Most Popular TFT Team Compositions
This table displays the most commonly played TFT team compositions based on pick rate, showing current meta trends and popular strategies. Top 8-champion Set 17 compositions: Party Animal (12.7% WR, 6.2 avg), N.O.V.A. (21.0% WR, 5.9 avg), N.O.V.A. (29.6% WR, 5.5 avg). Party Animal/N.O.V.A. leads with 12.71% win rate and 6.24 average placement. N.O.V.A. follows at 21.04% win rate. Analyzing 56 8-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.24 | 12.71% | 1.53% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.87 | 21.04% | 1.94% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.51 | 29.58% | 3.20% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.79 | 24.36% | 0.96% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.69 | 25.03% | 1.20% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
6.26 | 12.06% | 0.42% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
- | 5.43 | 29.73% | 2.74% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
5.49 | 29.96% | 1.87% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
4.91 | 40.94% | 6.85% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.83 | 23.83% | 0.34% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.53 | 69.49% | 16.84% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.62 | 85.26% | 23.70% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.84 | 22.37% | 2.04% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.62 | 25.27% | 2.14% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.98 | 80.33% | 22.58% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.40 | 51.53% | 9.33% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.24 | 76.39% | 18.50% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.85 | 22.01% | 0.97% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.73 | 67.17% | 16.57% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.97 | 63.95% | 9.20% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.84 | 84.84% | 22.80% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.92 | 19.17% | 1.39% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.17 | 36.02% | 2.17% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.37 | 72.18% | 19.91% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.12 | 84.64% | 11.24% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.93 | 40.35% | 4.38% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.50 | 31.68% | 1.35% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.71 | 68.39% | 13.10% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.83 | 42.82% | 0.88% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.02 | 60.22% | 16.13% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.34 | 57.46% | 7.46% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.59 | 66.56% | 15.48% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.70 | 25.45% | 0.40% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.74 | 45.33% | 5.51% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.67 | 22.70% | 2.01% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.89 | 41.09% | 6.24% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.63 | 65.53% | 14.47% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.17 | 34.15% | 1.06% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.45 | 28.13% | 5.29% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.66 | 21.43% | 0.73% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.48 | 50.53% | 2.65% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
2.99 | 78.41% | 25.25% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.82 | 65.92% | 9.24% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
2.98 | 81.34% | 18.87% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
4.84 | 42.55% | 10.91% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.40 | 78.46% | 7.60% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
4.65 | 49.16% | 3.03% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
5.50 | 30.16% | 1.13% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
- | 4.86 | 41.92% | 6.53% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
3.59 | 70.87% | 12.39% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
- | 4.29 | 54.55% | 7.32% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
- | 5.04 | 41.53% | 3.39% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
- | 5.22 | 34.73% | 5.88% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
5.70 | 25.98% | 2.66% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.50 | 71.64% | 15.67% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.12 | 74.63% | 24.63% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Team Comps - Set 17 FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 17?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 17 is Challenger/N.O.V.A. with Ornn as the primary carry, achieving a 85.3% win rate and 2.62 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Challenger/N.O.V.A. comp?
To play Challenger/N.O.V.A., focus on building around Ornn as your main carry. Look for Ornn and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 17?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 17, Challenger/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 2.62. Other reliable options include Challenger/N.O.V.A. (2.84 avg) and N.O.V.A./Brawler (2.98 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Challenger/N.O.V.A. is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 85.3% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 17?
In TFT Set 17, Meeple/Fateweaver has a 2.4% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Challenger/N.O.V.A.. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
What is the current TFT meta in TFT Set 17?
The TFT Set 17 meta is dominated by Meeple/Fateweaver with 2.4% pick rate, followed by Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 1.4%. High pick rate comps define the meta but are often contested. For uncontested games, consider less popular alternatives like Challenger/N.O.V.A. (0.1% pick rate).
Should I avoid playing popular comps in TFT?
Not necessarily. Popular comps like Meeple/Fateweaver (2.4% pick rate) are popular for a reason—they're strong. However, when multiple players contest the same comp, everyone's placement suffers. Scout your lobby early. If 2+ players are forcing the same comp, pivot to alternatives to avoid fighting for units.