Top First Place Rate TFT Team Compositions
This table highlights TFT team compositions with the highest first place rates, perfect for players looking to maximize their chances of winning games. Top double-up-champion Set 17 compositions: Party Animal (96.0% WR, 1.6 avg), N.O.V.A. (91.0% WR, 2.0 avg), Rogue (97.9% WR, 1.7 avg). Party Animal/N.O.V.A. leads with 96.03% win rate and 1.62 average placement. N.O.V.A. follows at 91.00% win rate. Analyzing 100 double-up-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.62 Avg Place | 96.03% Top 4 Rate | 66.40% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
1.98 Avg Place | 91.00% Top 4 Rate | 57.67% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
1.66 Avg Place | 97.86% Top 4 Rate | 55.61% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
1.80 Avg Place | 96.97% Top 4 Rate | 54.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.83 Avg Place | 97.80% Top 4 Rate | 51.79% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.71 Avg Place | 99.26% Top 4 Rate | 49.07% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 91.52% Top 4 Rate | 46.49% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.25 Avg Place | 91.24% Top 4 Rate | 45.62% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.20 Avg Place | 91.30% Top 4 Rate | 44.80% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.04 Avg Place | 95.20% Top 4 Rate | 44.72% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 92.22% Top 4 Rate | 42.45% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.37 Avg Place | 92.42% Top 4 Rate | 33.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 76.08% Top 4 Rate | 33.63% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.42 Avg Place | 90.13% Top 4 Rate | 33.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.81 Avg Place | 84.04% Top 4 Rate | 32.53% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.27 Avg Place | 95.04% Top 4 Rate | 32.23% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.54 Avg Place | 87.70% Top 4 Rate | 32.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.26 Avg Place | 95.46% Top 4 Rate | 32.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.76 Avg Place | 85.47% Top 4 Rate | 31.83% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.31 Avg Place | 92.61% Top 4 Rate | 31.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.27 Avg Place | 93.97% Top 4 Rate | 31.16% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.45 Avg Place | 91.39% Top 4 Rate | 29.59% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.38 Avg Place | 94.26% Top 4 Rate | 29.50% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.47 Avg Place | 92.06% Top 4 Rate | 28.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.64 Avg Place | 62.99% Top 4 Rate | 28.89% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.64 Avg Place | 89.00% Top 4 Rate | 27.61% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.95 Avg Place | 77.73% Top 4 Rate | 27.50% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.84 Avg Place | 82.86% Top 4 Rate | 27.24% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.52 Avg Place | 90.38% Top 4 Rate | 26.97% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.99 Avg Place | 79.29% Top 4 Rate | 26.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 82.32% Top 4 Rate | 26.29% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.55 Avg Place | 89.60% Top 4 Rate | 25.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.68 Avg Place | 87.92% Top 4 Rate | 25.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 73.93% Top 4 Rate | 25.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 74.02% Top 4 Rate | 25.47% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 76.66% Top 4 Rate | 25.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.39 Avg Place | 92.65% Top 4 Rate | 24.93% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.95 Avg Place | 81.54% Top 4 Rate | 24.86% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 79.95% Top 4 Rate | 24.70% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.64 Avg Place | 88.91% Top 4 Rate | 24.64% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.17 Avg Place | 77.46% Top 4 Rate | 24.10% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.92 Avg Place | 82.80% Top 4 Rate | 24.01% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.48 Avg Place | 69.26% Top 4 Rate | 23.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.30 Avg Place | 71.20% Top 4 Rate | 23.73% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 75.80% Top 4 Rate | 23.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.08 Avg Place | 77.54% Top 4 Rate | 23.19% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 72.98% Top 4 Rate | 22.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.17 Avg Place | 77.53% Top 4 Rate | 22.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.88 Avg Place | 83.61% Top 4 Rate | 21.58% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.64 Avg Place | 65.71% Top 4 Rate | 21.55% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 70.77% Top 4 Rate | 21.03% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.26 Avg Place | 76.38% Top 4 Rate | 20.70% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.96 Avg Place | 58.72% Top 4 Rate | 20.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 79.86% Top 4 Rate | 20.49% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 65.12% Top 4 Rate | 19.