Tear of the GoddessTFT Team Comps
Team compositions using Tear of the Goddess in TFT Set 16.12. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Tear of the Goddess as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 60 viable team comps currently building Tear of the Goddess, with an average win rate of 48.56% across all compositions. The highest performing Tear of the Goddess comp achieves a 91.46% win rate, primarily featuring Party Animal, Eradicator, Sniper traits with Ornn as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Tear of the Goddess is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
2.26 | 91.46% | 43.09% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.14 | 79.41% | 17.65% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.39 | 78.71% | 10.46% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.08 | 78.00% | 22.76% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.23 | 77.36% | 17.52% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.34 | 75.74% | 14.20% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.26 | 75.52% | 19.40% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.42 | 74.62% | 13.35% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.26 | 74.44% | 23.49% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.52 | 73.58% | 9.85% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.61 | 71.72% | 12.41% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.49 | 71.23% | 16.41% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.73 | 69.92% | 10.16% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.68 | 67.81% | 13.70% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.71 | 67.69% | 16.71% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.76 | 67.59% | 7.91% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.77 | 67.54% | 9.33% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.65 | 67.53% | 12.42% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.69 | 66.97% | 14.18% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.67 | 66.31% | 12.83% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.81 | 65.04% | 6.81% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.05 | 63.85% | 6.92% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.86 | 62.76% | 19.31% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.07 | 58.38% | 8.65% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.98 | 56.97% | 12.73% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.34 | 56.03% | 4.96% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.23 | 55.56% | 7.99% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.50 | 52.80% | 6.40% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.46 | 52.63% | 3.44% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.35 | 51.20% | 9.60% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.06 | 45.67% | 3.15% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.86 | 41.89% | 5.40% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.79 | 40.85% | 3.52% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.94 | 40.55% | 10.17% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.84 | 39.86% | 3.38% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.93 | 39.45% | 5.19% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.10 | 36.67% | 4.51% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.00 | 36.65% | 4.66% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.19 | 33.83% | 2.26% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.16 | 33.33% | 2.34% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.35 | 32.54% | 4.76% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.21 | 31.50% | 3.94% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.47 | 31.29% | 2.67% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.37 | 30.82% | 5.48% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.46 | 30.62% | 2.87% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.60 | 28.13% | 1.56% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.53 | 27.37% | 3.19% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.55 | 27.09% | 2.96% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.52 | 26.92% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.62 | 26.73% | 2.61% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.56 | 25.90% | 3.60% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.83 | 23.74% | 2.87% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.83 | 23.63% | 2.11% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.88 | 23.06% | 1.72% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.88 | 22.81% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.97 | 19.03% | 2.24% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.95 | 16.29% | 0.96% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.29 | 13.33% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.27 | 13.02% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
6.37 | 12.44% | 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Tear of the Goddess Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Tear of the Goddess in TFT Set 17?
The best team comp featuring Tear of the Goddess in TFT Set 17 achieves a 91.46% win rate with a 0.10% pick rate. This composition uses Party Animal, Eradicator, and Sniper traits and is picked in 0.10% of games featuring Tear of the Goddess.
How many team comps use Tear of the Goddess in TFT?
There are 60 viable team compositions that commonly build Tear of the Goddess in TFT Set 17. Tear of the Goddess appears in comps with an average win rate of 48.56% across 34,471 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Tear of the Goddess most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Tear of the Goddess in TFT Set 17 uses the Replicator, N.O.V.A., and Fateweaver traits with a 1.52% pick rate. This composition achieves a 74.44% win rate and average placement of 3.26.
What traits work well with Tear of the Goddess in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Tear of the Goddess in TFT Set 17 are Party Animal, Eradicator, Sniper, Vanguard, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Tear of the Goddess team compositions.