Best Average Placement TFT Team Compositions
This table ranks TFT team compositions by their average placement finish, showing which comps consistently achieve top placements. Top double-up-champion Set 17 compositions: Party Animal (96.0% WR, 1.6 avg), Rogue (97.9% WR, 1.7 avg), Challenger (99.3% WR, 1.7 avg). Party Animal/N.O.V.A. leads with 96.03% win rate and 1.62 average placement. Rogue follows at 97.86% win rate. Analyzing 100 double-up-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.62 Avg Place | 96.03% Top 4 Rate | 66.40% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
1.66 Avg Place | 97.86% Top 4 Rate | 55.61% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
1.71 Avg Place | 99.26% Top 4 Rate | 49.07% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.80 Avg Place | 96.97% Top 4 Rate | 54.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.83 Avg Place | 97.80% Top 4 Rate | 51.79% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.98 Avg Place | 91.00% Top 4 Rate | 57.67% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.04 Avg Place | 95.20% Top 4 Rate | 44.72% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 91.52% Top 4 Rate | 46.49% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 92.22% Top 4 Rate | 42.45% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.20 Avg Place | 91.30% Top 4 Rate | 44.80% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.25 Avg Place | 91.24% Top 4 Rate | 45.62% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.26 Avg Place | 95.46% Top 4 Rate | 32.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.27 Avg Place | 95.04% Top 4 Rate | 32.23% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.27 Avg Place | 93.97% Top 4 Rate | 31.16% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.31 Avg Place | 92.61% Top 4 Rate | 31.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.37 Avg Place | 92.42% Top 4 Rate | 33.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.38 Avg Place | 94.26% Top 4 Rate | 29.50% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.39 Avg Place | 92.65% Top 4 Rate | 24.93% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.42 Avg Place | 90.13% Top 4 Rate | 33.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.45 Avg Place | 91.39% Top 4 Rate | 29.59% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.47 Avg Place | 92.06% Top 4 Rate | 28.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.52 Avg Place | 90.38% Top 4 Rate | 26.97% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.54 Avg Place | 87.70% Top 4 Rate | 32.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.55 Avg Place | 89.60% Top 4 Rate | 25.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.64 Avg Place | 89.00% Top 4 Rate | 27.61% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.64 Avg Place | 88.91% Top 4 Rate | 24.64% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.68 Avg Place | 87.92% Top 4 Rate | 25.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.76 Avg Place | 85.47% Top 4 Rate | 31.83% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.81 Avg Place | 84.04% Top 4 Rate | 32.53% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.84 Avg Place | 82.86% Top 4 Rate | 27.24% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.88 Avg Place | 83.61% Top 4 Rate | 21.58% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 89.30% Top 4 Rate | 15.72% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 82.32% Top 4 Rate | 26.29% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.92 Avg Place | 82.80% Top 4 Rate | 24.01% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.95 Avg Place | 81.54% Top 4 Rate | 24.86% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.95 Avg Place | 77.73% Top 4 Rate | 27.50% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 79.95% Top 4 Rate | 24.70% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 83.60% Top 4 Rate | 18.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.99 Avg Place | 79.29% Top 4 Rate | 26.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 76.08% Top 4 Rate | 33.63% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.07 Avg Place | 83.74% Top 4 Rate | 16.56% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.08 Avg Place | 77.54% Top 4 Rate | 23.19% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 81.35% Top 4 Rate | 12.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 80.65% Top 4 Rate | 18.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 76.66% Top 4 Rate | 25.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 81.76% Top 4 Rate | 12.79% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.17 Avg Place | 77.46% Top 4 Rate | 24.10% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.17 Avg Place | 77.53% Top 4 Rate | 22.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 78.25% Top 4 Rate | 18.31% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 77.70% Top 4 Rate | 17.88% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 79.86% Top 4 Rate | 20.49% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.19 Avg Place | 81.05% Top 4 Rate | 16.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 75.80% Top 4 Rate | 23.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 73.93% Top 4 Rate | 25.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 13.81% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 74.02% Top 4 Rate | 25.47% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.23 Avg Place | 79.36% Top 4 Rate | 12.06% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.24 Avg Place | 73.53% Top 4 Rate | 17.91% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 73.75% Top 4 Rate | 18.