Chain Vest TFT item icon
Avg Place
4.85
1st Place
9.55%
Top 4 Rate
43.53%
Pick Rate
5.64%

Chain VestTFT Team Comps

Set 17
SetSet 17
Matches676,359
TierAll Tiers
RankAll Ranks
Last UpdatedJun 6, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Team compositions using Chain Vest in TFT Set 16.11. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.

MetaBot Desktop
Live In-Game Overlays
Join Our Discord
Bug reports, feature requests & developer chat
Join Discord

Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Chain Vest as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 55 viable team comps currently building Chain Vest, with an average win rate of 47.95% across all compositions. The highest performing Chain Vest comp achieves a 88.48% win rate, primarily featuring Challenger, N.O.V.A., Brawler traits with Ornn as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Chain Vest is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.

2.50
88.48%
28.57%
Low Contested Risk
2.72
86.09%
27.10%
Low Contested Risk
2.72
83.49%
32.97%
Low Contested Risk
2.84
83.31%
24.12%
Low Contested Risk
3.30
80.50%
9.60%
Low Contested Risk
3.01
80.22%
21.63%
Low Contested Risk
3.14
79.58%
17.51%
Low Contested Risk
3.03
79.49%
20.51%
Low Contested Risk
3.17
77.26%
21.72%
Low Contested Risk
3.36
75.39%
12.11%
Low Contested Risk
3.55
73.25%
11.40%
Low Contested Risk
3.54
71.30%
13.71%
Low Contested Risk
3.43
71.14%
19.61%
Low Contested Risk
3.52
70.96%
13.50%
Low Contested Risk
3.55
69.11%
17.34%
Low Contested Risk
3.55
69.09%
16.76%
Low Contested Risk
3.87
66.42%
8.55%
Low Contested Risk
3.83
66.13%
8.66%
Low Contested Risk
3.72
65.80%
12.35%
Low Contested Risk
3.76
64.58%
17.61%
Low Contested Risk
4.23
56.27%
10.62%
Low Contested Risk
4.26
55.36%
6.89%
Low Contested Risk
4.39
53.39%
6.18%
Low Contested Risk
4.56
50.37%
2.94%
Low Contested Risk
4.64
48.35%
3.80%
Low Contested Risk
4.77
44.95%
5.41%
Low Contested Risk
4.78
43.32%
8.82%
Low Contested Risk
4.90
41.09%
2.83%
Low Contested Risk
4.98
39.79%
5.34%
Low Contested Risk
4.96
39.45%
5.93%
Low Contested Risk
4.97
38.70%
3.99%
Low Contested Risk
-
4.89
38.63%
6.62%
Low Contested Risk
5.06
36.11%
5.56%
Low Contested Risk
5.21
35.17%
1.61%
Low Contested Risk
5.14
34.91%
1.29%
Low Contested Risk
5.18
34.46%
2.06%
Low Contested Risk
5.30
31.24%
7.81%
Low Contested Risk
5.42
31.05%
3.27%
Low Contested Risk
5.40
30.52%
1.61%
Low Contested Risk
5.48
30.33%
3.50%
Low Contested Risk
5.47
29.41%
2.94%
Low Contested Risk
5.55
29.40%
0.81%
Low Contested Risk
5.70
25.72%
2.72%
Low Contested Risk
5.75
23.51%
1.70%
Low Contested Risk
5.72
23.12%
1.59%
Low Contested Risk
5.70
22.82%
1.53%
Low Contested Risk
5.95
22.22%
0.25%
Low Contested Risk
5.84
21.89%
1.89%
Low Contested Risk
5.70
21.88%
0.76%
Low Contested Risk
5.89
21.34%
1.24%
Low Contested Risk
5.78
21.23%
1.45%
Low Contested Risk
5.92
20.30%
1.98%
Low Contested Risk
6.25
14.90%
1.23%
Low Contested Risk
6.33
13.56%
0.29%
Low Contested Risk
6.50
10.90%
0.24%
Low Contested Risk
2.72
Avg Place
86.09%
Top 4 Rate
27.10%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
2.72
Avg Place
83.49%
Top 4 Rate
32.97%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
2.84
Avg Place
83.31%
Top 4 Rate
24.12%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.30
Avg Place
80.50%
Top 4 Rate
9.60%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.01
Avg Place
80.22%
Top 4 Rate
21.63%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.17
Avg Place
77.26%
Top 4 Rate
21.72%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.36
Avg Place
75.39%
Top 4 Rate
12.11%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.55
Avg Place
73.25%
Top 4 Rate
11.40%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.54
Avg Place
71.30%
Top 4 Rate
13.71%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.43
Avg Place
71.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.61%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.52
Avg Place
70.96%
Top 4 Rate
13.50%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.55
Avg Place
69.09%
Top 4 Rate
16.76%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.87
Avg Place
66.42%
Top 4 Rate
8.55%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.83
Avg Place
66.13%
Top 4 Rate
8.66%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.76
Avg Place
64.58%
Top 4 Rate
17.61%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.26
Avg Place
55.36%
Top 4 Rate
6.89%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.39
Avg Place
53.39%
Top 4 Rate
6.18%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.56
Avg Place
50.37%
Top 4 Rate
2.94%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.64
Avg Place
48.35%
Top 4 Rate
3.80%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.77
Avg Place
44.95%
Top 4 Rate
5.41%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.78
Avg Place
43.32%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.90
Avg Place
41.09%
Top 4 Rate
2.83%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.97
Avg Place
38.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.99%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.89
Avg Place
38.63%
Top 4 Rate
6.62%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.06
Avg Place
36.11%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.21
Avg Place
35.17%
Top 4 Rate
1.61%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.18
Avg Place
34.46%
Top 4 Rate
2.06%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.30
Avg Place
31.24%
Top 4 Rate
7.81%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.40
Avg Place
30.52%
Top 4 Rate
1.61%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.48
Avg Place
30.33%
Top 4 Rate
3.50%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.47
Avg Place
29.41%
Top 4 Rate
2.94%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.55
Avg Place
29.40%
Top 4 Rate
0.81%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.70
Avg Place
25.72%
Top 4 Rate
2.72%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.70
Avg Place
21.88%
Top 4 Rate
0.76%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
6.50
Avg Place
10.90%
Top 4 Rate
0.24%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Chain Vest Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best team comp for Chain Vest in TFT Set 17?

The best team comp featuring Chain Vest in TFT Set 17 achieves a 88.48% win rate with a 0.06% pick rate. This composition uses Challenger, N.O.V.A., and Brawler traits and is picked in 0.06% of games featuring Chain Vest.

How many team comps use Chain Vest in TFT?

There are 55 viable team compositions that commonly build Chain Vest in TFT Set 17. Chain Vest appears in comps with an average win rate of 47.95% across 99,843 total matches analyzed.

Which comp uses Chain Vest most often in TFT?

The most popular comp for Chain Vest in TFT Set 17 uses the Rogue, Meeple, and Fateweaver traits with a 2.41% pick rate. This composition achieves a 44.95% win rate and average placement of 4.77.

What traits work well with Chain Vest in TFT?

The best traits that synergize with Chain Vest in TFT Set 17 are Challenger, N.O.V.A., Brawler, Marauder, Gun Goddess, Bastion, Redeemer, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Chain Vest team compositions.