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.08% Top 4 Rate | 19.48% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 73.63% Top 4 Rate | 18.75% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 78.25% Top 4 Rate | 18.31% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 74.47% Top 4 Rate | 18.24% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 80.65% Top 4 Rate | 18.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 83.60% Top 4 Rate | 18.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 73.75% Top 4 Rate | 18.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.24 Avg Place | 73.53% Top 4 Rate | 17.91% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 77.70% Top 4 Rate | 17.88% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 57.03% Top 4 Rate | 17.84% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 73.89% Top 4 Rate | 17.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.27 Avg Place | 79.14% Top 4 Rate | 17.27% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 75.39% Top 4 Rate | 16.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.07 Avg Place | 83.74% Top 4 Rate | 16.56% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.19 Avg Place | 81.05% Top 4 Rate | 16.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.27 Avg Place | 78.65% Top 4 Rate | 16.34% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 76.43% Top 4 Rate | 16.25% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.77 Avg Place | 65.31% Top 4 Rate | 16.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.92 Avg Place | 61.30% Top 4 Rate | 16.09% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 89.30% Top 4 Rate | 15.72% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.34% Top 4 Rate | 15.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 74.75% Top 4 Rate | 15.03% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.78 Avg Place | 64.84% Top 4 Rate | 14.84% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 72.80% Top 4 Rate | 14.76% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 70.03% Top 4 Rate | 14.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.15 Avg Place | 56.52% Top 4 Rate | 14.35% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 76.14% Top 4 Rate | 14.05% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 13.81% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.46 Avg Place | 73.54% Top 4 Rate | 13.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.54 Avg Place | 71.12% Top 4 Rate | 13.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 81.76% Top 4 Rate | 12.79% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.52 Avg Place | 74.58% Top 4 Rate | 12.41% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 81.35% Top 4 Rate | 12.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 12.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.20 Avg Place | 55.44% Top 4 Rate | 12.09% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.52 Avg Place | 72.20% Top 4 Rate | 12.08% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.23 Avg Place | 79.36% Top 4 Rate | 12.06% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 66.95% Top 4 Rate | 11.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.40 Avg Place | 78.75% Top 4 Rate | 11.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.62 Avg Place | 45.77% Top 4 Rate | 11.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.67 Avg Place | 69.93% Top 4 Rate | 11.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.15 Avg Place | 56.39% Top 4 Rate | 11.11% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.71 Avg Place | 68.58% Top 4 Rate | 11.03% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.40 Avg Place | 54.00% Top 4 Rate | 10.86% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.20 Avg Place | 53.08% Top 4 Rate | 10.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Team Comps - Set 17 FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 17?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 17 is Challenger/N.O.V.A. with Master Yi as the primary carry, achieving a 99.3% win rate and 1.71 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Challenger/N.O.V.A. comp?
To play Challenger/N.O.V.A., focus on building around Master Yi as your main carry. Look for Master Yi and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 17?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 17, Party Animal/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.62. Other reliable options include Rogue/Meeple (1.66 avg) and Challenger/N.O.V.A. (1.71 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Challenger/N.O.V.A. is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 99.3% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 17?
In TFT Set 17, Replicator/N.O.V.A. has a 1.9% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Challenger/N.O.V.A.. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
Which TFT comp wins lobbies most often in TFT Set 17?
Party Animal/N.O.V.A. achieves first place in 66.4% of games, making it the best comp for winning lobbies outright. N.O.V.A./Divine Duelist follows at 57.7% first place rate. If your goal is to win rather than just top 4, prioritize these high-ceiling compositions.
When should I play for first place vs top 4?
Play for first when you have a high-ceiling comp like Party Animal/N.O.V.A. (66.4% first rate) and hit your power spike with optimal items. Play for top 4 when you're contested, have suboptimal items, or need to preserve LP. In ranked, consistent top 4s often climb faster than coinflipping for first.