Adaptive HelmTFT Team Comps
Negatron Cloak
Tear of the GoddessTeam compositions using Adaptive Helm in TFT Set 16.14. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Adaptive Helm as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 62 viable team comps currently building Adaptive Helm, with an average win rate of 49.22% across all compositions. The highest performing Adaptive Helm comp achieves a 95.74% win rate, primarily featuring Party Animal, Dark Star, Divine Duelist traits with Fiora as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Adaptive Helm is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
1.85 | 95.74% | 57.45% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.04 | 92.73% | 41.82% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.42 | 90.63% | 43.75% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.70 | 84.82% | 28.57% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.89 | 82.61% | 30.43% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.07 | 80.60% | 14.93% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.07 | 80.00% | 26.67% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.12 | 79.46% | 19.05% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.05 | 78.74% | 22.32% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.20 | 78.00% | 10.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.18 | 77.36% | 19.82% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.26 | 75.72% | 16.76% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.43 | 74.12% | 10.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.59 | 72.73% | 15.91% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.41 | 72.50% | 19.17% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.68 | 71.43% | 8.88% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.57 | 71.31% | 10.28% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.46 | 69.27% | 18.35% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.57 | 68.18% | 18.32% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.71 | 67.24% | 13.79% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.81 | 67.03% | 12.09% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.57 | 66.67% | 11.90% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.00 | 65.67% | 11.94% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.83 | 63.11% | 9.71% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.10 | 62.50% | 6.25% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.02 | 60.45% | 17.16% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.37 | 54.35% | 6.52% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.12 | 53.49% | 18.60% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.43 | 52.55% | 8.03% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.57 | 48.94% | 8.51% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.67 | 46.94% | 2.04% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.79 | 45.83% | 6.25% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.80 | 45.67% | 3.37% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.04 | 40.17% | 8.55% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.82 | 39.56% | 5.49% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.20 | 38.64% | 2.27% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.10 | 38.34% | 2.59% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.16 | 36.39% | 5.20% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.04 | 34.48% | 1.72% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.34 | 34.25% | 1.37% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.16 | 32.50% | 0.83% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.40 | 31.11% | 4.44% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.16 | 30.86% | 3.70% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.62 | 30.00% | 2.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.47 | 27.30% | 5.08% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.77 | 26.63% | 3.80% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.79 | 25.86% | 1.72% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.66 | 24.59% | 1.64% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.78 | 24.18% | 1.10% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.37 | 23.53% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.91 | 22.88% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.78 | 22.31% | 1.65% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.78 | 22.03% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.87 | 19.57% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.14 | 19.05% | 2.38% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.88 | 18.87% | 0.81% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.73 | 18.52% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.00 | 17.31% | 1.92% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.87 | 15.94% | 2.90% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.34 | 14.00% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.44 | 13.95% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.58 | 12.28% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Adaptive Helm Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Adaptive Helm in TFT Set 17?
The best team comp featuring Adaptive Helm in TFT Set 17 achieves a 95.74% win rate with a 0.06% pick rate. This composition uses Party Animal, Dark Star, and Divine Duelist traits and is picked in 0.06% of games featuring Adaptive Helm.
How many team comps use Adaptive Helm in TFT?
There are 62 viable team compositions that commonly build Adaptive Helm in TFT Set 17. Adaptive Helm appears in comps with an average win rate of 49.22% across 11,029 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Adaptive Helm most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Adaptive Helm in TFT Set 17 uses the Challenger, N.O.V.A., and Brawler traits with a 2.25% pick rate. This composition achieves a 71.31% win rate and average placement of 3.57.
What traits work well with Adaptive Helm in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Adaptive Helm in TFT Set 17 are Party Animal, Dark Star, Divine Duelist, Voyager, Conduit, Mecha, Dark Lady, Redeemer, Vanguard, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Adaptive Helm team compositions.