradoks players facing #|mp|#Rem should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate ability usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where #|mp|#Rem's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Śr. zabójstwa
3.9#|mp|#Rem
5.1Paradoks
Paradoks secures approximately 1.2 more kills per match than #|mp|#Rem in this head-to-head (5.1 vs 3.9). Over the course of a typical match, this translates to Paradoks contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Paradoks's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though #|mp|#Rem can compensate through superior objective focus, team fight positioning, or clutch performances.
Śr. śmierci
5.6#|mp|#Rem
6.6Paradoks
#|mp|#Rem demonstrates markedly better survivability against Paradoks, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives #|mp|#Rem significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. Paradoks players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
Obrażenia graczom
24,905#|mp|#Rem
34,597Paradoks
The damage differential between Paradoks and #|mp|#Rem is exceptional: 34,597 compared to just 24,905. Paradoks deals 9,691 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Paradoks's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while #|mp|#Rem struggles to even trade effectively. #|mp|#Rem players should treat Paradoks as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.
Obrażenia celom
5,097#|mp|#Rem
5,288Paradoks
Objective damage contribution is similar between #|mp|#Rem (5,097) and Paradoks (5,288). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

#|mp|#Rem vs Paradoks Analiza ekonomiczna

Wartość netto
43,614#|mp|#Rem
42,542Paradoks
Ostatnie trafienia
89.2#|mp|#Rem
101.9Paradoks

#|mp|#Rem generates approximately 1,072 more souls than Paradoks on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving #|mp|#Rem a mid-game advantage. Paradoks secures more last hits (101.9 vs 89.2), while Paradoks leads in denies (3.7 vs 2.6). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

Polecane przedmioty dla #|mp|#Rem vs Paradoks

#|mp|#Rem build for Paradoks matchup

#|mp|#Rem Build vs Paradoks

This winning build for #|mp|#Rem against Paradoks focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 50.9% win rate against Paradoks, these 7 items help #|mp|#Rem press the advantage and close out games efficiently. Szał Bitewny, Widmowe Uderzenie, Wędrowiec Woalu, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 38,400 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

Paradoks build for #|mp|#Rem matchup

Paradoks Build vs #|mp|#Rem

Paradoks's counter-build against #|mp|#Rem attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, Paradoks players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. Spirytualne Uderzenie, Uzdrawiające Tempo, Kolos, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 24,800 souls Knowing Paradoks's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

Te buildy przedmiotów są zoptymalizowane pod kątem starcia #|mp|#Rem vs Paradoks na podstawie danych o współczynniku wygranych z 5,139 meczów rankingowych. Wybory przedmiotów w Deadlock znacząco wpływają na wyniki starć — odpowiedni build może pomóc przezwyciężyć statystyczne niedogodności lub rozszerzyć istniejące przewagi. Pamiętaj o dostosowaniu buildu do stanu gry, składów drużyn, ekwipunku przeciwników i tego, czy jesteś z przodu czy z tyłu w duszach.

#|mp|#Rem ma korzystne starcia przeciwko 5 bohaterom i niekorzystne starcia przeciwko 32 bohaterom w Deadlock. Najsilniejsze starcie #|mp|#Rem jest przeciwko Holliday z 52.5% współczynnikiem wygranych. Najtrudniejsze starcie to #|mp|#Siódemka z 40.9% współczynnikiem wygranych. Użyj poniższej tabeli, aby znaleźć szczegóły starć i rekomendacje buildów.

#|mp|#Rem matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6430)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
42.59%13,2183.133.95.825,26143,103
40.93%11,6693.003.85.924,94042,526
45.86%10,0643.123.85.724,60343,204
50.37%9,7383.073.95.925,15543,437
43.67%9,3643.043.75.825,17242,901
41.66%9,3462.973.65.825,63542,259
49.47%9,2983.133.85.724,80042,829
40.85%8,7812.993.85.924,52942,461
46.59%8,5092.973.96.026,04343,602
46.57%8,3482.933.76.024,36342,788
45.94%8,2803.043.85.924,63542,627
46.64%7,6102.993.75.924,74442,639
51.09%7,4673.124.06.125,60943,165
46.67%7,4163.123.75.624,54942,162
50.65%7,1463.153.85.825,19943,517
48.42%7,0213.123.85.825,44342,999
45.30%6,8753.123.75.725,39843,337
45.08%6,8333.173.65.525,15442,639
49.15%6,3613.113.75.625,55243,161
48.89%6,1732.983.75.923,62442,751
48.69%5,9883.103.85.824,98742,737
47.12%5,9713.113.75.825,93542,671
45.97%5,8103.103.85.825,73142,487
48.79%5,3903.223.85.725,40143,961
43.69%5,3833.043.55.625,21242,319
47.64%5,2703.043.75.924,37242,480
50.89%5,1393.253.95.624,90543,614
49.38%4,6913.123.85.925,30144,007
46.43%4,6073.113.85.624,90243,476
48.48%4,5353.083.65.824,37542,557
44.22%4,5192.953.55.823,64842,096
44.55%4,4603.033.75.825,75142,816
49.56%4,3453.083.85.725,33943,153
47.56%3,6293.123.85.824,93842,876
49.68%3,4853.013.85.724,26043,402
52.53%3,3803.133.85.825,08143,643
49.98%2,9813.173.95.725,19043,037

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Pomóż nam utrzymać dokładność! Jeśli zauważysz nieprawidłowe statystyki, brakujące dane lub jakiekolwiek problemy, Twoja opinia bezpośrednio poprawia jakość naszych danych dla całej społeczności.

Zgłoś problem

#|mp|#Rem Matchupy - FAQ

Jaki jest najlepszy matchup #|mp|#Rem w Deadlock?

Najlepszy matchup #|mp|#Rem to przeciwko Holliday, osiągając 52.5% wskaźnik wygranych. #|mp|#Rem wyróżnia się w tym matchupie dzięki lepszym statystykom bojowym.

Jaki jest najtrudniejszy matchup #|mp|#Rem?

Najtrudniejszy matchup #|mp|#Rem to przeciwko #|mp|#Siódemka, z tylko 40.9% wskaźnikiem wygranych. Przeciwko temu przeciwnikowi #|mp|#Rem powinien skupić się na koordynacji drużynowej.

Ile korzystnych matchupów ma #|mp|#Rem?

#|mp|#Rem ma 5 korzystnych matchupów (50%+ wskaźnik wygranych) i 32 niekorzystnych matchupów w Deadlock.

Jak powinienem grać #|mp|#Rem w trudnych matchupach?

Grając #|mp|#Rem w trudnych matchupach, priorytetyzuj bezpieczne farmowanie, pozycjonowanie i koordynację drużynową. Dostosuj swój build, aby zrekompensować wadę.

Na jakich statystykach powinienem się skupić w matchupach #|mp|#Rem?

Kluczowe statystyki w matchupach #|mp|#Rem to wskaźnik wygranych, stosunek KDA, średnie obrażenia gracza i różnica net worth.