Best Average Placement TFT Team Compositions

This table ranks TFT team compositions by their average placement finish, showing which comps consistently achieve top placements. Top double-up-champion Set 17 compositions: Party Animal (96.0% WR, 1.6 avg), Rogue (97.9% WR, 1.7 avg), Challenger (99.3% WR, 1.7 avg). Party Animal/N.O.V.A. leads with 96.03% win rate and 1.62 average placement. Rogue follows at 97.86% win rate. Analyzing 100 double-up-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
1.62
Avg Place
96.03%
Top 4 Rate
66.40%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.66
Avg Place
97.86%
Top 4 Rate
55.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
1.71
Avg Place
99.26%
Top 4 Rate
49.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.83
Avg Place
97.80%
Top 4 Rate
51.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.04
Avg Place
95.20%
Top 4 Rate
44.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.25
Avg Place
91.24%
Top 4 Rate
45.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.27
Avg Place
95.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.31
Avg Place
92.61%
Top 4 Rate
31.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.42
Avg Place
90.13%
Top 4 Rate
33.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.45
Avg Place
91.39%
Top 4 Rate
29.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.54
Avg Place
87.70%
Top 4 Rate
32.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.64
Avg Place
89.00%
Top 4 Rate
27.61%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
88.91%
Top 4 Rate
24.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.68
Avg Place
87.92%
Top 4 Rate
25.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.91
Avg Place
89.30%
Top 4 Rate
15.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.91
Avg Place
82.32%
Top 4 Rate
26.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.92
Avg Place
82.80%
Top 4 Rate
24.01%
First Place
Low Contested
2.95
Avg Place
81.54%
Top 4 Rate
24.86%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.07
Avg Place
83.74%
Top 4 Rate
16.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.46%
Top 4 Rate
24.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.53%
Top 4 Rate
22.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
77.70%
Top 4 Rate
17.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
74.02%
Top 4 Rate
25.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
12.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.53%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.27
Avg Place
78.65%
Top 4 Rate
16.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
79.14%
Top 4 Rate
17.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
75.39%
Top 4 Rate
16.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.30
Avg Place
71.20%
Top 4 Rate
23.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
72.98%
Top 4 Rate
22.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.41
Avg Place
70.77%
Top 4 Rate
21.03%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.45
Avg Place
74.75%
Top 4 Rate
15.03%
First Place
Low Contested
3.45
Avg Place
72.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.76%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.52
Avg Place
74.58%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.52
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
12.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.64
Avg Place
65.71%
Top 4 Rate
21.55%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.71
Avg Place
68.58%
Top 4 Rate
11.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.75
Avg Place
67.05%
Top 4 Rate
8.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.78
Avg Place
64.84%
Top 4 Rate
14.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.92
Avg Place
61.30%
Top 4 Rate
16.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.11%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.52%
Top 4 Rate
14.35%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 100 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 106.8K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 79.3% and average placement of 3.05 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Challenger/N.O.V.A. with Master Yi as the primary carry, achieving a 99.3% win rate. Following closely is Rogue/Meeple at 97.9% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Divine Duelist at 97.8%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Challenger/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Master Yi
  • Rogue/Meeple (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Bard
  • N.O.V.A./Divine Duelist (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kindred

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Party Animal/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 66.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Party Animal/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.62.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Challenger/N.O.V.A.: 99.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Rogue/Meeple: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Divine Duelist: 97.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replicator/N.O.V.A. with a 1.9% pick rate, though its 74.0% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Party Animal/Dark Star follows at 1.6% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

TFT Team Comps - Set 17 FAQ

What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 17?

The best TFT comp in TFT Set 17 is Challenger/N.O.V.A. with Master Yi as the primary carry, achieving a 99.3% win rate and 1.71 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.

How do I play the Challenger/N.O.V.A. comp?

To play Challenger/N.O.V.A., focus on building around Master Yi as your main carry. Look for Master Yi and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.

What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 17?

For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 17, Party Animal/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.62. Other reliable options include Rogue/Meeple (1.66 avg) and Challenger/N.O.V.A. (1.71 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.

What is the easiest TFT comp to play?

Challenger/N.O.V.A. is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 99.3% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.

When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 17?

In TFT Set 17, Replicator/N.O.V.A. has a 1.9% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Challenger/N.O.V.A.. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.

What is the most consistent TFT comp in TFT Set 17?

Party Animal/N.O.V.A. has the best average placement at 1.62, making it the most consistent comp for climbing. Rogue/Meeple follows at 1.66, and Challenger/N.O.V.A. at 1.71. Lower average placement means fewer bottom 4 finishes.

Is average placement better than win rate for climbing?

For consistent LP gains, average placement is often more reliable than pure win rate. A comp like Party Animal/N.O.V.A. with 1.62 average placement minimizes big LP losses from bottom 4 finishes. High variance comps might win more lobbies but also 8th more often. For climbing, consistency usually beats coinflip strategies.