Radiant Quicksilver TFT item icon
Avg Place
4.63
1st Place
8.38%
Top 4 Rate
47.30%
Pick Rate
0.13%

Radiant QuicksilverTFT Team Comps

Set 17
SetSet 17
Matches676,359
TierAll Tiers
RankAll Ranks
Last UpdatedJun 7, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Team compositions using Radiant Quicksilver in TFT Set 16.11. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.

MetaBot Desktop
Live In-Game Overlays
Join Our Discord
Bug reports, feature requests & developer chat
Join Discord

Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Radiant Quicksilver as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 30 viable team comps currently building Radiant Quicksilver, with an average win rate of 52.64% across all compositions. The highest performing Radiant Quicksilver comp achieves a 80.50% win rate, primarily featuring Challenger, N.O.V.A., Marauder traits with Bel'Veth as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Radiant Quicksilver is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.

3.30
80.50%
9.60%
Low Contested Risk
3.01
80.22%
21.63%
Low Contested Risk
3.14
79.58%
17.51%
Low Contested Risk
3.17
77.26%
21.72%
Low Contested Risk
3.36
75.39%
12.11%
Low Contested Risk
3.55
73.25%
11.40%
Low Contested Risk
3.54
71.30%
13.71%
Low Contested Risk
3.43
71.14%
19.61%
Low Contested Risk
3.52
70.96%
13.50%
Low Contested Risk
3.55
69.09%
16.76%
Low Contested Risk
3.87
66.42%
8.55%
Low Contested Risk
3.83
66.13%
8.66%
Low Contested Risk
3.72
65.80%
12.35%
Low Contested Risk
3.76
64.58%
17.61%
Low Contested Risk
4.23
56.27%
10.62%
Low Contested Risk
4.26
55.36%
6.89%
Low Contested Risk
4.56
50.37%
2.94%
Low Contested Risk
4.64
48.35%
3.80%
Low Contested Risk
4.77
44.95%
5.41%
Low Contested Risk
4.90
41.09%
2.83%
Low Contested Risk
4.98
39.79%
5.34%
Low Contested Risk
5.06
36.11%
5.56%
Low Contested Risk
5.30
31.24%
7.81%
Low Contested Risk
5.48
30.33%
3.50%
Low Contested Risk
5.55
29.40%
0.81%
Low Contested Risk
5.70
25.72%
2.72%
Low Contested Risk
5.75
23.51%
1.70%
Low Contested Risk
5.70
22.82%
1.53%
Low Contested Risk
5.78
21.23%
1.45%
Low Contested Risk
6.50
10.90%
0.24%
Low Contested Risk
3.30
Avg Place
80.50%
Top 4 Rate
9.60%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.01
Avg Place
80.22%
Top 4 Rate
21.63%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.17
Avg Place
77.26%
Top 4 Rate
21.72%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.36
Avg Place
75.39%
Top 4 Rate
12.11%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.55
Avg Place
73.25%
Top 4 Rate
11.40%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.54
Avg Place
71.30%
Top 4 Rate
13.71%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.43
Avg Place
71.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.61%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.52
Avg Place
70.96%
Top 4 Rate
13.50%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.55
Avg Place
69.09%
Top 4 Rate
16.76%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.87
Avg Place
66.42%
Top 4 Rate
8.55%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.83
Avg Place
66.13%
Top 4 Rate
8.66%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.76
Avg Place
64.58%
Top 4 Rate
17.61%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.26
Avg Place
55.36%
Top 4 Rate
6.89%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.56
Avg Place
50.37%
Top 4 Rate
2.94%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.64
Avg Place
48.35%
Top 4 Rate
3.80%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.77
Avg Place
44.95%
Top 4 Rate
5.41%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.90
Avg Place
41.09%
Top 4 Rate
2.83%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.06
Avg Place
36.11%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.30
Avg Place
31.24%
Top 4 Rate
7.81%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.48
Avg Place
30.33%
Top 4 Rate
3.50%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.55
Avg Place
29.40%
Top 4 Rate
0.81%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.70
Avg Place
25.72%
Top 4 Rate
2.72%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
6.50
Avg Place
10.90%
Top 4 Rate
0.24%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Radiant Quicksilver Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best team comp for Radiant Quicksilver in TFT Set 17?

The best team comp featuring Radiant Quicksilver in TFT Set 17 achieves a 80.50% win rate with a 0.13% pick rate. This composition uses Challenger, N.O.V.A., and Marauder traits and is picked in 0.13% of games featuring Radiant Quicksilver.

How many team comps use Radiant Quicksilver in TFT?

There are 30 viable team compositions that commonly build Radiant Quicksilver in TFT Set 17. Radiant Quicksilver appears in comps with an average win rate of 52.64% across 78,258 total matches analyzed.

Which comp uses Radiant Quicksilver most often in TFT?

The most popular comp for Radiant Quicksilver in TFT Set 17 uses the Rogue, Meeple, and Fateweaver traits with a 2.41% pick rate. This composition achieves a 44.95% win rate and average placement of 4.77.

What comp with Radiant Quicksilver has the best average placement?

The Radiant Quicksilver comp with the best average placement achieves 3.01 with the Challenger, N.O.V.A., and Brawler traits. This composition has a 80.22% win rate and 0.61% pick rate.

What traits work well with Radiant Quicksilver in TFT?

The best traits that synergize with Radiant Quicksilver in TFT Set 17 are Challenger, N.O.V.A., Marauder, Gun Goddess, and Bastion. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Radiant Quicksilver team compositions.