- Avg Place
- 0.00
- 1st Place
- 0.00%
- Top 4 Rate
- 0.00%
TFT Team Comps
- Set
- 15
- Matches
- 565,576
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Rank
- All Ranks
- Last Updated
- Oct 8, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Team compositions using in TFT Set 15. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 43 viable team comps currently building , with an average win rate of 53.85% across all compositions. The highest performing comp achieves a 83.02% win rate, primarily featuring Wraith, Monster Trainer, Prodigy traits with the primary carry as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
Avg Place 2.49 | Top 4 83.02% | First Place 42.45% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.41 | Top 4 72.58% | First Place 19.35% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.59 | Top 4 70.45% | First Place 13.64% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.57 | Top 4 67.42% | First Place 19.55% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.56 | Top 4 67.32% | First Place 19.44% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.62 | Top 4 67.17% | First Place 15.89% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.64 | Top 4 66.54% | First Place 14.34% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.80 | Top 4 66.12% | First Place 11.48% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.80 | Top 4 65.38% | First Place 15.38% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.79 | Top 4 63.98% | First Place 14.91% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.79 | Top 4 63.78% | First Place 16.83% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.74 | Top 4 63.20% | First Place 22.40% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.86 | Top 4 62.87% | First Place 12.66% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.95 | Top 4 62.70% | First Place 12.13% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.96 | Top 4 60.78% | First Place 14.49% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.83 | Top 4 60.33% | First Place 14.05% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.09 | Top 4 58.68% | First Place 14.07% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.05 | Top 4 58.05% | First Place 15.33% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.28 | Top 4 55.96% | First Place 5.50% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.27 | Top 4 55.91% | First Place 3.23% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.29 | Top 4 53.45% | First Place 6.90% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.26 | Top 4 53.39% | First Place 11.76% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.23 | Top 4 53.23% | First Place 11.29% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.44 | Top 4 51.99% | First Place 6.19% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.32 | Top 4 51.88% | First Place 12.50% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.38 | Top 4 51.04% | First Place 9.38% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.45 | Top 4 50.00% | First Place 5.74% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.61 | Top 4 50.00% | First Place 6.42% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.36 | Top 4 49.17% | First Place 12.54% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.53 | Top 4 48.61% | First Place 9.03% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.57 | Top 4 48.36% | First Place 8.06% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.59 | Top 4 47.60% | First Place 6.59% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.73 | Top 4 47.57% | First Place 4.85% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.69 | Top 4 46.99% | First Place 8.43% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.72 | Top 4 46.65% | First Place 5.48% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.64 | Top 4 44.82% | First Place 5.18% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.97 | Top 4 39.09% | First Place 5.45% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.23 | Top 4 33.45% | First Place 3.83% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.33 | Top 4 31.97% | First Place 6.56% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.40 | Top 4 31.83% | First Place 2.14% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.28 | Top 4 31.48% | First Place 1.85% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.42 | Top 4 30.33% | First Place 3.89% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.35 | Top 4 30.21% | First Place 3.13% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for in TFT Set 15?
The best team comp featuring in TFT Set 15 achieves a 83.02% win rate with a 0.06% pick rate. This composition uses Wraith, Monster Trainer, and Prodigy traits and is picked in 0.06% of games featuring .
How many team comps use in TFT?
There are 43 viable team compositions that commonly build in TFT Set 15. appears in comps with an average win rate of 53.85% across 17,516 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for in TFT Set 15 uses the Edgelord, Juggernaut, and Soul Fighter traits with a 1.21% pick rate. This composition achieves a 51.99% win rate and average placement of 4.44.
What traits work well with in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with in TFT Set 15 are Wraith, Monster Trainer, Prodigy, Protector, and Star Guardian. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate team compositions.