Fizzvs Nunu & Willump
Fizz vs Nunu & Willump is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Nunu & Willump wins with a 54.5% win rate (+9.1%) over Fizz based on 11 games. Fizz wins the early laning phase while Nunu & Willump scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Nunu & Willump matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Fizz vs Nunu & Willump Matchup?
Fizz vs Nunu & Willump Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Nunu & Willump matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 11 recent matches analyzed, Nunu & Willump wins with a 54.5% win rate compared to Fizz's 45.5%, giving Nunu & Willump a 9.1 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Fizz controls the early laning stage, but Nunu & Willump outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Fizz needs to press advantages before Nunu & Willump reaches their power spikes, while Nunu & Willump should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Nunu & Willump leads by 1,023 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Nunu & Willump has a strong advantage in this matchup. Fizz players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Nunu & Willump overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Nunu & Willump Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Nunu & Willump, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Nunu & Willump
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Nunu & Willump, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Nunu & Willump are Luden's Echo, Shadowflame and Lich Bane. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Nunu & Willump. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Nunu & Willump matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz66.7%
Nunu & Willump33.3%Fizz37.5%Nunu & Willump62.5%Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Nunu & Willump. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Nunu & Willump is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 62.5% win rate — 25.0 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Nunu & Willump, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Fizz must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Nunu & Willump reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Nunu & Willump survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Fizz Runes Against Nunu & Willump
Precision
Domination
The Precision and Domination rune setup gives Fizz the best tools to compete against Nunu & Willump in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.06% | 267 | 5.9 | 844 | 13,120 | 57.7% | 53.5% | |
| 49.06% | 267 | 6.0 | 871 | 12,938 | 55.3% | 45.1% | |
| 46.43% | 252 | 5.9 | 855 | 12,245 | 45.5% | 47.3% | |
| 49.53% | 214 | 5.9 | 828 | 13,002 | 59.5% | 43.1% | |
| 61.05% | 190 | 6.0 | 877 | 12,353 | 68.2% | 54.9% | |
| 49.73% | 183 | 5.8 | 890 | 12,035 | 46.6% | 52.6% | |
| 46.43% | 168 | 5.2 | 773 | 11,953 | 46.9% | 46.0% | |
| 51.22% | 164 | 5.6 | 814 | 13,227 | 49.1% | 52.3% | |
| 58.33% | 156 | 5.6 | 855 | 11,624 | 49.3% | 66.3% | |
| 46.45% | 155 | 6.0 | 735 | 11,718 | 59.7% | 34.9% | |
| 51.30% | 154 | 6.0 | 784 | 12,173 | 50.0% | 52.3% | |
| 47.97% | 148 | 5.8 | 899 | 12,505 | 53.7% | 43.2% | |
| 49.66% | 147 | 5.4 | 844 | 12,108 | 46.4% | 52.6% | |
| 58.99% | 139 | 5.7 | 846 | 12,696 | 62.1% | 56.8% | |
| 61.03% | 136 | 6.1 | 902 | 11,704 | 67.1% | 52.6% | |
| 58.33% | 132 | 5.5 | 865 | 12,707 | 65.4% | 53.8% | |
| 53.17% | 126 | 5.5 | 801 | 12,110 | 51.7% | 54.5% | |
| 38.40% | 125 | 6.1 | 828 | 12,793 | 31.4% | 43.2% | |
| 52.80% | 125 | 6.0 | 811 | 12,435 | 67.9% | 41.7% | |
| 54.78% | 115 | 5.9 | 927 | 12,574 | 61.5% | 49.2% | |
| 54.35% | 92 | 6.2 | 894 | 13,018 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 57.14% | 91 | 6.0 | 859 | 13,421 | 60.0% | 54.9% | |
| 62.92% | 89 | 5.9 | 843 | 13,234 | 66.7% | 61.0% | |
| 54.02% | 87 | 5.7 | 816 | 12,876 | 62.5% | 49.1% | |
| 58.33% | 84 | 6.0 | 882 | 13,344 | 73.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 84 | 5.8 | 791 | 11,786 | 54.5% | 60.0% | |
| 52.00% | 75 | 5.0 | 910 | 11,801 | 51.2% | 52.9% | |
| 60.00% | 75 | 5.9 | 830 | 12,236 | 58.8% | 61.0% | |
| 50.68% | 73 | 5.9 | 843 | 13,107 | 56.3% | 46.3% | |
| 54.79% | 73 | 5.8 | 851 | 12,337 | 60.6% | 50.0% | |
| 62.12% | 66 | 5.9 | 856 | 12,086 | 65.5% | 59.5% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 5.3 | 795 | 12,207 | 44.0% | 55.0% | |
| 48.44% | 64 | 6.0 | 920 | 12,942 | 58.1% | 39.4% | |
| 43.75% | 64 | 6.1 | 820 | 12,561 | 46.4% | 41.7% | |
| 50.79% | 63 | 5.6 | 804 | 12,467 | 54.8% | 46.9% | |
| 55.74% | 61 | 5.9 | 948 | 12,554 | 60.0% | 52.8% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 5.2 | 823 | 11,786 | 48.0% | 51.9% | |
| 68.63% | 51 | 6.2 | 951 | 13,134 | 66.7% | 70.0% | |
| 45.65% | 46 | 5.4 | 910 | 12,009 | 52.6% | 40.7% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 6.2 | 841 | 12,508 | 42.1% | 61.5% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 6.0 | 921 | 14,152 | 64.3% | 51.6% | |
| 31.43% | 35 | 1.5 | 664 | 12,569 | 33.3% | 30.0% | |
| 61.76% | 34 | 4.5 | 867 | 13,115 | 61.5% | 61.9% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 5.8 | 808 | 12,157 | 41.2% | 47.1% | |
| 54.55% | 33 | 5.5 | 867 | 12,995 | 42.9% | 63.2% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 5.2 | 907 | 14,519 | 42.9% | 38.5% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 5.8 | 875 | 11,913 | 56.3% | 50.0% | |
| 67.74% | 31 | 1.7 | 808 | 15,188 | 64.3% | 70.6% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.9 | 848 | 13,757 | 30.0% | 57.9% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 2.5 | 802 | 12,928 | 41.7% | 47.1% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.4 | 773 | 12,085 | 53.9% | 43.8% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 5.6 | 914 | 11,863 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.0 | 873 | 12,747 | 46.1% | 46.7% | |
| 28.57% | 28 | 2.0 | 833 | 14,150 | 11.1% | 36.8% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.1 | 716 | 13,625 | 63.6% | 56.3% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 5.6 | 756 | 11,162 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 29.63% | 27 | 1.4 | 721 | 13,059 | 30.0% | 29.4% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 5.7 | 825 | 12,636 | 45.5% | 40.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.9 | 675 | 12,352 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 1.8 | 707 | 11,527 | 58.3% | 41.7% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 5.8 | 778 | 12,093 | 60.0% | 69.2% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 5.6 | 879 | 13,606 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 1.1 | 577 | 12,757 | 66.7% | 53.9% | |