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 12.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.26 Avg Place | 76.38% Top 4 Rate | 20.70% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.27 Avg Place | 78.65% Top 4 Rate | 16.34% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.27 Avg Place | 79.14% Top 4 Rate | 17.27% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.08% Top 4 Rate | 19.48% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 75.39% Top 4 Rate | 16.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.34% Top 4 Rate | 15.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 76.14% Top 4 Rate | 14.05% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.30 Avg Place | 71.20% Top 4 Rate | 23.73% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 73.63% Top 4 Rate | 18.75% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 76.43% Top 4 Rate | 16.25% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 74.47% Top 4 Rate | 18.24% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 72.98% Top 4 Rate | 22.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.40 Avg Place | 78.75% Top 4 Rate | 11.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 70.77% Top 4 Rate | 21.03% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 73.89% Top 4 Rate | 17.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 74.75% Top 4 Rate | 15.03% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 72.80% Top 4 Rate | 14.76% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.46 Avg Place | 73.54% Top 4 Rate | 13.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.48 Avg Place | 69.26% Top 4 Rate | 23.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.52 Avg Place | 74.58% Top 4 Rate | 12.41% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.52 Avg Place | 72.20% Top 4 Rate | 12.08% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.54 Avg Place | 71.12% Top 4 Rate | 13.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 70.03% Top 4 Rate | 14.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.64 Avg Place | 62.99% Top 4 Rate | 28.89% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.64 Avg Place | 65.71% Top 4 Rate | 21.55% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 65.12% Top 4 Rate | 19.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.67 Avg Place | 69.93% Top 4 Rate | 11.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.71 Avg Place | 68.58% Top 4 Rate | 11.03% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 71.06% Top 4 Rate | 7.72% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 66.95% Top 4 Rate | 11.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 67.05% Top 4 Rate | 8.24% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.77 Avg Place | 65.31% Top 4 Rate | 16.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.78 Avg Place | 64.84% Top 4 Rate | 14.84% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.92 Avg Place | 61.30% Top 4 Rate | 16.09% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.94 Avg Place | 64.09% Top 4 Rate | 5.79% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.96 Avg Place | 58.72% Top 4 Rate | 20.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.03 Avg Place | 61.02% Top 4 Rate | 6.66% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 57.03% Top 4 Rate | 17.84% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.15 Avg Place | 56.39% Top 4 Rate | 11.11% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.15 Avg Place | 56.52% Top 4 Rate | 14.35% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Team Comps - Set 17 FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 17?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 17 is Challenger/N.O.V.A. with Master Yi as the primary carry, achieving a 99.3% win rate and 1.71 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Challenger/N.O.V.A. comp?
To play Challenger/N.O.V.A., focus on building around Master Yi as your main carry. Look for Master Yi and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 17?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 17, Party Animal/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.62. Other reliable options include Rogue/Meeple (1.66 avg) and Challenger/N.O.V.A. (1.71 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Challenger/N.O.V.A. is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 99.3% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 17?
In TFT Set 17, Replicator/N.O.V.A. has a 1.9% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Challenger/N.O.V.A.. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
What is the most consistent TFT comp in TFT Set 17?
Party Animal/N.O.V.A. has the best average placement at 1.62, making it the most consistent comp for climbing. Rogue/Meeple follows at 1.66, and Challenger/N.O.V.A. at 1.71. Lower average placement means fewer bottom 4 finishes.
Is average placement better than win rate for climbing?
For consistent LP gains, average placement is often more reliable than pure win rate. A comp like Party Animal/N.O.V.A. with 1.62 average placement minimizes big LP losses from bottom 4 finishes. High variance comps might win more lobbies but also 8th more often. For climbing, consistency usually beats coinflip strategies.