| 72.73% | 22 | 6.4 | 717 | 11,522 | 84.6% | 55.6% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.4 | 994 | 12,688 | 70.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 2.5 | 819 | 13,674 | 60.0% | 30.0% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 5.7 | 951 | 13,101 | 77.8% | 70.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.8 | 737 | 13,386 | 60.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.2 | 712 | 11,568 | 22.2% | 77.8% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 5.4 | 797 | 13,270 | 20.0% | 41.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 3.7 | 754 | 13,106 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.4 | 873 | 13,473 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.5 | 761 | 12,868 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.6 | 922 | 13,719 | 44.4% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 4.3 | 722 | 9,251 | 70.0% | 60.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 4.7 | 716 | 11,185 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 2.3 | 766 | 12,816 | 66.7% | 77.8% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 4.9 | 876 | 14,217 | 66.7% | 11.1% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 4.7 | 764 | 13,908 | 0.0% | 69.2% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.5 | 694 | 12,814 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.0 | 879 | 12,555 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.0 | 719 | 12,725 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.6 | 714 | 12,889 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.8 | 1,033 | 12,398 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.7 | 716 | 10,614 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.0 | 827 | 11,441 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.3 | 877 | 10,591 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.4 | 1,087 | 14,281 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.5 | 634 | 11,554 | 57.1% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 944 | 11,014 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.1 | 773 | 14,876 | 60.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 742 | 15,386 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.2 | 782 | 11,808 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.2 | 737 | 10,731 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.9 | 796 | 14,401 | 100.0% | 16.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.9 | 665 | 10,983 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 2.8 | 924 | 14,093 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.2 | 881 | 12,397 | 100.0% | 16.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.2 | 732 | 11,634 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.5 | 733 | 13,084 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 894 | 7,377 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 0.9 | 979 | 10,394 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.9 | 674 | 9,836 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.3 | 806 | 11,874 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 725 | 13,236 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.2 | 886 | 15,595 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.8 | 919 | 14,286 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 4.8 | 812 | 13,965 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.3 | 956 | 12,053 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.1 | 687 | 13,325 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 992 | 11,652 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.4 | 782 | 13,096 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.5 | 792 | 12,455 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 742 | 12,139 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 1,060 | 13,734 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 857 | 12,812 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 821 | 14,071 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 826 | 14,757 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 833 | 11,060 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 954 | 12,555 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 998 | 16,217 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 653 | 10,629 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.7 | 709 | 8,374 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 917 | 11,819 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 717 | 14,424 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Nunu & Willump - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Nunu & Willump in League of Legends?
Nunu & Willump wins the Fizz vs Nunu & Willump matchup with a 54.5% win rate compared to Fizz's 45.5%, a 9.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 11 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Fizz do against Nunu & Willump in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Nunu & Willump with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Nunu & Willump in the late game?
In the late game, Nunu & Willump takes over the Fizz vs Nunu & Willump matchup with a 62.5% win rate compared to 37.5%. Nunu & Willump scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Nunu & Willump matchup?
Nunu & Willump wins the matchup against Fizz with a 54.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 9.1 percentage point advantage means Nunu & Willump is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 11 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Nunu & Willump?
The best Fizz build against Nunu & Willump includes Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, Lich Bane with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Nunu & Willump?
The best Fizz runes against Nunu & Willump use the Precision primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fizz vs Nunu & Willump matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Nunu & Willump?
No, Fizz struggles against Nunu & Willump with only a 45.5% win rate. Nunu & Willump has the advantage in this matchup. Fizz players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Nunu & Willump's lead.
How do I play Fizz against Nunu & Willump?
When playing Fizz against Nunu & Willump, play cautiously and avoid Nunu & Willump's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Nunu & Willump has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.